Vault Minerals Ltd (ASX: VAU) shares are charging higher today following an unsolicited binding takeover proposal from fellow S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) gold stock Genesis Minerals Ltd (ASX: GMD).

Vault Minerals shares closed on Friday trading for $4.56. In early morning trade on Monday, shares are changing hands for $5.05 apiece, up 10.8%.

For some context, the ASX 200 is down 0.2% at this same time, while Genesis Minerals shares are down 6.7% on the news, trading for $5.87 each.

Here’s what’s happening.

Vault Minerals shares leap on superior $5.6 billion takeover offer

As you may recall, it was only back on 5 May that Vault Minerals announced its intentions to merge with Regis Resources Ltd (ASX: RRL).

(If you’re wondering, Regis Resources shares are up 0.5% today, trading for $6.66 each.)

Under what was labelled a “merger-of-equals”, Regis was planning to acquire 100% of Vault Minerals shares. Vault stockholders would then receive 0.6947 new Regis Resources shares in exchange for their Vault shares.

Commenting on the proposed Regis Resources merger on the day, Vault Minerals CEO Luke Tonkin said:

Vault’s portfolio, anchored by the King of the Hills operation currently undergoing a significant mill expansion, brings long-life, high-quality assets and a strong financial position to the merger.

By combining these strengths with Regis’ proven operational and exploration capability, the merged company is better positioned to deliver sustained production, enhanced reserve replacement and long-term value creation across gold price cycles.

But Genesis Minerals may have thrown a spanner into those plans with a superior takeover offer that was announced this morning.

Under the proposed scheme of arrangement, Vault Minerals shareholders will receive 0.7629 new ordinary shares in Genesis plus 47.5 cents in cash for every Vault share they hold.

The improved takeover offer values Vault at $5.274 per share, or $5.6 billion, based on the Genesis share price at market close on Friday.

That’s 15.7% above Friday’s closing price for Vault Minerals shares. And it represents a 14.5% improvement on the implied offer price from Regis Resources’ takeover offer.

Commenting on the improved takeover offer, the Vault board noted:

In accordance with the Regis SID, Vault has notified Regis that it considers the Genesis Proposal to be a Vault Superior Proposal for the purposes of the Regis SID and that the five business day matching right period has commenced.

During this matching right period, Regis has the right (but not the obligation) to announce or provide a matching or superior proposal to the Genesis Proposal.

Stay tuned!

The post Move over Regis Resources! Vault Minerals shares leaping 11% as Genesis Minerals’ lobs $5.6 billion takeover bid appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Genesis Minerals proposes Vault merger to create gold powerhouse
• Vault Minerals receives superior $5.6bn merger proposal from Genesis Minerals
• Regis Resources hits top end of FY26 guidance
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today
• 3 ASX 200 stocks storming higher this week on big announcements

Motley Fool contributor Bernd Struben has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Greatland Resources Ltd (ASX: GGP) shares are sinking on Monday, despite the gold and copper miner releasing a strong production update. 

In early morning trade, the Greatland share price is down 5.61% to $11.11. By comparison, the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) is down 0.2% to 8,823 points. 

The fall extends a weaker run for the ASX gold stock. Greatland shares are now down almost 16% over the past month, although they remain around 60% higher since this time last year. 

Here’s what investors were given. 

Production comes in ahead of guidance

According to the release, Greatland produced 79,090 ounces of gold and 3,573 tonnes of copper during the June quarter.  

This lifted full-year production to 328,986 ounces of gold and 14,594 tonnes of copper.

Management said full-year gold production was 6% above the top end of its FY26 guidance range of 260,000 to 310,000 ounces. 

Sales were solid as well, with Greatland selling 74,648 ounces of gold and 5,311 tonnes of copper during the quarter. For the full year, sales came in at 326,859 ounces of gold and 14,729 tonnes of copper.

While the production result was strong, investors will have to wait a little longer for the cost side of the update. Greatland said its all-in sustaining cost (AISC) is still being finalised and will be included in its June quarterly activities report later this month. 

Cash balance moves higher

The balance sheet was another positive part of the update.

Greatland ended June with $1.289 billion in cash, up from $1.208 billion at the end of March. It also had nil debt.

Even after capital expenditure and an $87 million quarterly tax instalment, Greatland still added $81 million of cash during the quarter. 

The company noted that another $20 million of sales were completed in late June, with the cash received after the quarter ended.

Why investors are still selling

Greatland has already had a huge run over the past year, so investors may have been looking for a reason to take some profit off the table.

The missing AISC figure may also be holding back some buyers. Without it, investors don’t yet have the full margin detail, even though production and cash were clearly strong.

Can Greatland shares find support?

I still think this was a good update.

Gold production came in ahead of guidance, cash moved higher, and the company remains debt-free. These numbers give buyers something solid to work with once the selling settles. 

The June quarterly report later this month will be the next key update.

If costs land around expectations, Greatland shares should have a decent chance to find support after this recent pullback.

The post Why this ASX 200 gold stock is falling despite beating guidance appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Greatland Resources posts record FY26 gold output
• 5 ASX 200 gold stocks to buy and hold amid the crashing gold price
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today
• Which ASX gold miners has Macquarie just upgraded?
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today

Motley Fool contributor Aaron Teboneras has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Superannuation is most likely front and centre for Australians in their mid-60s.

At age 66, Aussies have passed their preservation age (age 60), passed the average retirement age (age 65), and are just one year away from receiving their Age Pension payments (age 67, if eligible).

That means that at the age of 66, it is a great time to start living your dream retirement lifestyle.

But only if you have enough money in your superannuation.

After all, the balance you need at any retirement age depends entirely on your living situation, financial situation, and the lifestyle you want to live when you finally stop working.

Do you want to retire comfortably at age 66? Let’s break down what that might look like and how much money you’ll need.

What does a comfortable retirement lifestyle look like?

In Australia, retirement is generally split into two broad categories: comfortable and modest.

According to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), a comfortable retirement is defined as one that enables retirees to maintain a good standard of living well beyond the age pension. It budgets for expenses beyond a modest retirement, including top-tier private health insurance and regular leisure activities. It allocates funds for home repairs or renovations, and perhaps even an annual holiday.

Meanwhile, a modest retirement is defined as being able to cover expenses just slightly above what the full Centrelink Age Pension would provide from age 67. 

How much does it cost to retire comfortably?

ASFA estimates that a comfortable retirement costs around $55,923 per year for single Australians, and $78,566 for a couple. 

These figures also assume you’ll receive a part Age Pension, that you own your home in full, and that you’ll be able to plan and stick to your financial goals. It would also be wise to have an emergency fund set aside.

What do I need in my superannuation by age 66 to be able to afford that?

In order to fund a modest comfortable retirement, ASFA calculates that single Australians will need around $630,000. Meanwhile, couples will need around $730,000.

But, note that this figure assumes you’ll access your superannuation from age 67. It also assumes you’ll need to fund around 10 years of a comfortable retirement.

If you’re planning to retire slightly earlier, at age 66, it would be wise to factor in one additional year of retirement.

I’ve crunched the numbers using ASFA’s figures to work out what you should aim for. Singles should have closer to $686,000 in their superannuation and couples closer to $809,000 at age 66.

Remember also, that if you don’t own your home outright, you’ll also need to consider how you’ll pay your mortgage or rent on top of your other bills. 

The post How much superannuation do I need to retire comfortably at age 66? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• 3 ASX 200 shares to buy now: experts
• Buy, hold, sell: BHP, Woodside, PLS Group shares
• Dexus’ portfolio valuations show office fall, industrial gain
• Genesis Minerals proposes Vault merger to create gold powerhouse
• Capricorn Metals hits upper end of FY26 gold production guidance, advances project expansions

Motley Fool contributor Samantha Menzies has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.