Some investors love watching the market. They check prices over breakfast, read broker notes at lunch, and know exactly what the S&P/ASX 200 index (ASX: XJO) is doing by mid-afternoon.

There is nothing wrong with that. But not everyone wants investing to become a second job.

The good news is that a strong ASX portfolio should not need constant attention. In fact, some of the best portfolios are built to be left alone most of the time.

Start with investments that do the work for you

The easiest way to reduce the need for constant decision-making is to own investments that already spread money across lots of companies.

ASX exchange traded funds (ETFs) can help here.

Funds such as the Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF (ASX: VGS), iShares S&P 500 ETF (ASX: IVV), and the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS) give investors exposure to large collections of businesses in one trade.

That means an investor does not have to know which company will report the best result next month.

They are backing the long-term progress of markets rather than relying on one perfect stock pick.

Choose businesses that can compound quietly

Individual ASX shares can still have a place in a low-maintenance portfolio. But the type of company is important.

I would focus on businesses with strong market positions, repeat customers, pricing power, and long-term growth opportunities.

These are companies that can become more valuable over time without needing everything to go right each quarter.

Examples could include ResMed Inc. (ASX: RMD), Goodman Group (ASX: GMG), REA Group Ltd (ASX: REA), Wesfarmers Ltd (ASX: WES), and TechnologyOne Ltd (ASX: TNE).

They will still have weaker periods. No company avoids those. But if the long-term investment case remains intact, investors may not need to react to every share price move.

Avoid shares that require too much watching

Some ASX shares need constant monitoring. That might be because they carry too much debt, rely on commodity prices, need regular capital raisings, or have business models that are still unproven.

These shares can work out well, but they often demand more attention.

For investors who want a portfolio they can leave alone for longer periods, it may be better to avoid making these positions too large.

A portfolio becomes easier to live with when it is not filled with companies that can change dramatically from one update to the next.

Let dividends help

Dividends can also make a portfolio feel more productive.

Income from shares such as Transurban Group (ASX: TCL), APA Group (ASX: APA), Woolworths Group Ltd (ASX: WOW), and Charter Hall Long WALE REIT (ASX: CLW) can provide cash flow while investors wait.

That cash can be taken as income or reinvested to buy more shares.

Over time, reinvested dividends can quietly add to returns without the investor needing to do much at all.

Set a review schedule

A low-maintenance portfolio does not mean ignoring everything forever. It just means checking it sensibly.

For many investors, a proper review every six or 12 months may be enough. That review can ask a few simple questions.

Is the portfolio still diversified? Are the main holdings still doing what they were bought to do? Has any position become too large? Is there enough exposure to global shares, income, and long-term growth?

That is very different from watching every daily move. The aim is not to build a portfolio that never changes. It is to build one that does not need constant fixing.

For investors who want to build wealth without living inside their brokerage account, that could be a very good place to start.

The post How to build an ASX portfolio you do not need to check every day appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Why I think these boring ASX shares could build serious wealth
• Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today
• Coles stock vs Woolworths shares: Who had the better dividend this week?
• Buy, hold, sell: Netwealth, Sigma Healthcare, and Wesfarmers shares
• 9 ASX 200 shares with strengthened buy ratings this week

Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has positions in Goodman Group, REA Group, ResMed, Technology One, and Woolworths Group. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Goodman Group, ResMed, Transurban Group, Wesfarmers, and iShares S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Apa Group, ResMed, and Transurban Group. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Goodman Group, Vanguard Msci Index International Shares ETF, Wesfarmers, and iShares S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

A decade gives an exchange-traded fund (ETF) plenty of time to ride through market cycles and benefit from long-term economic growth.

If I were choosing two Vanguard ETFs with that timeframe in mind, these would be high on my list.

Vanguard FTSE Asia ex Japan Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAE)

The VAE ETF gives investors exposure to Asian markets excluding Japan.

I like it because some of the world’s most important economies sit within this region, including China, India, Taiwan, and South Korea. The fund provides exposure to businesses across technology, financial services, manufacturing, consumer spending, and other industries.

Over the next decade, I think several long-term trends could work in its favour.

Rising household incomes can increase spending on financial products, travel, technology, healthcare, and consumer goods. Asia is also central to global semiconductor manufacturing and electronics supply chains, while India continues developing into a much larger part of the global economy.

I would expect plenty of bumps along the way. Political and regulatory changes can move Asian markets quickly, while currency movements add another source of volatility because the VAE ETF is unhedged.

But I think a 10-year timeframe gives investors a better chance to look beyond those shorter-term swings and focus on the region’s long-term development.

Vanguard S&P 500 US Shares Index ETF (ASX: V500)

My second choice would be the V500 ETF.

This relatively new Vanguard ETF tracks the S&P 500 Index, giving ASX investors exposure to around 500 of America’s largest listed companies across all major sectors.

I think the attraction here goes beyond simply owning US shares. Many of the companies inside the index sell products and services around the world.

This means investors gain exposure to global spending on areas such as technology, healthcare, consumer products, financial services, and industrial development through one investment.

I also like that the S&P 500 can evolve. A decade is long enough for today’s corporate leaders to strengthen their positions, lose ground, or be overtaken by businesses that are much smaller today. An index fund adjusts as the market changes rather than asking investors to identify every future winner themselves.

For someone who wants a simple core holding with substantial long-term growth potential, I think the V500 ETF makes a lot of sense.

Foolish takeaway

I would be happy to buy both Vanguard ETFs and leave them invested for the next decade.

The VAE ETF gives me access to the long-term development of Asia, while the V500 ETF provides a simple way to own many of America’s leading businesses.

I think both offer compelling opportunities for investors prepared to stay patient through the inevitable market swings.

The post 2 Vanguard ETFs I’d buy and hold for a decade appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Why these ASX ETFs are on my watchlist
• 3 strong Vanguard ETFs to buy with $3,000
• Which Vanguard ETFs could be strong buys now?

Motley Fool contributor Grace Alvino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

Westpac Banking Corp (ASX: WBC) and Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) shares have both underperformed the 2.3% 12-month gain posted by the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) earlier this week.

In fact, both of the big four ASX 200 bank stocks are well into the red since this time last year.

With CBA shares recently trading for $157.08 apiece, Australia’s biggest bank stock is down 7.8% in 12 months.

Westpac shares have fared even worse, recently down 11.3% for the year at $33.95 each.

Now we shouldn’t leave out the fully franked dividends both banks have paid out over the full year. CBA shares trade on a fully franked dividend yield of 3.2%, while Westpac shares trade on a fully franked dividend yield of 4.5%.

Though even with these dividends in mind, the accumulated value of both ASX 200 bank stocks has gone backwards over the past year.

And looking ahead, Red Leaf Securities’ John Athanasiou expects they’ll both continue to struggle (courtesy of The Bull).

Here’s why.

Time to exit CBA shares?

“CBA shares deserve to trade at a premium given its dominant retail franchise, strong technology platform, solid deposit base and consistent execution,” Athanasiou said.

Summarising his sell recommendation on CBA shares, he concluded:

However, Australian banking remains a mature industry, with intense competition across mortgages and deposits limiting the potential for outsized earnings growth. At a premium valuation, investors are paying a higher price for quality, leaving little room for disappointment.

After a substantial re-rating, investors may be better served taking some profits and reallocating capital towards businesses offering stronger growth at more reasonable valuations.

Which brings us to…

Westpac shares could be facing competitive headwinds

Athanasiou also issued a sell recommendation on Westpac shares.

“The bank remains well capitalised and continues to generate solid earnings, but the operating environment is becoming increasingly competitive,” he said. “Mortgage pricing is aggressive, deposit competition remains intense, and the scope for sustained margin expansion appears limited.”

And Westpac’s 4.5% dividend yield isn’t enough to tip the scales for Athanasiou.

He noted:

Westpac’s dividend remains attractive, but investors should also consider opportunity cost.

We believe there are more compelling opportunities on the ASX, which offer stronger structural growth or more attractive valuations.

Another expert is bearish on CBA shares

Athanasiou wasn’t the only analyst to advise selling CBA shares this week.

He was joined by Alto Capital’s Tony Locantro.

“The CBA remains Australia’s leading banking franchise and delivered another strong result in full year 2026,” Locantro said.

Commenting on those strong results, he said:

Cash net profit after tax of $10.982 billion was up 7% on the prior corresponding period. The full-year dividend of $5.05 a share, fully franked, was up 4%. Strong lending, deposit growth and a robust capital position continue to demonstrate the quality of the business.

As for his sell recommendation, Locantro concluded:

However, operating expenses and loan impairment expenses increased.

The CBA continues to trade at a substantial valuation premium to domestic banking peers. Although the underlying business remains strong, the premium valuation leaves little room for disappointment and may potentially constrain prospective returns.

The post Sell alert! Why this expert is calling time on Westpac and CBA shares appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Could ASX shares crash? 5 questions every investor should ask now
• How much passive income can I earn off a $1 million superannuation balance?
• How much is needed in superannuation for $2,500 in weekly passive income?
• Another RBA interest rate hike could be just weeks away. Here’s what the big banks think
• CBA vs Westpac shares: Which is the best buy?

Motley Fool contributor Bernd Struben has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.