One of the biggest decisions you can make about your superannuation is the investment option you choose.
Most funds offer a menu.
Two of the most popular are “balanced” and “high growth.” The choice sounds arbitrary, but over the decades, making the right choice can be worth a fortune.
Let’s compare them.
How the two options differ
A balanced option spreads your money across shares, property, bonds, and cash.
A balanced portfolio typically holds around 60% to 76% in growth assets, while the rest sits in more defensive assets.
A high growth option tilts far harder towards shares and often holds 85% or more in growth assets.
That means bigger swings, but higher expected returns over time.
What the returns tell us about your superannuation
History gives us a useful guide.
Over the 10 years to 30 June 2026, AustralianSuper’s balanced option returned an average of 8.47% a year.
Its high growth option returned 9.64% a year over the same period.
That difference may look small, but it is anything but.
On a large balance compounded over decades, roughly one extra percent a year adds up to serious money.
However, the trade-off is volatility.
High growth options fall harder when markets wobble, and if investors panic and switch at the bottom, they lock in the loss.
Discipline is the price of those higher returns.
Which option suits you?
The answer depends on your time horizon. If retirement is 20 years away, you can usually ride out the bumps, and as such, high growth may suit you.
If you are close to retirement, a steep fall could hurt.
A more balanced mix may help you sleep at night. Many people shift towards safer assets as they near retirement.
On top of that, your risk tolerance matters just as much as your age. The best strategy is the one you can actually stick with.
Three ASX funds that lean growth
Some investors also hold ASX-listed funds directly, inside or alongside their superannuation. Three growth-tilted ETFs stand out.
The Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS) tracks the biggest ASX companies, and the iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF (ASX: IOZ) offers similar broad local exposure. By contrast, the BetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (ASX: NDQ) adds global technology heavyweights.
Together, they show what a growth tilt can look like. Just remember that more growth means more volatility.
Foolish Takeaway for your superannuation
There is no single right answer for your superannuation.
High growth has historically delivered more over the long run. Balanced offers a smoother ride.
Match the option to your timeline and your temperament. Then leave it alone and let compounding do the work.
The post Should I target high growth or balanced strategies for my superannuation? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.
Should you invest $1,000 in iShares Core S&p/asx 200 ETF right now?
Before you buy iShares Core S&p/asx 200 ETF shares, consider this:
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and iShares Core S&p/asx 200 ETF wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
* Returns as of 16 June 2026
.custom-cta-button p {
margin-bottom: 0 !important;
}
More reading
- 3 super ASX ETFs to buy and hold until 2046
- Why it’s vital for investors to look to international shares for growth: ExpertÂ
- Own Vanguard ASX ETFs? It’s dividend payday!
- Own NDQ, GAME, or other Betashares ASX ETFs? It’s pay day for you!
- 3 amazing ASX ETFs I’d buy this month
Motley Fool contributor Mark Verhoeven has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended BetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended BetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.