Tag: Business

• Bernie Sanders is calling for a temporary pause on AI data center construction nationwide.
• He says a pause would "give democracy a chance to catch up" with the rapid buildout.
• He's concerned about potential AI-driven job losses and the tech's effect on human relationships.

Sen. Bernie Sanders wants to put a halt to the multi-trillion-dollar AI infrastructure buildout — at least for now.

In a video posted to social media on Tuesday, the Vermont senator and two-time presidential candidate said he would begin pushing for a national moratorium on the construction of AI data centers.

He argued that AI, which he called one of the most "transformative technologies in the history of humanity," is moving too rapidly for lawmakers and citizens to keep up.

"This moratorium will give democracy a chance to catch up with the transformative changes that we are witnessing and make sure that the benefits of these technologies work for all of us, not just the wealthiest people on Earth," Sanders said.

While Sanders is not the only AI critic on Capitol Hill, it sounds like his planned proposal would go further than most. He is likely the first national politician to call for a moratorium on the construction of data centers, which are the primary infrastructure needed to support the expansion of AI.

"This process is moving very, very quickly, and we need to slow it down," Sanders said. "We need all of our people, all of our people involved in determining the future of AI, and not just a handful of multi-billionaires."

The Democratic socialist senator listed three major reasons for slowing down the advancement of AI: the fact that it's being promoted by wealthy tech titans, the potential for AI-driven job losses, and the technology's impact on human interaction.

"Think for a moment about a future when human beings are not interacting with each other and are spending virtually all of their time with devices instead of people," Sanders said. "Is that the kind of future you want? Well, not me."

At this point, it's unlikely that Sanders's vision comes to fruition.

President Donald Trump's administration has taken the opposite path, encouraging the rapid construction of data centers in a bid to win the AI race with China.

But skepticism of AI is continuing to grow on Capitol Hill, with some lawmakers warning about a potential AI bubble and others aiming to limit minors' use of AI chatbots.

• Warner Bros. Discovery is telling shareholders to reject an offer from Paramount and to stick with Netflix.
• The fact that the Paramount proposal included $24 billion from Gulf states complicated the deal.
• But that's not why WBD rejected Paramount.

Larry and David Ellison, who own Paramount, want to use $24 billion in Middle Eastern money to finance their bid for Warner Bros. Discovery. Is that a problem for WBD?

You might think so — especially since $10 billion of that came from the Saudi government. That's the same government that US intelligence said killed a Washington Post journalist in 2018. The kind of partner you might think a major American media conglomerate would want to keep at arm's length.

But that's not a problem WBD raises in its newest communication to shareholders, where it urges them to take the deal offered by Netflix instead.

What actually worries WBD about the Ellisons' bid isn't the Ellisons' particular partners. It's that the Ellisons had partners.

In a regulatory filing that tells the backstory of the proposed WBD sale, WBD execs and their reps repeatedly told the Ellisons they wanted a firm commitment that Larry Ellison — currently the world's 5th-richest man, with an estimated net worth of $243 billion — would guarantee the deal himself.

Instead, WBD argues, the Ellisons never gave them the assurances they wanted.

The filing does bring up the fact that money from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds would likely complicate regulatory issues for a proposed Ellison/Paramount deal. (Ditto for a proposed $1 billion investment from China's Tencent, which the Ellisons later took out of their proposal.) But those are presented as technical hurdles. Not moral or patriotic dealbreakers.

And they're just part of a laundry list of complaints WBD makes about the Ellisons. Among them: A December 2 tweet from New York Post reporter Charlie Gasparino, which WBD said violated a confidentiality agreement Paramount had signed.

And when it comes to the main pitch WBD is making to investors, all of that stuff disappears. It just boils down to "we did our homework, and the Netflix deal is better."

That's not shocking: If you're a WBD investor, you are (supposedly) only interested in getting the maximum value for shares. And WBD's filing argues that Netflix is the one that can pay the most.

Now we're waiting to see what the Ellisons do next: Many observers believe they'll return with yet another, higher bid. Will this one have Gulf money, too?

• I was born and raised in Mexico, and have seen tourists make plenty of mistakes when visiting.
• There's more to the country than its resorts, so I suggest exploring other areas, like Chichén Itzá.
• During your trip, I also recommend trying local dishes, like mole and pozole.

I was born and raised in Mexico and have spent the last 15 years exploring the country as a travel journalist. So, I know it has lots to offer, from incredible biodiversity and beautiful resorts to world-class museums.

However, I've seen tourists make plenty of mistakes when visiting my country, from failing to learn any Spanish to missing opportunities to explore.

Here are five things tourists should avoid so that they can get the most out of their trip.

Assuming all of Mexico is the same

Mexico is a huge country. To put it into perspective, the largest state, Chihuahua, is slightly larger than the UK. So, to reduce Mexico to a single stereotype would be to erase its incredible diversity.

It has everything from tropical beaches and historical cities to snow-capped mountains and deserts.

Getting from one city to another can require long bus rides or flights, so if you hope to travel throughout the country, I recommend trying not to plan too much for one trip.

Not exploring beyond your resort

Although Mexico is home to incredible resorts in cities like Cancún and Cabo San Lucas, the country has so much more to offer.

For example, about two and a half hours outside downtown Cancún lies Chichén Itzá, an archeological site of Mayan ruins and one of the "New 7 Wonders of the World."

One of the main attractions is El Castillo, also known as the Pyramid of Kukulkán, which stands nearly 100 feet tall and has impressive features. For example, if visitors clap at the base of the pyramid, they'll hear the sound of a quetzal, a sacred bird associated with the god Kukulkán.

Meanwhile, about 30 minutes outside Cabo San Lucas lies San José del Cabo, a charming town with a laid-back vibe full of art galleries and colonial architecture.

If you're willing to venture a bit further from Cabo San Lucas, I also recommend visiting Todos Santos, home of Hotel California, or Cabo Pulmo, a national marine park perfect for snorkeling and diving among coral reefs.

Being afraid to try local food

During your visit, I highly recommend trying one of the more than 50 types of mole, a traditional Mexican sauce that's very different from the spicy salsa you might be used to.

It's made with a wide range of ingredients, such as chiles, chocolate, nuts, seeds, spices, vegetables, and sometimes fruits like raisins or apples. It's usually served with meat or as the base for popular dishes, such as enchiladas de mole.

Another must-try dish is pozole. Almost every state has its own version of this comforting, flavorful soup.

It's made with cacahuazintle (a special type of corn), broth, and meat, and comes in various styles, including white pozole (without chile), red pozole (with red chile), and green pozole (with ground pumpkin seeds).

The spiciness is real, so I recommend starting slow and only trying what locals say is just a little spicy.

Skipping museums

Mexico City is home to the greatest concentration of museums in the country.

One unmissable stop is the spectacular National Museum of Anthropology in Chapultepec Park. With more than 20 galleries showcasing pre-Hispanic artifacts and ethnographic treasures, it's worth setting aside several hours — or even an entire day — to truly take it all in.

A short walk away, Chapultepec Castle houses the National History Museum, which showcases Mexico's story from pre-Columbian times to the modern era. As a bonus, you'll also find epic murals by David Alfaro Siqueiros and Juan O'Gorman, two of the most acclaimed Mexican visual artists of the 20th century — plus stunning views of the city.

And for fine art lovers, head downtown to MUNAL (the National Museum of Art), located in Plaza Manuel Tolsá. Its collection spans from the colonial period to the mid-20th century and includes works by Diego Rivera, Rufino Tamayo, and María Izquierdo.

Not learning even a few basic phrases in Spanish

At upscale hotels and restaurants, you'll probably get by just fine in English, but you shouldn't expect to do the same when wandering local streets, exploring markets, or trying street food.

I encourage learning a few Spanish phrases, such as thank you (gracias), good morning (buenos días), and please (por favor). It'll open doors and hearts.

• Kat Milner, 58, moved from the USA to Australia to be with her now husband.
• Their first phone call lasted 2.5 hours, and their first date lasted 7.5 hours.
• She says her story gives hope to those looking for love after their mid-40s.

This story is based on a conversation with Kat Milner, 58. It has been edited for length and clarity.

I first met Paul when I was living in Massachusetts; I'd been touring as a technical producer with a theater show. I'd been living with a friend, and I popped to the local fishery to buy salmon so I could cook us dinner.

Paul looked at me across the fish counter with these big, brown, beautiful eyes. He smiled his beautiful smile, and as I heard that Australian accent, I knew I was screwed.

We discussed how long he'd been in the US. He responded: "Oh, that'd take an entire evening and a large bottle of wine." I said, "OK, I've got time."

I was then 45 years old and divorced. I thought, why not?

He lost my number, but the connection was instant

Our epic date almost never happened. I'd given him my card with my number on it, then never heard from him. It turns out that he'd immediately lost my card.

A few days later, a friend who played in a band stopped by the fishery to invite me. He couldn't come — he had his son that night — but he apologized and begged me for another card. Before I left the building, he'd texted me. It said: "See, I now have your number in my phone!"

Sure enough, that weekend, in September 2012, we set up a phone call for Saturday. It actually lasted 2.5 hours. We set our first in-person date for the following Monday, when we were both available for coffee during the day.

That coffee date lasted for 7.5 hours. The only reason it didn't last longer is that he had to go to his shift at the fishmonger's. He was working very hard with two jobs. His other job was overnight at a gas station. It's hard to live on minimum wage in the US.

We both arrived at the Starbucks at the same time. I went to hug him, and he actually kissed me, but it felt natural rather than creepy. There was this amazing chemistry happening.

After four months of dating, we knew we were meant to be together. Paul said his 9-year-old son, whom he hadn't yet told about me, asked his dad: "What's going on? Why are you so happy lately?" That's when he said he knew.

He proposed 16 months after we met

There were bumps in the road. In February 2013, I took a contract job on a cruise ship for almost eight months as part of the theatre production crew for their shows. I really needed the work, and had agreed to it before we met. It was a long separation right during our honeymoon period as a couple. I really hoped, and believed, we would last. But I didn't see him for the whole eight months. I was on cruises around the Caribbean, Mexico, Europe, Canada, and Alaska. I'd go from one ship to another.

The day after I got off the cruise ship and came home to him, in October 2013, he took me back to that same Starbucks where we had our first date. In front of everyone in the Starbucks, he proposed to me. I, of course, said yes. It was 16 months to the day we met; we got married in November 2013.

The small ceremony was mostly my friends, because Paul didn't know many people in the US. They commented that you could've gotten high from the feeling of love in the room.

I moved to Australia

Further bumps lay ahead. Ten days after the wedding, Paul had to return to his native Australia, while I remained in the US and worked on getting my visa. I didn't know it then, but I wouldn't see him again for another year. I'd hoped my visa would arrive sooner, and I was desperate not to miss our first wedding anniversary. As it turned out, I arrived in Australia 10 days before the anniversary.

When I arrived in 2014, it was an experience of getting used to each other again. I was settling into a new country where they drive on the left, and I had to make a whole new group of friends.

Now I wake up grateful every day. I haven't been back to the US since I moved here 11 years ago. I haven't wanted to.

This month, we celebrated our 12th wedding anniversary.

After I moved to another city for my first marriage, I vowed I wouldn't do it again. But if your heart truly feels this is your person, trust that. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. I've been on both sides of that. The risk is always worth taking.

• Elon Musk's wealth hit a record $648 billion, extending his lead as the world's richest person.
• His fortune jumped thanks to Tesla's record stock rally and SpaceX's soaring valuation.
• Musk has gained an unrivaled $216 billion this year, more than Bernard Arnault's net worth.

Elon Musk's net worth has surged to a record $648 billion — and his wealth gain this year exceeds LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault's entire $205 billion fortune, the Bloomberg Billionaires Index shows.

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO's wealth has jumped by $178 billion in just two days, boosting his year-to-date gain to an unmatched $216 billion.

If that figure were his entire fortune, he would rank sixth on the rich list — ahead of not just Arnault but also former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.

Musk's record wealth partly reflects Tesla stock closing at an all-time high of $490 on Tuesday, as investors cheered news that the EV maker is testing driverless robotoxis on Austin, Texas streets. Musk holds a roughly 12% stake in Tesla, valued at around $200 billion.

But the bigger driver of his wealth surge this week has been SpaceX's valuation reportedly doubling since the summer to $800 billion, based on a secondary share sale by the aerospace company ahead of a potential IPO next year.

Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is now more than twice as wealthy as number two on the rich list, Alphabet cofounder Larry Page, who's worth $264 billion after a year-to-date wealth gain of $96 billion — second only to Musk.

He's also more than four times as rich as Warren Buffett, the outgoing CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, who's worth $150 billion after giving more than half of his fortune to good causes.

Musk's personal fortune exceeds the market values of Oracle, Mastercard, and Johnson & Johnson — three of the 20 most valuable US public companies with market capitalizations exceeding $500 billion. His recent gains have narrowed the gap with Visa, which has a market value of $660 billion.

Musk's epic wealth rally

The serial entrepreneur has had a striking wealth recovery in recent months. Tesla stock roughly halved between mid-January and mid-March as his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) sparked public backlash and worried shareholders that he was getting distracted.

Musk even briefly lost his top spot on the rich list to Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison in September, before Tesla shares rallied to fresh highs.

Tesla and other huge US tech companies have seen their stock prices soar this year, fueled by immense buzz around AI. In Musk's case, he's excited investors by spending big on AI to develop Tesla's autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots.

By contrast, skeptics such as Michael Burry of "The Big Short" fame have warned that AI companies are overspending on microchips and data centers, and diagnosed a stock-market bubble that's bound to burst.

The AI boom has translated into huge wealth gains for key shareholders such as Musk, Page and his cofounder Sergey Brin, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Ellison, Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, and Nvidia's Jensen Huang.

Musk could become the world's first trillionaire after Tesla shareholders approved his pay package in November, which promises to roughly double his stake in Tesla over the next decade if he hits milestones such as selling 1 million Optimus robots and raising adjusted profits from around $17 billion last year to $400 billion.

• I love Ina Garten, so I baked my way through four of her cookie recipes to see how they stacked up.
• The giant crinkled chocolate chip cookies were delicious, but a bit tedious to make.
• I thought the salty oatmeal chocolate-chunk cookies were crispy, flavorful, and perfectly chewy.

When it comes to cooking and baking, there's rarely an Ina Garten recipe I don't like.

Her recipes are reliable, and there's something for everyone to enjoy. So, I decided to bake my way through four of her cookie recipes to see how they compare.

For a mix of classic, chocolate, and fruity flavors, I went with her giant crinkled chocolate chip cookies, raspberry jam thumbprints, white-chocolate chunk cookies, and salty oatmeal chocolate-chunk cookies.

Here's how they stacked up, from worst to best.

Garten's giant crinkled chocolate chip cookies are made with vanilla, bittersweet chocolate, and sea salt.

To make 12 of Garten's giant crinkled chocolate chip cookies, I gathered:

• Two sticks of unsalted butter, at room temperature
• 1 ½ cups of granulated sugar
• ¼ cup of light-brown sugar, lightly packed
• One extra-large egg, at room temperature
• 1 ½ teaspoons of pure vanilla extract
• 2 cups of all-purpose flour
• ½ teaspoon of baking soda
• 1 teaspoon of kosher salt
• 8 ounces of bittersweet chocolate, chopped
• Sea salt for sprinkling

The dough was simple enough to make.

Making the dough was a pretty straightforward process. I mixed everything in an electric mixer, folded in the chocolate chunks, and let it chill for 30 minutes. Then, I was ready to bake.

The process to make these cookies was a bit tedious.

Although these have the word "giant" in the name of the recipe, I didn't expect the cookies to be as massive as they were. Each one used a whopping ⅓ cup of dough, and they spread a lot, so I needed to cook them in batches.

After baking for 10 minutes, the instructions said to pull the tray out and bang it on the counter. This was repeated every three minutes until the cookies were done baking to create the crinkle effect. However, this method became a little tedious after baking multiple trays.

For a smoother process, I also recommend baking on parchment paper. I didn't do this with the first batch, and even with cooking spray, mine stuck to the tray pretty badly since they had thinned out so much.

The giant crinkled cookies were good, but not the best I've tasted.

These cookies were good, but I wanted to like them more. They came out thin, buttery, and crispy, but were not the best chocolate chip cookies I've ever had.

However, I do prefer a more chewy cookie, so it's all up to personal preference. They look rather impressive, but these are the kind of treat I would need to fully commit time and dedication to making. For that reason, they landed in fourth place.

Garten's raspberry jam thumbprints call for vanilla, coconut, and your choice of jam.

To make 32 of Garten's raspberry jam thumbprint cookies, I grabbed:

• Three sticks of unsalted butter, at room temperature
• 1 cup of sugar
• 1 teaspoon of pure vanilla extract
• 3 ½ cups of all-purpose flour
• ¼ teaspoon of kosher salt
• One egg beaten with 1 tablespoon of water, for egg wash
• 7 ounces of sweetened flaked coconut
• Raspberry or apricot jam

I made the dough with the help of an electric mixer.

I started by making the dough in an electric mixer, using the butter, sugar, vanilla, flour, and salt.

Then, I dumped it out onto a clean surface and kneaded it lightly to incorporate some of the looser bits. The texture reminded me of a shortbread cookie.

More steps were involved in making these.

After wrapping the dough in plastic wrap and refrigerating it for 30 minutes, I began forming the cookies.

I shaped each ball, dipped it in egg wash, and rolled it in shredded coconut. Then, I pressed a thumbprint into the dough, filled it with jam, and baked.

The extra work to make the raspberry jam thumbprints was well worth it.

These cookies came out delicious. The coconut got nice and toasty, and the raspberry jam was the perfect sweet flavor to balance out the buttery, crumbly shortbread.

I used raspberry jam for this batch, but I could see myself making them again and experimenting with different flavors, like apricot, strawberry, and even cherry. Overall, these were a solid third-place choice.

Garten's chocolate white-chocolate chunk cookies require mostly pantry staples.

To make 40 of Garten's chocolate white-chocolate chunk cookies, I gathered:

• ½ pound of unsalted butter, at room temperature
• 1 cup of light-brown sugar, packed
• 1 cup of granulated sugar
• 2 teaspoons of pure vanilla extract
• Two extra-large eggs, at room temperature
• ⅔ cup of unsweetened cocoa
• 2 cups of flour
• 1 teaspoon of baking powder
• 1 teaspoon of baking soda
• 1 teaspoon of kosher salt
• 1 ½ pounds of white chocolate, chopped

The dough came together quickly.

The dough for these cookies — which was made with butter, both sugars, vanilla, eggs, cocoa, flour, baking powder, baking soda, salt, and white chocolate — came together easily in the mixer in under 10 minutes.

These cookies baked for exactly 15 minutes.

In her recipe, Garten emphasizes the importance of a precise 15-minute bake time. The recipe states that the cookies may seem underdone when they come out, but that's what helps perfect the chewy texture.

I let them cool for a few minutes to firm up before moving them to a separate plate.

I loved the combination of the chocolate cookie and white-chocolate chunks.

I'm not usually one to reach for a chocolate cookie, but this recipe changed that. These came out soft, rich, and chewy, with a brownie-like fudginess.

The combination of rich chocolate dough and chunks of white chocolate was so good that I would reach for these cookies over and over again. So, they came in second place.

Garten's salty oatmeal chocolate-chunk cookies are made with cranberries instead of raisins.

To make 30 of Garten's salty oatmeal chocolate chunk cookies, I grabbed:

• Two sticks of unsalted butter, at room temperature
• ¾ cup of light-brown sugar, lightly packed
• ¾ cup of granulated sugar
• 2 teaspoons of pure vanilla extract
• Two extra-large eggs, at room temperature
• 1 ¾ cups of all-purpose flour
• 1 teaspoon of baking soda
• 1 teaspoon of kosher salt
• 1 ¼ cups of old-fashioned oats
• ¾ pound of bittersweet chocolate, chopped
• ¾ cup of dried cranberries
• Sea salt for sprinkling

I appreciated how easy it was to make these cookies.

The recipe for these cookies was straightforward to follow.

I creamed the butter and sugars and added the dry ingredients. Then, I folded in the dried cranberries and chocolate chunks and baked for 10 minutes.

I appreciated that there were no complicated steps and the dough didn't need to be refrigerated.

The salty oatmeal chocolate-chunk cookies were chewy inside, but had perfectly crisp edges.

These cookies were insanely delicious, with a simple yet balanced flavor. The oatmeal cookie was buttery, the chocolate chunks were melty, and I ended up favoring the dried cranberries over the traditional oatmeal-raisin combination.

The salt was definitely noticeable, but it worked well. If I made them again, I'd add cinnamon. It feels like the only thing missing here, but otherwise, they're perfect as is.

Overall, these cookies were chewy, crispy, flavorful, and the kind I could eat all of in one sitting. For that reason, they were easily the best recipe I tried.

This story was originally published on November 25, 2025, and most recently updated on December 17, 2025.

• As an interior designer, I see lots of trends cycle in and out each season.
• Color drenching, versatile furniture, and colorful trim are all popular among my clients right now.
• However, I'm seeing less beige interiors, builder-grade lighting, and all-white kitchens.

As an interior designer, I know the hottest trends are always cycling in and out. What's popular today could be gone tomorrow — and back in a few years.

To help keep track of what's trending right now, here are four design choices I'm seeing everywhere right now — and a few that are on their way out.

Color drenching is in.

This season, I'm noticing that more people are saying goodbye to accent walls and instead choosing to paint entire rooms in a single hue, including walls, trim, and even the ceiling.

This trend, known as color drenching, makes a space feel intentional and instantly cozy.

I've been loving muted sage-green bedrooms, warm clay dining rooms, and soft powder-blue bathrooms that make you slow down and breathe a little deeper.

If you're nervous about committing to so much color, start small. A pantry, powder room, or laundry room is the perfect place to experiment and build your confidence before tackling larger spaces.

Versatile furniture is a great investment.

Lately, I've found myself gravitating toward furniture that's flexible and adaptable.

I've seen a huge demand for pieces that are versatile and can grow with you from apartments to homes and new life phases. For example, my clients are loving modular sofas that can be rearranged and reconfigured.

People want the ability to rearrange or refresh their furniture instead of tossing it every time they want a new look.

Overall, we seem to be entering a season of design where sustainability is more important than ever, and choosing versatile furniture is one of the smartest (and, in my opinion, chicest) ways to make your home livable.

Colorful trim is a fun way to add personality to a room.

Adding a pop of color to your trim, baseboards, or doors is a fun way to make a space feel elevated and playful without overwhelming it.

One of my favorite tricks when committing to a colorful trim or door is to repeat that exact color elsewhere in the room. It's an intentional design detail that ties your space together.

Mixing opposite styles — like vintage and modern — can bring new life to a room.

Mixing opposites — like vintage and modern, rustic and sleek, or tiny and oversize elements — is one of my favorite ways to create rooms that feel full of life.

For example, try pairing a clean-lined sofa with a weathered, farmhouse-style coffee table, or a delicate floral print with a chunky, antique frame.

The combinations are endless, and they make your home feel collected, not cookie-cutter.

On the other hand, all-beige interiors are out.

It seems like the era of all-beige interiors is officially over, and I couldn't be happier. At some point, the trend that started as "minimalist chic" began to make every room look the same.

Beige on its own can be gorgeous when it's executed the right way. However, when everything is the exact same tone, the room starts to feel flat and sad.

Nowadays, my clients are craving pops of color in their homes. For example, a moss-green throw on the sofa, a buttery yellow lamp in the corner, or even an unexpected wallpaper can completely brighten up a space.

Many clients are choosing to ditch builder-grade lighting fixtures.

Not only does lighting control how a room looks, but it also affects how you feel in a space.

Often, homes are filled with basic builder-grade lighting that can feel cold and impersonal. That's why I recommend swapping these fixtures with ones that bring you joy.

Some of my favorite tricks are replacing basic fixtures with something vintage, or bringing in new textures and materials like brass, linen drum, or woven rattan.

Matching furniture sets are becoming less popular.

Matching furniture sets might feel like an easy shortcut, but from a design perspective, it's one of the fastest ways to make a room feel flat and uninspired.

When every piece of furniture is the same wood tone, finish, and style, the space becomes one-dimensional. There's no contrast, tension, or sense of personality.

In my opinion, design works best when there's a little bit of friction — a balance of textures, finishes, and scales that play off each other.

I recommend curating your space with a mix of pieces to create visual interest and depth.

I'm also seeing fewer all-white kitchens.

When every cabinet, counter, and backsplash is white-on-white, the kitchen can lose the very thing it's meant to be: the warm, bustling heart of the home.

All-white kitchens often feel flat because everything is the same tone and finish. There's no depth, no contrast, and nowhere for your eye to land.

Design-wise, this can actually make a kitchen feel smaller and colder. Without variation in texture, color, or hardware, the space risks feeling more like a showroom or a spec house than a lived-in, well-loved home.

• Indeed's chief marketing officer says AI tools can help job seekers and employers.
• Both sides of hiring need to adapt their approaches to make the most of AI-assisted recruitment.
• Indeed's marketing team uses AI for better targeting, and Whitemore is hiring a head of transformation.

Job openings were down in 2025, yet employers still struggled to find the right skills match for their open positions, according to Indeed's 2026 US Jobs and Hiring Trends Report.

That paradox is a focus for James Whitemore, who joined Indeed as chief marketing officer in June 2025, the same month former CEO Hisayuki "Deko" Idekoba returned to lead the company once again.

Whitemore told Business Insider that both companies and candidates have to reorient how they share information, add more details and nuance to postings and profiles, and move towards natural language to optimize for AI.

These shifts are central to two new AI tools the company rolled out for job seekers and employers in September, called Career Scout and Talent Scout, and an API integration for employers, called Indeed Connect, which is launching in January 2026.

Whitemore also shared how Indeed's marketing team is using AI to maximize its first-party data, and uncanny experiences with synthetic audience testing.

The following interview is edited for length and clarity.

Business Insider: What do employers need to know about hiring using AI tools?

James Whitemore: We're trying to shift the whole conversation from job search to one that is more proactive, where a potential employer is sourcing and screening for the right candidates, rather than the candidates having to go find the job.

So first, when you are looking for candidates, how do companies build their profiles? A lot of large-scale employers have really complex search strings that they use to source candidates.

With our new tools, you're not using search strings anymore. You are using real-language descriptions of skills, personality traits, and educational backgrounds. Teaching employers how to use the tools and how to form searches, describe candidates, and the type of people that they want, is key.

Then to make the AI tools work effectively, there is much more ongoing communication about the candidate, so much more disposition sharing about who moved through the interview process and why some people were screened out versus other people who moved forward. That way you can constantly teach the platforms what worked for them.

So bringing all this together can be automated?

Yes, we call it Indeed Connect, which is basically an API-to-API integration between the Indeed platforms and the company's HR tech stack. The benefit that brings employers is that they can use those screening and sourcing tools across multiple sources of candidates.

Most large-scale employers will have their own databases of candidates, and they're looking at other third parties, but you can use a consistent set of sourcing tools across all of those candidates, not just the ones that are coming in from Indeed.

Job seekers are frustrated with the hiring process. What do they need to know in order to stand out in AI-enabled search?

You want yourself to be as searchable as possible when employers are using advanced sourcing and screening tools.

The key thing is to make sure that you have a full and complete profile, and that the profile goes beyond your resume. A resume is a historical look back at what you have done in the past. What most employers are really interested in is what you are capable of doing in the future.

When I think about our own team, we're looking for somebody who understands marketing, but also general-purpose people who understand a business process, who can be used effectively across multiple tasks.

Resumes typically don't bring out soft skills. Completing your profiles and talking about what makes you tick and what excites you in "about me" sections is important, so that as those profiles get screened, you are much more likely to show up as somebody who is an adaptable, curious type of person.

What are other best practices for job seekers today?

To be successful, you need to be very focused on the type of jobs you want. Mass-applying to jobs that aren't a good fit for you is not going to get you anywhere other than frustrated.

Also, it's OK to be constantly looking. The concept of "come look for a job when you need a job" is not the right way to be thinking about it. You should be passively open to understanding what jobs are open to you on an ongoing basis, rather than just coming to look for a job when you need a change for some reason.

That's the concept Indeed is moving to, from a place where you come to look for a job to a place where you expose your skills, your capabilities, your ambitions to potential employers, and those employers can find you when they need someone with your skills.

How is Indeed's marketing team using artificial intelligence?

Marketing is one of the disciplines that has the opportunity to be most transformed by the use of AI tools. A big element is understanding and segmenting audiences in ways that we've never been able to do before.

At Indeed, we have rich first-party audience data. We know who people are, what their job histories are, education, salaries, and much more data than a lot of CMOs have to work with.

Being able to take that data and compare it to third-party databases — that technology is rapidly evolving. Then it's being able to take those audience segments and run them against mass-scale media databases, so that you understand exactly where those people are consuming content across digital, print, radio, and TV.

The ability to test messages against a synthetic audience is also fascinating. We're running synthetic marketing tests versus traditional tests, and the synthetic tests are just as accurate. Then you can take that data and feed it into the content engines, so that you are producing personalized content for audiences at scale.

It's amazing to see how it's constantly evolving, so quickly. Part of the message to the team is that marketing has got to be at the leading edge of AI. We do a lot of work with our vendors, bringing them to demo their platforms and talk about their roadmaps.

How do you manage the variety of marketing AI systems and vendors?

I'm interviewing right now for a senior director of marketing transformation who will lead that group. It is so important to have somebody who is really on point to lead the discussions.

We purposely didn't call it "head of AI" because it's really looking at the processes, the workflows, the way that we work with others around the organization, as well as all the tools and technology, which is so important to get right.

• The Netflix-Warner Bros. tie-up is moving forward, despite a hostile bid from Paramount Skydance.
• WBD's board reiterated its recommendation of Netflix's offer.
• Netflix's co-CEOs celebrated the decision and laid out their case to WBD shareholders.

Netflix and Warner Bros. are moving toward a marriage, even as Paramount Skydance plans to crash the wedding.

Warner Bros. Discovery rejected Paramount again on Wednesday after the David Ellison-led company made a hostile offer for $30 per share for all of WBD last week. Instead, WBD's board recommended shareholders stick with its Netflix deal to sell assets, including its studio, HBO, and HBO Max, for $27.75 per share. In the Netflix deal, WBD's cable networks, like CNN, would be separated from the studio and HBO Max.

Paramount's offer to WBD's board of directors was "inadequate, with significant risks and costs imposed on our shareholders," WBD board chair Samuel Di Piazza said in a statement to shareholders on Wednesday morning, citing issues with Paramount's financing.

WBD publicly reiterated its decision after Paramount's hostile play for the company and said shareholders should go with Netflix. If WBD shareholders prefer Paramount's offer for the whole company, they could disregard the board's recommendation. Shareholders have until January 8 to choose Paramount's offer, though that deadline could be moved. WBD would have to pay Netflix a $2.8 billion fee if the deal were to fall apart.

Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters praised the decision by WBD's board in statements on Wednesday and wrote their own letter to WBD shareholders.

"The Warner Bros. Discovery Board reinforced that Netflix's merger agreement is superior and that our acquisition is in the best interest of stockholders," Sarandos said.

Sarandos added that the Netflix-Warner Bros. deal is "the best outcome for consumers, creators, stockholders, and the broader entertainment industry." He also reiterated Netflix's pledge to put Warner Bros. movies in theaters with a traditional theatrical window.

Peters added that Netflix and Warner Bros. would "offer audiences and creators around the world even more choice, value and opportunity" in a deal that he described as "pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-creator, and pro-growth."

In a letter to WBD shareholders, the co-CEOs said they were confident about regulatory approval and that they anticipated the transaction closing in 12 to 18 months. Netflix said it has submitted necessary filings and "is engaging with competition authorities," including the DOJ and EU Commission.

Read the full letter from Netflix's co-CEOs to WBD shareholders here:

Dear Warner Bros. Discovery Stockholders,

Today the Warner Bros. Discovery ("WBD") Board sent a clear message to you, their stockholders. The WBD Board urges you to reject Paramount Skydance's ("PSKY") unsolicited, inferior and illusory tender offer.

After a robust and highly competitive strategic review process, the WBD Board had already recommended the transaction with Netflix. Today they have reaffirmed that this transaction is the best and most certain path forward for WBD and its stockholders and therefore recommend you vote to approve the Netflix Merger when the WBD stockholder meeting is convened.

We want to reiterate why we believe the agreed-upon transaction with Netflix is the right deal, with the right partner, at the right time — and to set the record straight on some key points. Here's why our transaction is superior on multiple fronts:

1. Superior financing certainty and clear funding structure: Our deal structure is clean and certain, with committed debt financing from leading institutions. There are no contingencies, no foreign sovereign wealth funds, and no stock collateral or personal loans. We are a scaled company with a +$400 billion market cap and a strong investment grade balance sheet. As WBD said, the PSKY offer has "numerous risks and uncertainties" associated with it, among which are PSKY's financial condition and creditworthiness.
2. Confidence in regulatory approvals: We plan to close the transaction in 12-18 months, after completing customary regulatory approvals. Netflix has submitted its HSR filing and is engaging with competition authorities, including the DOJ and EU Commission. Our financing structure is not subject to review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Our $5.8 billion reverse termination fee, which is the largest cash regulatory termination fee in a public M&A transaction, shows our confidence in our ability to obtain required regulatory approvals.
3. Less risk and greater flexibility for WBD stockholders: Our offer provides flexibility for WBD to run its business between now and close, as well as facilitate the separation of Discovery Global quickly, as previously determined by the WBD board to be the right strategic direction that ensures continued stockholder value creation. In contrast, PSKY's offer puts substantial limitations on WBD's operations between sign and close and requires WBD to abandon its planned separation of Discovery Global. As a result, if PSKY's offer ultimately fails to close, WBD's stockholders will have lost the opportunity to reposition the company and realize substantial benefits of the separation for a prolonged period.
4. Fully negotiated agreement designed for execution: This agreement is the result of thoughtful, collaborative work between our two companies. Together, we will work cooperatively to ensure a smooth and stable transition for our creators, employees, partners, and stockholders. Because of this preparation and our shared commitment to excellence, we're moving forward with clarity, accountability, and real momentum.

More Value for Stockholders

Our transaction is superior, with a total equity value per share for WBD stockholders of $27.75 (comprised of $23.25 per share in cash and $4.50 per share in Netflix stock with a collar mechanism to protect stockholders as we move toward closing), plus the additional value of the shares of Discovery Global that WBD stockholders will receive pursuant to the separation of Discovery Global. As WBD addressed in its Schedule 14D-9, "the separation [of Discovery Global] will create additional value for WBD stockholders. The Separation will afford Discovery Global enhanced strategic, operating and financial flexibility, including to pursue accretive investments and M&A opportunities or realize a future control premium for stockholders."

Clear, Timely Path to Close

We are highly confident that regulators will see this deal for what it is: pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, pro-creator, pro-growth, and pro-competition.

The global entertainment market is highly competitive and dynamic. Consumers have more ways than ever to spend their time, whether it's with streaming services, linear TV, cable, gaming, social media, user-generated content, or all the big tech video platforms. And creators have more choices than ever for how to bring their vision to life.

You don't have to take our word for it:

• In the U.S.,¹ Netflix is in sixth place in TV view share, trailing Google/YouTube, Disney, Comcast NBCU, Fox, and Paramount.

• YouTube and Disney lead by a wide margin – 12.9% and 11.4% respectively – while Netflix sits at 8.0%.
• Pro forma, a combined Netflix-HBO/HBO Max would be 9.2% share (only up from 8%), still below both YouTube and Disney.  
• If PSKY acquired WBD, its share would increase to 14%.
• In major markets outside of the U.S., Netflix's TV view share is also less than 10%.

25+ Year Track Record of Stockholder Value Creation, Operational Excellence, and Trusted Creative Partnerships

Netflix has a demonstrated track record of disciplined investment, creative collaboration, and responsible ownership of a global entertainment company. We believe enduring value in this industry is built through sustained commitment to storytelling, talent, and brand integrity, and this transaction reflects those principles. We built Netflix through continuous improvement, innovation, consumer focus, and bold ambition – whether it was going from DVDs to streaming; licensing to originals; or Hollywood programming to hits from all around the world. Over the years, our deeply experienced management team has proven that they can successfully navigate an ever-changing, highly dynamic entertainment marketplace to create incredible value for consumers and the creative industry. And we've created over $400 billion in stockholder value.

We're fans first. We love film and television, and the creative talent that fuel this industry, which is why we've built a reputation for encouraging creative freedom. With Warner Bros., our track record of launching careers and supporting the creative community will continue.

More Value for Consumers Worldwide

Together, Netflix and Warner Bros. have some of the greatest shows and movies in the world, from The Big Bang Theory and The Sopranos to Game of Thrones, The Wizard of Oz, the DC Universe, Wednesday, Squid Game, Bridgerton, Adolescence and KPop Demon Hunters.

At Netflix, we can help Warner Bros.' iconic franchises generate even more value by connecting them to audiences in over 190 countries. And it's not just about reach: with approximately 75% of HBO Max subscribers also being Netflix members, the significant overlap creates an opportunity to offer consumers more tailored, better optimized subscription plans depending on their specific preferences.

More Opportunity for the Entertainment Industry

Unlike any other potential combination, Netflix and Warner Bros. truly complement each other.

Warner Bros. has three core businesses that Netflix doesn't: a successful theatrical film division, a world-class television studio that is a leading supplier to the industry, and HBO — the gold standard in prestige television. By combining them with Netflix's innovation, IP, global reach, and best-in-class streaming service, we'll be able to offer more opportunities to creators and strengthen the entire entertainment industry.

With Netflix, there is minimal overlap with the existing Warner Bros. business. In fact, it's almost entirely incremental and additive. With Warner Bros.' studio capabilities, we'll be able to ramp up our investment in original programming and production in the U.S. This will mean more and steadier work for crews, post-production teams, creative professionals, and on-screen talent. With wider global distribution, both established and emerging storytellers will have a bigger stage on which to showcase their films and series. And we'll continue to produce shows for third parties and be a leading supplier to the industry.

There's been a lot of talk about theatrical distribution, so we want to set the record straight: we are 100% committed to releasing Warner Bros. films in theaters with industry-standard windows. While this hasn't been part of our business model until now, we are looking forward to bringing this expertise from Warner Bros. to Netflix.

Netflix is the Right Home for Warner Bros.

For all these reasons, we believe Netflix is the right home for Warner Bros. and the legacy it has built over the last century.

As we move forward, we are committed to working closely with WBD, regulators, and all stakeholders to ensure a smooth and successful transaction. Our focus will remain on execution, delivering exceptional storytelling, investing in creative talent, and strengthening a vibrant, competitive global entertainment industry.

We are dedicated to preserving Warner Bros.' incredible library, keeping movies on the big screen, and introducing their iconic films and series to even more audiences around the world. Together, we have the opportunity to inspire and entertain the world like never before. We look forward to partnering with David Zaslav and his team to make this vision a reality.

Sincerely,

Ted Sarandos, co-CEO

Greg Peters, co-CEO

• The FAA will spend $6 billion to upgrade US air traffic control infrastructure by 2028.
• Recent outages and shutdowns exposed the fragility of the aging air traffic control system.
• Congress approved $12.5 billion, but the FAA may need another $19 billion.

Billions of dollars are about to be spent on upgrading the country's air traffic control system, according to the boss of the Federal Aviation Administration.

The FAA is committing $6 billion on ATC telecom and radar infrastructure, Administrator Bryan Bedford told a House subcommittee on Tuesday.

The new infrastructure is set to be deployed by the end of 2028, down from a previously planned timescale of 15 years, Bedford said.

It comes after incidents this year have highlighted the fragility and age of the current system.

However, while Congress has so far approved $12.5 billion to upgrade the air traffic control system, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has said it will cost $31.5 billion overall.

Passengers around the country have faced disruption this year due to the aging ATC system.

In April and May, several communications outages occurred at a control center that guides planes in and out of Newark Liberty International Airport.

Radar displays briefly went offline, so the FAA had to slow arrival and departure rates. The airport has also been dealing with runway construction.

At one point, Newark was limited to an hourly rate of 34 departures and arrivals, less than half the number it typically handled.

The government shutdown in the fall further exposed the fragility of the ATC system.

Controllers were among the federal workers who were told they had to keep working without a paycheck. As the shutdown dragged on, fewer and fewer controllers turned up for work.

In California, Hollywood Burbank Airport's control tower was left unstaffed for about six hours one day.

Eventually, the FAA had to mandate flight cuts at 40 of the country's busiest airports due to staffing shortages.