Is your superannuation investing on track to retire in 10 years?

Can you retire in 10 years?

For many Australians in their mid-50s, that question feels uncomfortably close to home. The numbers tell an important story.

According to recent data, the average superannuation balance for Australians aged 55 sits well below what most experts consider necessary for a “comfortable” retirement at 65. Meanwhile, industry benchmarks suggest a couple retiring at 65 may need well over $600,000 in super to fund a comfortable lifestyle, depending on spending expectations and eligibility for the Age Pension.

That gap is the simple number most Australians miss.

It is not just about how much you have today. It is about how much your capital can grow over the next decade.

The 10-year compounding window

Over the past 30 years, the Australian share market has delivered average annual returns of around 9.3%, including dividends. That does not mean markets rise by 9.3% every year. Some years are strong, others are deeply negative. However, over long periods, that average has held remarkably steady.

If you are 55 today and planning to retire at 65, you still have a full decade for your capital to compound.

For example, a $400,000 super balance growing at an average rate close to long-term market returns could look very different after 10 years of compounding. Even modest additional contributions during this period can meaningfully lift the final balance.

The key insight is this: the last 10 years before retirement are not a time when growth stops mattering. In many cases, they matter most.

The sequencing risk trap

There is, however, a major risk that often goes overlooked.

It is known as sequencing risk.

This refers to the danger of experiencing poor market returns in the years immediately before or after retirement. A sharp downturn just as you begin drawing income can have a disproportionate impact on how long your capital lasts.

This is why many investors think carefully about how they transition from growth to income. It is rarely an all-or-nothing decision.

Strategies such as dollar-cost averaging, where investments are made progressively over time rather than in one lump sum, are often discussed as a way to smooth out entry points and reduce the impact of short-term volatility. While no strategy removes market risk entirely, spreading investments over time can help investors navigate the natural ups and downs of markets and potentially stay closer to long-term average returns.

Growth first, income second

One of the most common mistakes is focusing too early on income and yield, especially when retirement is still years away.

For many Australians at 55, the priority over the next decade may still be capital growth. As retirement approaches, portfolios can gradually shift toward more income-oriented assets, depending on personal circumstances, risk tolerance, and access to other income sources.

The simple number that matters is not just your current super balance.

It is the number you are likely to have at 65.

That difference depends on three things:

• Your starting balance
• Your contribution rate over the next decade
• Your average return over that period

Retirement in 10 years is not simply about cutting spending or hoping the Age Pension fills the gap. It is about making deliberate decisions during what could be the most powerful compounding phase of your financial life.

For Australians approaching their mid-50s, the question is not whether retirement is close.

It is whether the next 10 years are being used wisely.

The post Is your superannuation investing on track to retire in 10 years? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• Forget CSL shares, this ASX biotech stock could triple in value
• Greatland Resources earnings: Bumper profit and revenue after first full Telfer half
• Here’s a $50,000 starter dividend portfolio delivering passive income
• Why this growing ASX 200 gold stock could rise 40%
• Regis Healthcare grows revenue and cash flow in H1 FY26 earnings

Motley Fool contributor Leigh Gant has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.