Category: Business Insider

  • These 11 House Republicans voted to advance MTG’s bid to oust Mike Johnson

    Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie at a press conference on their bid to oust Johnson last week.
    Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie at a press conference on their bid to oust Johnson last week.

    • Marjorie Taylor Greene's effort to oust Speaker Mike Johnson has officially failed.
    • But 11 House Republicans voted to at least allow debate on the matter.
    • Most lawmakers who voted with Greene were Democrats who are opposed to Johnson's politics.

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's effort to boot Speaker Mike Johnson has officially failed after the House voted by a 359-43 margin to table the Georgia Republican's motion to vacate on Wednesday.

    Several Republicans sided with Greene, voting against a procedural vote to table her motion. Basically, they voted to allow a debate on Greene's effort rather than simply quashing it.

    Just two other Republicans — Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Paul Gosar of Arizona — officially cosponsored her resolution.

    Seven Democrats voted "present."

    Greene's move was somewhat of a surprise, with the congresswoman forcing the vote just one day after seemingly backing off of her threat.

    The far-right congresswoman's effort was long expected to fail, given Democratic leaders' decision to vote to table the motion. Several Democrats voted with Greene or voted "present," citing their opposition to Johnson's politics and their belief that Democrats should have asked for more in exchange for their votes.

    "I'm not going to support MTG's silliness, but I don't want to support the most homophobic speaker in American history," Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan previously told BI, referencing Johnson's opposition to LGBTQ+ rights.

    It remains unclear whether Greene will continue to force votes on ousting Johnson.

    Here are the 11 House Republicans who voted to advance the effort to oust Johnson:

    • Andy Biggs of Arizona
    • Eric Burlison of Missouri
    • Eli Crane of Arizona
    • Warren Davidson of Ohio
    • Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
    • Paul Gosar of Arizona
    • Thomas Massie of Kentucky
    • Alex Mooney of West Virginia
    • Barry Moore of Alabama
    • Chip Roy of Texas
    • Victoria Spartz of Indiana
    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Nikki Haley won nearly 130,000 votes in the Indiana GOP primary. Here’s what that means for Trump ahead of the general election.

    Nikki Haley
    Nikki Haley.

    • Donald Trump is on cruise control to formally win the GOP presidential nomination in Milwaukee.
    • But ex-UN Ambassador Nikki Haley continues to rack up votes despite her March exit from the primary.
    • Across the country, there's been a notable bloc of GOP primary voters who aren't backing Trump.

    Indiana, which catapulted the political careers of conservatives like former vice presidents Mike Pence and Dan Quayle, is one of the most Republican states in the country.

    Since 1940, the state has voted for the Republican presidential nominee in every election except for 1964 and 2008. And former President Donald Trump is virtually assured of winning the state this November, as he also did in 2016 and 2020.

    But an interesting thing happened on Tuesday: Trump won the GOP presidential primary, but former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley still won over 20 percent of the vote, despite her March exit from the race.

    With nearly all precincts reporting their results, Trump earned 461,663 votes (78.3 percent) to Haley's 128,168 votes (21.7 percent).

    Similar to results in states like Virginia and North Carolina, Trump performed strongly in Indiana's rural counties. However, the former president still has a suburban problem, as evidenced by his numbers in the Indianapolis area, with many moderates and GOP-leaning independents continuing to be leery of his 2024 candidacy.

    In Marion County — which is consolidated with Indianapolis and is the most populous jurisdiction in the state with more than 965,000 residents — Trump only beat Haley by 30 points (65 percent to 35 percent).

    That's a significant drop-off from Trump's nearly 57-point statewide margin, and it's especially notable since the former president has been the presumptive nominee for weeks.

    And in suburban Hamilton County, a longtime GOP stronghold which has seen its Democratic vote share soar in recent years, Trump only won by 32 points (66 percent to 34 percent).

    In the general election, Biden is favored to win Marion, a county that he carried by a 63 percent to 34 percent margin over Trump in 2020. Meanwhile, Hamilton County will be more of a battleground, as Trump only won it by seven points (52 percent to 45 percent) that year.

    So while Trump might see the Indiana victory as a mere formality ahead of the RNC convention in Milwaukee, the national suburban trend is a glaring sign for the former president in an election where the margins are expected to be close in the key battleground states.

    While Indiana may be safely Republican in November, suburban voters in Hamilton County will likely vote in a similar manner to other marginally-Republican and swing jurisdictions that will decide the election.

    Trump has sought to tout his economic message to these sorts of voters, an area where he has found success in poll after poll. But many suburban voters are also concerned about issues like the preservation of democracy, abortion rights, and environmental policy, which all strongly favor Biden.

    And it could give the ex-president a good deal of trouble, especially if he doesn't court Haley's voters ahead of the fall election.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • See the campus protests over the last 6 decades that dwarf the Gaza protests in size and disorder

    A group of women demonstrate against the Vietnam War on the campus of University of California Berkeley holding a sign that says "Get out of Vietnam"
    A group of women demonstrate against the Vietnam War on the campus of University of California Berkeley.

    • Demonstrations against Israel's war in Gaza have rocked college campuses across the US.
    • Over 2,500 arrests have been made as police and university administrators crack down on protesters.
    • The widespread activism bears similarities to past student movements — but also key differences.

    Waves of protests against the seven-month Israel-Hamas war are roiling college campuses across the US, with students setting up encampments on central quads and taking over academic halls.

    Law enforcement and university administrators attempted to quell the disorder, shutting down encampments and conducting mass arrests.

    As of Monday, more than 2,500 people have been arrested or detained in connection to the protests, according to data collected by The New York Times.

    The recent spread of student activism has led some to compare it to major student movements over the Vietnam War and South African apartheid.

    While the recent demonstrations are still ongoing after several weeks, they are still far from the scale and disorder of movements in recent decades.

    Protesting Israel's war in Gaza
    Pro-Palestinian students gather on the campus of Wayne State University
    Students gather on the campus of Wayne State University to protest Vice President Kamala Harris and the Biden administration's support for Israel during her visit to Detroit.

    On April 17, Columbia University's president, Nemat Shafik, was called before Congress after Republican lawmakers accused her of failing to address concerns of antisemitism on the school's campus.

    The same day, hundreds of Columbia students occupied the South Lawn to set up an encampment on campus, dubbed the "Gaza Solidarity Encampment," demanding that school administrators divest from businesses and investments in Israel and calling for a cease-fire in Gaza.

    The following day, New York City police descended upon the encampment, arresting more than 100 protesters, including Rep. Ilhan Omar's daughter.

    The arrests sparked similar demonstrations at dozens of colleges and universities nationwide, including the University of Texas Austin, the University of Southern California, and the University of Chicago.

    More than 34,000 Palestinians have been killed and over 80,000 injured in the Gaza Strip, according to an assessment by the United Nations. The UN report called the level of casualties "unprecedented and still mounting" in the seven months since Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on October 7.

    Experts say the devastation in Gaza left behind by the Israeli military is among the deadliest and most destructive in modern history, The Associated Press reported.

    "We haven't seen anything like this since 1945, since the Second World War — that intensity in such a short time, and the massive scale of destruction," Abdallah Al Dardari, regional director for Arab states at the UN Development Programme, said at a press conference.

    Student takeovers and canceled graduations
    Pro-Palestinian student protesters lock arms at the entrance to Hamilton Hall
    Student protesters lock arms at the entrance to Hamilton Hall on the campus of Columbia University in New York City.

    On April 30, dozens of protesters seized Columbia's Hamilton Hall, barricading the doors and hanging a banner reading "Free Palestine" from a window.

    They refused to leave until Columbia met their demands to divest from companies that do business with Israel, provide financial transparency on its holdings, and promise amnesty for protesters.

    NYPD officers carrying riot shields stormed the building, detaining dozens of protesters and clearing out the encampment.

    The academic building has a decades-long history of student occupation during demonstrations over the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights movement.

    Last week, protests at the University of California, Los Angeles, reached a breaking point after counterprotesters attacked a pro-Palestinian encampment with pepper spray and fireworks, prompting university administrators to call in law enforcement. After a tense, hourslong standoff, police in riot gear breached the encampment around 3 a.m. on May 2 and arrested more than 130 demonstrators.

    As tensions continue to escalate between student protesters, law enforcement, and school administrators, US colleges and universities brace for a turbulent conclusion to the school year, moving in-person classes to hybrid or online and increasing security measures at graduation.

    On Monday, Columbia canceled its university-wide commencement ceremony, opting for smaller, school-based ceremonies throughout the campus.

    The move comes after the University of Southern California also canceled its main graduation ceremony following backlash for canceling the commencement speech of its valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, who is Muslim and pro-Palestinian.

    Protesting US involvement in the Vietnam War
    People raise their fists in the air during a protest with a statue in the Boston Common seen in the background
    View of the large crowd that had gathered in front of the State House, at Boston Common, to protest the Kent State University shootings.

    While the recent Gaza protests drew inspiration from past student movements, there are also key differences between them, especially in historical context, size, and level of disruption.

    Five years after the US had entered the war in Vietnam, President Richard Nixon ordered US troops to invade northern Cambodia in 1970, expanding the US' already controversial role in the Vietnam War.

    The announcement, which Nixon made two days after he authorized the Cambodia incursion, sparked waves of outcry throughout the US, which later turned into the largest and most organized anti-war movement in US history.

    Anti-war sentiment on college campuses had already been brewing years before the invasion of Cambodia, but for many, it was the final straw. More than a million students from nearly 900 college campuses across the US participated in anti-war protests, boycotting classes, attacking ROTC facilities, and seizing academic buildings.

    By 1968, Students for a Democratic Society, a radical student activist organization in the US, had grown to more than 100,000 members nationwide, according to the Bill of Rights Institute.

    Student protesters at elite universities like Harvard, Yale, and Columbia condemned the expansion of the war, the draft, and the Nixon administration. In addition to campus protests, thousands of students held hunger strikes, teach-ins, and class walk-outs.

    Peace movement turned deadly
    Ohio National Guard servicemen carry firearms as they move in on rioting students amid clouds of tear gas
    Ohio National Guard moves in on rioting students at Kent State University in Kent, Ohio.

    The student protests at Kent State University in Ohio became a flashpoint of anti-war student protests. The day after Nixon announced the Cambodian campaign, hundreds of students gathered to denounce the war and clashed with local law enforcement.

    The Ohio National Guard was mobilized to the campus the next day to quell the disorder, but by the time they arrived, protesters had set fire to the school's ROTC building.

    A major protest was scheduled for May 4, 1970, and about 100 Guardsmen armed with military rifles were stationed to crack down on the demonstration. The event was initially peaceful, but after Ohio National Guard General Robert Canterbury ordered them to disperse, protesters began throwing rocks and shouting at the soldiers.

    The Guardsmen fired tear gas in a bid to disperse the crowd of protesters but were eventually cornered against the enclosed football field nearby. In the span of 13 seconds, witnesses said the Guardsmen fired nearly 70 shots into the crowd. Four students were killed, and nine were injured.

    In a settlement with injured students and their families, the Ohio National Guard said some of the soldiers feared for their lives, and "hindsight suggests that another method would have resolved the confrontation."

    Less than two weeks after the Kent State shootings, students gathered at Jackson State College, a historically Black university in Mississippi, to protest a number of issues including the Vietnam War and racial discrimination. The demonstration escalated as student protesters and passersby threw rocks and bricks at responding law enforcement, and a civilian set a dump truck on fire.

    In 30 seconds, police discharged over 150 rounds at the crowd of protesters, killing two people — Jackson State junior Phillip L. Gibbs and high school senior James Earl Green. Twelve others were injured.

    Rep. Ilhan Omar, whose daughter was arrested during the Gaza protests at Columbia, recalled the Kent State shootings on the 54th anniversary of the tragedy.

    "We can't silence those expressing dissent, no matter how uncomfortable their protests may be to those in power," Omar wrote in a social media post.

    'Biden's Vietnam'
    US President Joe Biden speaks from the Roosevelt Room of the White House
    US President Joe Biden speaks from the Roosevelt Room of the White House about the ongoing protests on US college campuses.

    US President Joe Biden addressed the ongoing student protests last week, saying they "put to the test two fundamental American principles": the freedom of speech and the rule of law.

    "Dissent is essential to democracy," Biden said in his Thursday remarks. "But dissent must never lead to disorder or to denying the rights of others so students can finish the semester and their college education."

    "There's the right to protest but not the right to cause chaos," the president added.

    The chaos and violence erupting at some university protests have prompted some progressive lawmakers to liken it to the deadly police crackdowns on anti-Vietnam War demonstrations.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders said the president's contradictory Israel policy and response to the student protests "may be Biden's Vietnam."

    Protesting South African apartheid
    Several thousand students jam into Sproul Plaza on the University of California Berkeley campus
    Several thousand students jam into Sproul Plaza on the University of California Berkeley campus protesting the university's business ties with apartheid South Africa.

    While the Vietnam War and now Israel's war in Gaza have left Americans divided on the US involvement in both, the anti-apartheid movement in the 1980s was less polarizing in comparison.

    In the 1970s, progressives in Western democracies openly denounced South Africa's oppressive system of racial segregation under its apartheid regime. However, given South Africa's strategic and economic importance to Western powers, world leaders hesitated to completely sever ties with South Africa, sparking anti-apartheid demonstrations at a grassroots level.

    In the US, student protesters pressured administrators to divest from businesses that supported the South African apartheid by boycotting classes and organizing marches and rallies. They occupied campus buildings, including Columbia's Hamilton Hall in 1985, where 150 students occupied and renamed it "Mandela Hall" after apartheid opposition leader Nelson Mandela.

    Divestment from campus to Congress
    Yale University seniors hold up signs urging the university to divest from South Africa
    Yale University seniors hold up signs urging the university to divest from South Africa during their graduation ceremony in New Haven, Connecticut.

    As a result of community-driven efforts on US college campuses, 155 universities eventually divested from companies with ties to South Africa. The US government followed suit in 1986 when Congress imposed sanctions on South Africa and enacted a divestment policy.

    The calls to divest from South Africa-tied businesses echo the demands of Gaza protesters, who want their universities to stop doing business with companies supporting Israel.

    But public opinion on the Israel-Hamas conflict is not as aligned as it was on apartheid four decades ago, according to Pedro Noguera, who led student anti-apartheid protests at the University of California, Berkeley, in the 1980s.

    "It's really different because there was never a pro-apartheid group we had to contend with," Noguera, now a dean at the University of Southern California, told NPR in an interview. "There is a pro-Israel group, a pro-Zionist group. There are many Jewish faculty and students who see the protest as being antisemitic."

    "I don't see it that way, and I know many Jewish friends and colleagues who don't see it that way," he continued. "The other thing that was different is this group — the ones that have been building these encampments — don't seem to be doing a lot of educating and organizing. And so they're pretty small, and that makes them more easily isolated."

    Protesting against racial discrimination and segregation
    Black students marched through the Kansas University campus holding signs protesting a resolution against civil rights sit-ins
    Sixty Black students marched through the Kansas University campus in protest of a Big Eight student resolution against civil rights sit-in demonstrations.

    The 1960s saw massive demonstrations and activism nationwide against racial discrimination and segregation.

    The civil-rights movement, which lasted from the late 1940s to the late 1960s, was characterized by historic nonviolent demonstrations that ultimately led to the enactment of federal laws guaranteeing equal rights for Black Americans.

    On college campuses, students demanded racial equity in practices throughout the university, including fair admissions practices, more people of color among faculty, and a diverse curriculum.

    Integrated groups of Black and white protesters took over segregated lunch counters and "whites only" cafeterias. Law enforcement was called to respond to the sit-ins but couldn't detain the protesters since they remained peaceful.

    Seizing Hamilton Hall
    Civil rights leader H. Rap Brown converses with the crowd outside the student-occupied Hamilton Hall on the Columbia University campus
    Civil rights leader H. Rap Brown converses with the crowd outside the student-occupied Hamilton Hall on the Columbia University campus in New York.

    During a demonstration at Columbia University in April 1968, students occupied Hamilton Hall in protest of the Vietnam War and the university's plans to build a gym in a park that borders Harlem, mockingly referred to as "Gym Crow."

    More than 80 Black protesters remained in the building and refused to negotiate with university administrators, transforming the building into living quarters and renaming it the "Malcolm X Liberation College."

    A week later, nearly 1,000 police officers arrived on Columbia's campus to disperse the demonstrations. The 86 protesters occupying Hamilton Hall peacefully surrendered, but others violently clashed with officers trying to clear out buildings.

    More than 700 arrests were made — one of the largest mass detentions in New York City history.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • The 6 best Samsung TVs in 2024

    When you buy through our links, Business Insider may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

    An angled view of a Samsung S95D OLED TV on an entertainment console.
    The best Samsung TVs include OLED, QLED, and LED displays across all budgets.

    If you're shopping for a new TV, Samsung should be among the top brands you look at. The company is one of the most popular display manufacturers, and the best Samsung TVs deliver an excellent balance between picture quality and smart features.

    To help narrow your search, we've rounded up the best Samsung TVs you can buy right now. Our top pick is the Samsung S90C, which uses an OLED panel with quantum dots to deliver high contrast and bright colors. Meanwhile, shoppers looking for a budget-friendly display should consider the Samsung CU7000. It can't match the image quality of the company's pricier sets, but it offers a reliable smart TV experience without breaking the bank. 

    Our guide to the best Samsung TVs also has picks for buyers who prefer QLED models, glare-free screens, or 8K displays. We selected our top recommendation based on a combination of hands-on testing and research informed by more than a decade's worth of experience covering home entertainment products.  

    Note: All Samsung TVs we recommend are available in multiple sizes. Most stores let you select different sizes from each model's listing page. Performance may vary slightly depending on the size you choose.

    Our top picks for the best Samsung TVs

    Best overall: Samsung S90C OLED 4K TV – See at Amazon

    Best budget model: Samsung CU7000 Crystal LED 4K TV – See at B&H Photo

    Best high-end QLED: Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 4K TV – See at Amazon

    Best glare-free screen: Samsung S95D OLED 4K TV – See at Amazon

    Best for your wall: Samsung LS03D Frame QLED 4K TV – See at Amazon

    Best 8K display: Samsung QN900C Neo QLED 8K TV – See at Amazon


    Best overall

    The S90C is the best Samsung TV you can buy for the money. In fact, we think it's the best TV you can snag right now from any brand. The display uses an OLED panel with an infinite contrast ratio and quantum dots for better color performance than similarly priced models from LG and Sony. It also boasts a high 144Hz refresh rate when paired with a PC to enable smooth gameplay. 

    Like all Samsung TVs, the display supports the HDR10 and HDR10+ high dynamic range formats, and it looks stunning when playing compatible movies and TV shows. Highlights sparkle from the screen, and the S90C produces deeper, more precise black levels than any of Samsung's QLED models. It also has better viewing angles than a QLED, so you can sit to the side of the TV without seeing any major loss in image quality.

    The screen of the Samsung S90C with a sea turtle point of view.
    The S90C is the best Samsung TV for the money thanks to its QD-OLED panel with excellent color and contrast.

    But while the S90C is fairly bright for an OLED, at a peak of about 1,000 nits, it still can't match the 2,000-nit peak of Samsung's top QLEDs, like the QN90C. However, since the S90C's pixel-level dimming enables much better contrast control than a QLED's backlight, we think this dip in brightness is a more than acceptable tradeoff.

    Buyers should be aware that Samsung now sells a new 2024 version of this TV, called the S90D. We'll be testing the S90D soon, but upgrades are expected to be subtle. Since the new model is significantly more expensive, we think the cheaper S90C remains a better value while supplies last. 

    Read our Samsung S90C 4K TV review

    Note: Samsung's 83-inch S90C does not feature quantum dots, so its screen can't match the color performance of smaller sizes.


    Best budget model

    Samsung excels at high-end TVs, but its entry-level offerings tend to be a bit overpriced for what you get. At least compared to value-friendly options from TCL, Hisense, and Vizio. Though you can get more bang for your buck from one of those companies, the CU7000 is a solid budget pick for anyone set on sticking with the Samsung brand.

    The CU7000 uses a regular LCD panel with an edge-lit LED backlight, and it's missing all the step-up picture quality features you'd find on QLED and OLED models. This means the TV can't produce a wide color gamut, and black levels won't be as deep or uniform across the screen. The display is also one of the dimmest options in Samsung's lineup. It technically supports HDR10 and HDR10+ processing, but it's incapable of showing off the true benefits of those formats.

    On the plus side, the TV does support full 4K resolution for a sharp, clean image, and it plays standard dynamic range content in high definition just fine, so HD cable channels and all of the best live TV streaming services will look exactly like they're supposed to. Viewing angles are mediocre, however, so you'll want to sit at the center of the screen to get the best image. 

    This is a fine entry-level display for casual viewers who just want a capable smart TV and don't care about paying extra for better picture quality. But keep in mind, if you're willing to venture outside Samsung's lineup, you can find TVs with better contrast and color performance, like the Hisense U6K, for just a bit more money.


    Best high-end QLED

    Though we favor Samsung's OLED TVs for their superior contrast, the brand's high-end QLEDs are still impressive premium displays, especially if you need an extra-bright screen in your living room. Samsung's QN90C is easily one of the best QLED TVs on the market, offering a solid step up from the cheaper QN85C and a brighter alternative to Samsung's OLEDs.

    Part of Samsung's "Neo QLED" series, the QN90C uses quantum dots for expanded color, along with a Mini LED backlight. In conjunction with full-array local dimming, the TV's Mini LEDs enable it to produce deep black levels with better contrast and brightness control than a typical QLED TV. 

    However, the QN90C's dimming still isn't as precise as an OLED, so some minor blooming (small halos around bright objects) could appear in certain scenes, particularly sequences with objects like candles. But, compared to cheaper QLEDs, the QN90C gets remarkably close to OLED-level contrast while delivering around 2,000 nits of peak brightness, nearly double what the S90C offers.

    If you don't want one of Samsung's OLED TVs, the QN90C is an excellent QLED alternative. It's best for people who want an especially bright display and never want to think twice about burn-in.

    Buyers should note that Samsung does sell a 2024 edition of this TV, called the QN90D. This model delivered similarly impressive performance during our testing. But it costs a lot more, and its improvements are minimal, so the cheaper QN90C remains a better buy.    


    Best glare-free screen

    Samsung's S95D OLED boasts a new matte screen that significantly reduces glare and reflections in rooms with ambient light. The only other notable TVs with matte screens right now are Samsung's Frame and Hisense's upcoming Canvas TV, but neither of those models can match the S95D's high-end picture performance. 

    During our testing, the screen filter lived up to its claims, nearly cutting down glare entirely. This makes the S95D uniquely suited for bright rooms with lots of lights or windows where distracting reflections can be a problem.

    However, the glare-free coating does cause black levels to look slightly elevated in a bright room, causing the image to lose some of the inkiness that OLEDs are known for. Black levels are still perfect in a dark room, but perceived contrast does take a hit when watching dim scenes with the lights on. 

    A Samsung S95D TV in a living room with a video of rippling water on the screen.
    The Samsung S95D's matte screen can prevent glare and reflections better than any other TV we've seen.

    In addition to its impressive reflection handling, the S95D is the brightest OLED TV we've ever tested. We measured a peak of around 1,700 nits, about 700 nits more than the cheaper S90C. That's a notable increase, and it can make specular highlights and colors pop with a bit more intensity. However, we think the S90C's brightness capabilities are still great for most use cases, and that model remains a better overall value for most needs.

    Like the S90C, the S95D supports up to a 144Hz refresh to get incredibly smooth gameplay when hooked to a PC. The S95D has a slightly more high-end design than the cheaper S90 series, using a separate One Connect Box to house all its HDMI ports. This gives it a uniformly thin profile of just 0.4 inches all the way down.

    Buyers should note that you can still buy the 2023 version of this TV, called the S95C, for a lot less money. But that model can't get as bright and doesn't have the S95D's matte screen. If you're specifically looking for a high-end, glare-free experience, the S95D is the best Samsung TV to get.  

    Read our Samsung S95D 4K TV review


    Best for your wall

    Samsung's Frame TV is an excellent choice for anyone planning to wall mount their display. The unique TV is built to look like a piece of art hanging in your living room.

    The Frame has a black border by default, but you can pay extra to get different bezel colors for the exact picture-frame look you want. Options include white, brown, teak, red, beige, and more. The add-on bezels magnetically snap onto the display for simple installation. 

    Like Samsung's S95 series OLEDs, the Frame TV uses an external One Connect Box to house its video ports, which enables the panel to maintain a one-inch profile from top to bottom. When paired with the included slim-fit wall mount, the TV can be hung flush on your wall, just like a framed work of art.

    A Samsung Frame TV on an entertainment console in a living room with a bird displayed on its screen.
    The Frame looks best mounted on a wall, but it can still be placed on a traditional stand.

    The display uses a matte finish that's similar but not identical to the one used on the S95D. This finish helps prevent reflections and gives the screen a more canvas-like appearance. When you're not watching TV, you can have it enter "Art Mode," which will cycle through various paintings and photographs you can pull from Samsung's Art Store (subscription required) or a USB drive. A built-in motion sensor can even toggle the Art Mode to activate when people are in the room.

    While the Frame's unique design is its main selling point, the TV also benefits from using a QLED panel, albeit without all the bells and whistles that Samsung's best QLEDs have. The Frame can't hit the same peak brightness levels as our high-end picks, and it lacks local dimming for precise contrast control. 

    We don't recommend this TV for anyone focused on picture quality, but it still delivers a nice enough image for casual viewing. The Frame is really geared toward people who want the best Samsung TV that can double as an attractive design piece to hang in a living room, and in that sense, it excels.

    This new 2024 version of the Frame isn't a major upgrade over the previous model, but it's sold for around the same price as the older set. If you can find the 2022 Frame model on sale for less money, it's still a good buy, but when they're around the same price, we recommend snagging this latest edition. 

    Note: The 32-inch Frame TV features a Full-HD 1080p screen rather than a 4K panel.


    Best 8K display

    The QN900 series is the pinnacle of Samsung's QLED TV lineup. It's an 8K TV, which means it boasts four times the total number of pixels as a 4K display, and it uses the company's most advanced Mini LED backlight system. The results are undeniably impressive, even if we still think 8K resolution is unnecessary for most people.

    During our testing, the QN900C peaked at nearly 2,300 nits in Filmmaker Mode, making it one of Samsung's brightest TVs. High dynamic range highlights sparkle, allowing HDR content that's graded with peaks beyond 1,000 nits to come through with extra punch. 

    The TV's local dimming also works exceptionally well to keep black levels deep with minimal blooming. Samsung's OLED models still have an edge here, but the QN900C comes closer to OLED quality in a dark room than any of Samsung's other QLED TVs. Viewing angles are also great for an LCD-based display, with only small shifts in color and contrast when viewing from the side.   

    A Samsung QN900C 8K TV on a table in a dark room.
    Samsung's QN900C is an incredible 8K TV, but we still think most buyers are better off with a cheaper 4K set.

    But while the TV's 8K resolution means it has the potential to provide a sharper image than even the best 4K TVs, there really isn't any 8K content to play. Outside a few YouTube videos, any movies or shows you can watch right now are limited to 4K or HD resolution. This means the TV will simply upscale these videos to 8K. The QN900's upscaling looks good, but we don't think the resolution bump is worth the extra money to most people.

    The perks of 8K resolution are particularly hard to see on displays that are 65 inches or smaller. Instead, 8K benefits are more noticeable on sizes 75 inches and up since 8K's higher pixel density can give images a cleaner appearance on larger screens. 

    The QN900C is one of the best-looking QLED TVs that Samsung offers, but it's not a huge leap over much cheaper 4K QLEDs like the QN90C. And despite having a lower resolution, we think Samsung's OLED TVs provide better overall picture quality thanks to their superior contrast. However, if you're set on purchasing an 8K TV, this is the Samsung model to get.

    A new 2024 edition of this TV, called the QN900D, is available now, too. It also performed great during our tests but delivered very similar performance. Since the QN900C is often on sale for much less than the newer model, we still recommend the QN900C as the better buy. 


    How we test Samsung TVs

    A Samsung QN90D TV on an entertainment console displaying a video of cityscape during the day.
    We evaluate TVs in various lighting conditions using curated demo material and test patterns.

    Our picks for the best Samsung TVs are based on a combination of hands-on testing and research informed by a decade's worth of expertise covering the home entertainment market. Testing consists of several key evaluation points that we use to judge a TV's overall performance and value, including high dynamic range (HDR) quality, brightness, color gamut coverage, contrast, local dimming performance (if applicable), viewing angles, navigation speed, design, and price. 

    When measuring a TV's brightness and evaluating other technical picture quality attributes, we use an X-Rite iDisplay Plus colorimeter with test patterns on the Spears & Munsil UHD HDR Benchmark 4K Blu-ray disc. 

    However, test patterns only show one part of the equation, so we rely on real-world content to see how a TV looks when watching typical programs in bright and dark rooms. Our demo material is selected to feature scenes that show off black levels, highlights, color fidelity, and fine details with 4K Ultra HD, high definition (HD), and standard definition (SD) material. We also use various sources, including streaming services, cable channels, and a 4K Blu-ray player. 

    General usability and design are also considered. We get a feel for living with a TV for a few weeks while using its basic functions and smart TV features. If a TV has slow navigation or is missing key functions, that impacts our assessment, but we place expectations for each model within the context of its price range. 


    Samsung TV FAQs

    An angled view of a Samsung S95D OLED TV with the Tizen interface on screen.
    The S95D OLED is Samsung's new flagship TV for 2024.

    Are Samsung's 2024 TVs worth it?

    Samsung's new line of 2024 TV models is now available to purchase. However, the company's 2023 TVs will remain available as long as stock lasts.

    In many cases, Samsung's 2024 TVs only offer minor performance improvements, and most new sets cost much more than their 2023 counterparts. With that in mind, many 2023 TV models still offer the best value for your dollar. 

    However, there are two notable exceptions. The first is the 2024 Frame TV, which is already selling for the same price as the older Frame TV. If you can find the older model on sale for less, it remains a better buy, but when they're the same price, grab the 2024 edition. 

    The other exception is the new 2024 S95D OLED, our pick for the best Samsung TV with a glare-free screen. Out of all of Samsung's 2024 TVs, the S95D offers the biggest upgrade over its 2023 counterpart, with a 30% increase in brightness and a new glare-free screen that nearly eliminates reflections. That said, the S95D costs about $1,000 more than the 2023 S95C, which is a big price difference. So, if the glare-free feature isn't a key selling point for you, the S95C remains the better value. 

    What kind of TVs does Samsung make?

    Samsung's TV lineup can be best broken down into three categories: OLED, QLED, and Crystal UHD.

    Samsung's OLED TVs use organic light-emitting diode panels capable of self-illuminating pixels. This means they don't need a backlight and can produce perfect black levels and an infinite contrast ratio. Most Samsung OLEDs also use quantum dots, which gives them an expanded color range. On the downside, in extreme cases, OLED TVs are technically susceptible to burn-in, and even the best models can't get quite as bright as top QLED TVs.

    Samsung's QLED TVs use LCD (liquid crystal display) panels with LED backlights and quantum dots. They can't produce the pixel-level contrast and deep black levels of an OLED, but the best models can get brighter, and there's no risk of burn-in. Top Samsung QLEDs, branded as Neo QLED, also incorporate Mini LEDs with full-array local dimming, which enables them to get a lot closer to the contrast performance of an OLED. 

    For more details on how OLED and QLED TVs stack up, check out our full QLED vs. OLED comparison. 

    Finally, Samsung's Crystal UHD TVs use entry-level LCD panels with LED backlights. These displays lack the color, brightness, and contrast capabilities of Samsung's OLED and QLED sets. This series is meant for casual buyers who just want a basic smart TV and don't care about advanced picture quality.

    All of Samsung's different displays are available in multiple sizes, often ranging from as small as 32 inches to as large as 98 inches. For recommendations at various screen sizes, check out our size-specific guides:

    Does Samsung still sell HDTVs?  

    You can still find some older Samsung HDTVs in stock at several retailers, particularly in smaller screen sizes, but the company only has one notable HDTV model in its current lineup: the 32-inch Frame TV.

    HDTVs in 32-inch screen sizes and smaller can still offer decent value for buyers who just want a cheap, compact TV for casual viewing. However, given how affordable entry-level 4K TVs have become, we recommend avoiding HDTV models larger than 32 inches. 

    Are Samsung TVs better than LG TVs?

    Samsung and LG both make some of our favorite TVs, and it's difficult to say that one brand is better than the other. Instead, they both have pros and cons depending on your needs and which specific TV models you're looking at.

    Regarding LCD-based models, the best Samsung TVs are branded as QLED, while LG's are branded as QNED. There are some differences in the panel technology each uses, but they're similar in overall capabilities. Samsung's high-end QLEDs, however, have traditionally had an edge over LG's best QNEDs thanks to their higher brightness and better local dimming performance. But that could change with the release of LG's 2024 QNED 90T, which impressed us with its improvements in contrast control during an early hands-on look. 

    Both companies also sell some of the best OLED TVs, and it's here where the competition gets tougher. Most of Samsung's OLEDs use quantum dots, which gives them an edge in color performance over LG's OLEDs. But LG's top OLEDs, the G3 and G4, use Micro Lens Array technology to boost peak brightness. LG also has more OLED models and sizes, with options for more budgets. 

    And no matter what type of TV you get, it's important to remember that LG's mid- and high-end TVs support Dolby Vision, while Samsung's support the competing HDR10+ format. Both high dynamic range formats offer similar capabilities, with scene-by-scene guidance for displaying contrast and color, but Dolby Vision is used on more streaming services and 4K Blu-ray discs. 

    What smart TV interface does Samsung use?

    Samsung uses a proprietary smart TV interface built using the Tizen operating system (OS). Unlike other interfaces such as Roku OS, Android TV, Fire TV, or Google TV, you won't find Samsung's Tizen platform on other smart TV models or streaming devices. 

    For many years, Samsung's Tizen OS featured a pop-up screen that displayed apps across a horizontal bar at the bottom of the screen, but Samsung updated its interface in 2022. Now, Samsung smart TVs use a full-screen homepage that organizes your favorite services and presents you with content recommendations. There's also a Gaming Hub section that lets you access cloud services like Xbox Game Pass, Nvidia GeForce Now, and Amazon Luna. 

    Samsung's smart TV interface works well across its lineup of TVs and offers access to all of the best streaming services, but it's not the smoothest OS we've used. Even high-end models, like the QN90C and S90C, are prone to hiccups and slight lag when navigating menus and content libraries. 

    Most buyers should be satisfied with Samsung's smart TV performance, and no major services or features are missing. But if you prefer a different interface with slightly snappier navigation, we recommend checking out our guide to the best streaming devices for other options. 

    Are Samsung TVs prone to burn-in?

    Samsung's QLED and Crystal UHD TVs are not susceptible to burn-in, but the company's OLED models can experience this issue in extreme cases. Burn-in occurs if a static image is left on an OLED screen for hours on end — the CNN or ESPN logo in the corner, for example — which can cause a faint, ghostly image to get stuck on the screen.

    Though Samsung OLED buyers should be aware of this risk, OLED TVs have built-in measures to prevent burn-in, including automatic pixel-shift modes and pixel-refreshers. Publications like Rtings have done long-term tests with many OLED TVs, including Samsung's models, and while results do show that burn-in is possible, the tests show that people with regular viewing habits don't need to worry about it. 

    As long as you don't plan on watching CNN all day long, burn-in shouldn't be a factor when deciding whether to buy an OLED TV. But if you tend to watch just one cable channel for several hours daily, you're better off getting one of Samsung's QLED or Crystal UHD models so you don't have to think twice about burn-in. 

    Do Samsung TVs support Dolby Vision?

    Even the best Samsung TVs are missing Dolby Vision support. However, Samsung TVs do support a similar format called HDR10+. Dolby Vision and HDR10+ are both dynamic metadata high dynamic range formats. This means that compatible movies and shows can include specific instructions for how your TV should handle HDR contrast and color on a scene-by-scene basis. 

    This is in contrast to the standard HDR10 format, a static metadata format that can only include one set of instructions for an entire video rather than scene-by-scene details. In practice, Dolby Vision and HDR10+ can deliver a more refined HDR experience with video quality that better matches the specific capabilities of your TV. However, these benefits over standard HDR10 are often very subtle. 

    Though Dolby Vision and HDR10+ both offer similar capabilities, Dolby Vision is supported on more streaming services and 4K Blu-ray discs, which makes it the more desirable of the two formats. 

    Check out our HDR guide for more information about how these formats stack up. 

    Best overall: Samsung S90C
    The screen of the Samsung S90C with a sea turtle point of view.
    The S90C is the best Samsung TV for the money thanks to its QD-OLED panel with excellent color and contrast.

    Pros: OLED with quantum dots for rich colors and infinite contrast ratio, wide viewing angles, 144Hz refresh rate for PC gaming

    Cons: Not as bright as QLED TVs, risk of burn-in in extreme cases

    The S90C is the best Samsung TV you can buy for the money. In fact, we think it's the best TV value you can snag right now from any brand. The display uses an OLED panel with an infinite contrast ratio and quantum dots for better color performance than direct competitors from LG and Sony. It also boasts a high 144Hz refresh rate when paired with a PC. 

    Like all Samsung 4K TVs, the display supports the HDR10 and HDR10+ high dynamic range formats, and it looks stunning when playing compatible movies and TV shows. Highlights sparkle from the screen, and the S90C produces deeper, more precise black levels than any of Samsung's QLED TVs. 

    And though Samsung's high-end QLEDs also have solid viewing angles, the S90C's OLED screen is even better. You can sit far off to the side of the TV without seeing any major loss in image quality. But while the S90C is bright for an OLED, at a peak of about 1,000 nits, it still can't match the 2,000-nit peak of Samsung's top QLEDs, like the QN90C. 

    However, since the S90C's pixel-level dimming enables much better contrast control than a QLED's backlight, we think this dip in brightness is a more than acceptable tradeoff. 

    Read our Samsung S90C 4K TV review

    *Samsung's 83-inch S90C does not feature quantum dots, so its screen is not expected to match the color performance of smaller sizes.

    Best budget: Samsung CU7000
    A Samsung CU7000 Crystal UHD TV in front of a pink and blue backdrop.
    The Samsung CU7000 is a budget TV geared toward buyers who just want a basic display without advanced picture quality.

    Pros: Affordable, tons of screen size options

    Cons: Lacks wide color support, contrast suffers without local dimming, mediocre viewing angles, 60Hz screen can't support high frame gaming modes

    Samsung excels at high-end TVs, but its entry-level offerings tend to be a bit overpriced for what you get. At least compared to value-friendly options from TCL, Hisense, and Vizio. Though you can get more bang for your buck from one of those companies, the CU7000 is a solid budget pick for anyone who's set on sticking with the Samsung brand.

    The CU7000 uses a regular LCD panel with an edge-lit LED backlight, and it's missing all the step-up picture quality features you'd find on QLED and OLED models. This means the TV isn't capable of a wide color gamut, and black levels won't be as deep or uniform across the screen. The display is also one of the dimmest options in Samsung's lineup. It technically supports HDR10 and HDR10+ processing, but it's just not capable of showing off the true benefits of those formats.

    On the plus side, the TV does support full 4K resolution for a sharp, clean image, and it plays standard dynamic range content in high definition just fine, so HD cable channels and all of the best live TV streaming services will look exactly like they're supposed to. Viewing angles are mediocre, however, so you'll want to sit at the center of the screen to get the best image. 

    This is a fine entry-level display for casual viewers who just want a capable smart TV and don't care about paying extra for better picture quality. But keep in mind, if you're willing to venture outside Samsung's lineup, you can find TVs with better contrast and color performance, like the Hisense U6K, for just a bit more money.

    Best midrange QLED: Samsung QN85C
    A Samsung QN85C 4K TV against a green gradient background.
    Samsung's QN85C is the brand's most affordable QLED model with a Mini LED backlight.

    Pros: Good HDR performance, Mini LED backlight for great contrast, solid viewing angles for a QLED, no risk for burn-in

    Cons: Not as bright as Samsung's top TVs, contrast not as precise as an OLED

    The QN85C is an excellent QLED TV for anyone who wants to spend less than $1,500 on a 65-inch set. Though brightness and color volume aren't quite as impressive as Samsung's more expensive QN90C, the QN85C is still part of the company's "Neo QLED" lineup. The Neo QLED branding means that the TV boasts quantum dots for expanded colors and a Mini LED backlight for better contrast control than a typical QLED. 

    This upper-midrange set is ideal for buyers who want to save a little cash without sacrificing HDR quality. Samsung's S95C and QN90C can both get brighter, but make no mistake, this model is no slouch. You still get about 1,000 nits of peak brightness, which is the standard that a lot of HDR content is designed for, and is enough to deliver a punchy image in a living room that lets in a lot of light. 

    Contrast and black levels are strong, but the TV's local dimming performance can't match the pixel-level precision of an OLED TV. On the plus side, the TV has solid viewing angles, which isn't something you see in a lot of QLED models from other brands. 

    However, if you don't mind a narrower viewing angle, you can get more bang for your buck with cheaper Mini LED TVs from other companies, like the Hisense U7K. But the QN85C is the most affordable Mini LED TV that Samsung sells. The next step down in Samsung's lineup, the Q80C, uses a regular LED backlight and has far fewer dimming zones, which leads to less impressive contrast and lower brightness. When it comes to midrange QLEDs, the QN85C is the Samsung model to get. 

    Best high-end QLED: Samsung QN90C
    A Samsung QN90C 4K TV on a desk with the Sonic Frontiers video game on the screen.
    The Samsung QN90C is one of the brand's top Neo QLED models.

    Pros: Brighter than OLED models, Mini LED panel with full-array local dimming, no burn-in risk

    Cons: Contrast can't match an OLED, some blooming visible

    Though we favor OLED TV tech for its superior contrast, QLEDs are still great TVs, especially if you need a bright screen in your living room. Samsung's QN90C is easily one of the best QLED TVs on the market, and it offers a solid step up from the QN85C.

    Part of Samsung's "Neo QLED" series, the QN90C uses quantum dots for expanded color and a Mini LED backlight. In conjunction with full-array local dimming, the TV's Mini LEDs enable it to produce deep black levels with better contrast and brightness control than regular QLED TVs. 

    The QN90C's dimming still isn't as precise as an OLED like the S90C, so you might see some minor blooming (small halos around bright objects) in certain scenes. But, compared to cheaper QLEDs, the QN90C gets remarkably close to OLED-level contrast while delivering nearly double the peak brightness of the S90C and QN85C.

    The TV's high brightness capabilities make it an especially good choice for living rooms that let in a lot of ambient light. It also handles glare well, and unlike last year's QN90B, this model isn't prone to streaking rainbow reflections when light hits the screen at certain angles. And the QN90C has some of the best off-axis image quality you'll find on a TV of this type. 

    If you don't want one of Samsung's OLED TVs, the QN90C is an excellent QLED alternative for people who need an extra-bright display and never want to think twice about burn-in. 

    Best high-end OLED: Samsung S95C
    A Samsung S95C 4K TV on a TV stand in a living room displaying a scene featuring a river and mountains.
    The S95C is delivers the best overall picture quality of any Samsung TV right now.

    Pros: Samsung's brightest OLED, 144Hz panel for high frame rate PC gaming, thin design with One Connect Box

    Cons: Pricey compared to the similar S90C, risk of burn-in in extreme cases

    When it comes to the best image performance you can buy, the S95C is the current king of Samsung's 4K TV lineup. It takes everything we love about the S90C, pumps up the brightness, and packs it all in a thin, flat design. But given its high-end performance, it also comes at an equally high price. 

    Using Samsung's second-gen QD-OLED panel, the S95C manages to deliver a 30% increase in peak brightness over the S90C, with a max of about 1,360 nits. This can make specular highlights and colors pop with a bit more intensity while still offering perfect black levels. 

    Like the S90c, the TV also supports a 144Hz refresh rate versus the 120Hz rate you'll find on typical high-end displays from other brands. This means you can connect a computer to get incredibly smooth gameplay, so long as your PC is powerful enough to output 144 frames per second. 

    But unlike the S90C, the S95C has a uniformly slim profile. Though the S90C is technically slimmer at its thinnest point, that TV protrudes toward the bottom to accommodate all its video ports. The S95C, however, uses a separate One Connect Box to house all of its HDMI ports so that the panel can maintain a profile of just 0.4 inches all the way down. 

    Though we think the cheaper S90C is still a better overall value, the S95C is the best pick for buyers who want high-end OLED performance and a premium design but don't mind paying top dollar to get them.

    Read our Samsung S95C 4K TV review

    Best for your wall: Samsung Frame
    A Samsung 85 inch the frame QLED smart TV.
    Samsung's Frame TV has a matte screen and an art-frame border that make it a wonderful design piece.

    Pros: Unique art-frame design with matte-finish screen, hangs flush on wall, quantum dots for wide color support, customizable bezel options

    Cons: Brightness and contrast can't match Neo QLED and OLED TVs

    Samsung's Frame TV is an excellent choice for anyone planning to wall mount their display. The unique TV is built to look like a piece of art hanging in your living room.

    The Frame comes with a black border by default, but you can pay extra to get different bezel colors for the exact picture-frame look you want. Options include white, brown, teak, red, beige, and more. The add-on bezels magnetically snap onto the display for simple installation. 

    Like Samsung's S95C OLED, the Frame TV uses an external One Connect Box to house its video ports, which enables the panel to maintain a 1-inch profile from top to bottom. When paired with the included slim-fit wall mount, the TV can be hung flush on your wall, just like a framed work of art.

    The display itself uses a matte finish, which prevents reflections and helps give the screen a more canvas-like appearance. When you're not watching TV, you can have it enter "Art Mode," which will cycle through various paintings and photographs that you can pull from Samsung's Art Store (subscription required) or from a USB drive. A built-in motion sensor can even toggle the Art Mode only to activate when people are in the room.

    While the Frame's unique design is its main selling point, the TV also benefits from using a QLED panel, albeit without all the bells and whistles that Samsung's best QLEDs have. The Frame can't hit the same peak brightness levels as our high-end picks, and it lacks local dimming for precise contrast control, but it does have wide color support. 

    We don't recommend this TV for anyone focused on the best picture quality, but it still delivers a nice enough image for casual HDR viewing. The Frame is really geared toward people who want the best Samsung TV that can double as an attractive design piece hanging in their living room, and in that sense, it excels. 

    *The 32-inch Frame TV features a Full-HD 1080p screen rather than a 4K panel.

    Best 8K: Samsung QN900C
    A Samsung QN900C 8K TV on a table in a dark room.
    Samsung's QN900C is an incredible 8K TV, but we still think most buyers are better off with a cheaper 4K set.

    Pros: 8K resolution provides high pixel density for large screens, one of Samsung's brightest TVs, great local dimming performance with Mini LEDs

    Cons: 8K content is virtually nonexistent, the benefits of 8K versus 4K are subtle 

    The QN900C is the absolute cream of the crop of Samsung's QLED TV lineup. It's an 8K TV, which means it boasts four times the total number of pixels as a 4K display, and it uses the company's most advanced Mini LED backlight system. The results are undeniably impressive, even if we still think 8K resolution is unnecessary for most people.

    During our testing, the QN900C peaked at nearly 2,300 nits in Filmmaker Mode, making it one of the brightest TVs on the market from any brand. High dynamic range highlights really sparkle, allowing HDR content that's graded with peaks beyond 1,000 nits to come through with extra punch. 

    The TV's local dimming also works exceptionally well to keep black levels deep with minimal blooming. Samsung's OLED models still have an edge here, but the QN900C comes closer to OLED quality in a dark room than any of Samsung's other QLED TVs. Viewing angles are also great for an LCD-based display, with only small shifts in color and contrast when viewing from the side.   

    But while the TV's 8K resolution means it has the potential to provide a sharper image than even the best 4K TVs, there really isn't any 8K content to play. Outside a few YouTube videos, any movies or shows you can watch right now are limited to 4K or HD resolution. This means the TV will simply upscale these videos to 8K. The QN900's upscaling does look good, but we just don't think the resolution bump is worth the extra money to most people.

    The perks of 8K resolution are particularly hard to see on a 65-inch model, which is why we don't recommend any 8K TVs in our guides to the best 65-inch TVs or best 55-inch TVs. 8K benefits are more noticeable on sizes 75 inches and up since 8K's higher pixel density can give images a cleaner appearance on larger screens.  

    The QN900C is the best-looking QLED TV that Samsung has on offer right now, but it's not a huge leap over much cheaper 4K models like the QN90C. And despite having 4K resolution, we think Samsung's OLED TVs provide better overall picture quality thanks to their superior contrast. However, if you're really set on buying an 8K TV, this is the Samsung model to get.

    How we test Samsung TVs
    The screen of the Samsung S90C showing the Tizen interface.
    Samsung TVs use the Tizen smart TV platform with access to tons of apps.

    Our picks for the best Samsung TVs are based on a combination of hands-on testing and research informed by a decade's worth of expertise covering the home entertainment market. Testing consists of several key evaluation points that we use to judge a TV's overall performance and value, including high dynamic range (HDR) quality, brightness, color gamut coverage, contrast, local dimming performance (if applicable), viewing angles, navigation speed, design, and price. 

    When measuring a TV's brightness and evaluating other technical picture quality attributes, we use an X-Rite iDisplay Plus colorimeter with test patterns on the Spears & Munsil UHD HDR Benchmark 4K Blu-ray disc. 

    However, test patterns only show one part of the equation, so we rely on real-world content to see how a TV looks when watching typical programs. Our demo material is selected to feature scenes that show off black levels, highlights, color fidelity, and fine details with 4K Ultra HD, high definition (HD), and standard definition (SD) material. We also use a mix of sources, including streaming services, cable channels, and a 4K Blu-ray player. 

    General usability and design are also considered so we get a feel for what it's like to live with a TV for a few weeks while using all of its basic functions and smart TV features. If a TV has slow navigation or is missing key functions, that impacts our assessment, but we place expectations for each model within the context of its price range. 

    Samsung TV FAQs
    The smart TV interface displayed on a Samsung S95C OLED resting on an entertainment console.
    Samsung sells OLED (pictured above), QLED, and Crystal UHD (LED) TV models.

    When will Samsung's 2024 TVs be released?

    Samsung revealed its 2024 TV models at the CES trade show in January. However, the company has not confirmed the exact pricing or release dates of each model just yet. But new TVs typically start rolling out to stores in the late spring of every year, so that's when we expect 2024 Samsung TVs to launch.

    Samsung's 2023 TV models will also remain available throughout the year as long as stock lasts. Though the 2024 models will offer some performance improvements, they will likely cost quite a bit more than what Samsung's 2023 TVs are currently selling for. With that in mind, we still recommend picking up a 2023 TV to get the best value for your dollar. 

    What kind of TVs does Samsung make?

    Samsung's TV lineup can be best broken down into three categories: OLED, QLED, and Crystal UHD.

    Samsung's OLED TVs use organic light-emitting diode panels that are capable of self-illuminating pixels. This means that they don't need a backlight and can produce perfect black levels and an infinite contrast ratio. Most Samsung OLEDs also use quantum dots, which gives them an expanded color range. On the downside, in extreme cases, OLED TVs are technically susceptible to burn-in, and even the best models can't get quite as bright as top QLED TVs.

    Samsung's QLED TVs use LCD (liquid crystal display) panels with LED backlights and quantum dots. They can't produce the pixel-level contrast and deep black levels of an OLED, but the best models can get brighter, and there's no risk of burn-in. Top Samsung QLEDs, branded as Neo QLED, also incorporate Mini LEDs with full-array local dimming, which enables them to get a lot closer to the contrast performance of an OLED. 

    Finally, Samsung's Crystal UHD TVs use entry-level LCD panels with LED backlights. These displays lack the color, brightness, and contrast capabilities found on Samsung's OLED and QLED sets. This series is meant for casual buyers who just want a basic smart TV and don't care about advanced picture quality.

    Does Samsung still sell HDTVs?  

    You can still find some older Samsung HDTVs in stock at several retailers, particularly in smaller screen sizes, but the company only has one notable HDTV model in its current lineup: the 32-inch Frame TV.

    HDTVs in 32-inch screen sizes and smaller can still offer decent value for buyers who just want a cheap, compact TV for casual viewing. However, given how affordable entry-level 4K TVs have become, we recommend avoiding HDTV models larger than 32 inches. 

    Are Samsung TVs better than LG TVs?

    Samsung and LG both make some of our favorite TVs, and it's difficult to say that one brand is actually better than the other. Instead, they both have key pros and cons depending on your needs and which specific TV models you're looking at.

    When it comes to LCD-based models, the best Samsung TVs are branded as QLED, while LG's are branded as QNED. There are some differences in the panel technology each uses, but they're similar in overall capabilities. Samsung's high-end QLEDs, however, have an edge over LG's best QNEDs thanks to their higher brightness and better local dimming performance. 

    Both companies also sell some of the best OLED TV models, and it's here where the competition gets tougher. Most of Samsung's OLEDs use quantum dots, which gives them an edge in color performance over LG's OLEDs. But LG's top OLED, the G3, uses Micro Lens Array technology to boost peak brightness. LG also has more OLED models and sizes to choose from, with options for more budgets. 

    And no matter what type of TV you get, it's important to remember that LG's mid- and high-end TVs support Dolby Vision, while Samsung's support the competing HDR10+ format. Both high dynamic range formats offer similar capabilities, with scene-by-scene control over contrast and color, but Dolby Vision is used on more streaming services and 4K Blu-ray discs. 

    What smart TV interface does Samsung use?

    Samsung uses a proprietary smart TV interface that's built using the Tizen operating system (OS). Unlike other interfaces such as Roku OS, Android TV, Fire TV, or Google TV, you won't find Samsung's Tizen platform on any other smart TV models or streaming devices. 

    For many years, Samsung's Tizen OS featured a pop-up screen that displayed apps across a horizontal bar at the bottom of the screen, but Samsung updated its interface in 2022. Now, Samsung smart TVs use a full-screen homepage that organizes your favorite services and presents you with content recommendations. There's also a Gaming Hub section that lets you access cloud services like Xbox Game Pass, Nvidia GeForce Now, and Amazon Luna. 

    Samsung's smart TV interface works well across its lineup of TVs and offers access to all of the best streaming services, but it's not the smoothest OS we've used. Even high-end models, like the QN90C and S90C, are prone to some hiccups and slight lag here and there when navigating through menus and content libraries. 

    Most buyers should be satisfied with Samsung's smart TV performance, and there are no major services or features missing. But if you prefer a different interface with slightly snappier navigation, we recommend checking out our guide to the best streaming devices for other options. 

    Are Samsung TVs prone to burn-in?

    Samsung's QLED and Crystal UHD TVs are not susceptible to burn-in, but the company's OLED models can experience this issue in extreme cases. Burn-in occurs if a static image is left on an OLED screen for hours on end — the CNN or ESPN logo in the corner, for example — which can cause a faint, ghostly image to get stuck on the screen.

    Though Samsung OLED buyers should be aware of this risk, OLED TVs have built-in measures to prevent burn-in, including automatic pixel-shift modes and pixel-refreshers. Publications like Rtings have done long-term tests with many OLED TVs, including Samsung's models, and while results do show that burn-in is possible, the tests show that people with regular viewing habits don't need to worry about it. 

    As long as you don't plan on watching CNN all day long, burn-in shouldn't be a factor when deciding whether to buy an OLED TV. But if you're someone who tends to watch just one cable channel for several hours every day, you're better off getting one of Samsung's QLED or Crystal UHD models so you don't have to think twice about burn-in. 

    Do Samsung TVs support Dolby Vision?

    Even the best Samsung TVs are missing Dolby Vision support. However, Samsung TVs do support a similar format called HDR10+. Dolby Vision and HDR10+ are both dynamic metadata high dynamic range formats. This means that compatible movies and shows can include specific instructions for how your TV should handle HDR contrast and color on a scene-by-scene basis. 

    This is in contrast to the standard HDR10 format, which is a static metadata format that can only include one set of instructions for an entire video rather than scene-by-scene details. In practice, Dolby Vision and HDR10+ can deliver a more refined HDR experience with video quality that better matches the specific capabilities of your TV.

    Though Dolby Vision and HDR10+ both offer similar capabilities, Dolby Vision is supported on more streaming services and 4K Blu-ray discs, which makes it the more desirable of the two formats. 

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • A US ally is forging ties with China’s air force but probably won’t get its J-20 stealth fighter

    China's J-20 stealth fighter is probably not in the offing for the United Arab Emirates Air Force.
    China's J-20 stealth fighter is probably not in the offing for the United Arab Emirates Air Force.

    • The UAE is boosting ties with China's air force.
    • It could be a scheme to increase pressure to buy the US F-35 stealth fighter.
    • The UAE is pursuing a "balancing strategy" between Washington and Beijing, experts said.

    The United Arab Emirates is expanding air force ties with China in what may be a scheme to brighten their dim prospects of acquiring F-35 Lightning II stealth jets from the United States. However, this developing cooperation will not likely result in Abu Dhabi ordering alternative fifth-generation fighters from Beijing.

    Major General Saleh Mohammed bin Mejren Al Ameri, commander of the UAE's Joint Operations, met with the commander of China's People's Liberation Army Air Force on April 23 to promote closer air force cooperation.

    The meeting occurred as the UAE's prospects for acquiring F-35s "may be getting slimmer," according to one analysis. Another even speculated Abu Dhabi may eventually seek China's premier stealth fighter: the fifth-generation J-20 Mighty Dragon.

    The US approved a $19 billion deal to sell 50 F-35s and 18 MQ-4B drones to the UAE in January 2021. However, the deal hasn't materialized amid Washington's growing concern about China's central role in Emirati 5G infrastructure and suspicions that Beijing is establishing a military base there. On the other hand, Abu Dhabi has grown frustrated with American preconditions about the extent of its technical cooperation with China.

    The UAE ordered 80 Dassault Rafales from France in December 2021. It has also bought 12 L-15 trainer jets from Beijing and participated in a joint air force training exercise in China for the first time in 2023. Such moves did little to assuage Washington's concerns about expanding defense ties between China and its Arab Gulf allies.

    Nevertheless, Abu Dhabi's budding ties don't suggest it is replacing its Western military hardware with Chinese alternatives.

    "The main factor to consider here is that, unlike US policymakers, the UAE doesn't see arms purchases from China as a zero-sum deal," Ahmed Aboudouh, associate fellow at Chatham House and head of the China Studies Unit at the Emirates Policy Center, told Business Insider. "Abu Dhabi's first choice would certainly be to acquire the F-35 sale over any Chinese equivalent."

    Aboudouh noted that approaching China to discuss procuring advanced arms is driven by Washington's hesitance to provide Abu Dhabi with alternatives, which the UAE views as "crucial" based on "national security considerations and high regional volatility."

    The French multirole fighter Rafale F3R Marine lands on the tarmac of the Lann-Bihoue French Navy airbase in western France on January 12.
    The UAE has ordered 80 Rafale multirole fighters from France's Dassault Aviation.

    Furthermore, Abu Dhabi wants its "balancing strategy" between Washington and Beijing to pay off.

    Sebastien Roblin, a widely published military-aviation journalist, also sees Abu Dhabi's balancing act in play.

    "The nature of the relationship with the Gulf states and the US is that they nurture secondary ties with China and Russia to create additional pressure on Washington to sell to them, as one might flirt with a third party to attract the jealous attention from a partner," Roblin told BI.

    Both analysts see little significance in the L-15 acquisition and joint exercises.

    "I still see the bilateral relations between the air forces as very superficial and symbolic," Aboudouh said. "Strategic depth in military partnerships takes time to build. I don't see this relationship developing into something similar to what the UAE Air Force has with France or even Russia anytime soon."

    Roblin pointed out that while the L-15s are "respectable advanced trainers sold at a bargain unit price," they lack the benefit of "common systems" with the F-16 and Rafale jets, which Emirati fighter pilots will eventually graduate to fly. Furthermore, the Emirati air force fighter fleet is already large for such a small country, making it unlikely the L-15s will serve any combat role.

    "So the sale, like the common exercises, serves as a warning signal to the US that the UAE may take its money elsewhere," Roblin said. "Of course, there's a risk of that backfiring and convincing Washington it can't be trusted with more advanced US hardware like the F-35 if ties with China grow too cozy."

    Aboudouh believes it's "hard to predict" if the UAE might eventually acquire fifth-generation Chinese aircraft.

    "The main factor at play here is the US vision for its military relations with the UAE," Aboudouh said. "In other words, at a time of extensive debate on a US-Saudi defense pact potentially signed soon, the UAE would be interested in a similar deal. Will the US, in turn, deem signing this deal with Abu Dhabi a strategic necessity to curb Abu Dhabi's expanding military cooperation with Beijing?"

    Roblin also believes the "much-touted" Saudi defense pact could prove pivotal. If the deal is realized and leads to a Saudi F-35 sale, that could "indicate potential" for the UAE finally getting the fifth-generation American aircraft, too, provided it "locks out certain exchanges" with Beijing — such as Chinese radars and aircraft that could expose the F-35's stealth.

    There is also the salient fact that China hasn't exported any stealth fighters and Beijing will not likely offer the J-20 for export. It will likely sell the export version of its lighter J-35, the FC-31, which Pakistan is reportedly interested in procuring, but those haven't entered operational service yet.

    "The UAE also had a stake in Russia's Su-75 'export stealth fighter' pitched prior to 2022, but it doesn't seem appealing between risks of Western sanctions and Russian mass-production issues related to the war in Ukraine," Roblin said.

    He suggested South Korea's KF-21 or Turkey's TF Kaan fighter projects could offer "less geopolitically fraught options" to the UAE. The Emirates is already reportedly interested in investing in the KF-21.

    The UAE would probably not be interested in procuring advanced fourth-generation Chinese fighters either, especially given the enormous Rafale order it just signed.

    Roblin also questioned why the UAE would buy jets like the J-10 and J-16 from China when it already has access to equivalent or superior Western jets like the F-15EX, F-16V, and, of course, the Rafale.

    "Introducing such Chinese aircraft dependent on different weapons and communication ecosystems would be logistically senseless unless there was a broader project to convert to a Chinese fleet," Robin said.

    "But I'm skeptical the UAE would go all-in in that direction."

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • We asked a parasite expert about RFK Jr.’s claim that a worm ate his brain. Here’s what they said.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s claim that a worm ate his brain is most likely not accurate, a parasite expert told BI.
    Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s claim that a worm ate his brain is most likely not accurate, a parasite expert told BI.

    • Did a worm eat Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s brain?
    • The third-party presidential candidate said in a 2012 deposition that a doctor suggested a parasite hurt him.
    • We spoke to an expert, who said a brain-eating tapeworm larvae would be impossible.

    Brain-eating worms? Not likely.

    A shocking report in The New York Times on Wednesday revealed that independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested in a 2012 deposition that doctors had found a dead worm in his brain.

    In the court proceeding — part of his divorce from his second wife — Kennedy said that he had short-term and long-term memory loss, according to The Times.

    Kennedy said he had visited doctors in 2010 who thought he had a brain tumor, but another doctor suggested that a dark spot on Kennedy's brain scan was "caused by a worm that got into my brain and ate a portion of it and then died," The Times reported.

    Kennedy argued in the deposition that he couldn't make as much money due to his health, and also revealed that he had mercury poisoning around the same time.

    Kennedy has portrayed himself as the younger, more healthy alternative to the other two men running for president, Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

    His campaign's press secretary confirmed that Kennedy was infected with a parasite 10 years ago and said it was resolved. His campaign told Business Insider that Kennedy is in "robust physical and mental health" and said questioning his fitness is a "hilarious suggestion, given his competition."

    But could a parasitic worm even cause that kind of damage? One medical expert told Business Insider that Kennedy's version of events doesn't quite add up.

    Dr. Janina Caira, a University of Connecticut professor and tapeworm specialist, told BI that Kennedy's parasite sounds more like the larvae of a pork tapeworm.

    That would be rare, Caira said in an email. Humans can be infected with the adult worm by eating undercooked pork, but can only be infected with the larvae after eating food or drinking water contaminated by the feces of someone with an adult tapeworm infection.

    "This typically happens in areas with poor sanitation," Caira said. "So, it is possible that he could have contracted the infection in South Asia if he came into contact with food or water contaminated with eggs of the tapeworm."

    But there's no way the larvae could have consumed Kennedy's brain tissue.

    "Absolutely not," Caira wrote. 

    She said the larvae don't have mouths or digestive systems. Instead, they absorb nutrients through the surface of their bodies. While Caira said it is possible that a worm could do some "mechanical damage" to nearby brain tissue, the larvae are very small, and a single one "would not cause much damage."

    That lines up with what experts, who were skeptical of the details, told The New York Times.

    However, Dr. Peter Hotez, a pediatrician and global health advocate who is a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology & microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, wrote on X that "neuroparasitic diseases" and "parasitic worms have a huge impact on the human brain."

    Hotez said the diseases are seen in poor populations, with a "surprising amount of illness" in southern states and Texas. He said his team at the National School of Tropical Medicine is working on low-cost vaccines to prevent the conditions.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • How counterfeit Rolexes are produced and distributed, according to an investigator

    Rob Holmes is a private investigator. He works with major luxury-watch brands to track down fakes and stop them from getting to market.

    Holmes speaks with Business Insider about how counterfeits are made in factories overseas. He gives details about how fake luxury goods are trafficked into the United States and distributed to consumers, tells us how the counterfeit industry has evolved with the rise of a new generation of "superfakes," and gives advice about how to spot a counterfeit. He also examines a genuine Rolex and gives tips on how to spot a genuine watch.

    Holmes began investigating counterfeits during his childhood: His father, Rob Sr., was a renowned counterfeit investigator in New York in the 1980s. Holmes describes his dad's encounters with Chinatown gangs and tells Business Insider how he and his brother are carrying on their father's legacy through their investigations business, MI:33.

    Find out more:

    https://linktr.ee/holmespi

    https://mi33.co/

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • An escalating cold war between US and China would be a blow to global growth, IMF official says

    US and Chinese flags
    • A brewing US-China cold war could drag global economic growth down as much as 7%, an IMF official said this week. 
    • The emergence of "connector" countries is why the effect of ongoing tensions hasn't been bigger. 
    • Trade fragmentation carries a higher price tag compared to the US-Soviet cold war, the official said. 

    A more intense cold war between the US and China would have a potentially dire impact on the global economy, according to an official from the International Monetary Fund. 

    Speaking at Stanford University on Tuesday, IMF deputy managing director Gita Gopinath said that while US-China tensions haven't yet devolved into a full-blown cold war, such an escalation would be a major headwind to global growth. 

    The IMF predicts that the global economy could incur economic costs equivalent to as much as 7% of the world's GDP in the worst-case scenario and take a 0.2% hit to growth in milder scenarios. 

    According to the fund, lower-income countries could suffer four times the loss of economic output compared to other nations if commodity markets split into blocs aligned with either China or the US. 

    Conflict between the world's two largest economies has escalated to a new heights since the pandemic. With China's growing economic ambitions and recent aggressions against neighboring countries, the US has put up new guardrails in its dealing with China, including restricting trade in key areas both countries are racing to dominate, such as AI.

    IMF data shows that more than 3,000 trade restrictions were imposed globally in 2022 and 2023, more than triple the count from 2019, with Gopinath saying that trade within the China and US blocs has dropped compared to intra-group trade.

    The tensions have also dented flows of foreign capital to China, with the country suffering its first foreign investment deficit in November 2023 and seeing further declines in the first three months of 2024. 

    The emergence of "connector" countries, which have acted as neutral go-betweens for the US and China, may be the reason the impact of tensions hasn't been greater. 

    "The emergence of these 'connector' countries—perhaps most notably Mexico and Vietnam—may have helped cushion the global economic impact of direct trade decoupling between the U.S. and China," Gopinath said. 

    Zooming out, Gopinath highlighted that geopolitical instability in regions like the Middle East and turmoil stemming from the Russia-Ukraine war has sparked trade turbulence unseen since the Cold War. 

    The IMF emphasized that trade fragmentation carries a higher price tag today, with the goods trade-to-GDP ratio now at 45% compared to 16% at the onset of the Cold War.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • US Marines debuted new amphibious combat vehicle, which was previously pulled out of the water after multiple rollovers

    US Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicles conduct open water transit
    US Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicles conduct open water transit during Exercise Balikatan 24 in Palawan, Philippines.

    • The US Marines' new amphibious combat vehicle made its first overseas deployment in the Philippines.
    • US and Philippine troops conducted drills in the South China Sea to strengthen security in the region.
    • The service temporarily suspended ACV operations following multiple rollovers in 2022.

    The Marine Corps' new amphibious combat vehicle, or ACV, debuted in the Philippines as part of its first overseas deployment after more than a year-and-a-half of limited operations.

    Marines aboard ACVs launched from amphibious ships in the Pacific on Saturday to conduct live-fire training in the Philippines, the service said in a statement. The Marine unit involved in the training was the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, or MEU, a unit out of Camp Pendleton, California, which deployed this spring for partner exercises across the Pacific.

    The ACV was involved in multiple rollovers in 2022, which did not result in any injuries or deaths then, but the Corps temporarily pulled the vehicles from service to better train Marines in operating them. Amid the preparation for its deployment to the Pacific this year, a Marine was killed in an on-land ACV rollover incident in December.

    "The hard work and dedication of our Marines is what made today's training successful," Col. Sean Dynan, commanding officer of the 15th MEU, said in a statement Saturday. "Today's training is a proof of concept across the Marine Corps for successful ACV employment in its intended environment."

    A US Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicle splashes off the amphibious dock landing ship USS Harpers Ferry
    A US Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicle splashes off the amphibious dock landing ship USS Harpers Ferry (LSD 49) during Exercise Balikatan 24 in Palawan, Philippines.

    The deployment of the vehicle occurred during Exercise Balikatan '24, which involved US training with the Philippine military meant to build the partnership and counter Chinese influence in the region.

    A platoon of ACV Marines left the USS Harpers Ferry and attacked targets along the shore of Oyster Bay, Philippines, with MK19 grenade launchers. After wrapping up the attack, the ACVs reembarked aboard the Harpers Ferry.

    In 2022, the vehicle rolled over twice on land, which prompted the Marine Corps to pull the ACV from surf operations while it recertified crews to operate it. Late last year, a Marine with the 15th MEU, Sgt. Matthew Bylski, died after the vehicle rolled over on land during an exercise to prepare for the unit's current deployment.

    The following month, after the Corps said it had recertify its crews, the assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. Chris Mahoney, announced that the ACV was again operating in the surf and the 15th MEU would be deploying with them to the Pacific.

    US Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicles conduct a towing exercise during Exercise Balikatan 24 in Palawan, Philippines.
    US Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicles conduct a towing exercise during Exercise Balikatan 24 in Palawan, Philippines.

    The new ACVs can deploy from amphibious ships, travel across the water and take beachheads. It replaced a decades-old platform that had a troubled history, including a 2020 incident that resulted in the deaths of eight Marines and one sailor.

    That vehicle, called the amphibious assault vehicle, or AAV, had been used since the 1970s. It was lighter and had tracks, different from the wheeled ACV, which weighs roughly 70,000 pounds when fully loaded.

    The 15th MEU is deployed as part of the Boxer Amphibious Ready Group, or ARG, which includes the Harpers Ferry and USS Somerset.

    Part of the 15th MEU's deployment in April was met with trouble due to the readiness of the USS Boxer, the ARG's namesake. After suffering engineering issues, the Boxer returned to San Diego, causing Marines and sailors to be offloaded so repairs could be made.

    The Boxer had already been delayed by months, Military.com previously reported, due to maintenance issues.

    Editor's note: this story has been updated to correct the name of the amphibious combat vehicle.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Cybertruck owner calls for trend of sticking body parts in the frunk to end after his finger wound up in a splint

    Joseph Faye Tesla frunk
    Cybertruck owner Joseph Fay injured his finger after deliberately allowing the frunk to close on his finger.

    • A Tesla owner posted a video trying out the new Cybertruck frunk update by closing it on his finger.
    • The experiment led to his finger getting hurt and ending up in a splint.
    • The video follows a trend of testing the frunk's safety by closing it on body parts, which isn't advisable.

    Tesla owner Joseph Fay said the trend of sticking body parts in the Cyberfrunk frunk to test if it'll close on them needs to end, following an experiment that left his finger in a splint.

    Fay stitched a video of a Cybertruck owner closing the frunk on his finger and initially tried out the trend himself prior to the update, which was said to improve the sensor. He placed his arm, hand, and finally finger in the frunk. The frunk left him sore the first time but didn't make a major impact, he said.

    After receiving comments that he pointed his finger upward, which may have prevented the frunk from crushing it, Fay said he decided to retry the video with the new update.

    @jf.okay Replying to @kcow like this so i can pay for my medical bills please. #tesla #cybertruck ♬ original sound – TeslaTok

    https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js

    Fay was heard struggling in the video and yelling "ow" as he tried to remove his finger from the frunk. The next shot in the video showed him with a splint on his finger. He said the whole trend of sticking body parts inside Tesla's frunk should stop.

    "We can kind of cancel that now," Fay said in the video. "I think we can end that. Big thumbs down."

    Fay told BI he didn't go to the doctor after he hurt his finger, but he probably should have. He said a previous video showing the wound was removed by TikTok. Business Insider viewed two videos that showed the injured finger, including one with a clear opening in the skin that appeared to extend down to his tendon. In the current version, viewers can see a less graphic version of a deep dent on both sides of his finger.

    "The first couple days, I couldn't move my finger at all and I had it in that splint," Fay told BI. "The past couple days, I've had it out and could move it around but it's very tender."

    The original video came from Tesla vlogger Jeremy Judkins, who tested out the new Cybertruck update by closing the frunk on his finger, leaving it with a dent and a small skin tear. Others have since tried out the experiment, with one user testing it with a pinky.

    After making the video, he released a follow-up saying a Tesla engineer had told him about a new algorithm with the update that makes it close harder each attempt after it senses an obstruction.

    Fay said he didn't realize there was an algorithm that made the frunk close harder when it senses resistance. The Cybertruck owner said he closed the frunk on multiple items off-camera before eventually trying his finger.

    "Unfortunately when I tried my finger, it was at max strength," Fay said.

    Fay said he regrets putting his finger in the frunk and said the biggest lesson is that no one should put anything they don't want breaking in the way of something automatic.

    "It got a lot of views and earned a little bit of money," Fay said. "But at the sacrifice of my finger, no I am not glad I did it."

    Judkins, whose video of the finger test initially went viral, told BI he didn't mean to start a trend and made the original video as a "little experiment." While the update made it safer, Judkins concluded in his video that it still wasn't fully safe for a finger — and abstained from trying it again.

    Tesla has a warning in the owner's manual that says to "use caution around the panel edges on Cybertruck," including the powered frunk. The manual states "neglecting to follow the correct opening procedure for front and rear doors can lead to injury."

    Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

    Read the original article on Business Insider