• Venezuela Rejected by U.S. Supreme Court in Citgo Stake Clash

    Venezuela Rejected by U.S. Supreme Court in Citgo Stake Clash(Bloomberg) — The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal by Venezuela in its fight to retain control of oil refiner Citgo Holding Inc., putting the country a step closer to losing its largest asset.The justices, without comment on Monday, left intact a federal appeals court victory for a defunct Canadian gold mining company seeking to force the sale of Citgo’s parent company. The gold miner, Crystallex International Corp., is trying to collect a $1.4 billion arbitration award, most of which remains unpaid.The rebuff leaves Venezuela at risk of losing a much-needed source of revenue in Citgo. The country’s opposition leader, Juan Guaido, has been fighting to safeguard the assets since taking control of Citgo as part of his power struggle with President Nicolas Maduro.Crystallex is seeking compensation for Venezuela’s 2011 takeover of the company’s gold mining operations near Las Cristinas. Crystallex won in arbitration in 2016, and a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court ruled last year that the shares could be seized to satisfy the award. The gold miner must still secure a U.S. Treasury Department license before the shares could be auctioned.Crystallex is the furthest along of a group of creditors, including oil company ConocoPhillips, that are eyeing the shares of Citgo’s parent company, PDV Holding Inc.Venezuela and its national oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela SA, asked the Supreme Court to review the appeals court ruling, saying it conflicts with a federal sovereign immunity law. Crystallex urged the Supreme Court not to hear the case.The case is Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Crystallex, 19-1049.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

    from Yahoo Finance https://ift.tt/2yYM7hi

  • How Does Trulieve Cannabis’s (CSE:TRUL) P/E Compare To Its Industry, After Its Big Share Price Gain?

    How Does Trulieve Cannabis's (CSE:TRUL) P/E Compare To Its Industry, After Its Big Share Price Gain?Trulieve Cannabis (CSE:TRUL) shares have had a really impressive month, gaining 36%, after some slippage…

    from Yahoo Finance https://ift.tt/36bMbX1

  • Oaktree’s Howard Marks Says Fed Support Isn’t Forever, Distress Coming

    Oaktree’s Howard Marks Says Fed Support Isn’t Forever, Distress Coming(Bloomberg) — As successful as the Federal Reserve has been propping up corporate debt prices, the support is only temporary and distress will sweep through the credit markets when the central bank inevitably steps back, Howard Marks said.“Can the Fed keep it up forever?” Marks, the billionaire co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Group, said in a Bloomberg “Front Row” interview. “Those of us in the markets believe that stocks and bonds are selling at prices they wouldn’t sell at if the Fed were not the dominant force. So if the Fed were to recede, we would all take over as buyers, but I don’t think at these levels.”That, in a nutshell, is the dilemma for policy makers.Confronted by the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression, they’ve resorted to unprecedented means to keep big employers in business, including the March 23 announcement of two corporate-credit facilities with $750 billion of total spending power.The prospect of intervention on that scale sparked an immediate surge in demand for both investment-grade and junk bonds. Now that the program has started buying, it’s unclear what happens when — and if — the funding runs out.Some investors think the prices of stocks and bonds are justified by the promise of endless central bank liquidity. In other words: You can’t fight the Fed.Marks disagrees. He expects a slow and halting recovery from the coronavirus pandemic and said “there will be plenty” of debt defaults and bankruptcies when corporate borrowers start running out of cash in the months ahead.“There are large, highly levered companies and investment vehicles that the government and Fed rescue program is not likely to reach and take care of,” he said.Already, Neiman Marcus Group Inc., Stage Stores Inc., Avianca Holdings SA and J. Crew Group Inc. are among the bankruptcies hastened by the economic fallout from Covid-19. In the bond market, some 540 issuers are still trading at yields that suggest a high probability of default, though that number is down from almost 900 in late March.One example of the Fed’s efforts is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Even though cruises have been halted during the pandemic and revenue has shriveled to almost zero, the company was able to sell $3.3 billion of secured debt at a yield of about 11%.“It’s what happens in a market which is, I would say, artificially supported by Fed buying,” Marks said.‘Potemkin Market’In the 1980s, Marks became one of the first investors to specialize in beaten-down bonds. Oaktree, the Los Angeles-based firm he co-founded with Bruce Karsh, is now trying to raise $15 billion for what would be the biggest-ever fund to invest in distressed debt.Oaktree was a “very active buyer” when credit markets were swooning in mid-March, but has pulled back since the Fed announced it would intervene, Marks said. While the central bank has committed to buying investment-grade bonds and debt recently downgraded to junk, it hasn’t extended that support to less-creditworthy issuers.“They could do that,” Marks said. “And in theory, if they bought aggressively, they could make all the markets rise. Now everyone would know that that’s a Potemkin market, a fake, and the minute they stopped things would collapse.”In one of his recent memos to clients, Marks quoted a saying: “Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Catholicism without hell.” In the interview, he said he worries that Fed support for the credit market will result in moral hazard — the likelihood that those who escape the consequences for reckless behavior will be reckless again.That’s not to say he objects to Fed support for the economy.“Thank God that it did what it did,” he said. “Just because something has unforeseeable negative consequences, that doesn’t mean it was a mistake.”For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

    from Yahoo Finance https://ift.tt/36eaLGD