Author: openjargon

  • The solution to the urban doom loop is right beneath our feet

    A skyscraper surrounded by pipe work

    Tucked beneath a 48-story San Francisco skyscraper, at the far end of the parking lot on the first subbasement level, is a door with a keypad lock. An unimposing sign reads "Utility Meter Room." Behind the door is a tangled clot of pipes: yellow, blue, and orange, each one as wide as a 100-pound barbell plate. The pipes — along with thousands more just like them, winding their way under more than 600 American cities, campuses, hospitals, and airports — are more than a blast from our industrial past. They're a steampunk vision of the future.

    I've come to 345 California Center, a postmodern hexagon that towers over San Francisco's financial district, to get a look at the hottest new idea for how to break the urban doom loop — the post-pandemic, remote-work apocalypse that is hollowing out America's cities. And when I say "hottest," I don't mean it metaphorically. It's like a sauna down here. Because the Utility Meter Room doesn't run on a self-contained, industrial-sized boiler, like most big buildings. Instead, it's drawing a feed of blistering, high-pressure, vaporized water from a century-old loop of steam pipes that runs beneath the city's streets. The steam loops are a relic of the 19th century, as forgotten as the pneumatic tubes that used to shoot mail all over American cities. But unlike the pneumatic tubes, the steam loops are still there — and they can provide enough heat to keep a building like 345 California Center nice and toasty, even on the coldest of days.

    The steam loops are part of an antiquated system known as "district energy." It was basically a shared-services model: a utility would make steam at a central location and then pipe it out to every building in the city. Nobody had to provide their own heat — it was way more convenient, and cheaper, to get it from a common source. 

    But then cities began to abandon district energy. Buildings, businesses, and homes started making their own hot water in boilers fueled by coal, then oil, then natural gas. Sometimes it was cheaper, and maybe it was more convenient. But it also set the planet on fire. More heating meant more greenhouse gases, and more global warming

    Which brings me back to our steampunk future. Today, cities are starting to price the looming climate catastrophe into their energy costs. Starting this year, commercial buildings in New York City will be slapped with steep fines if they're emitting too much carbon. Boston and Washington have similar "decarbonization" laws in place, and San Francisco isn't allowing natural gas in any new construction. That means businesses need to find a cleaner, cheaper source of heat. And those ancient steam loops beneath the streets are starting to seem like a ready-made solution.

    "The real benefit of a district-energy system, especially in cities, is the distribution system," says Kevin Hagerty, the CEO of Vicinity Energy. "If a city wants to decarbonize, and they have a district-energy system, it's much easier. They don't have to change things on a building-by-building basis."

    An orange upright pipe vents steam into the night sky in front of a building with stone arches and gaslamp-type lights, and parked cars on an urban street
    Like dozens of cities, New York has a loop of steam pipes under its streets that could help reverse the urban doom loop.

    In July, Vicinity is installing what will be the nation's first zero-carbon urban steam loop. Drawing electricity from the increasingly decarbonized New England grid, powered by solar and offshore wind, the utility will use the energy to boil water and then deliver steam directly to Boston office buildings and restaurants and storefronts through the city's antiquated maze of pipes. It's a remnant of the Industrial Revolution being used to forestall a lethal climate evolution.

    District energy could also be a godsend to businesses struggling to survive the current landscape of empty offices and boarded-up shops. By taking steam right out of the street beneath them, commercial landlords can pay less for their utilities and avoid carbon fines — which means they can lower their rents and hold on to tenants who might otherwise bail. District-energy loops also eliminate the need for boilers and other cumbersome building infrastructure, freeing up space for tenant-grabbing amenities like gyms, roof-decks, and golf simulators. (Yep. That's a real thing.)

    The other choice? Spend thousands to upgrade a building's energy systems — cash that landlords don't have on hand, and an expense they can't pass along to tenants. "If you're a building owner, district energy allows you to pay a small premium on your service to get that type of steam," says Blake Ellis, a principal at the engineering firm Burns & McDonnell. "Then you don't have that big capital outlay you probably don't want right now." Especially if, as in many downtowns, your building is only 70% occupied.

    About a third of the cost of running a commercial building is energy. And according to one major study, a building as energy-efficient as 345 California Center can charge 20% more for rent than a comparable, inefficient building. Every dollar saved in energy costs, the study found, equates to 3.5% higher rent. And it's a lot easier to be energy efficient if all you have to do is plug into a carbon-free steam loop. 

    "This building is 40 years old," Tim Danz, the chief engineer for 345 Cal, tells me. "But we're using the latest technology to manage our energy." He points to the gnarl of pipes that shoots the steam up to the 36th floor, where it's used to cook a water supply large enough to heat the entire building. Having a boiler, Danz explains, "would be another system we would have to provide care and feeding for." District energy, by contrast, is just there for the taking, right beneath our feet.

    The most convincing evidence that steam loops make economic sense comes from who's getting into the district-energy game. Vicinity, the nation's biggest clean-steam provider, is owned by Antin Infrastructure Partners, a leading private-equity firm. Cordia, an energy provider operating in 10 cities, is partially owned by the private-equity giant KKR. Everyone needs heat — which makes it a highly bankable investment. "These private-equity funds come in and find areas where they can put capital into a business and get a nice steady rate of return," Hagerty says. "Decarbonizing takes capital, and private equity is a great source of capital." 

    From AI startups to biotech companies, steampunk-heated buildings could become the cool new place to be. 

    In the long run, of course, private equity may decide to do what it always does and load up these new energy businesses with massive amounts of debt before dismantling them for parts. But for now, the big money sees big profits to be made from America's forgotten infrastructure. Outside of places like airports and college campuses, the idea of district energy fell out of favor long ago. We let the systems go fallow — but fortunately, all the accumulated infrastructure we buried on top of the old steam loops made it impossible to dig their little-used pipes out of the ground. So the whole thing was still down there, waiting, when COVID drove millions of city dwellers to head for the countryside. Now, by drawing heat from their old steam loops, America's cities have an opportunity to jump-start all the downtown commerce that was crippled by the pandemic. 

    And it could happen all over the place! Dozens and dozens of cities have steam loops they can use, from New York and Chicago to Miami to San Diego and Portland and Milwaukee. What's more, lots of companies these days are looking for greener buildings, both to save money and to burnish their environmental bona fides. From AI startups to biotech companies, steampunk-heated buildings could become the cool new place to be. 

    "Forward-minded companies want to be in a building that doesn't have any on-site fossil-fuel combustion," says Costa Samaras, the director of the Scott Institute for Energy and Innovation at Carnegie Mellon. "The best, greenest buildings will be net-zero buildings. They'll be considered a premium asset. The challenge is, are we going to get enough premium assets in time?" Meaning: Can we use steam loops to fix the urban doom loop before the climate doom loop dooms us all?


    Adam Rogers is a senior correspondent at Business Insider.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • How to run an efficient meeting, according to tech billionaires who took them very seriously

    Jeff Bezos, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Eric Schmidt
    Jeff Bezos, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Eric Schmidt share their meetings tips.

    • These tech billionaires ran meetings to avoid wasting time, groupthink, and compromise.
    • Their different techniques mostly focus on brevity and decision-making.
    • Jeff Bezos would get employees to respond to memos, and Bill Gates would grill people for details.

    Billionaires are known to be ruthless with their time.

    But even people running the world's biggest tech companies have to endure meetings, which have a bad reputation for wasting time and money. Mark Cuban even said they were a "last resort."

    The rest of us have to do our best to use them to generate ideas, investigate details, and focus on a single issue.

    These are some of the tips household names in business have had for stopping unproductive meetings.

    Jeff Bezos began his with 30 minutes of silent study

    Jeff Bezos.
    Jeff Bezos.

    Meetings with Amazon cofounder Jeff Bezos started with employees studying a memo.

    One employee might spend two weeks pulling together a six-page memo for a specific meeting.

    After 30 minutes of silent reading, attendees were invited to ask questions and start a discussion about the memo. "I like a crisp document and a messy meeting," Bezos said in a conversation with podcaster Lex Fridman in December.

    Allowing attendees time to read a memo and prepare their thoughts enables employees to ask more productive questions in the meeting, he said.

    Bezos said he didn't like slideshow presentations, which can hide "sloppy thinking" in bullet points.

    He also maintained a "two-pizza" rule: If two pizzas can't feed everyone in the room, there are too many people.

    Bill Gates dug for answers

    Bill Gates in May 2024.
    Bill Gates in May 2024.

    Microsoft founder Bill Gates would use meetings to quiz attendees, said Chris Williams, the former VP of HR at Microsoft, who worked closely with Gates for eight years.

    Williams said he'd never forget his first meeting with Gates in 1992. Microsoft had just bought the company Williams worked at. Gates wanted to meet its employees to find out why one of its products ran faster than Microsoft's equivalent.

    He grilled a developer with "rapid fire" and "detailed" questions, Williams recalled. By the end, the pair were discussing "the movement of single bits and the size of the Intel 80386 instruction cache," he added.

    Gates "was always curious, always wanted to understand, always drilling for more detail," Williams wrote for BI in 2023.

    "As he got older, his passion for detail never left, just his method for getting there mellowed," Williams added.

    Steve Jobs ensured only key staff were in the room

    Steve Jobs
    Steve Jobs.

    Steve Jobs was meticulous about keeping meetings small, according to Ken Segall, who worked closely with Jobs as creative director of Apple's ad agency.

    After Jobs died in 2011, Segall wrote a book about Apple's work culture, "Insanely Simple." In it, he described how Jobs once noticed someone new had joined a weekly meeting.

    "He stopped cold," Segall wrote. "His eyes locked on to the one thing in the room that didn't look right. Pointing to Lorrie, he said, 'Who are you?'"

    After she explained who she was and that she was working on related marketing projects, Jobs said, "I don't think we need you in this meeting, Lorrie. Thanks," Segall recalled.

    Eric Schmidt made sure meetings had a hierarchy

    Eric Schmidt
    Eric Schmidt.

    Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt said meetings need leaders to make decisions.

    In "How Google Works," the 2014 book Schmidt wrote with former SVP of products Jonathan Rosenberg, the pair said each meeting needed a designated "decision-maker" to have the final say.

    They wrote that when companies have meetings where everyone present is equal, there's a risk of compromising instead of finding a clear resolution.

    Schmidt and Rosenberg added that this person should set the purpose and structure of the meeting and summarize decisions and tasks for participants afterward.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Some wealthy people trying to sell their luxury homes are struggling

    Bravo star's Sonja Morgan's Upper East Side home is up for auction, with a starting bid of $1.75
    Bravo star's Sonja Morgan's Upper East Side home is up for auction, with a starting bid of $1.75

    • Even celebrities and ultrawealthy homeowners can face challenges selling their homes.
    • Take socialite Sonja Morgan — the starting bid for her NYC home is a fraction of its purchase price.
    • She's one of many homeowners resorting to auctioning or renting out pricy homes to offload them.

    The world of luxury real estate might seem like a place where deals are plentiful, transactions are swift, and satisfaction is guaranteed.

    But that isn't always true, especially in New York City, where a slowdown in demand has made selling multimillion-dollar condos and townhouses more challenging, StreetEasy Senior Economist Kenny Lee told Business Insider.

    In many of NYC's upscale neighborhoods, homes are lingering on the market longer and sales are falling, signaling that when it comes to a slump in the real-estate market — not even the nation's wealthiest Americans can walk away unscathed.

    Consider the case of Sonja Morgan, the ex-wife of John Adams Morgan, a great-grandson of the founder of J.P. Morgan Chase. Despite Morgan's socialite status and her home's location on the posh Upper East Side, she has struggled to sell the five-story, six-bathroom brownstone.

    Morgan, a star of Bravo's "Real Housewives of New York," has owned the home at 162 E. 63rd St. for 27 years, living there on and off. Since around 2008, she has made numerous attempts to sell it, but has failed to attract any serious buyers.

    Now, after years of listing and delisting the property, she has opted to auction it with a starting bid of $1.75 million, far below its reported purchase price of $9.1 million in 1997, according to Curbed's Bridget Read.

    "I wanna be free to garden and travel and not have to worry about the house — but I'm not taking nothing," Morgan told Curbed.

    Bidding opened with Concierge Auctions on May 16 and will remain open until May 29. As of May 24, the current highest bid is $4.25 million, according to the company.

    Even the ultrawealthy lose in the game of real estate market

    Luxury real estate shows like "Million Dollar Listing" or "Buying Beverly Hills" often portray the selling of high-end homes as effortless. However, even with an elite ZIP code and the pedigree of a famous or rich seller, sealing the deal can still prove difficult. Michael Jordan, for example, has been unable to sell his mansion outside Chicago for more than 11 years.

    There's also the 105,000-square-foot megamansion in Los Angeles, developed by former film producer Nile Niami. Following ten years of construction, the home languished on the market without attracting a buyer. It was later placed into court-ordered receivership and subsequently entered bankruptcy proceedings. Finally, it was auctioned off for $126 million to the billionaire CEO of Fashion Nova, Richard Saghian, in 2022.

    The crux of the issue is that, the more expensive a home is, the fewer potential buyers it has — it's a troublesome scenario amid slowing buyer demand and growing economic uncertainty. The lack of demand from traditional buyers has led to an increasing number of ultrawealthy homeowners, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, renting out their homes or auctioning them off rather than waiting around for buyers.

    "A lot of luxury buyers may already have a primary home, so maybe they're looking for a new investment," StreetEasy Senior Economist Lee said. "For that reason, even though they are generally less affected by high mortgage rates, they are heavily influenced by the general economic outlook."

    That's partly why more luxury buyers are increasingly considering renting out their homes rather than selling them, he added.

    Custom features added by sellers and maintenance costs canalso put off buyers

    One person's dream renovation could be the next person's nightmare.

    Lee pointed out another obstacle for luxury homeowners: their inclination to elaborately customize their homes with features that may or may not be appealing to the average buyer.

    "A lot of houses and apartments in New York City were built before the war," Lee said. "It's also for that reason, it's common for a lot of owners to go through renovations, to make it more livable and more to their own taste."

    In addition to a koi pond in the garden, the Morgans also installed a large nautical star in the entryway on the ground floor during a $3 million renovation, according to Curbed.

    The entry way of Sonja Morgan's Upper Eastside brownstone.
    The nautical star the Morgans added to their Upper Eastside home.

    Lee noted another factor contributing to the difficulty of selling luxury properties: the high costs associated with their maintenance and upkeep.

    Morgan's townhouse carries estimated monthly property taxes of $6,003, per the StreetEasy listing. This figure doesn't include additional expenses that come with owning a townhouse such as insurance, repairs, upgrades, landscaping, and more.

    Morgan told Curbed she's ready to be rid of it all.

    "I don't want anyone to think, 'New York is done and that's why she's leaving,'" Morgan said. "I'll always be a New Yorker. I just don't need all this."

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Elon Musk just spent a chunk of his Memorial Day weekend needling Meta’s AI chief on X

    xAI founder Elon Musk (left) and Meta's AI chief Yann LeCun (right).
    xAI founder Elon Musk (left) and Meta's AI chief Yann LeCun (right).

    • Meta's AI chief Yann LeCun is an award-winning computer scientist. 
    • But Elon Musk says he isn't impressed with LeCun's scientific work.
    • LeCun seemed entertained by the exchange, which he says he engaged in while on a transatlantic flight.

    Meta's AI chief, Yann LeCun, might have won a Turing Award for his contributions to computer science, but Elon Musk doesn't seem too impressed with his work.

    The Tesla and SpaceX CEO spent a chunk of his Memorial Day holiday volleying jibes at LeCun after the latter mocked Musk's attempt to recruit workers for his AI startup, xAI.

    "What 'science' have you done in the past 5 years?" Musk asked LeCun in an X post on Monday.

    "Over 80 technical papers published since January 2022. What about you?" LeCun replied with a link to his Google Scholar profile.

    "That's nothing, you're going soft. Try harder!" Musk said in response.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    LeCun joined Meta in December 2013 and has worked for the social media giant for over a decade. The 63-year-old French-American is also a computer science professor at New York University.

    But Musk didn't seem to believe that LeCun was involved in any scientific work at Meta.

    "Yann is 'just following orders,'" Musk wrote when LeCun clarified that he's "a scientist, not a business or product person."

    "You don't seem to understand how research works," LeCun replied.

    Interestingly, LeCun didn't seem too fussed by his exchange with Musk. In fact, he even told an X user named Alvin Wang that he found the conversation "entertaining."

    "You'd think they'd have more important things to do with their time than have a pissing contest," Wang wrote.

    "On a holiday? During which I was stuck on an 8 hour transatlantic flight with free wifi? Pretty entertaining, I'd say," LeCun replied.

    This exchange with LeCun is one of many times that Musk has butted heads with his tech rivals. The mercurial billionaire once challenged Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg to a cage match — which has yet to take place. Musk also filed a lawsuit against his OpenAI cofounder, Sam Altman, in February.

    LeCun, however, wasn't raring for a cage fight like Zuckerberg.

    "I'd settle for a sailing race," he said in a subsequent X post on Monday night.

    Representatives for Musk and LeCun didn't immediately respond to requests for comment from BI sent outside regular business hours.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • 3 reasons this broker thinks Woolworths shares are a cheap buy

    A businessman looking at his digital tablet or strategy planning in hotel conference lobby. He is happy at achieving financial goals.

    Woolworths Group Ltd (ASX: WOW) shares have been having a tough time over the last 12 months.

    During this time, the supermarket giant’s shares have lost about 18% of their value.

    This means that a $10,000 investment in Woolworths would now be worth approximately $8,200.

    Whereas over the same period, the ASX 200 index has risen by almost 8%. This would have turned a $10,000 investment into $10,800.

    That’s a disappointing opportunity cost of $2,600 from investing in Woolworths shares.

    But could the worst be over? Is now the time for investors to snap up the retailer’s shares while they are cheap?

    Well, Goldman Sachs certainly thinks it is. The broker sees significant value in its shares at the current level and has named a few reasons why it thinks investors should be investing today.

    3 reasons Woolworths shares could be cheap

    One of the reasons that Goldman Sachs believes investors should be buying the company’s shares is its customer loyalty.

    It notes that Woolworths has some of the highest consumer stickiness and loyalty among its peers. The broker expects this to drive market share gains.

    Another reason it is positive is the company’s ability to pass on cost inflation. It believes this will protect Woolworths’ margins more than the market currently anticipates.

    Finally, the broker highlights that Woolworths shares are trading at levels well below historical averages. Given its positive sales growth outlook, it feels this is unwarranted and has created a compelling buying opportunity. Goldman summarises:

    WOW is the largest supermarket chain in Australia with an additional presence in NZ, as well as selling general merchandise retail via Big W. We are Buy rated on the stock as we believe the business has among the highest consumer stickiness and loyalty among peers, and hence has strong ability to drive market share gains via its omni-channel advantage, as well as its ability to pass through any cost inflation to protect its margins, beyond market expectations. The stock is trading below its historical average (since 2018), and we see this as a value entry level for a high-quality and defensive stock.

    The broker currently has a conviction buy rating and $39.40 price target on its shares. Based on its current share price of $31.54, this implies potential upside of 25% for investors over the next 12 months.

    In addition, the broker is forecasting 3.4%+ dividend yields from Woolworths shares through to at least FY 2026.

    The post 3 reasons this broker thinks Woolworths shares are a cheap buy appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Woolworths Group Limited right now?

    Before you buy Woolworths Group Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Woolworths Group Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    See The 5 Stocks
    *Returns as of 5 May 2024

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today

    The silhouettes of ten people holding hands with their arms raised against the sky, as the sun rises or sets in the background.

    It ended up being a fairly disappointing day for the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) this Tuesday.

    After initially rising this morning, investors spent the rest of the day pumping the brakes. By the closing bell, the ASX 200 had shed 0.28%, leaving the index at 7,766.7 points.

    This miserly ASX Tuesday session comes after a decent night of trading up on Wall Street overnight that kicked off the American trading week.

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DJX: .DJI) had another nervous day, rising by just 0.011%.

    But it was far better for the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index (NASDAQ: .IXIC), which vaulted 1.1% higher.

    Let’s return to the ASX now though, and check out what the different ASX sectors were doing today.

    Winners and losers

    It was fairly bleak across the ASX sectors today, with only a couple eking out a green day.

    The worst place to be though was in industrial stocks. The S&P/ASX 200 Industrials Index (ASX: XNJ) led the losers with a hefty plunge of 1.01%.

    Utilities shares weren’t much better, with the S&P/ASX 200 Utilities Index (ASX: XUJ) tanking 0.9%.

    Communications stocks also had a rough one, with the S&P/ASX 200 Communication Services Index (ASX: XTJ) slumping 0.77%.

    Consumer discretionary shares were rejected by investors as well. The S&P/ASX 200 Consumer Discretionary Index (ASX: XDJ) cratered 0.68%.

    Tech stocks were also on the nose, as you can see from the S&P/ASX 200 Information Technology Index (ASX: XIJ)’s 0.62% loss.

    Healthcare shares didn’t exactly live up to their name today. The S&P/ASX 200 Healthcare Index (ASX: XHJ) sunk 0.34%.

    Another losing space was financial stocks. The S&P/ASX 200 Financials Index (ASX: XFJ) retreated 0.14%.

    Gold shares were no safe haven either. The All Ordinaries Gold Index (ASX: XGD) had a day to forget, enduring a 0.13% sell-off.

    Mining stocks and energy shares tied for this Tuesday’s best-worst sectors. Both the S&P/ASX 200 Materials Index (ASX: XMJ) and the S&P/ASX 200 Energy Index (ASX: XEJ) slipped 0.11% lower.

    Turning now to the far less numerous winners, these were led by consumer staples stocks. The S&P/ASX 200 Consumer Staples Index (ASX: XSJ) enjoyed a 0.19% bounce today.

    The other lucky sector to pull out a rise was the real estate investment trust (REIT) space. The S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT Index (ASX: XPJ) enjoyed a 0.04% lift.

    Top 10 ASX 200 shares countdown

    Coming out on top of the index this Tuesday was energy stock Strike Energy Ltd (ASX: STX).

    Strike shares ballooned a healthy 7.23% today to finish up at 22 cents a pop.

    This was prompted by a well-received update regarding Strike’s Walyering gas field.

    Here’s how the rest of today’s winners look:

    ASX-listed company Share price Price change
    Strike Energy Ltd (ASX: STX) $0.22 7.32%
    Centuria Capital Group (ASX: CNI) $1.85 4.23%
    Nickel Industries Ltd (ASX: NIC) $0.965 3.21%
    Credit Corp Group Ltd (ASX: CCP) $14.51 3.13%
    Whitehaven Coal Ltd (ASX: WHC) $8.00 2.30%
    De Grey Mining Ltd (ASX: DEG) $1.125 1.81%
    Stockland Corporation Ltd (ASX: SGP) $4.57 1.78%
    New Hope Corporation Ltd (ASX: NHC) $5.05 1.61%
    Treasury Wine Estates Ltd (ASX: TWE) $11.62 0.96%
    Pro Medicus Limited (ASX: PME) $114.31 0.94%

    Our top 10 shares countdown is a recurring end-of-day summary to let you know which companies were making big moves on the day. Check in at Fool.com.au after the weekday market closes to see which stocks make the countdown.

    The post Here are the top 10 ASX 200 shares today appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Credit Corp Group Limited right now?

    Before you buy Credit Corp Group Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Credit Corp Group Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    See The 5 Stocks
    *Returns as of 5 May 2024

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Pro Medicus. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Pro Medicus and Treasury Wine Estates. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • A group of emerging nations could soon start knocking down one key pillar of dollar dominance

    US dollar bill with glitch effect
    Some emerging nations are calling for a move away from the US dollar-denominated global financial system.

    • The BRICS bloc could pick up its de-dollarization agenda at its October summit in Kazan, Russia.
    • Expect more trade in alternative currencies, wrote one analyst.
    • Central bank digital currencies could weaken the greenback's role in payments.

    The BRICS group of emerging nations has been agitating for a move away from US dollar dominance.

    Last year, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva called for a BRICS common currency. The economist who first gave the bloc its name called that idea "embarrassing."

    While the set-up of a common currency is practically challenging, the bloc — which comprises the countries of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa that make up its acronym, and new members Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates — has called for more trade and lending in local currencies as a way to break up with the dollar.

    There may be more traction in ditching the dollar this year when the BRICS bloc meets in the Russian city of Kazan from October 22 to October 24, wrote Christopher Granville, the managing director of global political research at GlobalData.TS Lombard, in a Friday report.

    The summit would take place in the context of the US and its allies' increasingly aggressive stance toward Chinese exports, which they say are over capacity. And Washington is imposing secondary sanctions against banks processing payments to and from Russia, even if they are in local currencies, such as the Chinese yuan.

    Central banks eye digital currency transfers

    A more systemic solution is in the works: a Bank of International Settlement Central Bank Digital Currency platform that allows for the direct, peer-to-peer settlement of commercial invoices and foreign exchange trades in the central bank digital currencies of participating countries, wrote Granville. These currencies are similar to cryptocurrencies but are issued and backed by central banks.

    The central banks of China, Hong Kong, the UAE, and Thailand participated in a BIS trial of the digital currency system in 2022, but it's not live yet.

    Still, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov also touted a digital currency-based settlement system to local media recently — a signal that central banks are eyeing the "US-insulated" solution, wrote Granville.

    "That Lavrov signal was unsurprising given Russia's own pressing need," wrote Granville. "While other countries outside the US alliance system will not feel the same urgency, this US-insulated CBDC solution still looks to be in their interests."

    Specifically, it would make sense for China amid its trade war with the US. China's central bank already has one of the most developed digital currencies, the digital Chinese yuan, that is used domestically, including to pay some public-sector salaries.

    The BIS suspended the Russian central bank's membership following the country's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, so it's unclear how the central bank-to-central bank digital currency-based platform and infrastructure would work for Russia.

    Central bank digital currencies could weaken the USD's role in international payments

    Even so, Granville wrote that the participation of other central banks in the CBDC system could weaken a key pillar of the US dollar's global reserve currency status: international payments outside the eurozone.

    The greenback accounted for 60% of international payments ex-eurozone in 2023, according to Granville's analysis. This is in contrast to its 80% share in trade finance — which covers a wide range of products banks and companies use for trade — and 60% of global foreign exchange reserves.

    As Business Insider reported recently, the West can't afford to totally isolate Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging network due to the disastrous knock-on impact on trade finance — a key pillar of international trade. As for global FX reserves, the greenback is still king.

    But, chipping away at the US dollar's share in international payments through a non-dollar CBDC platform "would weaken one of three planks of the US dollar's global reserve currency status," Granville wrote. The effect would hold even though the currency of choice for cross-border payments is less systemically important than the dollar's role in trade finance and FX reserves, Granville added.

    Despite the discussion over central bank digital currencies, there would inevitably be challenges in any implementation.

    Even China, which has one of the world's most advanced digital currencies, relies on a "two-tier" system involving banks as wallet-holding agents. That setup avoids excessively disrupting the financial institution's business model and creating financial instability, wrote Granville.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • ASX retail shares mixed amid modest April sales growth

    Woman smiling whilst shopping in a clothing store.

    ASX retail shares are mixed today after the release of the latest retail sales data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Shortly before market close, the ASX consumer discretionary sector is the third-worst performing of the day, with heavyweights like Wesfarmers Limited (ASX: WES) and JB Hi-Fi Limited (ASX: JBH) lagging the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO).

    Elsewhere in the sector, though, Harvey Norman Holdings Limited (ASX: HVN) is trading flat and Temple & Webster Group Ltd (ASX: TPW) is surging almost 3% on the back of share buyback news.

    The April numbers revealed a small increase in retail sales for April 2024. Seasonally adjusted, retail trade rose by 0.1% month-on-month and 1.3% compared to April 2023. 

    The combination of inflation and high interest rates is squeezing retail spending. Clothing, footwear, and personal accessory retailing saw a decline of 0.7% in April, and food retailing was down 0.5%. Sales of household goods, however, showed a positive trend rising by 0.7%. Department stores also experienced a modest increase of 0.1%, maintaining their positive trajectory over recent months. 

    Analysts have predicted sales will remain flat throughout 2024 due to rising living costs, high household debt, and economic uncertainty. This could dampen profit expectations for ASX 200 retail shares. JB Hi-Fi advised earlier this month that sales remained resilient, but cautioned that the retail market was “challenging and competitive”. Other major retailers like Wesfarmers, which owns Kmart and Target, could also be impacted by the insipid outlook.

    Online sales accelerate

    Overall retail sales may be down, but the portion of sales taking place online is accelerating. Data from the latest NAB Online Retail Sales Index reveals Australians spent $57.14 billion on online retail in the 12 months to April, making up about 13.4% of the total retail trade. The performance of online retail has consistently outpaced broader retail, leading to an increase in the online share of total retail sales.

    Retailers with a strong online presence and diversified product offerings have seen substantial benefits from the ongoing shift towards online shopping. Companies like JB Hi-Fi and Temple & Webster have invested heavily in their e-commerce infrastructure and have seen significant share price gains over the past few years.

    The accelerated shift to online could arguably further strengthen the market position of companies that have invested in their e-commerce infrastructure and allow them to stay ahead of competitors with less developed online capabilities.

    Foolish takeaway

    Despite mixed trading in ASX retail shares following modest retail sales growth in April, the accelerating shift to online shopping could present a silver lining. Retailers with strong e-commerce platforms may be well-positioned to navigate the challenging economic landscape and capitalise on the growing online retail market.

    The post ASX retail shares mixed amid modest April sales growth appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Jb Hi-fi Limited right now?

    Before you buy Jb Hi-fi Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Jb Hi-fi Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    See The 5 Stocks
    *Returns as of 5 May 2024

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Katherine O’Brien has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Temple & Webster Group, and Wesfarmers. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Harvey Norman, and Wesfarmers. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Jb Hi-Fi and Temple & Webster Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Should I buy TechnologyOne shares before they trade ex-dividend on Thursday?

    You might have seen TechnologyOne Ltd (ASX: TNE) shares pop up on your radar recently. This ASX 200 tech stock reported its latest earnings covering the half-year ending 31 March a week ago today. And they caused quite a stir upon their release.

    As we covered last week, these earnings saw TechnologyOne report a 16% year-on-year rise in revenues to $244.8 million, as well as a 21% boost to the company’s annual recurring revenue to $423.6 million.

    This all helped TechnologyOne bring in $48 million in profits after tax, a 16% increase over the prior period.

    As a result, TechnologyOne was able to deliver a record interim dividend of 5.08 cents per share, partially franked at 65%. That’s a pleasing 10% hike over the 4.62 cents per share payout that shareholders enjoyed this time last year.

    Since these earnings results were made public, TechnologyOne shares have exploded higher. The company was going for $16.02 a share on the day before these results came out. But today, those same shares are asking $17.93 each after hitting a new record high of $18.22 last Wednesday.

    But this ASX 200 tech stock is due for a share price pullback this week. How do we know? Well, because TechnologyOne is scheduled to trade ex-dividend for this latest interim dividend this Thursday, 30 May.

    Should we rush out and buy TechnologyOne shares before Thursday?

    Yep, the ex-dividend date has been set for Thursday, which means that anyone who doesn’t own TechnologyOne shares as of Wednesday’s market close will not be eligible to receive said dividend. if one buys this company’s shares from Thursday onwards, they will miss out on this latest payment.

    As such, we should see a drop in the price of TechnologyOne shares on Thursday morning, reflecting this inherent loss of value.

    So should you get in and secure some shares of this ASX 200 tech stock before then?

    Well, probably not if you are just trying to grab a freebie. Buying a company’s shares before or after they trade ex-dividends in order to secure a financial gain is usually a fool’s errand. When a company trades ex-dividend, its share price normally falls by almost exactly what that dividend is worth.

    Upon TechnologyOne’s return to trade on Thursday, its share price is almost certainly just going to be 5.08 cents lower than where it otherwise would be trading.

    So you can buy the more expensive shares on Wednesday and nab the rights to the dividend, or wait until the shares are a little cheaper on Thursday and miss out. In all likelihood, it will be a zero-sum game – two paths leading to the same financial endpoint.

    As such, if you wish to invest in TechnologyOne as a long-term investment, it probably won’t make a lick of difference whether you buy on Wednesday or Thursday.

    ASX brokers say buy

    On that note, many ASX experts are telling investors to consider buying TechnologyOne shares in light of its recent results.

    Last week, we covered the views of ASX broker Bell Potter. Bell Potter slapped TechnologyOne with a buy rating. That was alongside a 12-month share price target of $19.

    We also took stock of what another broker in Morgans had to say. Morgans was also delighted by TechnologyOne’s results. It gave the tech stock an ‘add’ rating, as well as a share price target of $20.50.

    The post Should I buy TechnologyOne shares before they trade ex-dividend on Thursday? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Technology One Limited right now?

    Before you buy Technology One Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Technology One Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    See The 5 Stocks
    *Returns as of 5 May 2024

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Technology One. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Technology One. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Russian experts were guiding North Korea’s space program ahead of Pyongyang blowing up its latest satellite: South Korean report

    People walk past a television showing file footage during a news report at a train station in Seoul on May 28, 2024, after North Korea said late Monday that the rocket carrying its "Malligyong-1-1" reconnaissance satellite exploded minutes after launch due to a suspected engine problem.
    People walk past a television showing file footage during a news report at a train station in Seoul on May 28, 2024, after North Korea said late Monday that the rocket carrying its "Malligyong-1-1" reconnaissance satellite exploded minutes after launch due to a suspected engine problem.

    • North Korea's latest satellite launch failed in a fireball in the sky on Monday evening.
    • That comes after South Korean media reported that Russia was helping Pyongyang's space program.
    • Yonhap reported that a "large number" of Russian experts entered North Korea ahead of the launch.

    North Korea announced on Monday that its latest spy satellite launch ended in the explosion of its rocket just minutes after liftoff — a third failure in its last four attempts to put a satellite into orbit.

    And that was despite Russian space experts recently arriving to guide North Korea's space program, South Korean news agency Yonhap reported a day before the failed launch, citing a senior defense official who was not named.

    Yonhap wrote that a "large number" of Russian technicians had entered North Korea after Russian leader Vladimir Putin last year offered to support Pyongyang with its satellite launches.

    It's unclear exactly how many technicians were sent to North Korea, when they might have arrived, or how they might have advised Pyongyang.

    The senior South Korean defense official told the agency that the Russian experts likely had high standards, causing a delay between North Korea's last satellite launch and preparations for Monday's attempt.

    Yonhap reported that North Korea's space rockets also likely face issues with their second and third-stage engines.

    That could forewarn even deeper problems in Pyongyang's space program; the explosion at Monday's launch occurred during the rocket's first stage of flight.

    North Korean state media cited a space official saying that preliminary investigations showed the rocket's new liquid oxygen and petroleum engine was to blame. However, he also said there may have been other reasons for the launch failure.

    Roscosmos, Russia's space agency, and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to requests for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider.

    Russia and North Korea's relationship has come under scrutiny in the past year after the US accused them of trading arms and materials deployed in the war in Ukraine.

    Per the accusations from the US and its allies, Moscow has been sending raw materials, food, and technical expertise to Pyongyang in exchange for shipments of artillery ammunition and missiles that Ukraine reports seeing on the battlefield.

    South Korea has for months said that North Korea's sole successful satellite launch of 2023 came off the back of Russian assistance.

    Pyongyang launched the Malligyong-1 in November and claims it is still functioning, though Seoul said in February that it detected the satellite is no longer communicating with the ground.

    Some international experts, however, said that month that they've seen signs of activity from the Malligyong-1.

    North Korea's repeated satellite launches come as a concern for the US and its allies, who have tried to limit its nuclear weapons and space programs through sweeping sanctions. Pyongyang's repeated testing of ballistics and space launches indicates that it's been able to persist despite the global restrictions.

    The US Indo-Pacific Command noted that Pyongyang's Monday launch appeared to use technology related to North Korea's ballistic missile program. It condemned the launch as a "brazen violation" of United Nations resolutions that could destabilize regional security.

    Read the original article on Business Insider