I have a question for you.
Would you rather a certain $500,000, or a 50:50 shot at ending up with $700,000, but getting only $200,000 if things donât work out?
I can tell you what the maths suggests: a 50:50 chance of either $700,000 or $200,000 gives an expected value of $450,000 (50% of 700k + 50% of 200k).
A certain $500,000 is, well, still $500,000. Itâs the better bet, statistically speaking.
But why do I ask?
Because that very question â explicit and implicit â is being asked and answered by investors, every day.
Some have the conversation with their financial planner, assessing their tolerance for risk, and selecting an investment strategy accordingly.
Some think it through themselves, and the answer is shown in what psychologists call their ârevealed preferencesâ â how they actually invest.
And some answered a Twitter poll, posted by our US sister organisation. The question posed was âWhat matters more to you in stock investing?â.
The options:
1. Avoiding big losers
2. Finding big winners
And the results?
50:50.
Well, 49.9% and 50.1%, respectively⦠but Iâll call that a tie.
Now, Twitter polls arenât scientific etc. And yet, that very poetic 50:50 split illustrates the issue beautifully.
See, when someone asks me, at a barbecue, on telly, or in an Uber âWhat stocks should I buy?â, the real answer is always âit dependsâ.
It depends on your answer to the above question.
And a whole lot of other things!
But â and let me dig a little deeper here â Iâm not even sure those people answering the poll really, truly, know themselves, necessarily.
How many investors, in 2021, were in the âFinding big winnersâ camp, but are now chastened by the big tech company share price falls of 2022 and 2023 and are now in the âAvoiding big losersâ group?
How many investors, who consider themselves in the âAvoiding big losersâ camp, will start swinging for the fences, once their brothers-in-law start getting rich on some speculative mining stocks?
Or who will play it safe for a while, only to realise they wonât have as much as theyâd like in retirement, and start to try to play âcatch upâ, taking greater and greater risks â knowingly or otherwise?
And â and let me put my investment advisorâs hat on here for a sec â how many of both groups are making decisions without a good understanding of themselves, of the maths, and of the markets?
Youâve probably heard the Mike Tyson line that âeveryone has a plan until theyâre punched in the faceâ. That can be true of investing. It can be very easy to lose your nerve when markets go south.
See pain â emotional and otherwise â is hard to endure. And people will do what they can to avoid it. Itâs where the phrase âto cut your lossesâ comes from. The key thought? Just. Make. It. Stop.
Now, Tyson more than anyone, understands âno pain, no gainâ. (Well, Evander Hollyfield probably understands it better, after Tyson bit off part of his ear, but I digress.)
So what should an investor do? Well, there is one good option, one okay option, and one bad option.
The good option is to have planned for down markets, to have steeled yourself for them, and to have prepared your portfolio for them. To own companies that are long term winners, even if you have to endure some paper losses along the way.
The okay option? If you canât do the above, donât do it at all. Becauseâ¦
The bad option is investing during the good times, then selling, at a loss, in the bad times because you canât take it any more⦠crystallising a permanent capital loss.
Because itâs easy for me to say âI reckon you should buy shares in Company X, because over the next decade, I think itâll do really wellâ.
Itâs harder for some people (perhaps those 50% who wanted to avoid big losers) to keep the faith, if that companyâs shares fall 30%, 40% or more half a dozen times along the journey, even if Iâm right in the end.
And if theyâre going to sell at the first sign of trouble, theyâre better not buying those shares at all, because they wonât be around to share in the eventual spoils.
Iâve often talked about Amazonâs extraordinary rise, both as a business, and as a stock. (I own shares, for the record).
Those shares, up 129,000% (unfortunately, I was late to this particular party!) since listing, have nonetheless fallen â hard â many, many times.
Worth holding, regardless? You bet.
But you had to do just that⦠hold.
Too many people didnât. Couldnât.
They get no criticism from me. But I wish theyâd have known that about themselves, up front, rather than buying, then selling for a loss, and wondering what might have been.
See, I want everyone to invest. Iâve seen â from history and with my own eyes â just how remarkable long-term compounding can be.
But I donât want people to invest unless and until theyâve made their peace with what to expect from the stock market.
If you havenât, or canât, I reckon youâre better off not investing at all.
But I hope you can find a way to make your peace with it.
To know what to expect. And to commit yourself to seeing it through anyway; accepting the lumps and bumps because the outcomes are worth the pain.
You donât have to be Mike Tyson.
But you do have to make sure youâre still in the proverbial ring at the end of the bout.
You donât have to love the pain.
You donât have to enjoy falling share prices.
But you do have to commit to staying the course.
How you do that is up to you.
Maybe you make yourself a student of financial history, learning about both the historical volatility and the enormous historical returns, despite that volatility.
Maybe you use a financial planner as your financial coach.
Maybe you build your portfolio using one of our investment services (or one of our â reputable â competitors) where you can lean on the analysis and experience of others.
Maybe you simply decide itâs not for you.
All of those are valid options.
And each is better than jumping in and out of the market, locking in losses each time, and swearing off investing.
Because forewarned is, as they say, forearmed.
There is going to be volatility.
There are going to be losses.
There are going to be times when you just want the pain to stop.
And yet, history tells us that, over the long term, a suitably diversified portfolio has delivered extraordinary gains.
I canât promise thatâll continue. No-one knows the future.
But I can tell you that I expect to be fully invested â and adding more to my portfolio â for decades and decades to come.
My suggestion?
Why not re-read the above. Work out what sort of investor you are, and what you need to do to make sure you can stay the course.
Because, financially, nothing substitutes for making sure youâre still there at the end.
Fool on!
The post Mike Tyson on investing appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.
Should you invest $1,000 in right now?
Before you consider , you’ll want to hear this.
Motley Fool Investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.* And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that are better buys.
See The 5 Stocks
*Returns as of April 3 2023
(function() {
function setButtonColorDefaults(param, property, defaultValue) {
if( !param || !param.includes(‘#’)) {
var button = document.getElementsByClassName(“pitch-snippet”)[0].getElementsByClassName(“pitch-button”)[0];
button.style[property] = defaultValue;
}
}
setButtonColorDefaults(“#43B02A”, ‘background’, ‘#5FA85D’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#43B02A”, ‘border-color’, ‘#43A24A’);
setButtonColorDefaults(“#fff”, ‘color’, ‘#fff’);
})()
More reading
- The market has soured 20% on the A2 Milk share price. Is it a turnaround buy?
- Is the Webjet share price a buy before it reports this week?
- Here are the 10 most shorted ASX shares
- Guess which ASX rare earths share has exploded 1300% in a year?
- Buy these ASX dividend shares for good yields and outsized returns: analysts
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Foolâs board of directors. Motley Fool contributor Scott Phillips has positions in Amazon.com. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Amazon.com and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Amazon.com. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
from The Motley Fool Australia https://ift.tt/OrgmCTS