Wesfarmers Ltd (ASX: WES) shares are an excellent option for Australians seeking passive income. It’s such a solid business that I’d rather invest in it than receive the Age Pension.

Wesfarmers is the company that owns various businesses such as Bunnings, Kmart, Officeworks, Priceline, Target, a chemicals, energy and fertiliser business called WesCEF and other healthcare businesses (such as InstantScripts).

Australia’s Age Pension is one of the most generous in the world. The maximum per fortnight that a single person can receive was recently hiked to $1,237.70 per person.

For me, there are two key reasons why I’d prefer Wesfarmers shares to the Age Pension.

The payout is growing faster than inflation

The Age Pension is regularly growing over time, with inflation playing a key role in how fast it increases.

However, the Wesfarmers dividend is growing faster. Therefore, my cash flow could steadily improve beyond the Age Pension if I started with the same income.

In FY26 – the financial year that finished in June 2026 – Wesfarmers’ board decided to hike its annual dividend per share by 7.8% to $2.22. That payout growth rate was significantly more than the inflation rate.

Its dividend is projected to increase again in FY27. According to Commsec’s forecast, the business is expected to grow its payout by 5.5% in FY27, 6.5% in FY28, and 8.8% in FY29.

Of course, projections are not guaranteed future payments.

Potential for a rising Wesfarmers share price

Another reason I prefer this ASX dividend share is its potential for capital growth. I think it’s a good thing to have a strong asset base.

In the past four years, it has risen by 70%, at the time of writing. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.

The business has proven that its main businesses are excellent at growing their earnings. In FY26 alone, Bunnings Group (which includes Beaumont Tiles) grew earnings by 5.1%, and Kmart Group grew earnings by 6%. WesCEF grew earnings by 18.5%, but it’s significantly smaller than Bunnings and Kmart.

In my view, for two retailers to deliver solid growth in a difficult retail environment is really impressive.

Both Bunnings and Kmart achieve returns on equity (ROC) of close to 70%, while Wesfarmers’ overall return on equity (ROE) was 35.5%. The company achieves enormous returns on money invested in certain areas of the business, which, to me, is a stronger indicator that future internal investments can help profit grow.

Over the long-term, profit growth is the best driver for the Wesfarmers share price, so I’d say this business is a solid ‘compounder‘ option.

How many shares it’d take to match the Age Pension

I’m going to focus on the FY27 payout, given that investors have already received the FY26 dividend.

The business is projected to pay an annual dividend per share of $2.34 in FY27. The maximum Age Pension currently annualises to an approximate total of $32,180.

If we exclude franking credits from the income goal, it’d take 13,753 Wesfarmers shares. Including franking credits, it would take 9,627 Wesfarmers shares to match the Age Pension.

But, I wouldn’t suggest putting someone’s entire investment portfolio into one business. I’d include other quality ASX shares as well.

The post 9,627 shares of Wesfarmers pay an income equal to the Age Pension appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Wesfarmers vs Qantas: Which ASX share suits a 60-year-old investor?
• Wesfarmers vs Coles: Which dividend share is better for retirees?
• Why this top broker is buying Charter Hall, Soul Patts, and Wesfarmers shares
• Down 20%: Is the Wesfarmers share price a top buy?
• How much passive income can I earn from a $950,000 superannuation balance?

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Wesfarmers. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Wesfarmers. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia vs Coles Group shares

Thinking about putting a decent sum of money to work at age 50? You might be weighing up blue-chip mainstays like Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) and Coles Group Ltd (ASX: COL). Both are household names, offer steady dividends, and can anchor a portfolio for long-term wealth – but which really stacks up as the better buy now?

The case for Commonwealth Bank of Australia

Commonwealth Bank of Australia is the country’s largest bank by market value, with a history dating back over a century. It’s truly a financial powerhouse, serving millions of Aussies and Kiwi customers across banking, funds management, insurance, and broking. CBA’s brand is instantly recognisable and its digital banking platform is widely regarded as an industry leader.

Looking at the fundamentals:

• P/E Ratio: 23.38 – a not-uncommon range for the big banks in recent years.
• Dividend yield: 3.31%, fully franked, with a long record of consistent, rising payouts (recent years showing annual increases).
• Market Cap: $251.64 billion – it absolutely dominates the ASX banking sector by size.
• CBA’s earnings per share is 6.517, supporting its substantial dividends.
• Importantly for many retirees or near-retirees, it franks all its dividends at 100%.

The case for Coles

Coles is a giant of the Australian supermarket scene, serving everyday groceries to millions of households each week. The company includes Coles Supermarkets, Coles Liquor, and significant online channels, making it a true consumer staple. Once part of the old Coles Myer empire, it found new independence after spinning off from Wesfarmers in 2018.

Some standout numbers:

• P/E Ratio: 28.18 – that’s above CBA’s, but supermarkets can warrant higher multiples due to their stable, recurring demand.
• Dividend yield: 3.41% (fully franked), a touch higher than CBA’s, and the dividend per share has shown steady growth since relisting.
• Market Cap: $30.75 billion – much smaller than CBA, but still a top-20 ASX company and a true blue-chip by any measure.
• Earnings per share: 0.812, in line with its sector and size.

Valuation comparison

Here’s how the two stack up on key metrics:

Metric	Commonwealth Bank	Coles Group
P/E Ratio	23.38	28.18
Dividend Yield	3.31% (100% franked)	3.41% (100% franked)
Market Cap	$251.64 billion	$30.75 billion
Dividend per Share	$5.05	$0.74
EPS	6.517	0.812

Both companies pay fully franked dividends, nice for after-tax income in retirement. Coles edges out CBA for current yield (3.41% vs 3.31%) but trades at a noticeably higher P/E ratio. Just note, as banking and supermarket stocks belong to very different sectors, their typical P/E ranges don’t always line up apples-for-apples – supermarkets are often seen as more consistent defensive earners.

Recent share price momentum

Comparing recent share price momentum up to 7 October 2026:

• CBA: Closed at $150.37, down 1.32% on the day. Year to date, the return sits at -2.0%, showing modest underperformance in 2026 so far.
• Coles: Closed at $22.88, flat on the day. Year to date, the return is 10.4% – Coles has delivered a solid positive run in 2026 to date.

So if you’re after recent price momentum, Coles has the edge.

Which is the better buy?

If I was making a large investment at 50 and wanted a reliable, lower-volatility cornerstone holding, I’d personally lean toward Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Its size gives it economic moat, its payout history oozes consistency (with strong franking), and its banking model has longer-term pricing power. While its dividend yield is slightly lower than Coles’, the payout per share is much higher and has grown considerably over decades.

Coles is no slouch – I really like the company for its dependable earnings, and its share price has outperformed CBA over the past year. But at a noticeably higher P/E ratio and with much slower historical dividend growth, I see CBA as a more attractive blend of yield, scale, and proven resilience, especially if income and peace of mind are top priorities in the run-up to retirement.

That said, if steady capital growth and lower bank sector exposure appeal more, Coles is by no means a bad alternative. But for a large, set-and-forget holding at age 50, my pick would be Commonwealth Bank.

The post CBA vs Coles shares: Which is the better buy at age 50? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• How many CBA shares do I need to buy for $10,000 of passive income?
• CSL vs CBA: Which ASX share is best for SMSFs?
• How much is needed in superannuation to target a $100,000 annual passive income?
• Wesfarmers vs Coles: Which dividend share is better for retirees?
• If I invest $8,000 in CBA shares, what passive income could I earn in FY27 and FY28?

Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial draft. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.

National Australia Bank Ltd (ASX: NAB) shares may be one of the most popular choices for passive income on the ASX.

As one of Australia’s largest banks, the business has strong economic power that many other companies don’t have. The size of the business and the strength of its balance sheet give the bank pleasing advantages.

Of course, generating strong profits means the bank can pay a good dividend to investors. But, after multiple RBA rate rises, what do experts think could happen with the NAB dividend in the year ahead?

Projection for owners of NAB shares

The bank’s 2026 financial year has just ended, with it being the financial period ending 30 September 2026. Although we haven’t seen the result yet, we can now look ahead to what may happen in the 2027 financial year.

According to the projection on CMC Invest, the ASX bank share is projected to pay an annual dividend per share of $1.70 in FY26 – that’s the year that has just gone.

But we want to look at the dividend payment that could happen for the financial year ahead.

Based on CMC Invest’s projection, the business is forecast to slightly increase its shareholder payout to $1.705 per share. That would represent a year-over-year increase of 0.3%, not much, but better than nothing.

At the time of writing and the current NAB share price, that works out to be a cash dividend yield of 4.4% excluding franking credits. If we include the franking credits as part of the potential passive income, then the grossed-up dividend yield becomes 6.3%.

What would a $15,000 investment in the ASX bank share do?

At the time of writing, if someone were to invest $15,000 into NAB shares, they’d be able to buy 390 shares.

With that investment in the ASX bank share, those shares could unlock $664.95 of dividend cash and $949.93 of grossed-up dividend income, including franking credits.

In my view, that’s a solid passive income payout to start with.

Is this a good time to invest in NAB shares?

Time will tell how the company performs in the 2026 financial year, but given expectations and the current economic environment, analysts are divided on the business.

According to CMC Invest, 10 analysts have rated the business in the last three months. Three of those rating calls were a buy, four were a hold, and three were a sell.

The average price target for those 10 ratings was $39.13, suggesting a slight rise over the coming year at the time of writing.

However, the most pessimistic price target is $29.08, implying (at the time of writing), a decline of 24% over the year ahead. Meanwhile, the most optimistic price target is $48.64, suggesting a possible rise of 26% over the next 12 months.

Time will tell whether analysts are right to be pessimistic or optimistic about the ASX bank share. But with NAB’s slow growth in mind, there are other ASX shares I’d concentrate on first.

The post If I invest $15,000 in NAB shares, how much passive income will I receive in 2027? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• How much passive income can I earn from a $950,000 superannuation balance?
• Westpac vs NAB shares: Which big bank is the better buy?
• How much could the big 4 banks’ share prices fall?
• How much superannuation do I need to earn $56,000 per year in passive income?
• Fortescue vs National Australia Bank: Which ASX blue chip is the better buy this month?

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.