The REA Group Ltd (ASX: REA) share price has fallen by approximately 35% in the past year. Not many S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) shares have fallen that far over the same time period.

I get excited when high-quality businesses fall that far because it could be a rare opportunity to buy part of a great business.

REA Group describes itself as a multinational digital advertising business, specialising in property. It operates Australia’s leading residential and commercial property websites – realestate.com.au and realcomercial.com.au, as well as the leading website dedicated to share property, Flatmates.com and the property research website property.com.au.

The company also owns Mortgage Choice, an Australian mortgage broking franchise group, PropTrack, a leading provider of property data services, Campaign Agent, Australia’s leading provider of vendor-paid advertising finance solutions to the Australian real estate market and Realtair, a digital platform providing technology for the real estate transaction process. It also has investments in Simplicity Loans and Advisory, Arealytics, Athena Home Loans and Planitar.

As you can see, REA Group has a strong presence across the real estate sector.

Has recent financial performance been compelling?

The company delivered a solid set of numbers during the FY26 result.

Australian revenue grew 11% to $1.7 billion, Australian operating profit (EBITDA) before associates rose 13% to $1.1 billion, net profit after tax (NPAT) rose 15% to $650 million and earnings per share (EPS) climbed 15% to $4.93.

The company noted a number of highlights for realestate.com.au, with 12.7 million people visiting the portal on average each month. It also said it receives 146.4 million average monthly visits, which is 104.5 million more monthly visits than the nearest competitor on average.

It also noted 2.9 million people visited realcommercial.com.au per month on average, 1.8 million more people than the nearest competitor.

FY27 could be a challenging year for the company amid all of the changes to property-related taxes.

It said that new national buy listings are anticipated to be “flat to down low single-digits” in FY27. July listings were 2% lower and in line with the eight-year average. However, combined Melbourne and Sydney listings declined by 13%, while Brisbane, Perth and Adelaide increased by 13%.

Despite that headwind, the company continues to target operational margin expansion, which I’d say is a positive development.

Management expects a low double-digit controllable residential buy yield, excluding the impact of the geographical mix, driven by an 80% premium price increase and growth in add-ons.

So, whilst the number of listings is challenging, price rises are helping offset the headwinds.

According to Commsec’s projection, the business is now valued at just 25x FY27’s estimated earnings. Commsec forecasts suggest the company could grow its EPS by 13.75% in FY28 and another 15.7% in FY29.

Is the REA Group share price a buy?

According to CMC Invest, there have been 10 analyst ratings on the business within the last three months. Four of those ratings were a buy, five were a hold and one was a sell.

The average price target of those analyst ratings was $188.50, which implies a possible rise of 27% over the next year from where it is at the time of writing. In other words, it could be an underrated opportunity, so it could be one to take a closer look at.

The post Is the REA Group share price a strong contrarian buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Buy, hold, sell: New Hope, REA, Telix Pharmaceuticals shares
• Where to invest as interest rates charge higher
• REA Group vs CAR Group: Which is best for income investors?
• Why this expert believes it’s time to exit positions in REA Group shares
• Buy, hold, sell: James Hardie, REA Group, and Ramelius shares

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

The idea of working until 67 before finally enjoying retirement has never appealed to me.

I’d much prefer to build enough wealth to retire earlier and spend more time doing the things I enjoy.

And I think investing in the stock market is one of the best ways to get there.

If I were putting together a portfolio specifically for early retirement, I’d focus on two things: ETFs and individual growth stocks.

Nothing particularly complicated, but I think getting the balance right could make a big difference over time.

Here’s how I’d approach it.

I’d start with ETFs

The first thing I’d do is build a decent position in ETFs.

One that really interests me is the Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF (ASX: VHY).

It holds a diversified portfolio of Aussie companies selected for their generous dividend yields.

And that’s something I’d want in a retirement portfolio.

While I’m still working, I’d reinvest the distributions to buy more units and let compounding do its thing.

Eventually, I’d like those distributions to provide a steady income stream to help cover my living expenses.

I’d also add a growth-focused ETF with international exposure, so I’m not relying entirely on the Australian market.

The idea would be to build a solid foundation that could continue growing while generating income along the way.

I’d also back some growth stocks

Now, while ETFs would make up a substantial part of my portfolio, I wouldn’t stop there.

I’d also want exposure to individual companies that I believe have the potential to become much bigger businesses over the coming years.

Two that interest me are WiseTech Global Ltd (ASX: WTC) and Ouster Inc (NASDAQ: OUST).

WiseTech operates a global logistics software business through its CargoWise platform, which helps freight forwarders manage complex supply chains.

Meanwhile, Ouster offers exposure to lidar technology, robotics, and physical AI.

Its sensors and software help machines understand their surroundings, with applications across industrial automation, robotics, and smart infrastructure.

Of course, these aren’t risk-free investments, and I wouldn’t be putting all my money into them.

But I’d be happy allocating a portion of my portfolio to businesses I believe have plenty of room to grow.

Time would be my biggest advantage

One thing I wouldn’t do is buy shares and expect them to double in six months.

That’s not how I’d look to build a retirement portfolio.

I’d want at least a three-year investment horizon for my individual growth stocks, though I’d ideally hold them much longer.

And with ETFs, I’d be looking at decades.

I’d also keep investing regularly, especially when the market gives us opportunities to buy quality businesses at more attractive prices.

Ultimately, I’d want a portfolio that combines dividend income with long-term capital growth.

And if I keep investing over the years, I’d hope to retire early and work because I want to, not because I have to.

The post Want to retire early? Here’s where I’d put my money appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• How much do I need in ASX dividend shares to receive $15,000 passive income per year?
• 5 best ASX shares to buy in October
• Own VAS, VHY, VGS, or other Vanguard ETFs? Here’s your next dividend
• These 3 ASX 200 shares have lost 49%+ in 2026. Are any now bargains?
• Should I invest $5,000 into WiseTech and Xero shares?

Motley Fool contributor Aaron Teboneras has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended WiseTech Global. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended WiseTech Global. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

The Age Pension is a fortnightly payment for Australians aged 67 or older. It’s designed as a financial safety net to help retirees cover basic living expenses.

Not everyone is eligible though. Not only do you need to meet age requirements (67 years old), you also need to be an Australian resident who has lived here for at least 10 years, with at least five of those years in a single continuous period.

You’re also subject to an asset and an income test, the results of which determine how much Age Pension you can get, if any. Centrelink assesses you under both tests then applies whichever gives the lowest rate of payment for your individual circumstances.

The income test assesses all income pooled from all sources, including wages, superannuation, investment income, commission payments, and any other types of income including those from overseas.

Meanwhile the asset test assesses everything you own, whether it’s in full, in part, or you have an interest in it. It does exclude the home you live in but includes any assets you hold overseas.

How much can I earn and own?

To receive the full Age Pension, single Australians can earn up to $226 per fortnight. Meanwhile, couples can earn up to $396 per fortnight.

Meanwhile, the asset rules just changed. As of the 20th of September, in order to receive the full Age Pension, single homeowners can now own assets (including superannuation) up to a value of $333,000, and non-homeowners can own assets up to $600,000 in retirement.

Again, a couple has a different threshold, and it’s not double the amount of one person. A couple combined can now own up to $499,000 in total if they own a property, or $766,000 if they don’t.

But it’s still possible to earn something if you’re over these limits. A part payment is assessed on a sliding scale depending on your income and assets.

The rules are strict. So it’s easy to see why so many retirees or soon-to-be-retirees try to reduce their income or assets by gifting off money to their kids to try to meet thresholds for the Age Pension.

But that’s a huge no-no.

Gifting money can backfire.

Here’s why.

Centrelink has strict rules about gifting money

Centrelink has strict rules to deter Australians from giving away money to influence their Age Pension eligibility.

If you give away your income or assets, they may still count towards your income and asset tests. This also applies if you sell them for less than they’re worth.

This includes selling or gifting property, a car, money, moving money into a trust, giving up control or a trust or company, forgiving a loan, donating money, or even refusing income to fall under the Age Pension limits.

Gifting limits

You can choose to give away any amount and as many gifts as you like. If the total value of your gifts is more than the value of the gifting-free area, your Age Pension payment may be affected.

If you gift over the value of the gifting free areas, Centrelink will count the excess in your asset text and apply deeming and include it in your income test.

This applies for five years from the date you make the gift.

The value of the gifting free areas is the same whether you’re a single person or a couple. 

You can gift up to $10,000 in one financial year and $30,000 over five financial years. The $30,000 can’t include more than $10,000 in a single financial year. This won’t affect your asset or income test, but any amount over this will be counted for the next five years.

The post Gifting money to your kids? How it could accidentally dent your Age Pension appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Want to retire early? Here’s where I’d put my money
• How much should I have in my superannuation at age 55?
• Invested in ASX IVV or other iShares ETFs? Here’s your next dividend
• Woodside vs Westpac: Which ASX share is better for passive income?
• Temple & Webster vs Nick Scali: Which furniture share is better?

Motley Fool contributor Samantha Menzies has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.