Fortescue vs Wesfarmers: Which ASX share is better for passive income in 2026?

Fortescue vs Wesfarmers shares: Which is better for passive income?

Weighing up Fortescue Ltd (ASX: FMG) and Wesfarmers Ltd (ASX: WES) shares is a classic fork in the road for Aussie investors hunting for passive income. Both are giants of the ASX and reliable dividend payers—but that’s about where the similarities end. With one rooted in iron ore and the other sprawling across retail, energy, and healthcare, the choice between Fortescue and Wesfarmers shares could shape the nature of your dividend stream and the risk in your portfolio. Here’s how they stack up for those of us keen on generating income from our investments.

The case for Fortescue

Fortescue is one of the world’s largest iron ore producers, operating huge mines and infrastructure assets in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Since getting its ASX start in 1987, Fortescue has built a global reputation for exporting iron ore, with expansion into integrated infrastructure like heavy haul rail and port facilities. This scale makes it a powerhouse among miners.

What stands out for Fortescue is its juicy dividend—boasting a market-leading fully franked yield of 6.46%, if you take the most current snapshot. Dividends have historically been consistent, fully franked, and generous, with recent payments including $0.62 interim and $0.46 final dividends (all at 100% franking). The company’s P/E ratio of 12.81 suggests the market isn’t pricing in runaway growth, but that’s typical for resources—what Fortescue delivers is strong cash flow, fuelling those dividends. Bear in mind, though, the shares are down 19.1% in 2026 year to date, reflecting the ups and downs tied to iron ore prices.

The case for Wesfarmers

Wesfarmers is Australia’s quintessential conglomerate, with interests spanning Bunnings Warehouse (the hardware titan), Kmart and Target, Officeworks, Priceline (health and pharmacy), plus chemicals and fertilisers. Since its origins as a farmers’ co-op, Wesfarmers has become a fixture in many Aussie portfolios—appreciated for its diversification and steady management.

Dividend lovers take comfort in Wesfarmers’ consistent and long history of payments, also at 100% franking. Its current yield sits at 3.05%, which is solid but less than half that of Fortescue’s on paper. Recent dividends include $1.02 interim and $1.20 final declared for 2026, also fully franked. The P/E, at 28.71, is much higher than Fortescue’s—a function of its diversified earnings and the stability the conglomerate offers. Shares are down 7.6% year to date in 2026, which is less than the slide seen at Fortescue.

Valuation comparison

With both companies sitting among the ASX’s top names, their market caps are hefty: Wesfarmers at $83.20 billion and Fortescue at $51.57 billion. But the numbers that shine for income investors are dividend yield, P/E, and franking. Here’s a quick look:

Note: Wesfarmers’ P/E ratio is much higher than Fortescue’s, reflecting its diversified and arguably more stable business mix. Both companies offer 100% franking, so the tax advantage is even.

Recent share price performance

Looking at how the shares have moved recently can highlight sentiment and risk. Comparing the period of 25 August to 22 September 2026:

• Fortescue shares slid 19.1% year to date and experienced periods of volatility over the past month, with swings both up and down. Standouts include a sharp 4.6% dip on 2 September and several other days with moves over 2%—reminding us that resources stocks are always at the market’s mercy when it comes to commodity prices.
• Wesfarmers shares are down just 7.6% over the same period in 2026. The volatility has been notably less wild than Fortescue, with changes mostly under 1% for most days. The steepest daily move was -4.6% on 27 August, but otherwise Wesfarmers’ price chart is a much gentler ride.

Which is the better buy?

If my main goal is passive income, my pick would be Fortescue. That 6.46% fully franked yield, backed by a long streak of generous dividend payments, is hard to overlook if dividend flow is my top priority. Yes, there’s a trade-off—the ride can be bumpy, and much depends on iron ore prices. Investors in Fortescue need to accept that resource shares will always be at the mercy of the commodity cycle.

Wesfarmers, by comparison, offers stability and sector diversification, but at a much steeper P/E and with only half the yield. If I were after more defensive exposure and lower share price swings, I’d lean toward Wesfarmers—but my dividends would be notably smaller, at least for now.

For pure passive income, Fortescue takes the cake for me. But as always, diversification and risk appetite matter—so it’s worth thinking about how either of these fits within your own portfolio goals.

The post Fortescue vs Wesfarmers: Which ASX share is better for passive income in 2026? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

More reading

• How I’d build a $50,000 ASX share portfolio today
• 5 ASX 200 shares upgraded by experts this week
• Super Retail Group vs Wesfarmers: Dividend showdown for Aussie investors
• What do brokers tip for Fortescue shares over the next 12 months?
• Could Wesfarmers shares reach $100 in 2027

Motley Fool contributor Laura Stewart has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Wesfarmers. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Wesfarmers. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips. This article was prepared with the assistance of Large Language Model (LLM) tools for the initial draft. Any content assisted by AI is subject to our robust human-in-the-loop quality control framework, involving thorough review, substantial editing, and fact-checking by our experienced writers and editors holding appropriate credentials. The Motley Fool Australia stands behind the work of our editorial team and takes ultimate responsibility for the content published by The Motley Fool Australia.