A landslide struck Papua New Guinea in the middle of the night May 24, burying thousands and destroying six villages.
Category: Business
-
Massive landslide buries 6 villages in Papua New Guinea
Read the original article on Business Insider -
A big F-16 donation to Ukraine comes with a major condition
A Belgian F-16 fighter jet during the visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Belgium, on May 28, 2024 in Brussels, Belgium. Didier Lebrun/Photonews/Getty Images
- Belgium will send 30 F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine, however it must avoid use over Russia.
- Zelenskyy has emphasized Ukraine's need for enhanced air defenses against Russia.
- The F-16s are part of a $1 billion aid package, with delivery over four years.
Belgium agreed to send 30 US-made F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine as long as they aren't flown within Russian territory.
"F-16 jets will be provided to Ukraine as soon as possible. Our aim is to be able to provide first aircraft before the end of this year, 2024," Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo announced Tuesday while hosting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Everything which is covered by this agreement is very clear, it is for utilization by the Ukraine Defense Forces on Ukraine['s] territory."
Zelenskyy has been vocal about Ukraine's need for improved air defenses against Russia and to rebuild its air force battered from two years of war. The 30 F-16s will be delivered over the course of the next four years as part of a promised $1 billion aid package from Belgium, boosting Ukraine's future fleet to an estimated 85 F-16s.
The total number is important because Ukraine is expected to lose many F-16s in what may be its most dangerous battlefield in five decades of flying.
In addition to defending Ukraine's airspace, F-16s customized with long-range missiles can improve Ukraine's strike capacity — a useful step as Kyiv tries to halt Moscow's momentum on the battlefield.
"Our task is to use the first F-16 on the battlefield this year and in such way fortify our positions," Zelenskyy said.
Netherlands, Denmark and Norway have previously offered up dozens of F-16s to support Ukraine. The US Air Force is also training Ukrainian pilots to fly them.
Ukraine could still strike into Russia from its own airspace with the F-16, but the usage restriction limits the plane from deeper attacks and the sight of a US-made plane overflying Russian land; the US has imposed similar caveats on other weapons.
While Ukraine awaits the gradual flow of military aid from the US and other allies, Russia's summer offensive has kicked off.
Ukraine's current air defense deficiencies have allowed Russia to launch continuous barrages of deep strikes beyond Ukraine's lines.
Experts from the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington DC-based think tank, have noted that Russia may have started its offensive too early and lacks the adequate manpower on its front lines needed to "conduct a successful operation to envelop, encircle, or seize Kharkiv City."
Despite Russia's soldier shortage, Ukraine continues to struggle to make up for its own manpower and resource deficits.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
The IRS has failed to police the huge tax breaks offered by Puerto Rico, whistleblower claims
A whistleblower says the IRS hasn't been policing the abuse of tax breaks offered to new residents of Puerto Rico. Maridav/Getty Images
- The IRS's probe into the abuse of a Puerto Rican tax benefit has made little progress, a whistleblower said.
- In a letter reviewed by The New York Times, the insider says that less than 1% of beneficiaries were audited.
- The tax break allows new residents of Puerto Rico to be exempt from local taxes on investment profits.
A whistleblower claims that the Internal Revenue Service has not done enough to stop the exploitation of a Puerto Rico tax break, The New York Times reported.
According to a letter written by an IRS insider, the agency's three-year campaign to uncover abuse of a tax benefit has failed to make much headway. Fewer than 1% of beneficiaries have been audited, yielding no taxes, the whistleblower said.
"My understanding is that no assessments have been made by any office nationwide for a campaign that has been open for three years," the letter said.
The NYT-reviewed document has sparked a Senate investigation, and lawmakers are now urging the enforcement campaign to pick up speed.
The IRS' high-profile operation centers on a 2012 tax break that allows new Puerto Rican residents to not pay local taxes on investment income made when residing on the island. Such benefits are common on the island territory, offered to entice wealthier Americans and corporations to move there.
While on the surface this benefit would seem easy to apply — it's chiefly determined by where the investor lives — complications arise when an investment made outside of Puerto Rico leads to a profit after the residents move to the island.
For instance, if a business was started in the mainland US and sold after its owner settled on the island, the tax benefit should only apply for the years lived in Puerto Rico. However, concerns have risen that investors are ignoring this and exempting the entirety of their profits.
The IRS opened its probe into the issue after the 2020 indictment of Gabriel Hernandez, an accountant accused of offering to help wealthy Americans exploit the 2012 tax break, Bloomberg reported. Hernandez has pleaded not guilty.
However, according to the whistleblower's letter, few enforcement actions have actually been taken against those who may be abusing the benefit.
For instance, the IRS will typically send out "soft letters" to any scrutinized beneficiaries, encouraging them to voluntarily fix any potential issue with their taxes. Yet, the agency hasn't issued any soft letters, the whistleblower said.
"This is completely absurd in light of the amount of tax dollars at issue," the insider wrote.
In an interview with NYT, IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel acknowledged that no soft letters were sent, but highlighted the dozens that have been audited. He also said that the campaign was still in an early phase and that momentum is growing after the agency received $80 billion in new funding from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
"We're still coming out of our period of underinvestment, and we are still building muscle that atrophied," IRS commissioner Danny Werfel told NYT.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
I live with my partner in a 399-square-foot tiny home on wheels that cost $90,000. Take a look inside.
We prefer owning a tiny home on wheels instead of paying to rent an apartment. Destiny DeJesus
- My wife and I live in a tiny home on wheels that cost us $90,000.
- Moving the home and downsizing our stuff was tricky, but it's been worth it.
- Our space has tons of storage, an office, a bedroom, a living room with a guest bed, and more.
My wife and I couldn't afford the constant apartment rent increases in our city, so we started looking for a tiny home at the end of 2021.
On Christmas Eve that year, we drove from Las Vegas to Los Angeles to look at a 30-foot-long house on wheels that was for sale. We completely fell in love with the idea of a space on wheels since we didn't know where we wanted to permanently settle down and we like to travel. We bought the house for $90,000.
In March 2022, we hired movers to bring the home from Los Angeles to Portland, Oregon. We then witnessed how stressful it is to see your home on the highway. It was a long moving process, but we think it was worth it.
Take a look inside our tiny home and our journey to get it set up.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
OpenAI’s former executive Jan Leike joins its rival Anthropic days after quitting over safety concerns
OpenAI has been hit with several resignations recently NurPhoto/Getty Images
- Ex-OpenAI exec Jan Leike joined rival AI company Anthropic days after he quit over safety concerns.
- Leike, who co-led OpenAI's Superalignment team, left less than two weeks ago.
- It comes as OpenAI has been hit with a wave of resignations from employees recently.
OpenAI's former executive Jan Leike announced he's joining its competitor Anthropic.
Leike quit OpenAI less than two weeks ago and announced his departure on X, formerly Twitter. He accused the ChatGPT maker of putting "shiny products" ahead of "safety culture and processes."
Leike co-led OpenAI's Superalignment team alongside cofounder Ilya Sutskever, who also resigned. The team was tasked with ensuring superintelligence doesn't go rogue and has since been dissolved, with remaining staffers joining the core research team.
In addition to defecting to competitor Anthropic AI, which Amazon invested $4 billion in, Leike also called for potential recruits to join him at his new employer.
In a post on X Tuesday, Leike said, "I'm excited to join @AnthropicAI to continue the superalignment mission! My new team will work on scalable oversight, weak-to-strong generalization, and automated alignment research. If you're interested in joining, my dms are open."
Anthropic was founded by former OpenAI employees and siblings Dario Amodei and Daniela Amodei in 2021. Amazon has a minority ownership stake in the company, which has attempted to position itself as more safety-conscious than its rivals. The company previously said it will use Amazon Web Service's cloud servers and chips to train and power its large language models.
Jan Leike did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
OpenAI has been hit recently with a small wave of departures. In addition to Leike and Sutskever resigning, a few other employees have recently quit the firm. Last week, policy researcher Gretchen Krueger announced in a thread on X that she resigned on May 14. She said that she shared some of the concerns voiced by others.
OpenAI announced on Tuesday that it has set up a safety committee, which is being overseen by all of its board members: chair Bret Taylor, CEO Sam Altman, Nicole Seligman, and Adam D'Angelo. The company also revealed that it's starting to test its "next frontier model."
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Chipotle customers are roasting the chain for its portion sizes — and filming their orders in hopes of getting more food
Some Chipotle customers are trying to record employees to document how much protein they get in their orders. Gregory Rec/Portland Press Herald via Getty Images
- Some TikTokers are recording their orders being made at Chipotle in hopes of getting more food.
- The so-called "phone hack" originated with complaints that the chain is serving smaller portions of protein.
- Chipotle said it hasn't made any changes to its portion sizes.
This year's burrito season at Chipotle is closing out with a controversy.
Some customers say that the restaurant chain famous for its bowls of meat, cheese, and guacamole isn't as generous with its portions as it used to be. In response, they're pulling out their smartphones as Chipotle employees add chicken al pastor, steak, or another one of their preferred proteins to their order.
Smaller portions of meat were one of the issues that influencer Keith Lee pointed to in an early May post on TikTok. In the video, Lee samples multiple Chipotle items, including a bowl he ordered with chicken al pastor.
For several seconds, Lee searches the bowl for a piece of chicken with his fork as tense music from the gameshow "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" plays over the video.
Lee rates the bowl a "two out of 10," citing factors including the small protein portion. "This was $12 or $13," Lee says in the post. "I only got four pieces of chicken."
Lee previously helped popularize ordering a steak quesadilla with fajita veggies and a side of honey vinaigrette mixed with sour cream. Chipotle later made the item a formal part of its menu.
After Lee's video, other TikTokers started recording employees as they prepared their Chipotle orders to see if they would get bigger portion sizes than if they hadn't whipped out their phone.
It's not clear that the so-called "phone hack" works, though.
One poster on TikTok headed to a Chipotle restaurant to try it out.
His conclusion: "I really don't think there's any difference in this," he said while showing his bowl. "Maybe a little more chicken than usual."
He did point to another issue: The portion of chips he received was small, the poster said, and they were cold. "Chipotle needs to step it up," he says in the video.
"There have been no changes in our portion sizes, and we have reinforced proper portioning with our employees," Chipotle Chief Corporate Affairs and Food Safety Officer Laurie Schalow told Business Insider. "If we did not deliver on our value, we want our guests to reach out so we can make it right."
Customers "can vocalize or digitally select their desired portions" when ordering, Schalow said in a statement. Chipotle hasn't given employees instructions on what to do when customers start filming, a spokesperson added.
The chain has also defended itself in a more lighthearted way on TikTok, posting its own video featuring a sea of customers holding their phones up near the ordering counter at a restaurant.
Do you work or dine at Chipotle and have a story idea to share? Reach out to this reporter at abitter@businessinsider.com
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Lucid CEO says Tesla is ‘losing its way’
Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson took a dig at Tesla during an interview with BBC. Noam Galai/Getty Images for TechCrunch and Apu Gomes/Getty Images
- Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson criticized Tesla in a recent interview.
- Rawlinson, a former Tesla engineer, said that Tesla has lost its way.
- The executive said that "there's a clear distraction there from leadership."
Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson isn't a fan of Tesla's recent trajectory under Elon Musk.
Rawlinson, who served as a chief engineer at Tesla from 2009 to 2012 before joining Lucid in 2013, said that Tesla seems to have lost its sense of purpose during an interview with BBC's Wake Up to Money that aired Monday.
"Tesla was truly at the cutting edge developing the most advanced technology with a clarity of vision and purpose and an absolute singularity of mindset," Rawlinson said of his time at the EV company. "And what I'm seeing now is I'm seeing a worrying trend towards a sort of distraction."
The Lucid CEO said he feels Tesla is "losing its way" and doesn't have the same sense of purpose it once did. While Rawlinson did not directly say Elon Musk by name, he said that "there's a clear distraction there from leadership." He also mentioned things that line up with Musk's actions in recent years, appearing to allude to the Tesla CEO's purchase of Twitter and politics.
"There's an interest in social media, even politics, and it's kind of losing its way. I don't see it having that singular sense of purpose, and I think it really falls to Lucid to take the technology to a whole new level now," Rawlinson said.
Rawlinson is far from the first to question Musk's focus on Tesla. Since Musk acquired Twitter in 2022, some Tesla investors have questioned his commitment to the electric carmaker. After all, Musk is directly involved in at least six different companies.
While Rawlinson told BBC that Lucid is "many years ahead" of other automakers, including Tesla, when it comes to some of its technology, the company has only a fraction of the market share compared to Tesla. Lucid only delivered about 6,000 vehicles in 2023. Tesla delivered more than 1.8 million.
Both automakers have faced headwinds in recent months due to slumping EV sales. Over the past month, Tesla initiated a series of layoffs, and on Wednesday, Lucid kicked off a round of job cuts as well, slashing its workforce by 6%.
Lucid declined to comment further when contacted by Business Insider. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment ahead of publication.
Rawlinson and Musk have traded barbs on social media in the past. In 2021, Musk said Rawlinson was "never chief engineer."
"He arrived after Model S prototype was made, left before things got tough & was only ever responsible for body engineering, not powertrain, battery, software, production or design," Musk posted on X in 2021.
Rawlinson told Axios at the time that Musk's view of his role was an example of "historical revisionism."
Do you work for Tesla or have a tip? Reach out to the reporter via a non-work email and device at gkay@businessinsider.com or at 248-894-6012
Read the original article on Business Insider -
Jimmy Carter said his wife, Rosalynn, was ‘my equal partner in everything I ever accomplished.’ Here’s a timeline of their 77-year relationship.
US President Jimmy Carter and first lady Rosalynn Carter dance at a White House Congressional Ball in 1978. Universal History Archive/Getty Images
- Jimmy Carter and Rosalynn Carter were married for 77 years before her death in November 2023.
- It makes them the longest-married presidential couple in US history.
- They were both from Plains, Georgia, and knew each other since Rosalynn was a newborn.
Jimmy Carter was 3 years old and Rosalynn Smith was a baby when they met for the first time.
They were the longest-wed presidential couple in history, married for 77 years until Rosalynn Carter's death on November 19 at the age of 96.
"The best thing I ever did was marrying Rosalynn," the former president said in a 2015 interview at his nonprofit, The Carter Center, shared by C-SPAN. "That's the pinnacle of my life."
"Though we faced extraordinary responsibilities and lived a life we could have never, ever dreamed of, we are first and always Rosalynn and Jimmy Carter from Plains, Georgia," Rosalynn wrote in her 1984 autobiography, "First Lady From Plains."
In February 2023, Jimmy Carter, now 99, entered hospice care at their home in Plains, Georgia, where they've lived since 1962. The Carter Center announced in November that Rosalynn died at home surrounded by friends, family, and her husband.
Here's a timeline of the Carters' relationship.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
In a baffling closing argument, Trump attorney Todd Blanche used DA’s evidence against his own client
Donald Trump at his New York hush-money trial, where his lawyer, Todd Blanche, delivered closing arguments Tuesday. Christine Cornell via AP, Pool
- In closings Tuesday, defense lawyer Todd Blanche tried the classic " but if he did do it" defense.
- If Trump did falsify documents, he didn't do it with the required criminal intent, Blanche argued.
- He then showed jurors 3 prosecution exhibits where Trump admits to the hush-money reimbursement.
It's the classic defense closing argument: My client didn't do it, ladies and gentlemen — but if he did do it, it wasn't intentional.
This is the argument that Donald Trump's lawyer, Todd Blanche, tried out on the hush-money jury in Manhattan on Tuesday.
Yes, Blanche spent the bulk of his argument denying that Trump committed the charges he's on trial for
Prosecutors say Trump falsified 34 business records to hide a year's worth of reimbursement payments to his then-attorney, Michael Cohen, who had fronted a $130,000 hush-money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.
Trump was not involved with any such conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, Blanche told jurors in great detail on Tuesday, during a three-hour summation.
But if he was, there was no requisite intent, Blanche argued. How could there be, he asked, when Trump freely admitted to reimbursing Cohen?
Blanche then showed the jury three exhibits from the prosecution's own case.
Each exhibit — showing a tax form, a tweet, and a government ethics form — was shown on the courtroom's display screens.
Each bolsters the prosecution's case: that Trump knew full well that the $130,000 he paid Cohen in installments throughout 2017 was for reimbursement, not legal fees as his business- record entries falsely claimed.
"The government has to prove to you that President Trump caused these entries — even if they were false — with an intent to defraud," Blanche told jurors.
"Where is the intent to defraud on the part of President Trump?" the lawyer asked the jury.
Prosecutors must demonstrate Trump had an intent to defraud in order to prove first-degree falsifying business records, the state charge that Trump allegedly violated 34 times throughout 2017, including when he personally signed nine of Cohen's reimbursement checks.
Here are the three exhibits that Blanche displayed in court for jurors as "proof" that Trump had nothing to hide.
1. A 1099 tax form from 2017
The Trump Organization — and Trump as an individual — reported that they'd paid Michael Cohen a total of $420,000 in 2017.
Prosecutors say this is the sum Trump's then CFO, Allen Weisselberg, calculated for what Cohen would be paid as reimbursement for his hush-money outlay, plus taxes and other money Trump owed him.
-
Why would Trump announce these payments to the IRS "if there was some deep-rooted intent to defraud on the part of President Trump?" Blanche asked jurors.
Manhattan district attorney's office/BI
Manhattan district attorney's office/BI
2. A 2018 tweet
On May 3, 2018, Trump posted a somewhat garbled tweet that concedes the payments he'd made to Cohen throughout 2017 were, in his word, "reimbursement."
An incriminating tweet Manhattan district attorney's office/BI
This tweet was made just five months after signing the last of nine $35,000 checks to Cohen. Each check was labeled "RETAINER."
3. A government ethics form
Also during closing arguments, Blanche showed jurors what's called an "Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report" for the year 2017. This was the then-president's mandatory disclosure of his assets and liabilities .
-
Under "Liablities" — which is the section where Trump must list the money he's borrowed — Trump certified that in 2017, he "fully reimbursed" Cohen an interest-free sum of between $100,000 and $250,000.
"President Trump tweeted what happened when it came out," and then signed a government ethics form that also admitted to the reimbursement, Blanche told jurors Tuesday.
"That's not evidence of any intent to defraud," Blanche said.
The defense lawyer spent most of his summation impugning the credibility of Cohen, whose testimony is key to the prosecution case.
Cohen is "literally like an MVP of liars," Blanche told jurors. Two jurors — a woman in the front row and a man in the back row, smiled when Blanche went on to call Cohen "The 'Gloat'" — for Greatest Liar of All Time."
Deliberations are expected to begin on Wednesday.
Read the original article on Business Insider -
‘Total joke’: Josh Hawley’s bid to win labor support just backfired
Sen. Josh Hawley rallied with striking UAW members last year. They're still backing his likely Democratic opponent, Lucas Kunce. AP Photo/Reed Hoffmann; Drew Angerer/Getty Images
- GOP Sen. Josh Hawley has positioned himself as a populist ally of workers.
- That's included rallying with striking auto workers with the UAW last year.
- But the UAW just backed his likely Democratic opponent, Lucas Kunce, while calling Hawley a "joke."
In recent years, Sen. Josh Hawley has sought to position himself as populist Republican and a staunch ally of organized labor.
That's included rallying with striking auto workers in his home state of Missouri last September, courting support from labor unions, and even voting against a recent GOP-led effort to overturn a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board.
Despite those moves, the United Auto Workers are endorsing Democrat Lucas Kunce over Hawley as the Missouri Republican seeks reelection this year.
"Josh Hawley calling himself pro-worker is a total joke. There is only one candidate in this US Senate race who has earned the trust of Missouri autoworkers, and that's Lucas Kunce," said Fred Jamison, President of the UAW Region 4 Midwest States Cap Council, in a statement first shared with Business Insider.
A spokesperson for Hawley did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.
Kunce, a self-styled populist Democrat who also ran for Senate in 2022, is likely to prevail in the August 6 primary. Observers generally consider the race to lean Republican, though organizers are hoping to put a constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights on the ballot this November — a move that could drive Democratic turnout.
"I'm honored to have the support of UAW in this race," Kunce said in a statement to Business Insider. "The only way we'll put Missouri and America first in the next generation of industry is by investing in and empowering workers like them. In the US Senate, I'll fight like hell for them. Let's pass the PRO Act and Make Shit In America Again!"
Hawley has made some pro-worker moves in recent years, including voting to give seven extra days of paid sick leave to rail workers during a looming strike in December 2022 and supporting a $15 minimum wage for workers at companies that generate more than $1 billion in annual revenue.
The Teamsters, one of the country's largest labor unions, contributed $5,000 to Hawley's reelection campaign in April. They also gave $45,000 to the Republican National Committee — along with the same amount to the Democratic National Committee — and have seemingly considered endorsing former President Donald Trump.
But Hawley previously supported right-to-work laws, and he remains opposed to the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, a top priority of organized labor. The Democratic-backed bill is designed to strengthen workers' ability to form unions.
"I'm not a huge fan of the PRO Act," Hawley told Business Insider in September. "My worry would be that it might, you know, hurt workers more than it helps."
He went on to say that "we can have a debate about" the bill, but that the "real question" is whether certain jobs will remain in the US at all.
"If you want to talk about how to divide up a shrinking pie, I suppose we can do that," said Hawley. "But why don't we think about how we get more pie for labor in this country?"
Hawley has also criticized public sector unions, which account for slightly less than half of all union members in the US and include teachers and police officers.
"I just think that public sector unions for a long time have held government hostage, held vital government services for people hostage, and that's different," Hawley told the Kansas City Star in October. "But when you're talking about private sector unions that are trying to get folks bargaining power, these multinational corporations, particularly in the last 30 years, they're really less and less tied to this country and less and less tied to American workers."
Read the original article on Business Insider