BlackRock has announced the next lot of estimated distributions for some of its ASX iShares exchange-traded funds (ETFs). 

All of these ASX ETFs are invested in international shares or bonds.

The ex-dividend date is tomorrow.

In order to receive an upcoming distribution, you must own the ASX ETF before its ex-dividend date.

iShares S&P 500 ETF (ASX: IVV) is among this group of exchange-traded funds.

IVV tracks the US benchmark S&P 500 Index (SP: INX), giving Aussies easy access to the runaway US market.

US stocks have smashed the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) over the past three years.

In FY26, US stocks produced triple the total return of ASX 200 shares at 22% vs. 7%, largely due to the artificial intelligence (AI) boom.

A recent CMC survey of more than 8,500 investors and traders found ASX IVV was the most popular ETF among buyers today.

BlackRock will pay its ETF investors on 9 October. 

Here’s what ASX IVV and other ETFs will pay

Here is a list of the estimated distributions that iShares ETF investors will receive next month.

The dividend amounts will be confirmed on Wednesday.

ASX ETF	Distribution
iShares S&P 500 ETF (ASX: IVV)	17.35 cents per unit
iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ASX: IJH)	12.94 cents per unit
iShares S&P Small-Cap ETF (ASX: IJR)	59.78 cents per unit
iShares U.S. Factor Rotation Active ETF (ASX: IACT)	2.43 cents per unit
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 ETF (ASX: ITEK)	1.16 cents per unit
iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (ASX: IHCB)	195.24 cents per unit
iShares Global High Yield Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (ASX: IHHY)	133.29 cents per unit
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (ASX: IHEB)	72.68 cents per unit
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (ASX: AESG)	146.85 cents per unit
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (ASX: AGGG)	70 cents per unit
iShares U.S. Treasury Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (ASX: IUSG)	201.61 cents per unit
iShares World Equity High Income Complex ETF (ASX: WYNC)	70.28 cents per unit

IVV and iShares ETFs join 15 other ASX stocks and REITs going ex-dividend this week.

Vanguard has also announced its next batch of estimated distributions for its ASX ETFs.

They include the most popular ETF on the Aussie market, Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS), as well as Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF (ASX: VHY), and Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (ASX: VGS).

The ex-dividend date for Vanguard distributions is Thursday. Vanguard will pay investors on 16 October.

The post Invested in ASX IVV or other iShares ETFs? Here’s your next dividend appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• 10 top ASX ETFs to watch in 2027
• Want to invest in AI? Here are the best ASX ETFs for 2027
• 5 ASX ETFs for Aussie investors to buy and hold for 20 years
• Here are the most popular ASX share superannuation investments in SMSFs
• Where to invest $20,000 in ASX ETFs today

Motley Fool contributor Bronwyn Allen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended iShares S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended iShares S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Woodside Energy vs Westpac

When it comes to building a reliable passive income stream, many ASX investors find themselves comparing household names like Woodside Energy and Westpac. Both are titans in their respective fields—energy and banking. But when deciding between Woodside shares and Westpac shares for passive income, the differences in dividend profiles, business models, and recent momentum can really shape the call. Let’s take a closer look at how these two stocks stack up.

The case for Woodside

Woodside is Australia’s largest independent oil and gas company, producing and marketing energy both here and offshore. With a history stretching back to 1954 and a significant boost from its recent merger with BHP’s petroleum assets, Woodside has evolved into a global energy player. According to its most recent public description, Woodside operates a diverse portfolio of offshore platforms and floating production vessels, and its shares have established themselves among the biggest names on the ASX.

For income-focused investors, Woodside’s fundamentals stand out in a few ways:

• Dividend yield: 5.24%, fully franked, which remains attractive compared to many blue chips.
• P/E ratio: 13.81, offering moderate earnings multiples for the sector.
• Recent returns: Its year-to-date return is sitting at a robust 38.9%, pointing to strong recent share price momentum.

Woodside’s dividend history also confirms consistent and fully franked payouts, and its most recent annual dividend is $1.63 per share.

The case for Westpac

Founded in 1817, Westpac is one of Australia’s four biggest banks and a major fixture on the ASX. It operates across multiple banking and wealth management lines, from retail and business banking to specialist financial services, both locally and across the Tasman. Through brands like St.George and Bank of Melbourne, Westpac has become a cornerstone for many Aussies’ day-to-day finances.

On the passive income front, Westpac offers:

• Dividend yield: 4.43%, fully franked—solid, though a step below Woodside’s headline rate.
• P/E ratio: 17.13, which is somewhat higher (i.e. more expensive earnings multiple) than Woodside, though this is not unusual for a major bank.
• Earnings per share: $2.029, comfortably supporting the current $1.54 annual dividend.

Westpac has also maintained a long and stable record of paying dividends—every single one fully franked in the last two decades—and remains a stalwart income stock for retired and dividend-focused investors.

Valuation comparison

Here’s how the key numbers stack up right now:

Metric	Woodside	Westpac
Market Cap	$60.09 billion	$116.73 billion
P/E Ratio	13.81	17.13
Dividend Yield	5.24% (100% franked)	4.43% (100% franked)
Earnings per share	1.605	2.029
Dividend per share	1.63	1.54
Year-to-date return	38.9%	-8.0%

Recent share price performance

Comparing recent share price history up to 24 September 2026:

• Woodside Energy: Closed at $31.61, up 1.54% on the day. The share price is up 38.9% year to date—a very strong run.
• Westpac: Closed at $34.13, down 1.81% on the day. Year to date, Westpac shares are actually down 8.0%, showing some negative momentum recently.

Which is the better buy?

If I’m looking for a passive income pick today, I’d lean toward Woodside. Here’s why: Right now, Woodside offers a higher fully franked dividend yield than Westpac, with dividends underpinned by healthy earnings (as suggested by the EPS and payout ratio). The oil and gas operator is also showing strong recent price momentum, up almost 39% this year, while pockets of the banking sector—including Westpac—are lagging, with Westpac shares down about 8% over the same stretch.

Westpac still offers a reliable, fully franked dividend and is a classic income play. But with Woodside’s higher income yield and noticeably better recent share performance, my pick for new passive income dollars would be Woodside Energy. Of course, no dividend stock is risk-free—energy profits can be cyclical, and banks have their own headwinds. Still, based on the latest data, the edge goes to Woodside for now.

The post Woodside vs Westpac: Which ASX share is better for passive income? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Commonwealth Bank vs Westpac: Which ASX bank stock is the better buy for resilient passive income?
• 5 things to watch on the ASX 200 on Friday
• How much superannuation do I need to earn $2,000 per week in passive income?
• Buy, hold, sell: BHP, CSL, and Westpac shares
• 5 things to watch on the ASX 200 on Thursday

Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial draft. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.

Temple & Webster vs Nick Scali shares: Furniture retail head-to-head

If you’re tossing up between Temple & Webster Group Ltd (ASX: TPW) and Nick Scali Ltd (ASX: NCK) shares, you’re not alone. Both companies are leaders in the Australian furniture retail space, but take very different approaches. With digital disruption shaking up the industry, one is an online-only growth play, while the other is a well-established, dividends-paying bricks-and-mortar business with growing international reach. Here’s how they stack up against each other.

The case for Temple & Webster Group

Temple & Webster is Australia’s largest pure-play online furniture and homewares retailer. Launched in 2011, it quickly carved a niche for itself, now offering an enormous range of over 200,000 products aimed at furnishing and decorating Australian homes and offices. Its model skips physical showrooms entirely, keeping costs low and focusing on customer convenience.

Several key metrics define Temple & Webster’s investment case:

• P/E Ratio: 127.09 – It’s priced for growth, which signals high expectations for future earnings but also brings risk if growth lags.
• Dividend Yield: 0.00% – Temple & Webster doesn’t pay dividends, choosing to funnel any profits back into expanding the business.
• Year To Date Return: -67.8% – The shares have had a very tough run lately, down substantially this year.

Temple & Webster has more than a million Australian subscribers and incorporates private label brand Milan Direct. However, as a pure-play online retailer, it’s heavily exposed to changing consumer sentiment and digital competition.

The case for Nick Scali

Nick Scali is a long-established name in the Australian furniture scene. Founded in 1962, it operates a sprawling network of Nick Scali and Plush stores across Australia and New Zealand, and is now setting sights on the UK with recent acquisitions and store rebranding. The business is known for its sofas but also covers most household furniture.

Notable fundamentals for Nick Scali:

• P/E Ratio: 16.11 – Far lower than Temple & Webster’s, reflecting more stable, mature earnings.
• Dividend Yield: 5.05% (fully franked) – A strong, fully franked income stream, with a history of consistent dividend payments.
• Year To Date Return: -37.8% – The shares have also dropped sharply this year, but less so than Temple & Webster.

Nick Scali’s model combines physical presence with growing e-commerce. It’s a reliable cash-generating business, as shown by a dividend per share of $0.78 and a long history of fully franked payouts.

Valuation comparison

Here’s how the major numbers stack up:

	Temple & Webster	Nick Scali
Market Cap	$511.64 million	$1.23 billion
P/E Ratio	127.09	16.11
Earnings per share	0.064	0.885
Dividend Yield	0.00%	5.05% (100% franked)
Dividend per share	N/A	$0.78

Nick Scali stands out for value-conscious investors, with a much lower P/E and a high, franked yield, reflecting its consistent profit and mature business model. Temple & Webster’s extremely high P/E signals a business the market expects to grow rapidly – although such multiples can unravel quickly if those expectations aren’t met.

Note: Temple & Webster’s reported P/E ratio may be based on a different earnings measure (e.g. underlying or forward earnings) than the EPS figure shown, which is why they may appear inconsistent.

Recent share price performance

Comparing recent share price trends until 23 September 2026:

• Temple & Webster: Closed at $4.41 on 23 Sep 2026, gaining 4.8% that day but still suffering a year-to-date return of -67.8%.
• Nick Scali: Closed at $14.40 on 23 Sep 2026, rising 1.0% that day with a year-to-date return of -37.8%.

Both companies have been hit hard in 2026, but Temple & Webster shares have fallen almost twice as much as Nick Scali’s.

Which is the better buy?

For my money, I’d lean toward Nick Scali as the better buy right now. The reasons? First, Nick Scali offers a much lower P/E ratio and a high, franked dividend yield of over 5%, so you’re getting paid to wait even if the business hits some bumps. While both shares are deep in the red year to date, Temple & Webster’s steeper fall and nosebleed valuation multiple set a higher bar for recovery. Of course, if you have a high-risk tolerance and believe in the long-term potential of online retail, you might prefer Temple & Webster’s growth option. But personally, I prefer Nick Scali’s steadier earnings, dividends, and international expansion story at today’s price.

The post Temple & Webster vs Nick Scali: Which furniture share is better? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• 15 ASX shares going ex-dividend next week
• Treasury Wine Estates vs Temple & Webster: Which beaten down ASX stock is better value?
• 3 ASX shares down 40% to 80% I’d buy on the cheap
• Buy, hold, sell: Temple & Webster, Kelsian, Boss Energy shares
• Lovisa vs Temple & Webster: Which ASX retailer is the better growth stock today?

Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Temple & Webster Group. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Nick Scali and Temple & Webster Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial draft. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.