Are Lake Resources shares going to zero?

Number zero with a dollar sign in gold.

Number zero with a dollar sign in gold.

Lake Resources N.L. (ASX: LKE) shares continued their horror run on Tuesday.

The lithium developer’s shares were down 9% to a multi-year low of 9.5 cents.

This means that its shares are now down 88% since this time last year.

Is the rot over or is this lithium stock going to zero? Let’s take a look.

Are Lake Resources shares going to zero?

It is fair to say that things aren’t looking good for this lithium developer given recent lithium price weakness.

As I warned here late last year with the release of the company’s phase one definitive feasibility study (DFS) for the Kachi lithium brine project in Argentina, this project is only viable with lithium prices materially higher from current levels.

Lake Resources commissioned a bespoke study for its DFS pricing from Wood Mackenzie, which estimated that the average lithium carbonate sales price will be US$33,000 per tonne for the life of the project.

As I covered here yesterday, the current spot lithium carbonate in China is just US$11,867 per tonne.

Furthermore, Goldman Sachs expects its price to stay around these levels until 2027, when a rebound to US$15,646 per tonne is forecast. After which, its analysts estimate an average long term price of US$15,500 per tonne.

This is less than half the price that Lake Resources plugged into its DFS study.

Is this bad? Yes, it’s about as bad as it gets. The company even explains why with its DFS:

Project cash flows are most sensitive to changes in lithium carbonate selling price, where a 15% change in price resulted in a 28% change to the Post-Tax NPV. Lithium price impact can be limited/mitigated by the pricing mechanisms to be put in place with potential offtakers. Production volume fluctuations are expected to have similar effect as price fluctuations on NPV.

A lithium carbonate price 15% lower than its US$33,000 per tonne estimate wiped out 28% of its Post-Tax NPV. A 50% change makes the project completely uneconomical.

And with management estimating that its initial capital expenditure for phase one is US$1.38 billion, it is going to have a real battle on its hands to raise these funds from debt or equity.

We have already seen Liontown Resources Ltd (ASX: LTR) stripped of its $760 million debt funding packaging because of low lithium prices. It’s hard to imagine anyone willing to risk lending to Lake Resources based on its numbers.

It is also worth noting that Wood Mackenzie has become very bearish on lithium prices since it was commissioned by Lake Resources. In fact, it was reportedly the research company’s lithium price downgrades that led to Liontown’s lenders pulling the plug on their deal.

All in all, this doesn’t bode well for Lake Resources shares and zero seems like it could be a real possibility down the line. Time will tell if that’s the case.

The post Are Lake Resources shares going to zero? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

Wondering where you should invest $1,000 right now?

When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool Share Advisor newsletter he has run for over ten years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

Scott just revealed what he believes could be the ‘five best ASX stocks’ for investors to buy right now. These stocks are trading at near dirt-cheap prices and Scott thinks they could be great buys right now…

See The 5 Stocks
*Returns as of 10 November 2023

(function() {
function setButtonColorDefaults(param, property, defaultValue) {
if( !param || !param.includes(‘#’)) {
var button = document.getElementsByClassName(“pitch-snippet”)[0].getElementsByClassName(“pitch-button”)[0];
button.style[property] = defaultValue;
}
}

setButtonColorDefaults(“#0095C8”, ‘background’, ‘#5FA85D’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#0095C8”, ‘border-color’, ‘#43A24A’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#fff”, ‘color’, ‘#fff’);
})()

More reading

Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

from The Motley Fool Australia https://ift.tt/fWqYhBl

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *