Temple & Webster vs Harvey Norman shares
If you’re on the hunt for a value play in the battered Australian retail sector, Temple & Webster Group Ltd (ASX: TPW) and Harvey Norman Holdings Ltd (ASX: HVN) have both taken a hammering lately. But these are very different retailers. Should you bet on the nimble pure-play online player or the diversified retail giant with an eye-catching dividend yield? Here’s how I stack up Temple & Webster vs Harvey Norman shares for value investors, based on the latest available figures.
The case for Temple & Webster
Temple & Webster is Australia’s leading online-only furniture and homewares retailer. Since launching in 2011, its growth story has revolved around shaking up traditional home buying. According to its most recent company profile, the platform stocks over 200,000 products and counts more than 1 million subscribers. While numbers like these signal scale and reach, I’d note they come from profile info, not up-to-the-minute financials.
A few fundamentals catch my eye:
- Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is a hefty 123.05.
- No dividend paid â all earnings are being retained for growth or shoring up the business.
- Its year-to-date (YTD) share price return is a bruising -68.8%, showing how hard sentiment has turned against tech and online retail models recently.
This pure digital play grew quickly when lockdowns favoured online shopping, but with normality returning, the harsh downturn in its share price is a reminder that markets can turn fast for disruptors.
The case for Harvey Norman
Harvey Norman is an established household name and one of Australia’s largest retail conglomerates, spanning furniture, electronics, computers, and entertainment goods. Beyond its core stores, it also owns the Domayne and Joyce Mayne brands in Australia. According to its latest public profile, it operates more than 270 outlets across eight countries, plus a significant property portfolio, especially in Australia and New Zealand.
Key fundamentals I notice:
- Much more modest P/E ratio at 9.56.
- Temptingly high ~6.8% dividend yield, fully franked at 100%.
- YTD share price return of -37.7% shows Harvey Norman shares have still been hit hard, but not to the same extent as Temple & Webster.
Harvey Norman also has plenty of runs on the board when it comes to paying dependable, franked dividends. In tough markets, that’s a comfort for value investors.
Valuation comparison
There’s a dramatic contrast between these two on current valuation metrics. Here’s how they stack up side-by-side:
| Metric | Temple & Webster | Harvey Norman |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $504.7 million | $5.08 billion |
| P/E Ratio | 123.05 | 9.56 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 6.79% (100% franked) |
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) | $0.035 | $0.424 |
| YTD Return | -68.8% | -37.7% |
Note: Temple & Webster’s high P/E ratio relative to its modest EPS reveals it’s priced for big expected growth, while Harvey Norman’s low P/E (for its sector) looks more classic value. Both have negative returns this year, but Temple & Webster’s losses have been far steeper. For income seekers, only Harvey Norman is paying a dividendâand a sizeable, franked one.
Recent share price momentum
Comparing recent share price performance up to 7 October:
- Temple & Webster closed at $4.33 on 7 October 2026, up 1.4% for the day but still deeply in the red year-to-date (-68.8%).
- Harvey Norman closed at $4.08 on 7 October 2026, gaining 0.7% for the session and sporting a year-to-date decline of -37.7%.
- Both companies have seen some choppy trading in the last fortnight, but the magnitude of Temple & Webster’s drawdown highlights the sharper fall from grace.
Which is the better buy?
Both of these retailers are bruised, but in my eyes, Harvey Norman stands out as the better bet for value investors right now. The reasons? Its underlying valuation looks far more attractive, with a P/E of 9.56 compared to Temple & Webster’s lofty 123âand it’s paying a substantial fully franked dividend. If I’m looking for value, I want some measure of income and downside protection.
Temple & Webster’s growth story is tantalising, but its sky-high valuation and the absence of a dividend make it more suited to growth investors willing to stomach big swings and back a post-punishment rebound. The negatives? That massive YTD fall signals sentiment could take a while to repair.
For my money, Harvey Norman’s long record of payouts, more defensive business model, and low P/E make it my pick of these two beaten-down retailers for a value-focused investor. If you’re hunting for bargains in a challenged sector, I’d lean toward Harvey Norman for its combination of income, value, and resilience.
The post Temple & Webster vs Harvey Norman: Which beaten-down ASX retailer offers better value? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.
Wondering where you should invest $1,000 right now?
When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool Share Advisor newsletter he has run for over ten years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
Scott just revealed what he believes could be the ‘five best ASX stocks’ for investors to buy right now. We believe these stocks are trading at attractive prices and Scott thinks they could be great buys right nowâ¦
* Returns as of 1 August 2026
.custom-cta-button p {
margin-bottom: 0 !important;
}
More reading
- 10 ASX shares with ex-dividend dates next week
- Adairs vs Temple & Webster: Which ASX retail stock wins for October?
- Where I’d invest in ASX shares after the recent RBA rate rise
- Where to invest $20,000 in ASX dividend shares for passive income
- Temple & Webster vs Nick Scali: Which furniture share is better?
Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Temple & Webster Group. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Harvey Norman. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Temple & Webster Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial draft. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.
