A Manhattan jury found Donald Trump guilty of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels, making him the first US president to be convicted of a felony.
Category: Business
-
Guilty Trump says ‘real verdict’ will be on election day
Read the original article on Business Insider -
OpenAI board members brush off warnings from ex-directors and defend Sam Altman as ‘highly forthcoming’
Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley left OpenAI when Sam Altman returned as CEO. Microsoft
- Two former OpenAI board members warned about CEO Sam Altman and AI safety in an op-ed in The Economist.
- Two current board members wrote a response pushing back on the concerns.
- The current members pointed to OpenAI's new safety committee and Altman's support for regulation.
This has been the week of dueling op-eds from former and current OpenAI board members.
Current OpenAI board members Bret Taylor and Larry Summers issued a response to AI safety concerns on Thursday, stating that "the board is taking commensurate steps to ensure safety and security."
The response comes a few days after The Economist published an op-ed by former OpenAI board members Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley, who criticized CEO Sam Altman and OpenAI's safety practices while calling for a need to regulate AI. The title of the piece argued that "AI firms mustn't govern themselves."
Taylor and Summers, the two current members, pushed back against the former directors' claims in a response that was also published in The Economist. They defended Altman and discussed OpenAI's stance on safety, including the company's formation of a new safety committee and a set of voluntary commitments OpenAI made to the White House to reinforce safety and security.
The pair said that they had previously chaired a special committee as part of the newly established board and set up an external review by law firm WilmerHale of the events leading to Altman's ousting. The process entailed reviewing 30,000 documents, along with dozens of interviews with OpenAI's previous board, executives, and other relevant witnesses, they added.
Taylor and Summers reiterated that WilmerHale concluded that Altman's ousting "did not arise out of concerns regarding product safety or security" or "the pace of development."
They also took issue with the op-ed's characterization that Altman had created "a toxic culture of lying" and engaging in psychologically abusive behavior. In the last six months, the two current board members said they had found Altman "highly forthcoming on all relevant issues and consistently collegial with his management team."
In an interview published the same day as her op-ed, Toner explained why the former board previously decided to remove Altman, saying that he lied to them "multiple times" and withheld information. She also said that the old OpenAI board found out about ChatGPT's release on Twitter.
"Although perhaps difficult to remember now, Openai released Chatgpt in November 2022 as a research project to learn more about how useful its models are in conversational settings," Taylor and Summers wrote in response. "It was built on gpt-3.5, an existing ai model which had already been available for more than eight months at the time."
Toner did not respond to a request for comment ahead of publication. OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment.
OpenAI supports "effective regulation of artificial general intelligence" and Altman, who was reinstated only days after his ousting, has "implored" lawmakers to regulate AI, the two current board directors added.
Altman has been advocating for some form of AI regulation since 2015, more recently saying he favors the formation of an international regulating agency — but he's also said he's "super nervous about regulatory overreach."
At the World Government Summit in February, Altman suggested a "regulatory sandbox" where people could experiment with the technology and write regulations around what "went really wrong" and what went "really right."
OpenAI has seen multiple high-profile departures in recent weeks, including machine learning researcher Jan Leike, chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, and policy researcher Gretchen Krueger. Both Leike and Krueger vocalized safety concerns following their departures.
Leike and Sutskever, who is also a cofounder of OpenAI, were the co-leads of the company's superalignment team. The team was tasked with researching the long-term risks of AI, including the chance it could go "rogue."
OpenAI dissolved the superalignment safety team before later announcing the formation of a new safety committee.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Trump and Biden agree: November will decide the ex-president’s fate
Biden and Trump both said it call comes down to who Americans vote for in November. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images; Justin Lane-Pool/Getty Images
- Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records related to a hush-money payment.
- The verdict made Trump the first-ever US president to also be a convicted felon.
- Still, both Biden and Trump said it all comes down to the 2024 presidential election.
President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump agree on at least one thing: it all comes down to the November election.
Trump on Thursday became the first-ever former US president to become a felon when a New York jury found him guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a hush-money payment made to Stormy Daniels.
Trump has decried the verdict and insisted he is a "very innocent man." But as far as the 2024 presidential election goes, he was fundraising off the verdict right after it was delivered.
"This was a disgrace. This was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge that was corrupt," Trump told reporters outside the Manhattan courtroom, adding that the "real verdict is going to be November 5 by the people."
Biden seemed to agree that despite the guilty verdict, the only way to stop his 2024 challenger was by voting.
"There's only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office: At the ballot box," Biden said in a post on X shortly after the conviction.
A statement from the Biden campaign reiterated that message, adding, "Today's verdict does not change the fact that the American people face a simple reality."
"Convicted felon or not, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president," the campaign said.
Legal experts previously told Business Insider that even if Trump did get convicted of the hush-money felonies, the odds he would actually go to jail were slim to none.
Even if Trump were to go to prison, the Constitution doesn't necessarily stop people from running for president from behind bars.
Trump's sentencing date is scheduled for July 11, just four days before the Republican National Convention.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Here’s what every member of the Trump family is up to after leaving the White House
From left to right: Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Tiffany Trump at the 2020 Republican National Convention. Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images
- Donald Trump, who is running for president again, was just found guilty in his hush-money trial.
- Melania Trump did not attend his trial but has supported his campaign at private events.
- Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner bought homes in Florida and launched the Abraham Accords Caucus.
Since leaving the White House in 2020, Donald Trump and his family have remained powerful political figures.
Trump is the presumptive Republican nominee in the 2024 presidential election. On Thursday, Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts in his hush-money trial involving a $130,000 payment to adult film actor Stormy Daniels.
Here's a look at what Trump's family members have been doing since his presidency.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Biden remains silent after Trump verdict, but his campaign underlined the brutal months ahead of the election
President Joe Biden has said little about former President Donald Trump's historic Manhattan criminal trial. Getty Images
- President Joe Biden's campaign broke his silence on Thursday about Trump's Manhattan trial verdict.
- Biden and his campaign had been mostly mum about Trump's historic trial.
- The verdict marks a major moment ahead of a brutal fall campaign season.
President Joe Biden on Thursday was mostly muted in responding to the historic news that his predecessor is now the first American president to be convicted of a felony.
The White House offered a perfunctory statement to reporters but otherwise avoided the sweeping presidential statement that some had hoped Biden would issue once the verdict in former President Donald Trump's Manhattan criminal trial was in.
"We respect the rule of law, and have no additional comment," White House Counsel's Office spokesperson Ian Sams said in a statement to the White House press pool.
On the other hand, Biden's campaign showed that it may increasingly lean into the reality that one of the two major parties will put forward a convicted felon as its nominee.
"Donald Trump has always mistakenly believed he would never face consequences for breaking the law for his own personal gain," Michael Tyler, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, said in a statement. "But today's verdict does not change the fact that the American people face a simple reality. There is still only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office: at the ballot box. Convicted felon or not, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president."
Minutes after a Manhattan jury delivered 34 guilty charges against Trump, Biden's campaign posted a fundraising link on X urging people to donate to the incumbent Democrat.
"There's only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office: At the ballot box," the post said.
The president's campaign stressed the heightened "threat" they say Trump poses to American democracy.
"He is running an increasingly unhinged campaign of revenge and retribution, pledging to be a dictator 'on day one' and calling for our Constitution to be 'terminated' so he can regain and keep power," the spokesperson said. "A second Trump term means chaos, ripping away Americans' freedoms and fomenting political violence — and the American people will reject it this November."
Biden had previously been reticent to comment directly on Trump's legal struggles, even though the former president's criminal indictments have shaped the course of the 2024 race. Politico reported that last year, Biden directed the White House, the Democratic National Committee, and his reelection campaign to largely avoid commenting on Trump's legal cases.
"I've had a great stretch since the State of the Union. But Donald has had a few tough days lately. You might call it stormy weather, Biden said during the White House Correspondents' Dinner, one of the few oblique the president has made to Trump's trial.
In recent days, Biden's campaign has signaled that deference to the justice system is shifting. The president's reelection campaign literally went there, hosting a news conference right outside the Manhattan courthouse. Biden's campaign tapped actor Robert De Niro and two Capitol police officers to speak to reporters, but none of them directly referenced the historic trial taking place behind them.
"We're not here today because of what's going on over there," Biden campaign communication director Michael Tyler told reporters, according to the Associated Press. "We're here today because you all are here."
Biden's campaign also started selling a "Free on Wednesdays" shirt when the president outlined his plan for general election debates, referencing the trial's weekly day off. Trump was required to be present for his trial, which limited his ability to campaign during the week.
Trump's legal issues have overshadowed the 2024 race. Top Republicans began rallying around Trump following the FBI's August 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago and never really stopped as local and federal prosecutors ultimately unveiled four criminal indictments against him. Trump and his campaign also embraced his image as a criminal outlaw, hawking merchandise with his Fulton County, Georgia, mugshot.
But the general election raises new potential risks for Trump. Polling shows voters don't agree with Trump's claim that the trial is a sham. Voters have also responded that they believe Trump did something wrong.
The verdict comes just weeks before Trump and Biden square off in history's earliest televised major presidential debate. It is almost certain that Trump's legal issues will come up again there.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Trump’s sentencing is set for July, but he won’t face consequences anytime soon, legal expert says
Donald Trump walks out of the courtroom at the conclusion of his hush-money trial at Manhattan Criminal Court on May 30, 2024 in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
- A jury found Donald Trump guilty of all 34 felony counts in the New York hush-money trial.
- The judge scheduled Trump's sentencing hearing for July 11.
- But it could take months, maybe over a year, until Trump faces any consequences, legal expert says.
A Manhattan jury found Donald Trump guilty of all 34 felony counts in the hush-money criminal trial concerning a clandestine payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
What comes next? Delays, delays, delays.
The judge, New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, set Trump's sentencing hearing for July 11 at 11 a.m. ET.
In that hearing, Trump could face up to a four-year prison sentence for each count.
But don't expect Trump to face any of those consequences before the election.
It will likely be months, maybe even more than a year, before the former president needs to address them, Alex Reinert, a criminal and constitutional law expert from Cardozo School of Law, told Business Insider.
"I think we can expect months, a year, more than a year of potential delays," Reinert said. "It's hard to predict at the outset, but it's going to take some time."
The main reason for delays is because Trump's defense team can be expected to appeal the jury's decision. And there's a number of reasons they can seek to fight the verdict, Reinert said.
The attorneys can raise issues with the jury instructions that were given by Justice Merchan, evidentiary issues, or even challenge whether the Manhattan District Attorney's office attempted to use New York state law to prosecute a federal campaign violation, Reinert said.
"I don't know if any of these arguments will ultimately have merit, but I think these are all potential," he said.
With an appeal, which can come after Trump's sentencing, Reinert said it's almost certain that any sentence will be stayed pending the appeal, meaning Trump won't have to face the consequences until the appeal is resolved.
Reinert added that there are plenty of people who are sitting in prison today as they wait on the status of their appeal but that's highly unlikely to happen given the nature of the crime and who the defendant is: a former and running president.
"I'd be shocked if that happens here," Reinert said. "Shocked because of who the defendant is, and I think there's a tendency to treat crimes like this differently than crimes of violence."
Read the original article on Business Insider -
You can run for president from prison as a felon. Here’s what happened when 2 candidates campaigned from behind bars.
Left: E.V. Debs, portrait bust. Right: Right-wing politician Lyndon H. LaRouche attending a press conference. HUM Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images/Steve Liss/Getty Images
- The Constitution doesn't stop candidates from running for president while serving jail time.
- Two previous candidates, Eugene V. Debs in 1920, and Lyndon LaRouche in 1992, both ran from prison.
- If Trump is convicted, it's still possible he could run for president from behind bars.
Former President Donald Trump was found guilty on Thursday of all 34 criminal counts related to a hush-money payment made to porn star Stormy Daniels. It's the first time a former president has been convicted of a felony. With sentencing scheduled for July 11, Trump could face prison time. But as the presumptive Republican nominee in the 2024 presidential race, could Trump still run for office from behind bars?
Legal experts told Insider there's nothing in the Constitution preventing him from doing just that.
Michael Gerhardt, a constitutional law professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law in Chapel Hill, said: "If he happens to be in prison at the time of the next presidential election, the fact that he's in prison will not prevent him from running."
Running for president from jail isn't exactly unprecedented — it's been done twice before.
Socialist Eugene V. Debs ran from behind bars over 100 years ago
The socialist party 1904 Eugene V. Debs and Ben Hanford. HUM Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
In 1920, Socialist Eugene V. Debs ran for the Oval Office from the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary, where he was known as "prisoner 9653," according to Smithsonian Magazine. Debs was a so-called "radical" at the time, decrying capitalism and the World War I draft. The latter got him locked up, but Debs earned plenty of supporters during his imprisonment. He had also run for president on the Social Party ticket five prior times, often campaigning what historians attributed as more a symbolic race.
On election night in 1920, Debs didn't make a speech, and instead, he wrote a statement, the Washington Post reported.
"I thank the capitalist masters for putting me here," he wrote, according to The Post. "They know where I belong under their criminal and corrupting system. It is the only compliment they could pay me."
Debs ended up earning about 3.5% of the national vote for president, Smithsonian Magazine reported.
Fringe candidate Lyndon LaRouche tried for the Democratic Party nomination and then switched tickets
Atlanta: Lyndon LaRouche at a press conference at the Viscount Hotel. Getty Images
Over 70 years later, another convicted candidate ran for the president from jail: political fringe and conspiracy theorist Lyndon LaRouche.
LaRouche was no stranger to campaigning — he ran in every election from 1976 to 2004 — but his 1992 campaign from federal prison garnered particular attention.
USA Today reported in 2019 that in the lead-up to the 1992 election, LaRouche was behind bars serving a 15-year sentence for committing mail fraud and campaign fraud conspiracy, the latter involving $30 million in loans from supporters that prosecutors said LaRouche had never attempted to repay. But that didn't stop him from seeking out the Democratic Party nomination.
When Bill Clinton won the primary, LaRouche switched to the National Economic Recovery ticket, campaigning on overhauling the world's financial and baking systems. He ultimately received over 26,000 votes in the election, about 0.02% of the popular vote.
Beyond his economic viewpoints, LaRouche's other beliefs often played into conspiracy theories and apocalyptic visions about the world, Reuters reported in 2019. He had a variety of confounding views of the AIDS crisis —including that it was first spread by the International Monetary Fund — and believed the Holocaust was "mythical," Reuters and USA Today reported.
What would it look like for Trump to campaign from prison?
Then President Donald Trump stands in front of Mount Rushmore. Alex Brandon/File/AP
While Debs and LaRouche were both unsuccessful in their campaigns, they were still able to run for president while behind bars. Their supporters, running mates, and parties spread the word, bolstering their messages when they couldn't.
And support for Trump, who announced his 2024 campaign late last year, is still surging. Recent polling puts him well ahead of his GOP rivals, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.
But how Trump navigates his bolstering legal challenges could determine how successful his campaign is.
Earlier this year, Trump was charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a 2016 payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels. Months of witness testimonies to a New York grand jury, including some by Trump's former fixer Michael Cohen, spoke to the decade-long timeline between Trump, Daniels, and the $130,000 payment he said was made ahead of the 2016 election.
And in the past few months, Trump was hit with an initial and superseding indictment in Miami related to his handling of classified documents. In June, the Justice Department's special counsel Jack Smith brought 37 counts against him, and according to the indictment, accused Trump of violating the Espionage Act 31 times by illegally holding onto sensitive national security documents, conspiring to obstruct justice, lying to law enforcement, and violating three different statutes related to withholding and concealing government records.
Then, in late July, a superseding indictment added three additional charges against Trump.
And just Monday, Fulton County DA Willis hit Trump with his greatest legal threat yet, with Georgia prosecutors alleging he and 18 other defendants plotted to overturn the state's 2020 presidential election results. In particular, the most significant of the 28 charges against the former president are under the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, which carries a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.
In all of these cases, the timeline for a trial isn't entirely clear, and it's possible they could occur after the 2024 election.
But if convicted, Trump "would be subject to the same rules as other prisoners, which could restrict their communications and ability to appear at events," Barbara McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan and a former US attorney, previously told Insider. "He would need to rely on proxies to campaign for him."
But he could still run. And, if he wins the nomination and the presidency in 2024, Trump may well test a presidential power that's never been needed before: a self-pardon.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Historical photos capture the strength of Asian American activism and its impact throughout US history
American Citizens for Justice rally for Vincent Chin after his murder. Corky Lee's Asian America: Fifty Years of Photographic Justice; Courtesy of the Estate of Corky Lee
The term "Asian American" was first coined in 1968 amid the rising voices of the Third World Liberation Front student movements in California.
With tensions from protests against the Vietnam War and calls for universities to invest in ethnic studies programs, the Asian American identity was born out of advocacy for multiethnic unity among the Asian diaspora. The new identity also became a form of resistance against the otherness of being labeled as "Orientals" and fighting back against US imperialism in Asia.
Historical photographs showcase the history of Asian American resistance movements from the 1960s to the 1980s, demonstrating the strength and resilience of the Asian American community among tenants, students, and laborers.
The impassioned fight for justice depicted in the photos contrasts the societal stereotype of the obedient and subservient Asian. They also remind us of the civil rights and labor rights won by Asian Americans with the sheer power of the collective.
Delano Grape Strike (1965)
Cesar Chevez's Huelga Day March in San Francisco, 1966; (l/r) Julio Hernandez (UFW officer), Larry Itliong (UFW director), Cesar Chavez (NFWA founder). Gerald French/Corbis / Getty Images
One of the most important labor movements in US history was the Delano Grape Strike, a collaborative effort between Filipino American and Mexican American farm workers in California.
On September 8, 1965, Filipino-American farm workers, members of the Agricultural Labor Organizing Committee, walked out and declared a strike against Delano-area table and wine grape growers in Bakersfield, California.
They demanded a raise in their hourly wage from $1.25 to $1.40 and in the pay rate per packed box of grapes from 10 cents a box to 25 cents.
Pickets gather at edge of grape field here to urge workers to join strike but these two ignored the call. The word "Huelga" is Spanish for strike. Bettmann/Getty Images
Labor organizers of the Agricultural Labor Organizing Committee enlisted the help of the National Farm Workers Association, and in 1966, the two unions merged to form the United Farm Workers.
For the next five years, Filipino and Mexican American workers continued to strike for economic justice for all farm workers.
In his statement before the US Senate Subcommittee on Migratory Labor in 1966, Cesar Chavez, a labor organizer with the National Farm Workers Association, said the "whole system of occupational discrimination must be killed just like the discrimination against people of color is being challenged in Washington."
"This, and nothing more, is what farmworkers want," Chavez added.
Grape pickers carry American flags and National Farm Workers Association banners as they march along a road from Delano to Sacramento to protest their low wages and poor working conditions. Ted Streshinsky Photographic Archive / Getty Images
Third World Liberation Front Strikes (1968)
The Third World Liberation Front strikes ignited the first Asian American activist movement.
Held at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1968, the five-month strike was led by a coalition of student groups demanding ethnic-focused courses be added to the university's curriculum.
As police move in, student strikers and supporters start to run in Berkeley, California, after trying to disturb a meeting of the University of California Regents in the building at left. Slava J. Veder / AP Photo
Though initiated by the Black Student Union, the coalition was made up of African-American, Asian-American, Latin-American, and Native-American students. These students were unified not only through their shared colonial and imperial struggles across Asia, Africa, and Latin America but also their experiences as people of color in a predominantly white, Eurocentric institution.
A student reads from an informational packet during a demonstration at the UC Berkeley campus. Garth Eliassen/Getty Images
During the strikes, the students conducted large rallies, teach-ins, sit-ins, and picketing on the campus. In response, the university called the police, and riot squads began mass arrests of students.
The same year, Yuji Ichioka and Emma Gee, both graduate students and key organizers of the Asian American Political Alliance, coined the term "Asian American." This term was created to "unify Asian ethnicities together based on their shared experiences under Orientalist US racism."
In 1969, the first Asian American studies curricula were established at the UC Berkeley, San Francisco State University, and the University of California, Los Angeles.
Protests Against the I-Hotel Evictions (1977)
A crowd of protestors marched and chanted outside the International Hotel before evictions. Dave Randolph for the San Francisco Chronicle / Getty Images
International Hotel, or I-Hotel, in San Francisco's Kearny Street was a residential hotel for older Filipino and Chinese people, immigrant workers, and families who had been there since they immigrated in the 1920s.
With real estate development rapidly growing in the late 1970s, what was once a 10-block stretch of Manilatown was reduced to a single block anchored by I-Hotel.
At 3 a.m. on August 4, 1977, the San Francisco police went in and staged a mass eviction of the I-Hotel residents. At least 3,000 residents confronted 400 riot-geared police outside the building. Over 100 tenants and supporters barricaded themselves inside the building. Police broke into the windows of apartments and removed the remaining older tenants.
Sheriff Richard Hongisto used a sledge hammer to knock open the door to a tenant's apartment at the International Hotel during evictions. Terry Schmitt/San Francisco Chronicle / Getty Images
With the last vestige of Manilatown destroyed after the building was demolished in 1979, community members and supporters of the former I-Hotel residents continued to resist local real estate developers. Organizations such as the Chinatown Community Development Center and the Manilatown Heritage Foundation formed as a result of the community's efforts to fulfill social needs and fight for grassroots housing for their fellow residents.
Emil de Guzman, tenants association secretary, resist while being dragged from the second floor of I-Hotel. Terry Schmitt/San Francisco Chronicle / Getty Images
Garment Worker Strikes (1982)
One of the largest protests in New York City's Chinatown history took place in 1982 when 20,000 garment workers went on strike.
Whispers of striking spread among the workers, predominantly young Chinese immigrant women. They no longer tolerated the low wages, little to no benefits, dangerous working conditions, and long hours.
Chinese immigrant women ply their trade in a Chinatown garment factory. Poor working conditions and low wages propelled these garment workers to go on strike. Bettmann / Getty Images
In late June, they crowded Columbus Park and made their demands, and their employers signed the new International Ladies Garment Workers Union contract. With the help of city councilmen, local businesses, and community advocates, the garment shop employers began to sign the contract. They managed to get the signatures of every manufacturer by mid-afternoon.
Despite the swiftness and scale of the strike, May Chen, one of the ILGWU strike organizers, said she believes the strike's success remained "invisible up to the millennium" given the limited media coverage on Asian American communities and issues at the time.
Members of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union Local 23-25, stand on 5th Avenue during the Labor Day parade. Walter Leporati / Getty Images
Conviction of Chol Soo Lee (1982)
Chol Soo Lee, a 21-year-old Korean immigrant, was wrongfully convicted of first-degree murder in 1974 after a local gang member, Yip Yee Tak, was shot to death in Chinatown.
After being misidentified by eyewitnesses, Lee was sentenced to life in prison.
Chol Soo Lee at San Quentin State Prison, where he was imprisoned for a decade. John O'Hara/San Francisco Chronicle / Getty Images
K.W. Lee, founder of the Korean American Journalists Association, brought Lee's case to public attention. After investigating the case, he was convinced of Lee's innocence and began a series of writings advocating for his freedom.
This caught on with Asian Americans nationwide, and the "Free Chol Soo Lee Defense Committee" was created. The committee raised more than $120,000 to support Chol Soo's appeal of his initial murder conviction. The collective effort of Lee's supporters won him a retrial, which successfully led to the overturning of his murder conviction.
Supporters of Chol Soo Lee at the Hall of Justice. Jerry Telfer/San Francisco Chronicle / Getty Images
After spending a decade in prison, Lee spent the next 30 years working as a union organizer and advocate for the Asian American community.
"When you go through that kind of experience, and you see inhumane acts of violence … going through that brings out deeper humanity and compassion for other people," Lee said in a 2008 interview with Asian Week.
Murder of Vincent Chin (1982)
Vincent Chin was murdered on the night of his bachelor party at the age of 27. Courtesy of The Estate of Vincent and Lily Chin
On the night of his bachelor party on November 2, 1983, Vincent Chin, then 27, was brutally beaten to death by two white men in Detroit.
Chin, who was Chinese-American, was targeted by the men who blamed Asians for job losses in the American auto industry amid the success of Japanese automakers.
Ronald Ebens and Michael Nitz denied the attack was racially motivated and were charged with manslaughter after pleading to a second-degree murder charge. They left with three years of probation and a $3,000 fine and did not spend a single day in jail.
The judge presiding over the trial said Ebens and Nitz "aren't the kind of men you send to jail … You fit the punishment to the criminal, not the crime."
Activist and founder of American Citizens for Justice, Helen Zia, at Vincent Chin Rally, Detroit, 1983. Photo by Victor Yang; Courtesy of Vincent and Lily Chin Estate
As a result of this sentencing, Asian Americans in Detroit protested the sentence and denounced the city's legal system. A second investigation was initiated by the Department of Justice and the FBI after mass mobilization.
In 1983, a federal grand jury ruled that the attack against Chin was racially motivated and found Ebens guilty, sentencing him to 25 years in prison.
Chin's murder contributed to the landmark passing of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which expanded federal civil rights protections to safeguard American minorities against hate crimes.
American Citizens for Justice rally for Vincent Chin after his murder. Corky Lee's Asian America: Fifty Years of Photographic Justice; Courtesy of the Estate of Corky Lee
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Can Trump still run for president after being convicted? Yes.
Former US President Donald Trump. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
- Former President Donald Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts in New York.
- Now a convicted felon, he is also the presumptive Republican nominee for president in 2024.
- A presidential candidate can still run for office despite being convicted of a crime.
Donald Trump is now officially a convicted felon. But can he still become president?
Short answer: Yes, according to the Constitution.
A New York jury convicted the former president on 34 felony counts on Thursday, reigniting a wave of questions about what it means for his 2024 presidential campaign.
A presidential candidate can, indeed, still run for office despite being convicted of a crime, according to the US Constitution.
Article II of the constitution lays out the requirements for any presidential candidate: They must be at least 35 years of age, they must have resided in the US for at least 14 years, and they must be a natural-born US citizen.
The Constitution does not bar presidential candidates who have been charged or convicted of crimes.
In fact, the Constitution does not even disqualify presidential candidates who are incarcerated, legal experts previously told Insider.
Two presidential candidates — Eugene Debs in 1920 and Lyndon LaRouche in 1992 — ran for the Oval Office from behind bars, though neither won. Debs had been serving time in a federal prison for violating the Espionage Act, and LaRouche had been convicted of committing mail fraud and campaign fraud conspiracy.
The jury found Trump guilty on all 34 felony charges of falsifying business records ahead of the 2016 election to cover up an alleged affair with adult film star Stormy Daniels.
The jury's decision to convict Trump makes him the first former president in US history to be convicted of a felony. Trump has denied the affair and any wrongdoing, saying he's a "very innocent man" and that he's been targeted by his political foes.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Costco says it’s not ready to raise its $60 membership fee — for now
Costco last raised its membership fees in 2017. Shoshy Ciment/Business Insider
- Costco still won't raise its membership fee, saying it's still a matter of when, not if.
- The wholesale club last raised fees in 2017, and about every five years before that.
- Membership fees represent more than half the company's operating income.
Costco is once again kicking the can on raising its membership fee.
"I would really kind of revert back to some of the comments that Richard shared previously," CFO Gary Millerchip told investors Thursday, referring to his predecessor, Richard Galanti, who said last year that a Costco membership fee increase would "happen at some point."
"There's nothing about anything that we see within how the business is performing that's changing our view on that," Millerchip said.
The wholesale club last raised fees in 2017, and analysts have noted that an increase is long overdue, based on the typical five- to six-year interval of prior hikes.
Because Costco sells merchandise at extremely low mark-ups, membership fees are a key way the company is able to turn a profit.
Costco reported nearly $1.1 billion in revenue from membership fees last quarter, representing more than half its operating income.
Costco now boasts nearly 134 million member cardholders, up 7.4% from a year ago, and said more than 90% of members renew each year.
The company has resisted a fee increase in favor of alternatives like encouraging entry-level members to upgrade and last year's Netflix-style crackdown on shoppers improperly sharing membership cards.
"It's something that is still a case of when we increase the fee, rather than if we increase the fee, but we're still evaluating those considerations to determine what the right timing is," Millerchip said.
In addition, a fee increase would put Costco's $60 basic Gold Star membership even more ahead of competitors BJ's Wholesale and Sam's Club, who charge $55 and $50, respectively.
Read the original article on Business Insider