There are not many ASX dividend stocks that I’d prefer to own rather than receive the cash flow of the Age Pension. WCM Quality Global Growth Fund (ASX: WCMQ) is one of the passive income choices I’d pick.

The exchange-traded fund (ETF) may not be as famous as names like Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA), BHP Group Ltd (ASX: BHP) or Rio Tinto Ltd (ASX: RIO). But, for various reasons, I think the WCMQ ETF offers investors more positives and potentially stronger long-term returns.

For me, there are three reasons to like the investment so much.

Excellent and diversified portfolio

WCM is a fund manager that’s based in Laguna Beach, California. That’s deliberately a long way from the culture of Wall Street in New York.

The investment strategy of the fund is to invest in a portfolio of high-quality shares from across the world.

There are two main factors that go into deciding whether the business is high-quality for this ASX dividend stock’s portfolio.

First, WCM wants to see that the business has an expanding economic moat (improving competitive advantages). For WCM, the direction of the moat is more important than the actual size of the moat.

One of the main ways that WCM judges whether a business is seeing a strengthening economic moat is with a rising return on invested capital (ROIC). This shows that the company’s economics are getting stronger.

Second, WCM analyses whether the business has a corporate culture that supports improvement of the economic moat.

The portfolio is truly global – it’s not massively focused on the US share market. Its portfolio is invested across the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific and elsewhere.

Its holdings regularly change, but its sector exposure typically focuses on IT, industrials and healthcare names. It also has positions in financials, consumer discretionary and others.

Great passive income

The WCMQ ETF offers investors a solid distribution yield, which is based on its net asset value (NAV).

The fund targets a distribution yield of 5%, which I’d say is a solid starting yield and I think the payments will rise over time thanks to WCMQ ETF’s pleasing investment track record.

A rising NAV over time should lead to growing payouts for investors.

Capital growth

In its July 2026 update, the ASX dividend stock revealed that its portfolio had returned an average of 15.2% per year since the ETF’s inception in August 2018.

With that level of return, the fund has been able to deliver both its pleasing dividend yield and the retained returns have helped grow the WCMQ ETF unit price over the long-term – it has approximately doubled in the last eight years.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance, of course, but I’m optimistic the fund can deliver pleasing returns, including capital growth. That’s why I think the ASX dividend stock is so appealing.

How to match the Age Pension with the ASX dividend stock

Currently the Age Pension is paying a maximum of approximately $1,200 per fortnight, though this will increase in the coming weeks. That translates into annualised income of $31,200.

The ETF expects to pay an annual distribution of 53.6 cents per security in FY27. That translates into needing 58,209 WCMQ ETF units to unlock the same level of cash payment. I’m also optimistic the ETF’s payout can grow at a faster pace than the Age Pension in the coming years. However, I’d also want to diversify my portfolio, rather than relying on one idea.

The post 58,209 shares of this high-yield ASX dividend stock pays an income equal to the Age Pension appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• 2 ASX passive income ideas I’d use to generate $300 a month in 2027
• How much do I need to retire on $120,000 a year at 55?
• How much is needed in superannuation to target a $5,500 monthly passive income?
• How much is needed in superannuation to target a $40,000 annual passive income?

Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has positions in Wcm Quality Global Growth Fund. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended BHP Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Serious money continues to flow into two of the ASX’s most popular Vanguard exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS) and Vanguard MSCI International Shares ETF (ASX: VGS) now collectively manage rougly $40 billion in funds under management.

These two ASX ETFs form the backbone of countless long-term portfolios, offering broad exposure to Australia, global markets and the world’s largest economy.

But after gains and shifting global conditions, investors may be asking whether they still deserve a place in a modern portfolio.

Aussie classic

The Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF remains the core domestic building block for many investors, tracking the performance of the 300 ASX’s largest companies.

The popular Vanguard ETF has delivered around 5% in 2026 and 2% over the past 12 months, reflecting steady but modest growth compared to global markets.

Two of its largest holdings include Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) and BHP Group Ltd (ASX: BHP), giving investors exposure to both financials and resources.

The strength of VAS lies in its diversification across Australia’s leading companies and its consistent dividend income stream. Many Australian shares pay dividends, and the VAS ETF passes those distributions on to its investors.

However, risks remain, particularly its heavy concentration in banks and resources, which can make returns heavily dependent on domestic economic conditions and commodity cycles.

True global reach

The Vanguard MSCI International Shares ETF provides broad global diversification outside Australia and has returned around 8% over the past year.

This Vanguard ETF invests across developed markets, reducing reliance on the Australian economy and offering exposure to a wide range of industries and geographies.

Two of its largest holdings are Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) and NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA), giving investors exposure to both established tech leaders and the high-growth semiconductor sector.

VGS is often viewed as a long-term portfolio stabiliser due to its global reach. However, it still carries risks associated with international market cycles, geopolitical uncertainty, and currency movements, all of which can affect returns for Australian investors.

Foolish takeaway

Despite decent recent performance across the two funds, these Vanguard ETFs continue to play distinct and complementary roles in long-term portfolios. VAS offers domestic stability and dividends and VGS delivers global diversification.

For many investors, the combination remains a powerful foundation for building wealth over time. With a single purchase, an investor can gain exposure to a broad portfolio of established Australian and international businesses, then keep investing and let those companies compound over time.

But understanding each ETF’s risks and exposures is essential in deciding whether they still deserve a place in your portfolio today.

The post Are these 2 top Vanguard ETFs still worth buying today? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Buy, hold, sell: Rio Tinto, PLS Group, BHP shares
• Experts name 2 ASX 200 blue chip shares to buy this week
• By September 2027, BHP shares could turn $10,000 into…
• Buy, hold, sell: Commonwealth Bank, Goodman Group, CSL shares
• The 2 top yielding ASX 200 bank stocks revealed (Hint: Not CBA shares)

Motley Fool contributor Marc Van Dinther has positions in BHP Group. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Apple and Nvidia. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Apple, BHP Group, Nvidia, and Vanguard Msci Index International Shares ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Australia’s cost-of-living debate lives almost entirely in the present tense. 

Grocery bills. Energy prices. Mortgage repayments. Rent dues.

Retirement planning often needs the opposite treatment. Targets are set using today’s prices, even though the money may not be needed for another 10, 15 or 20 years.

That is why some of the most damaging superannuation mistakes do not look dramatic. They are small assumptions that quietly compound in the wrong direction.

1. Treating a benchmark as a personal plan

The latest ASFA Retirement Standard estimates that a comfortable retirement costs around $55,923 a year for a single person and $78,566 for a couple.

These figures are useful starting points, but they are not personal forecasts.

Housing, travel, healthcare and family commitments can produce very different outcomes. ASFA’s related lump-sum estimates also assume retirees own their home, draw down their capital and receive some Age Pension support.

A benchmark can tell you what an average retirement might cost today. It cannot decide what your retirement will look like.

2. Planning entirely in today’s dollars

Suppose you want retirement income of $6,000 a month, or $72,000 a year, in today’s dollars.

If retirement is 15 years away and inflation averages 3.5% (in line with the latest figure), funding the same lifestyle would require approximately $120,625 a year. That is more than $10,000 a month.

This is a stress test rather than an inflation forecast. The Reserve Bank of Australia targets inflation of 2% to 3%.

Even at the midpoint of 2.5%, however, the equivalent income rises to approximately $104,277. That is more than $32,000 above the original nominal target.

Inflation does not merely increase the required balance. It moves the destination while you are still travelling towards it.

3. Becoming defensive too early

Reaching retirement does not mean an investment horizon suddenly falls to zero. A portfolio may still need to fund 20 or 30 years of spending.

Growth assets carry real volatility. The S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) has endured plenty of difficult years, and another downturn will eventually arrive.

However, removing too much growth exposure too early can create a different risk: a portfolio that struggles to keep pace with inflation.

The appropriate balance will differ for every investor. The important point is that market volatility and lost purchasing power are both risks.

4. Ignoring a small fee difference

Superannuation fees rarely feel urgent because they are deducted gradually. Compounding makes them expensive.

Consider a $400,000 balance invested for 15 years with no additional contributions. At a net annual return of 6.5%, it would grow to approximately $1.03 million.

Reduce that net return to 6%, with everything else unchanged, and the ending balance falls to roughly $958,600.

That half-percentage-point difference costs approximately $70,000 before allowing for tax, insurance premiums or changing market returns.

Put more bluntly: small recurring costs deserve investors’ attention because the compounding effect can be destructive to your capital.

5. Assuming every contribution has arrived

The final mistake is the least glamorous. Many employees rarely check whether their superannuation has actually been paid.

The ATO’s estimate puts the net super guarantee gap at approximately $6.25 billion for 2022–23, equal to 6% of the super employers were expected to pay.

Payday super, which began on 1 July 2026, should make missing contributions easier to identify. Employer contributions must generally reach an employee’s super fund within seven business days of payday rather than being paid quarterly.

That improves visibility, but it does not remove the need to check. Comparing payslips with a super account can reveal missing or incorrect payments before years of potential returns are lost.

Foolish takeaway

None of these mistakes announces itself with a market crash or frightening headline.

Instead, there is a benchmark treated as a plan, an inflation assumption that proves too optimistic, a portfolio that becomes cautious too soon, fees that look harmless and contributions that nobody checks.

Each gap can appear small in isolation. Over 15 years, the arithmetic becomes much less forgiving.

Markets will always remain uncertain. However, assumptions, fees, asset allocation and whether contributions arrive are variables investors can still monitor.

That may be considerably more valuable than chasing a perfect retirement number.

The post 5 superannuation mistakes that could shrink your nest egg appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• 5 things to watch on the ASX 200 on Monday
• Are ASX bank shares a buy in September?
• ASX 200 mining shares outperform in final week of earnings season
• Could ASX shares crash? 5 questions every investor should ask now
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today

Motley Fool contributor Leigh Gant has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.