Author: openjargon

• Ukraine is aiming to field a diverse arsenal of ground robots to help support its war efforts.
• These robots can launch assaults, lay mines, and deliver supplies to the front lines. 
• One senior Ukrainian official said they could be the "next game-changer technology" of the war. 

Ukraine has its eyes set on a dynamic fleet of ground robots to fight alongside — and, sometimes, instead of — its soldiers in combat as Kyiv continues growing its arsenal of unmanned systems.

These robotic systems, also known as unmanned ground vehicles, can launch assaults on Russian positions, self-destruct next to enemy armor, and deliver ammunition to front-line positions, among various other tasks.

UGVs have already carried out these kinds of missions, though not on the same scale as Ukraine's unmanned aerial vehicles and drone boats.

"Ground robotics is one of the solutions," Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine's minister of digital transformation, said in translated remarks shared with Business Insider. "If robots can fight instead of people, why won't we try to do this?"

Fedorov set up UNITED24, a Ukrainian government initiative that has for over two years helped fuel Kyiv's war efforts by raising money to purchase weaponry like drones, and recently, it launched a fundraising campaign to acquire three types of ground robots for the military.

Ukraine hopes to use the new ground robots in different roles, supporting direct combat, minelaying, and logistical operations on the battlefield, according to a fact sheet about this initiative shared with BI.

The new ground combat robots can assault and defend positions, as well as conduct surveillance and reconnaissance, all while being operated remotely from up to two-and-a-half miles away. The systems are armed with machine guns, hardened against small-arms fire, and outfitted with thermal-imaging cameras for nighttime missions.

The minelaying and self-destruct robots can threaten Russian armor, positions, and supply routes. Strapped with anti-tank mines, these systems can charge into a target at over 15 mph before detonating, or they can drop explosives on the ground. They can be operated remotely from nearly three-and-a-half miles away.

The logistical robots, on the other hand, aren't necessarily capable of directly inflicting losses on the Russians, but they can be used for life-saving and resupply missions. These systems can quickly deliver ammunition and equipment to front-line positions and evacuate wounded soldiers with their ability to carry over 1,300 pounds. They also boast a 25-mile operational range.

"Squads of robots will save the lives of our military and civilians," the Ukrainian fact sheet says. "They will fight alongside people and for people. The first robots are already proving their effectiveness on the battlefield, but there are many more required."

Fedorov said there's no exact number of robots that Ukraine is seeking because there's a "constant need" for them, so they are just trying to get as many as possible. The cost of the robots varies, as each type has different variants manufactured across the defense industry.

Systems that have more sophisticated technologies, like those with machine guns, for instance, are naturally going to be more expensive than those used primarily for medical evacuations without any weaponry attached.

Fedorov explained that the goal right now is to pump money into the defense industry so production facilities can invest in research and development and scale-up the operation — leading to cheaper, faster, and better products. He said that Ukraine's drone industry has already seen this big push in other areas, and now robots are the next focus.

"I believe robotics [is] the next game-changer technology of this war," Fedorov said. "The same one as were drones at some point."

Both Ukraine and Russia have employed UGVs in this war, giving the two militaries another domain in which they can wage war with unmanned systems beyond the air and sea. Ground robots have even been involved in drone-on-drone combat, underscoring a level of depth and sophistication to these operations.

The evolution of unmanned systems has been one of the defining elements of the Ukraine war. Beyond being used to conduct one-way attacks on enemy personnel and armor and keep soldiers out of harm's way, they have also given the world an unprecedented — and often terrifying — look at the conflict.

These developments observed in Ukraine, meanwhile, have prompted Western forces like the US military and its partner forces to reexamine how they can better prepare for future conflicts.

"This is the most technologically advanced war in human history," Fedorov said. "Technologies make a difference on the battlefield, and we are basically re-inventing their use every day."

• Travis Kelce made a surprise appearance onstage at Taylor Swift's Eras Tour show in London.
• It's the first time Swift has invited a boyfriend to share the spotlight during one of her concerts.
• The cameo recalls the 1989 World Tour — before Swift pulled back from the public eye.

Taylor Swift is no stranger to bringing guests onstage. But during her last show in London on The Eras Tour on Sunday, she had a very special one: Her boyfriend, Travis Kelce.

Dressed in a ringmaster ensemble, the football star popped up during a costume change skit that acts as the prelude to Swift's performance of "I Can Do It With a Broken Heart." Before she delivered the first lyric, Swift even broke character to blow Kelce a kiss.

Of course, Swift and Kelce haven't been shy about kissing, cuddling, and supporting each other's endeavors since they began dating last summer. But Kelce's cameo gave PDA a whole new meaning. Never before had Swift invited a boyfriend to share the spotlight during one of her concerts, never mind one on a legacy-cementing, billion-dollar tour.

The move seems even more surprising and extravagant in contrast to Swift's previous relationship with British actor Joe Alwyn. During their six years together, both stars fiercely protected their privacy and were rarely seen together in public.

But for longtime Swifties, those who predate her relationship with Alwyn, Sunday's events will feel more familiar than strange — almost like a callback to simpler times.

In the first half of her career, Swift wasn't shy about her most romantic whims. She posted photos of heart-shaped lockets and tropical getaways; she took seaside strolls with her boyfriend's mom; she wore ballgowns and belted starry-eyed ballads while suspended in the air on flying balconies. Swift loved a grand gesture, both real and imaginary.

This was especially evident during The 1989 World Tour, which ran for nearly seven months in 2015. No, Swift's boyfriend at the time, Calvin Harris, did not make a surprise appearance. But pretty much everyone else did — from close friends like Karlie Kloss and Lena Dunham to athletes like Kobe Bryant and all manner of musicians and rock stars. Every night brought a new face, a new thrill, a new thread in the vast web of Swiftian lore.

At the time, the "1989" era marked the highest peak in Swift's fame. Mostly thanks to her talent and partially thanks to her self-spun underdog narrative, she had enjoyed years of headlines like "Taylor Swift: America's Sweetheart" and "Taylor Swift Is the Music Industry."

With her new synth-pop sound, inescapable singles like "Shake It Off" and "Blank Space," a so-called "squad" full of supermodels, and a cameo-packed tour, Swift was everywhere. And so, as often happens with female celebrities, her success went from charming to grating. A new kind of headline began to pop up, immortalized by Dayna Evans' Gawker essay, "Taylor Swift Is Not Your Friend," which criticized her tour antics as "opportunistic and sinister."

Then came the infamous phone call. When Kim Kardashian shared a snippet of Swift's conversation with Ye about his song "Famous" that seemed to contradict Swift's version of events, the world was already ready to turn on her. In Swift's own words, she was "canceled within an inch of my life and sanity."

The backlash forced the self-described "mastermind" to recalculate her strategy and pull back from the public eye. She still released big pop bangers and went on tour, but her movements felt more careful, sparing, and protective.

Ever since Swift kicked off The Eras Tour last year (and split from Alwyn shortly after), she's gradually returned to her pre-cancellation mentality. It's arguably the most classic Swiftian ideology: More is more. This can apply to everything and anything. More songs, more hours onstage, more CD variants, and, naturally, more photo ops with her hunky boyfriend. She threatens to become overexposed again, but maybe this time, she knows she'll survive.

Indeed, Swift told Time in December that she's not interested in being "locked away" anymore — in exerting "an extreme amount of effort" to hide her passion and enthusiasm from the world, including her bond with Kelce.

"When you say a relationship is public, that means I'm going to see him do what he loves, we're showing up for each other, other people are there and we don't care," she said.

In this respect, Kelce may be the perfect match for Swift. After all, their relationship started after he mentioned wanting to meet her on his podcast; he's a businessman (and a ham) in his own right. His managers have been open about their plan to make him "as famous as the Rock."

For these two peas in a pod, personal triumphs are communal by trade, whether it's a touchdown at the Super Bowl or a first kiss that inspires a smash hit.

"Ultimately, we can convolute it all we want, or try to overcomplicate it," Swift told Time. "But there's only one question: Are you not entertained?"

Ever the performer, Swift knows exactly what she's doing. As much as maximalism is true to Swift's brand, it's also good for business.

Swift's music indicates that she is expressive, theatrical, and sentimental at her core. Her net worth proves that she's skilled at monetizing those qualities. After all, Swift made her name as a confessional songwriter, transforming her intimate moments into morsels for public consumption.

Perhaps bringing Kelce onstage felt as natural to Swift as writing a love song about him. But as Swift well knows, both will generate headlines.

• I went to Il Mulino for the first time to try the upscale Italian chain's prix-fixe dinner.
• The main-course options were diverse, and the scallops and risotto I had were excellent.
• For $60 a person, I think a round of drinks and coffee should've been included.

When I entered the Il Mulino on Long Island, I was shocked by just how quiet it was. The upscale Italian chain is located right next to a major thoroughfare, and I went to dine at the height of rush hour. But inside, things were perfectly tranquil.

That alone should've foreshadowed the kind of fine-dining experience I was about to have. The chain has been operating its flagship Greenwich Village location in New York for 40 years, but it also has five other locations in New York, New Jersey, and Florida.

Although many restaurants struggled to regain their footing during the COVID-19 pandemic, fine-dining establishments in the US have seen a 2.7% revenue increase over the last five years. Il Mulino exemplifies that success as the brand has continued to expand to include casual and steak-house restaurants over the years.

I brought my father-in-law — a good home cook who's fiercely proud of his Italian heritage — with me to try the chain's $58 prix-fixe weeknight dinner for the first time.

Here's what it was like.

Il Mulino has a large menu of specials, à la carte offerings, and prix-fixe meals.

Similar to most Italian restaurants, Il Mulino's menu is full of appetizers, soups and salads, meats, chicken dishes, pasta, fish, and sides. Starters cost between $24 and $32, and mains range from $34 to $95.

When we sat down, we listened to the server list out the sumptuous-sounding specials, but I was already committed to trying the $58 three-course, prix-fixe menu.

The special dinner, which is only offered Monday through Friday, consists of a starter, a main dish, and a dessert.

The bread was included, but we had to pay extra for drinks.

The prix-fixe menu notably doesn't include drinks, which I found a little disappointing.

The chain's wine menu has glasses ranging from $16 to $40, and I paid $15 for two 10-ounce bottles of ginger ale. It felt steep, to say the least.

We sipped on our drinks and snacked on the complimentary bread basket while mulling over the menu.

I started my meal with a nice salad.

Among the first-course options, I closely considered the arugula salad with pear, goat cheese, walnuts, and a lemon dressing; the minestrone soup; and the house-made burrata with tomato and basil.

But in the end, I went with the Mediterranean salad, which included organic tomatoes, cucumbers, onions, green olives, and feta cheese.

I figured a simple salad would be a good way to judge the place against the comparable Italian restaurants I've dined at.

As it happened, I made the wrong choice — but not because the salad was bad.

My salad was quite delicious. All the ingredients were fresh and well-balanced — aside from it being a touch salty.

But I know I made the wrong choice because the burrata my father-in-law ordered looked amazing.

Since the portion was rather small, I declined his offer to share.

There are more than a dozen choices for the main course on the prix-fixe menu.

It took me twice as long as usual to pick my main course because there were so many options on the prix-fixe menu.

The salmon in a Champagne-grape sauce was a contender, and the chicken Sorrentina almost won out. There were also steaks and other seafood dishes to consider.

But I chose the pan-seared scallops with saffron risotto. An overcooked scallop is like a piece of dry rubber, so this would be a real culinary test.

The entrées were simply excellent.

The chicken my father-in-law ordered featured tender meat, a thin cut of eggplant, and just enough cheese to add flavor and texture without upstaging the meat.

Despite my concerns, my scallops were perfectly cooked and rested on a bed of risotto with a rich yellow hue and a deep, savory flavor.

I'm used to getting extra vegetables or potatoes with my entrées at Italian restaurants. But I suppose the lack of sides made the entrées shine brighter.

I focused on every bite, enjoying the tender scallops with the perfectly al dente risotto and appreciating the seafood notes, herbs, and butter.

I never get dessert, but it was already paid for.

I really never order desserts at restaurants, but it came with the prix-fixe menu. I asked for a scoop of the pistachio gelato.

I also spent an extra $7 on a cup of decaf coffee, which I think should've been included with the meal.

In terms of taste and texture, the gelato was some of the best ice cream I've had all year. Rich, creamy, and lightly sweet, it was a perfect pairing to my black coffee and a good way to end a fine meal.

I’d return to Il Mulino, but I'd stick to what's included on the prix fixe next time.

Compared to the regular dinner menu at Il Mulino — where an antipasti plate of caprese costs $31 and a main course of English Dover sole is $90 — the $58 three-course meal is a solid deal.

That said, when I spend nearly $60 on dinner (well over $75 after the tip), I usually like to have a beverage and be well stuffed at the end. The fact that I had to pay extra for drinks and coffee annoyed me a bit, and the portions here were definitely on the smaller side.

But if you want superb Italian food at a decent price, Il Mulino can still be a worthwhile weeknight reservation. Better yet, the chain also offers an even cheaper four-course Sunday supper (salad, appetizer, main, dessert) for $52 a person.

• BPA is an industrial chemical that scientists have linked to hormone disruption and diabetes risk.
• Plastic water bottles and food containers can leach BPA into what you eat and drink. 
• A new study found it can be risky at levels previously considered safe by government agencies. 

Scientists have long suspected that industrial chemicals used in plastic water bottles can disrupt human hormones.

But, to date, evidence has been observational, meaning it shows an association between plastics exposure and certain diseases, but can't prove a causal effect.

Now, a groundbreaking new study shows direct evidence that bisphenol A — or, BPA, a chemical used to package food and drink — can reduce sensitivity to insulin, a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar.

An impaired ability to respond to insulin, known as insulin resistance, can mean chronically high blood sugar levels and a much higher risk of type 2 diabetes.

The researchers, who presented their findings at the 2024 Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, said this study shows the EPA may need to reconsider the safe limits for exposure to BPA in plastic bottles, food containers, and other containers.

Even so-called safe levels of BPA may cause health issues

Researchers from California Polytechnic State University studied 40 healthy adults who were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or a small dose of BPA daily.

After four days, the participants who were given BPA were less responsive to insulin, while the placebo group did not experience any change.

The dose of BPA that participants received, 50 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day, is an amount currently classified as safe by the EPA.

"These results suggest that maybe the US EPA safe dose should be reconsidered and that healthcare providers could suggest these changes to patients," Todd Hagobian, senior author of the new study and professor at California Polytechnic State University, said in a press release.

The FDA considers BPA to be safe at low levels occurring in food containers, up to 5 mg per kg body weight per day, or 1,000 times the amount the new study found to be risky. Some researchers argue the FDA guidelines are outdated.

Other regulatory agencies around the world have taken a tougher stance on the chemical — the European Commission proposed to ban BPA in products that come into contact with food or beverages by the end of 2024.

Environmental contaminants can be a major threat to human health

The concern about BPA is part of a broader alarm being raised about our everyday exposure to substances that may be harmful to our health.

Other recent research has found microplastics, particles so tiny they can infiltrate human cells, may potentially wreak havoc with our health. They've been found everywhere, from human lungs to reproductive organs.

Understanding how the substances we encounter every day may affect our health long-term could help us make better decisions about how to reduce the risk of chronic illnesses like type 2 diabetes.

"Given that diabetes is a leading cause of death in the US, it is crucial to understand even the smallest factors that contribute to the disease," Hagobian said in the press release. "We were surprised to see that reducing BPA exposure, such as using stainless steel or glass bottles and BPA-free cans, may lower diabetes risk."

• Federal data indicates wind-turbine technician is the fastest-growing job in the US.
• The US and other countries are building more wind farms to tackle the climate crisis.
• This article is part of "Trends to Bet Your Career On," a series about trending professional opportunities.

Dakota Carter was in middle school when a new wind farm went up near his hometown of Delavan, Illinois.

He was fascinated by the project's turbines, which can churn out enough power for 35,000 homes.

"I've always been passionate about the environment," Carter said. "So I thought a career in wind could actually make a difference."

Now Carter, 29, is the operations site supervisor at that project, known as the Rail Splitter Wind Farm, owned by EDP Renewables North America. He started as an intern in 2017 before becoming a wind technician and then advancing over the past seven years.

Carter entered the field at the right time. Federal data indicates wind-turbine technician is the fastest-growing job in the US, alongside nurse practitioner.

The jobs website Indeed said postings for wind-turbine technicians grew by 30% in 2023, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics expects about 1,800 openings each year over the next decade. Industry groups have forecast demand for about 240,000 new recruits by 2027 across Australia, Brazil, China, Colombia, Egypt, India, Japan, Kenya, South Korea, and the US.

These countries want to build onshore and offshore wind farms rapidly so they can meet renewable-energy targets and mitigate the climate crisis. The International Energy Agency estimates that for the world to achieve net-zero greenhouse-gas emissions by 2050, about 17% more wind capacity must be added to power grids every year. The US is expected to add 11% capacity from 2023 to 2025.

The UK has long been a leader in wind but was recently surpassed by China, which accounted for half of all the new wind capacity added around the world in 2022. The US is further behind, but the industry got a boost from the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. The law authorized generous tax breaks for renewable-energy projects and companies that pay their workers well.

In the US, the jobs are mostly onshore, in states like Texas, New Mexico, Kansas, and Colorado. The first large-scale offshore projects recently opened up off the coasts of New York and Massachusetts.

Last year the median pay for a wind-turbine technician was $61,770, but listings on Indeed averaged $80,100

Harry Willats, an executive consultant at Darwin Recruitment who specializes in the wind sector, told Business Insider that the starting wage for a wind technician was typically $20 to $25 an hour. More-experienced technicians with specialized training could earn nearly $50 an hour. Offshore wind technicians can expect to earn an extra 30% to 40% compared to onshore workers. There are a lot of overtime opportunities as well. As technicians move into supervisor positions, they might get an annual salary.

Federal data indicates the average hourly wage for the position in the US in 2023 was nearly $30 an hour, or $61,770 a year. But listings on Indeed averaged $80,100 a year.

Willats said there are several pathways into the industry. Typically, people finish a one-year electrical certificate program at a technical or community college and then get hired as apprentices. Those interested in offshore wind need to complete Global Wind Organization courses in basic safety, first aid, and sea survival.

There's a lot of on-the-job training. Wind technicians in the early stages of their careers might do scheduled maintenance and cleaning. As they advance, their jobs involve more troubleshooting and repairing, as well as managing crews. Willats said the highest-paid technicians tend to have specialized equipment certificates, such as those from Siemens Gamesa and GE.

Carter earned a bachelor's degree in business management at Robert Morris University in Illinois. He realized he didn't want a desk job, so he returned to a local community college for a one-year sustainable-energy certificate program focused on solar, wind, and building systems before joining EDP Renewables.

Exposed to the elements

"The biggest con is pretty obvious: the weather," Carter said. "You're working in the heat or the cold, and you're high up in the air. That can be pretty brutal. It's also a very physical job."

But Carter said that working in renewable energy made him feel like he was leaving the world a better place. He also has work-life balance at Rail Splitter Wind Farm. EDP owns, operates, and repairs the site, meaning Carter doesn't have to spend time away from home. Technicians who work for a company that operates a lot of wind farms may have to travel from site to site for long stretches.

Now that Carter is a supervisor, he spends more time talking with developers and people in the community about new projects the company is considering.

• Camping didn't always involve fancy RVs, watching movies on iPads, or state-of-the-art campgrounds.
• Camping has evolved from sleeping under the stars to camping out at music festivals and events.
• These vintage photos show there's nothing more nostalgic than sleeping in a tent in nature.

While technology has been incredibly helpful in outdoor adventuring, making recreational camping simpler and more comfortable, there's something nostalgic about how basic the activity used to be.

The decked-out RVs people can now travel in can cost $20,000 to $100,000, but the price of luxury RVs can reach as high as $2 million, according to HomeGuide. 

In the 1930s and following decades, however, recreational campers primarily set up simple tents or basic caravans to spend time with their friends and family outdoors. And today, simpler camping can be a great option for families wanting to spend time together — without spending a fortune — as the cost of living climbs.

These photos show what recreational camping used to be like. They might even inspire you to try it for yourself this summer.

Recreational camping looked different 100 years ago.

In 1940, the Regional Review called camping "an American tradition," according to a copy of the article shared by the National Park Service.

Starting in the mid-to-late 1800s, people camped for fun in North America, according to Britannica. As people increasingly sought to escape cities, organizations such as the Appalachian Mountain Club began to crop up. At the turn of the 20th century, books such as "The Camper's Handbook" continued to ignite interest, and throughout the century, organized camping grew in popularity.

In 1930, before the Great Depression really took hold, there were more than 3 million campers across the US, The Dyrt reported, citing Terence Young, the author of "Heading Out: A History of American Camping."

While the basic idea of camping was the same as we now know it — sleeping outdoors — the gear was markedly different.

Camping originally just involved the campers, the outdoors, and some simple cooking ware. The shelter was simple, too: People would often sleep beneath a sheet held up by sticks and string.

If you went camping like this group in France in 1930, you were unreservedly experiencing nature. 

These simple tents were used regardless of weather conditions.

There was usually no electricity for miles, and campers had to make do with whatever heat sources they had — whether that be fires, blankets, or even huddling together for warmth. 

The lack of technology made the experience much more authentic.

Friends and families would go camping to spend time together outside of their homes.

… but also a lot more work-intensive.

There was a lot more manual labor involved with getting set up and making food than in campsites of the future, which might have access to full kitchens or electricity. 

Regular morning routines had to be done without a bathroom or mirror.

Basic grooming was still expected.

Even just making tea could be a chore.

Campers had to gather everything from the outdoors if they didn't bring water or other supplies with them.

Hammers had to be schlepped to the campsite.

Tent pegs were often wooden, not plastic, and had to be hammered into the ground.

But the work was part of the fun.

Part of the allure of going camping was the authenticity of living outdoors — even if just for the night.

People still found ways to make their camping trips a little more comfortable.

Campers would bring furniture, books, and other items from home to make their time in the great outdoors more comfortable.

Forget the paper plates — some campers brought actual porcelain dinnerware.

While this may seem impractical today, it certainly made for a more sophisticated camping excursion.

Early on, camping was often done out of necessity during long travels. But over time, it became a more common recreational activity for people.

The appeal of having no distractions while enjoying quality time with friends endures.

Boy Scouts went on camping trips every year after their establishment in 1910.

Campgrounds, as we know them today, weren't really established until the 1930s when the National Park Service developed "Recreation Demonstration Areas," according to the National Park Service.

The Girl Scouts were established in 1912, and wilderness survival was also at their core.

Apparently, the first official mention of s'mores appeared in a Girl Scouts manual in 1927, according to Reserve America.

As the years passed, camping became more involved.

People started bringing more with them on camping trips.

Rather than just setting up tents, people began bringing RVs.

RVs have also evolved a lot. Starting as small cabins built onto the back of regular cars in the 1910s, they eventually evolved into homes, and even mansions, on wheels.

The famous Volkswagen Westfalia Camper was an instant classic for campers and road trippers alike.

While the VW bus, as it is better known, came out in the '50s, it reached peak popularity in the '70s. It is one of the most iconic road trip vehicles in history, and synonymous with wanderlust.

Having camper vans meant being able to bring more of the luxuries of home, from barware …

Camping, as a result, became easier.

… to decorative lanterns.

Who says camping needs to mean roughing it?

Camper vans also allowed campers to be more comfortable.

Instead of sleeping outside, you could have some protection by staying inside your car, or even kick back on a seat that converted into a bed.

One could now avoid truly living in the elements.

Everyone wants to be close to nature … but not too close.

Once campers were able to have more cover from nature, they did that instead.

Camping became more comfortable, meaning campers could now spend days or even weeks at a time in the wilderness.

Camping also became a way to get good seats at events.

People sometimes spent days camping outside ahead of an event.

People would camp to stake out good spots at festivals.

Camping is still used as accommodation at modern festivals like Bonnaroo.

By the 1960s, camping was no longer just a necessity — it was a popular recreational activity.

However, many campsites were still segregated, meaning only white visitors had access to certain parks and campgrounds. 

Writers of the Beat Generation popularized camping the old-fashioned way in the '60s.

The Beat Generation was a literary movement made up of a group of writers who wrote about American culture using a stream-of-consciousness writing method.

Jack Kerouac, a popular writer of the time, wrote about the times he slept outside on the beach in Big Sur, which he later published in his 1962 novel "Big Sur."

The Beat Generation romanticized the idea of living on the road.

To this day, their raw stories about traveling constantly and taking odd jobs to survive encourage readers to live more in tune with nature.

Many state and national parks upheld segregation until the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, limiting access to these outdoor spaces for Black citizens.

However, Black people and families still made use of desegregated parks and campsites or used parks and campgrounds that were designated only for Black citizens. These parks, like Virginia's Shenandoah National Park, became places of community for Black families and received thousands of visitors each year, Atlas Obscura reported.

After state and national parks were mandated to be desegregated, many of the Black-only parks closed or were absorbed by surrounding parks, according to the National Park Service.

Traditional camping will likely remain a popular activity for years to come, regardless of technological advancements.

In fact, the more dependent we become on technology, the more people might like to retreat into nature for a few days.

Camping may keep changing, but it will never go out of style.

There's been a statistical rise in camping over the past decade. According to Kampgrounds of America's 2024 Camping and Outdoor Hospitality report, active campers have increased by 68% in the last 10 years, and six out of 10 US households identify as campers. 

As families try to find affordable summer activities due to the rising cost of living, we may see even more campers seeking the great outdoors this summer.