Is the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ) worth buying for dividend income?

A smiling woman with a satisfied look on her face lies on a rug in her home with her laptop open and a large cup on the floor nearby, gazing at the screen. researching new ETFs

A smiling woman with a satisfied look on her face lies on a rug in her home with her laptop open and a large cup on the floor nearby, gazing at the screen. researching new ETFs

The BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX: NDQ) is one of the most popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on the ASX, with net assets of $2.6 billion. It has managed to achieve good capital growth, though investors may be wondering about the potential of dividend income.

Over the last five years, the Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF has risen by 78%. That’s comfortably more than the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO), which has only risen by 22% over the same time period. But, that includes the COVID period.

One of the most important things to remember with an ETF is that the performance is dictated by the underlying holdings. If the underlying holdings, as a whole, go up in price then the ETF price should go up too (after accounting for fees).

ETFs are also meant to pass on the investment income of dividends received from the business holdings to investors as well.

This ETF owns 100 of the biggest businesses listed on the NASDAQ, such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon.com, Alphabet and Tesla. The bigger the position in the portfolio, the more the company’s dividend yield influences the whole ETF’s yield.

But, some of the names, like Amazon.com, Alphabet and Tesla don’t even pay a dividend to investors.

Dividend yield estimate

BetaShares says that the 12-month distribution from the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF is 3.3%. That’s the yield calculated by “summing the prior 12-month per unit distributions divided by the closing net asset value (NAV) per unit.”

However, I think it’s important to remember that ETFs also distribute crystallised capital gains to investors. So, if the ETF sells some of its shares and has made a profit, then that is included in the distribution. So, the actual dividend income of the ETF may not make up the whole distribution.

Between July 2019 to January 2023, the distribution yield has ranged between 2.35% to 5%, according to BetaShares.

Is BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF worth buying for passive income?

On the dividend income alone, I wouldn’t suggest it’s going to pay a big yield.

It’s not surprising considering the current Microsoft dividend yield is only just above 1% and the Apple dividend yield is less than 1%, according to Google Finance.

However, when we look at the distributions by the ETF, it’s a solid yield over the past few years. If its yield is around 3% over the next three years, that would be pretty good to me.

But, the main potential here, in my opinion, is capital growth. Over the last five years, it has returned an average of 15.2% per annum, which includes a drop of more than 20% since the start of 2022. Though, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

I think this group of businesses has an attractive future with global growth potential.

The post Is the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ) worth buying for dividend income? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

Should you invest $1,000 in Betashares Nasdaq 100 Etf right now?

Before you consider Betashares Nasdaq 100 Etf, you’ll want to hear this.

Motley Fool Investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Betashares Nasdaq 100 Etf wasn’t one of them.

The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.* And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that are better buys.

See The 5 Stocks
*Returns as of March 1 2023

(function() {
function setButtonColorDefaults(param, property, defaultValue) {
if( !param || !param.includes(‘#’)) {
var button = document.getElementsByClassName(“pitch-snippet”)[0].getElementsByClassName(“pitch-button”)[0];
button.style[property] = defaultValue;
}
}

setButtonColorDefaults(“#43B02A”, ‘background’, ‘#5FA85D’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#43B02A”, ‘border-color’, ‘#43A24A’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#fff”, ‘color’, ‘#fff’);
})()

More reading

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Alphabet, Amazon.com, Apple, BetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF, Microsoft, and Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended the following options: long March 2023 $120 calls on Apple and short March 2023 $130 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended BetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Alphabet, Amazon.com, and Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

from The Motley Fool Australia https://ift.tt/QXMuiYt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s