The GQG Partners Inc (ASX: GQG) share price is in focus after the company reported total funds under management (FUM) of US$149.2 billion as at 30 September 2026, with net outflows of US$2.3 billion offset by investment performance gains of US$2.4 billion for the month.

What did GQG Partners report?

• Total FUM as at 30 September 2026: US$149.2 billion
• Net outflows for September 2026: US$2.3 billion
• Investment performance gains for September 2026: US$2.4 billion
• Quarterly net outflows: US$11.1 billion
• Quarterly investment performance gains: US$4.4 billion
• All four core strategies delivered positive absolute and relative returns in September and Q3 2026

What else do investors need to know?

GQG Partners continues to focus on its four primary investment strategies, all of which delivered positive results in both absolute and relative terms during the month and quarter. The company noted double-digit annualised net returns over the three-year period ending 30 September 2026, in line with its investment objectives.

Most of GQG’s fee income comes from ongoing fees calculated as a percentage of assets rather than performance fees, providing stable and predictable revenue. The management team remains committed to daily portfolio reviews and prudent risk management aimed at compounding client capital over the long term.

What’s next for GQG Partners?

Looking ahead, GQG Partners will maintain its disciplined investment approach and regular portfolio reviews to manage risk and pursue growth for client funds. The next funds under management disclosure is set for 11 November 2026, with further updates scheduled monthly.

The team remains focused on generating consistent results across market cycles, closely aligning management interests with those of shareholders and clients for long-term business development.

GQG Partners share price snapshot

Over the past 12 months, GQG Partners shares have declined 28%, trailing the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO), which has declined 2% over the same period.

View Original Announcement

The post GQG Partners posts FUM of US$149.2bn in September 2026 appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Soul Patts vs GQG Partners: Which is the stronger pick?
• Magellan Financial Group vs GQG Partners: ASX fund manager showdown
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today
• Buy, hold, sell: Orica, GQG Partners, BHP shares
• 3 ASX shares trading at 52-week lows that could be outstanding value plays 

Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Gqg Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial summary of the company announcement. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia vs AMP shares

If you’re considering Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) versus AMP Ltd (ASX: AMP) shares for passive income, you’re not alone. Both are well-known names in Aussie financial services, but they stand in very different corners of the market. Let’s break down where these two fit in the ASX ecosystem, how their dividends compare, and which might better suit a 40-year-old investor searching for reliable income.

The case for Commonwealth Bank of Australia

Commonwealth Bank of Australia, or CBA, is the bank most Australians recognise. As one of the “big four” local banks, CBA offers everything from everyday banking to superannuation, insurance, funds management, and broking. Its huge customer base and geographic reach through Australia, New Zealand, Asia, and beyond make it a dominant force in Australian financial services.

What jumps out in the numbers? First, CBA has a massive market cap of $251.64 billion—this is financial muscle few can match on the ASX. Its dividend yield is 3.31%, and those dividends are fully franked at 100%, meaning investors benefit from the maximum tax credits. The trailing P/E ratio sits at 23.38, reflecting the bank’s premium status (and market confidence) but also suggesting investors pay up for its perceived stability.

The case for AMP

AMP, once one of the giants in Australian wealth management, is now a very different beast to CBA. AMP still delivers superannuation, insurance, and banking products, but in recent years has massively restructured—offloading large business units, entering joint ventures, and refocusing on its core services. AMP is aiming to restore its reputation and grow through a more focused wealth and banking platform.

What’s striking here is the smaller scale: AMP’s market cap is $6.13 billion, a small fraction of CBA’s. Yet, its shares have soared YTD, up 43.41%, likely helped by optimism around its ongoing turnaround. The dividend yield stands at 1.95%—lower than CBA—and dividends are only 20% franked, so the tax benefit for income-seekers is much lower. Its P/E ratio sits at 34.59, higher than CBA’s, which may reflect expectations for future growth, but could also indicate the market is willing to pay more for the turnaround story.

Valuation comparison

Here’s how the key numbers stack up side-by-side:

Metric	Commonwealth Bank of Australia	AMP
Market Cap	$251.64 billion	$6.13 billion
P/E Ratio	23.38	34.59
Dividend Yield	3.31%	1.95%
Dividend Franking	100%	20%
Dividend per Share (TTM)	$5.05	$0.05
Earnings per Share	6.517	0.074
Year To Date Return	-1.96%	43.41%

What stands out? CBA offers higher dividend yield and much fuller franking—critical if you’re relying on dividends for income in retirement or semi-retirement. AMP’s higher P/E and much lower dividend payouts, as well as only 20% franking, make it less attractive for passive income, at least on these numbers.

Recent share price momentum

Comparing recent share price performance up to 7 October:

• Commonwealth Bank of Australia closed at $150.37 on 7 Oct 2026, posting a -1.32% move that day and a YTD return of -1.96%.
• AMP closed at $2.54 on 7 Oct 2026, down 0.78% for the day but boasting a stellar YTD gain of 43.41%.

While AMP’s 2026 share performance has far outpaced CBA, its day-to-day volatility is also higher. CBA has delivered flat-to-slightly-negative returns YTD, but in the context of larger banks, that’s not unusual given macro conditions.

Which is the better buy?

If passive income is your goal—especially with franking credits to boost after-tax returns—I’d lean clearly toward Commonwealth Bank of Australia. The combination of a higher dividend yield (3.31% vs AMP’s 1.95%), fully franked payouts, and greater dividend reliability across many years all play in CBA’s favour. Its earnings, scale, and track record make it a mainstay for anyone seeking regular, tax-effective income.

AMP’s dramatic rebound in 2026 is eye-catching, but for passive income seekers, the thin yield, patchy franking, and the uncertainty of recent years don’t tick enough of the right boxes. AMP might suit those hunting for turnaround potential or capital gains. But for a 40-year-old after consistent, tax-friendly dividends—the sort that can help fund a comfortable lifestyle without too much risk—my pick would be Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

The post CBA vs AMP: Which is better for a 40-year-old investor seeking passive income? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Experts tip CBA and these ASX 200 shares as sells
• CBA vs Coles shares: Which is the better buy at age 50?
• How many CBA shares do I need to buy for $10,000 of passive income?
• CSL vs CBA: Which ASX share is best for SMSFs?
• 6 ASX shares downgraded by experts this week

Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial draft. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.

The REA Group Ltd (ASX: REA) share price has been one of the ASX’s best shares over the last two decades, but the last few years have seen a lot of volatility. Experts have given their view on whether it’s great value and could deliver good returns.

As the chart below shows, the REA Group share price has dropped by around 30% in the past year.

When valuations fall that much, it could be an opportunity to invest. Is that the case with the REA Group share price?

High-quality economic moat remains

Investors should keep in mind that the company’s competitive advantages with realestate.com.au seem to remain.

In every result, the business tells the market how much ahead of its nearest rival it is.

For FY26, the company said that 12.7 million people visited per month on average, with around half of that total exclusively using realestate.com.au.

It achieved 146.4 million average monthly visits, which was 104.5 million more monthly visits than the nearest competitor on average.

REA Group also reported that 5.2 million unique properties were tracked by their owner on realestate.com.au, up 15% year over year. It also noted 2.5 million average monthly realestate.com.au buyer enquiries, up 8% year over year, as well as a 22% year-over-year increase in realestate.com.au leads.

For another important business that REA Group owns, realcommercial.com.au saw 2.9 million people visit per month on average, 1.8 million more people than the nearest competitor.

It’s with these competitive and numerical advantages that REA Group is able to sustain its leadership. Buyers want to go where the most property listings are, most sellers want to advertise on the property portal with the most buyers – a self-fulfilling circle.

The above market dynamic allows REA Group to generate revenue, regularly increase prices, and earn strong margins.

In FY26, the company reported that core revenue grew 7% (on flat listings growth), thanks to ‘buy yield’ growth of 13%, core operating profit (EBITDA) excluding associates rose 12%, and core net profit rose 15%.

What could the REA Group share price do in the next 12 months?

The company is currently in a tricky situation following tax changes affecting investment properties, and interest rates are considerably higher. Currently, new national buy listings are expected to be “flat to down low single-digits” in FY27.

But the company is targeting operational margin expansion with low-double-digit, controllable residential buy yield growth, driven by an 8% premiere+ price rise and growth in add-ons. Operating costs are expected to increase in the mid-single digits for Australia and mid-to-high single digits in FY27.

According to CMC Invest, there have been 10 ratings on the company in the last three months. The average price target is $187.40, suggesting a potential rise of around 20% over the next 12 months.

If that rise does happen, I think it would likely be an ASX market-beating return. So, at the current REA Group share price, it could be one to consider. However, there may be ASX shares that could produce even greater returns.

The post How much could the REA Group share price rise in the next year? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• I screened the ASX for quality and value. These 5 shares stood out
• 5 ASX 200 shares brokers tip to rocket 25% to 77%
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today
• 6 ASX shares upgraded by experts amid a weak market 
• 5 things to watch on the ASX 200 on Wednesday

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.