Well, it has been just over a month since the much-hyped initial public offering (IPO) of Space Exploration Technologies Corp (NASDAQ: SPCX). The IPO of Space Exploration Technologies Corp, better known as SpaceX, was perhaps the blockbuster investing event of the year. It was the largest IPO in history.

When SpaceX floated at US$135 a share last month, it valued the company at a whopping US$1.75 trillion. Despite valuation concerns, the initial float went exceedingly well for anyone who already owned SpaceX stock, or was able to secure some at US$135. After just a few days of trading, the company had rocketed (no pun intended) more than 67% to a high of US$225.64 on 16 June. That valued SpaceX at a near-inconceivable US$2.93 trillion.

Bear in mind that, as we’ve previously discussed, some investors have noted the disparity between SpaceX’s financials and the value that investors were willing to place on the company. To reiterate, the company generated US$18.7 billion in revenue last year and recorded an operating loss of US$4.2 billion.

That might explain why SpaceX stock hasn’t been doing that well since that 16 June high. In fact, SpaceX shares seem to be going in just one direction since that date a month ago. Last night (our time), the company closed at US$135.27 a share. That’s just a whisker above the initial SpaceX IPO price. What’s more, the company dipped below US$135 a share during intraday trading, hitting a low of US$132.15 (US$1.58 trillion). At that price, only investors who held shares prior to the IPO would not have been sitting on an on-paper loss.

So what’s going wrong with the SpaceX IPO then?

You might be wondering what has gone wrong with SpaceX shares since the IPO. After all, it’s not too often that a company whipsaws between US$1.58 trillion and US$2.93 trillion over just a month.

Well, I think this is a classic case of a hype bubble inflating and then deflating as excitement dies down and profits are taken off the table. We often see this happen with IPOs. The case of Guzman y Gomez Ltd (ASX: GYG) is a good local example. IPOs are, by nature, designed to maximise the profits of insider sellers, brokers, and the company itself, not to enrich retail investors. Once the rush is over, the market tends to revert to normalised valuation. And that is often bad news for those who were first to jump onto the train.

SpaceX was, and arguably still is, being priced on what it might deliver in the future, not what kind of profits it is bringing in the doors today (which were reportedly none last year). Potential is a difficult thing to price. So it’s no surprise to see the shares coming off the boil since the SpaceX IPO. I wouldn’t be surprised to see this stock continue to drift lower until we get a look at the company’s books when it reports its first set of public results. Perhaps even beyond that. Let’s see what happens to the SpaceX share price going forward.

The post What’s gone wrong with the SpaceX IPO? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• How much superannuation do I need to retire comfortably at age 67
• 3 ASX dividend shares that look better after CGT reforms
• 1 ASX dividend stock down 18% I’d buy today!
• Here’s what brokers tip for CSL shares over the next 12 months
• A miner and an energy company to buy according to Macquarie

Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

When it comes to retirement, we all want to make sure we have enough superannuation to afford the best lifestyle possible. 

But working out exactly how much money you need is trickier than you’d think. 

After all, the super balance you need depends on your living situation, your expected retirement age, and what type of retirement lifestyle you’re aiming for.

Do you own your own house outright? Are you a single person or living as part of a couple? What type of travel do you expect to do after you finish working? Do you have any debts? What age do you want to retire?

Let’s assume you’re aiming for a comfortable retirement starting at age 67.

Here’s a breakdown of what that could look like, what it could cost you, and how much superannuation you’d need.

What does a comfortable retirement look like?

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) splits retirement into two broad categories: comfortable and modest.

ASFA defines a comfortable retirement as one that gives retirees a good standard of living well beyond the age pension. It budgets for expenses beyond a modest retirement, including top-tier private health insurance and regular leisure activities. It allocates funds for home repairs or renovations, and perhaps even an annual holiday.

Meanwhile, a modest retirement is defined as being able to cover expenses just slightly above what the full Centrelink Age Pension would provide from age 67. 

How much is a comfortable retirement expected to cost?

A comfortable ASFA retirement is expected to cost around $55,923 per year for single Australians, and $78,566 for a couple living together.

These figures also assume you’ll receive a part Age Pension, that you own your home in full, and that you already have an emergency fund set aside.

How much superannuation do I need at age 67 to afford that?

In order to fund a comfortable retirement, ASFA calculates that at age 67, single Australians will need around $630,000. Meanwhile, couples will need a superannuation balance of around $730,000.

How do I know if I’m on track to reach that balance by age 67?

I’ve crunched the numbers using ASFA’s super detective tool to work out what superannuation balance you should have at each age milestone to be able to reach that goal.

At age 40, Australians should have a superannuation balance of around $178,000.

By age 45, this should be closer to $239,000.

At age 50, you’ll want to have around $313,500 in your superannuation.

This should then increase to about $399,000 by age 55.

Aussies aged 60 should have close to $496,500.

By age 65, to remain on track, your total superannuation balance should be around $604,500.

Are you on track?

The post How much superannuation do I need to retire comfortably at age 67 appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• 3 ASX dividend shares that look better after CGT reforms
• 1 ASX dividend stock down 18% I’d buy today!
• Here’s what brokers tip for CSL shares over the next 12 months
• A miner and an energy company to buy according to Macquarie
• How much could ResMed shares rise according to Morgans?

Motley Fool contributor Samantha Menzies has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

---

Capital gains tax (CGT) changes should never be a reason to throw a sound investment process in the bin.

A mediocre business does not become attractive because it pays a dividend. Nor should investors abandon companies capable of compounding capital simply because future gains may be taxed differently.

However, the announced CGT reforms could change the after-tax maths behind total shareholder returns.

Under current rules, Australian resident individuals who hold an asset for at least 12 months can generally apply a 50% discount to the taxable capital gain. If implemented as announced, the government will replace that discount from 1 July 2027 with inflation-based cost-base indexation and a minimum 30% tax rate on real gains. The new system would apply only to gains accruing after that date.

Treasury’s examples show low-return investments may pay less tax because inflation is removed from the gain. However, assets delivering strong returns above inflation can face a larger tax bill than under the current discount.

That makes it worth considering how returns are generated. Dividends remain taxable income, so they are not a free lunch. But reliable and growing distributions — particularly when supported by franking credits — may become a more valuable part of the total-return equation. The shift towards income assets is already influencing investor behaviour.

Here are three ASX dividend shares that could fit that framework.

Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Co. Ltd (ASX: SOL)

Soul Patts is not simply a high-yield stock. It is a diversified investment house designed to build wealth across market cycles.

Its portfolio spans listed companies, private businesses, emerging companies, credit, and real assets. Earlier in 2026, the company reported pre-tax net asset value of $13.8 billion, with no single asset class representing more than one-third of the portfolio.

That flexibility allows management to recycle capital into opportunities offering better risk-adjusted returns.

The dividend record is equally compelling. Soul Patts has paid a dividend every year since listing in 1903 and increased its regular dividend every year since 1998. Its latest interim dividend rose to 48 cents per share, fully franked.

For investors thinking about both capital growth and rising income, Soul Patts may be one of the ASX’s clearest all-rounders.

Transurban Group (ASX: TCL)

Transurban offers a different kind of durability.

Its toll roads are essential pieces of urban infrastructure, with revenue supported by traffic volumes and contractual toll increases. More than 90% of revenue is linked to inflation or fixed escalations, providing some protection when costs rise.

The company reported 2.6 million average daily trips in the first half of FY26, up 2.5%. Proportional revenue rose 6%, while proportional operating earnings increased 6.4%.

There are risks. Transurban carries substantial debt, making funding costs important, while toll-road regulation can create uncertainty. Even so, long-life assets, inflation-linked pricing, and growing urban congestion give it a relatively visible income base. It also adds a different income driver to a diversified dividend portfolio.

Macquarie Group Ltd (ASX: MQG)

Macquarie is often grouped with the major banks, but its earnings engine is far broader than Australian mortgages.

The group operates across asset management, commodities, infrastructure, advisory, private credit, and banking. This creates more earnings volatility than a traditional retail bank, but also reduces dependence on one economy and one lending market. It is not necessarily lower risk overall, but its risks are less concentrated in Australian housing.

Macquarie reported FY26 net profit of $4.85 billion, up 30%, and lifted its full-year dividend to $7 per share, 35% franked. The payout represented 55% of earnings, within its stated 50% to 70% policy.

An investment in Macquarie isn’t without risk. Investment banking earnings can move sharply between years. However, Macquarie’s global reach, diversified revenue streams, and conservative capital position make it an appealing dividend grower rather than a simple yield play.

Foolish takeaway

The CGT reforms should not dictate which companies investors own.

Business quality, valuation, balance-sheet strength, and future prospects still matter far more than tax settings.

However, the reforms may encourage investors to look beyond capital growth alone. Companies that can reinvest profit, grow earnings, and steadily lift dividends could offer a more balanced path to total shareholder returns.

Soul Patts, Transurban, and Macquarie each approach that task differently — through diversified capital allocation, infrastructure cash flows, and global financial expertise.

The post 3 ASX dividend shares that look better after CGT reforms appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• The Macquarie share price just hit a new record high
• How much superannuation is needed to target a $100,000 annual passive income?
• How much passive income can I earn off a $50,000 portfolio?
• How to build a successful ASX dividend portfolio
• How I’d invest $10,000 in ASX shares for the next decade

The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Macquarie Group, Transurban Group, and Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Transurban Group and Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Macquarie Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.