NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams conduct suited operations in the Boeing Starliner simulator at NASA's Johnson Space Center.
NASA/Robert Markowitz
NASA and Boeing are proceeding with a space launch after discovering a helium leak.
Starliner's maiden voyage will carry two US astronauts.
Boeing VP Mark Nappi said the design vulnerability was "not a safety of flight issue."
NASA and Boeing said a helium leak in its Starliner spacecraft is "stable" and won't prevent two astronauts from launching into space next week in a mission more than a decade in the making.
NASA and Boeing execs said the cause of a leak in Starliner's propulsion system had been identified in a press conference on Friday, and it was safe to fly.
A previous launch attempt was scrubbed on May 6 hours before takeoff due to a separate issue — after which the "small" leak was discovered on a flange on one of Starliner's thrusters, NASA program manager Steve Stich said during the press conference.
Days after it was discovered, "we proved to ourselves that the leak was stable," added Boeing VP Mark Nappi.
He said the design vulnerability was "very remote" and "not a safety of flight issue."
"We can handle up to four more leaks," Stich said, "and we can handle this particular leak if that leak rate were to grow even up to 100 times."
Now, Boeing's Starliner is set to take NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station (ISS) on June 1 and then back after a one-week stay.
There are backup launch opportunities on June 2, June 5, and June 6.
Now we are two steps into the same process: Google is widely rolling out its "AI Overview" feature, which replaces its usual answer to search queries — a list of links to sites where you might find the actual answer you want — with an AI-generated answer that tries to summarize the content on those sites. And people are finding examples of Google generating answers that are wrong, and sometimes comically bad.
So here's the two trillion-dollar question: Is Google going to have to backtrack on this one, too?
No, says Google, which argues that the dumb answers it has been generating are few and far between. And that most people don't know or care about search answers that tell people how many rocks to eat. Or that you should stare into the sun for 5 to 15 minutes — unless you have darker skin, in which case you can go for twice as long.
Google AI gives a curious answer when asked about staring into the sun.
Google AI Overview
And Google also notes that it is quickly swatting down Bad Answers as they crop up. Particularly ones where someone smart enough to use a phone but stupid enough to follow those answers could harm themselves.
Here's the formal version of that answer, via Google comms person Lara Levin:
"The vast majority of AI Overviews provide high quality information, with links to dig deeper on the web. Many of the examples we've seen have been uncommon queries, and we've also seen examples that were doctored or that we couldn't reproduce. We conducted extensive testing before launching this new experience, and as with other features we've launched in Search, we appreciate the feedback. We're taking swift action where appropriate under our content policies, and using these examples to develop broader improvements to our systems, some of which have already started to roll out."
OK.
But like I've said. We've seen a version of this story before. What happens if people keep finding Bad Answers on Google, and Google can't whac-a-mole them fast enough? And, crucially — what if regular people, people who don't spend time reading or talking about tech news, start to hear about Google's Bad And Potentially Dangerous Answers?
Because that would be a really, really big problem. Google does a lot of different things, but the reason it's worth more than $2 trillion is still because of its two core products — search, and the ads that it generates alongside search results. And if people — normal people — lose confidence in Google as a search/answer machine …
Well, that would be a real problem.
Privately, Googlers are doubling down on the notion that these Bad Answers really are fringe problems. And that, unlike its "woke Google" problem from a few months ago — where there really was a problem with the model Google was using to create images — they say that's not the case here. Google never gets things 100% correct (they say even more quietly) because, in the end, it's still just relying on what people publish on the internet. It's just that some people are paying a lot more attention right now because there's a new thing to pay attention to.
And the thing that's very different between the old Google results and the new ones is the responsibility and authority Google is shouldering. In the past, Google was telling you somebody else could answer your question. Now Google is answering your question.
It's the difference between me handing you a map and me giving you directions that will send your car barreling over a cliff.
You could argue, as my 15-year-old son does (we are weird people so we talk about this stuff at home) that Google shouldn't be replacing its perfectly fine olde-timey search results with AI-generated answers. If people wanted AI-generated answers, they'd go to ChatGPT, right?
But of course, people going to ChatGPT is what Google is worried about. Which is why it's making this major pivot — to disrupt itself before ChatGPT or other AI engines do.
You can argue that it's moving too fast, or too sloppily, or whatever. But it's hard to imagine Google walking this one back now.
If you are trying to decide which ASX dividend shares to add to your income portfolio, then it could be worth looking at three listed below that Goldman Sachs is bullish on.
Here’s what you need to know about these income options:
The first ASX dividend share for income investors to look at is IPH. Goldman is a big fan of the intellectual property solutions company and believes it is “well-placed to deliver consistent and defensive earnings with modest overall organic growth.”
The broker expects this to underpin fully franked dividends of 34 cents per share in FY 2024 and 37 cents per share in FY 2025. Based on the current IPH share price of $6.16, this represents yields of 5.5% and 6%, respectively.
Goldman currently has a buy rating and $8.70 price target on IPH’s shares.
Another ASX dividend share that Goldman Sachs is positive on is Rio Tinto.
It is one of the largest miners in the world and the owner of a portfolio of operations across a number of commodities. This includes the Gudai-Darri iron ore mine and the ISAL aluminium smelter.
Goldman Sachs like the company due to its belief that “Rio is a FCF and production growth story.”
The broker expects this to support the payment of fully franked dividends per share of US$4.29 (A$6.49) in FY 2024 and then US$4.55 (A$6.88) in FY 2025. Based on the latest Rio Tinto share price of $132.50, this will mean yields of approximately 4.9% and 5.2%, respectively.
Goldman has a buy rating and $138.90 price target on its shares.
A third ASX dividend share that has been given the thumbs up by analysts at Goldman Sachs is Suncorp.
It is one of Australia’s largest insurance companies, operating countless brands including AAMI, Apia, Bingle, GIO, Shannons, and Vero.
In addition, the company has Suncorp Bank. However, these banking operations are in the process of being sold to big four bank ANZ Group Holdings Ltd (ASX: ANZ) for $4.9 billion. Once complete, Suncorp will be a pure-play insurance provider. It may also return some of the proceeds to shareholders via a special dividend or share buyback.
For now, though, Goldman expects Suncorp to pay fully franked dividends per share of 78 cents in FY 2024 and 83 cents in FY 2025. Based on the current Suncorp share price of $16.00, this will mean dividend yields of 4.9% and 5.2%, respectively.
The broker has a buy rating and $17.54 price target on Suncorp’s shares.
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Iph wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended IPH. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
With a share price of $44.75 in late Friday trading, investors are no doubt keen to know if BHP shares present a good buying opportunity. Let’s dive into what the brokers are saying about the mining giant.
Are BHP shares good value?
According to broker Goldman Sachs, BHP shares are currently trading at an attractive level. The investment bank has a buy rating with a $49/share price target on the company over the next 12 months, a potential upside of 9.5%. For a $10,000 investment, this could mean growth to around $10,950 if the forecast proves accurate.
Then, there’s the miner’s dividend potential.
BHP is renowned for its generous dividends. With a trailing dividend yield currently at 5.08%, it remains a strong choice for income-focused investors.
According to my colleague James last month, consensus estimates are for BHP to pay fully franked dividends of $2.30 per share in FY 2024. This translates to a dividend yield of around 5.1%, adding $510 in dividends to a $10,000 investment over the next 12 months.
What are analysts saying?
Goldman Sachs notes that BHP is trading at approximately 6x its next 12-month projected EBITDA, slightly above the 5.5x multiple of rival mining giant Rio Tinto Ltd (ASX: RIO).
In my opinion, this premium is supported by BHP’s strong operating margins and presence, particularly in the Pilbara iron ore region. According to the OECD, the Pilbara region contributed 3.4% of Australia’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2021.
BHP also announced last year its plans to invest $4 billion in the Pilbara region to develop c.550MW of wind, solar and battery storage to reduce operating costs.
Goldman also justified the premium by highlighting BHP’s potential for growing copper production in Chile and South Australia.
Despite some concerns about limited upside following recent gains, brokers still see value in BHP shares. In April, Morgans placed an add rating with a $48.30 price target, implying a potential upside of 7.9%.
Similarly, Citi rates BHP as a buy with a $48.00 price target, suggesting a total return of more than 10% when including dividends.
Goldman Sachs maintains its buy rating with a $49.00 price target, as mentioned earlier.
Passive income from BHP shares
BHP shares are a popular choice for passive income investors. Let’s run the numbers. Assuming you purchase 100 shares at $44.75, you would invest $4,475 of your hard-earned capital.
Goldman Sachs forecasts fully franked dividends of US$1.45 (A$2.20) per share for FY 2024, resulting in A$220 in passive income. For FY 2025, the expected dividends of US$1.26 (A$1.97) per share would yield A$197. Over the next few years, dividends are projected to slightly decrease but still provide solid returns, as per Goldman’s estimates:
FY 2026: US$1.22 (A$1.85) per share, yielding A$185
FY 2027: US$1.12 (A$1.70) per share, yielding A$170
FY 2028: US$1.07 (A$1.62) per share, yielding A$162
Note: All AUD figures are quoted at the exchange rate of $1 AUD = $0.66 USD at the time of writing.
Foolish takeaway
BHP’s recent quarterly results have prompted positive feedback from brokers, highlighting its attractive valuation, strong dividend yield, and growth potential in copper production.
With a current share price of $44.75 and a trailing dividend yield of 5.08%, BHP shares may be an opportunity for both growth and passive income investors. The mining giant certainly appears to have the backing of our top brokers.
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Bhp Group wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor Zach Bristow has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
Fisker launched another round of layoffs this week, multiple sources told Business Insider.
Michael Tullberg
Fisker initiated another round of layoffs on Wednesday, multiple sources told Business Insider.
The company has gone through a series of cuts and warned it might go out of business.
Henrik Fisker has said the company is in talks with other automakers regarding a potential acquisition.
Embattled EV startup Fisker kicked off another round of layoffs on Wednesday, four sources with knowledge of the issue told Business Insider.
Fisker has made multiple cuts to its workforce over the last few months. In February, Fisker CEO Henrik announced plans to cut 15% of its staff. Most recently, Fisker sent a round of layoff notices on April 29.
The series of cuts are designed to eventually bring the workforce down to a skeleton crew of only "mission critical" staff, one Fisker employee with knowledge of the issue said.
The total number of employees impacted by this latest staff reduction wasn't clear. A spokesperson for Fisker declined to comment.
Fisker has warned multiple times over the past few months that the company might go out of business within the year. On April 29, the company sent out notices to staff in compliance with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, warning employees that they might be laid off in two months if the company is not able to find a buyer or additional funding.
That same month, Fisker had told workers in an all-hands meeting that it was in talks with four automakers regarding a potential buyout.
Last week, Fisker's CEO told staff in a companywide meeting that the company had reached out to other automakers in addition to the initial four regarding an acquisition.
"I do hope we're closing in on something serious here in weeks rather than months," Henrik Fisker said at the time.
In March, Business Insider first reported that Fisker had delivered over 6,000 of its all-electric SUV, the Fisker Ocean, since its launch. A year prior, the company said it had "approximately 65,000" reservations for the vehicle ahead of its US launch in June 2023, but the company has faced negative reviews and cancellations since its launch.
Do you work for Fisker or have a tip? Reach out to the reporter via a non-work email at gkay@insider.com
It goes without saying that anyone who invests in ASX shares wants to maximise the returns on their investment. After all, the only real reason to buy ASX shares in the first place is to build wealth. And achieving the highest rate of return possible is the best way to ensure you are effectively increasing your wealth with the share market.
But of course, doing this is far easier said than done.
Luckily, today we’ll be discussing three simple ways any ASX investor can boost their share market returns. These are brought to us by exchange-traded fund (ETF) provider BetaShares, which just released a report on this very subject.
Three easy ways to juice the returns of your ASX shares
Pay the lowest management fees possible
Passively investing in ASX shares using index funds or ETFs is an investment strategy that has exploded in popularity over the past decade or two. Many investors love the instant diversification and hands-off approach this strategy allows.
But passive investors who don’t ensure they are paying the lowest management fees possible for their ASX shares can really hobble the compounding process and handicap future returns. Betashares ran a scenario comparing the impacts of investing in a high-cost ETF compared to a low-cost fund.
The provider found that someone who invests $1,000 a month into a fund returning 6% per annum but charging 1% in annual management fees would end up with 1,526,020 after 40 years. But let’s assume that investor opted for a fund that also returns 6% every year but charges just 0.04% in fees instead.
If so, they would instead enjoy a final balance of $1,970,010 after those 40 years. That’s a difference of $443,900. Put another way, that difference in management fees over those four decades amounts to a performance gap of 29%.
So make sure you are paying the lowest fees possible if you opt for a passive ASX shares investing strategy.
Minimise brokerage costs on your ASX shares
This is another simple fix that can save an ASX investor a few pretty pennies over time.
Brokerage costs have been falling on the ASX for years now. However, most investors can still expect to pay a brokerage fee every time they buy or sell ASX shares. These dead-wood costs can really add up after a while if one does not work to keep them in check.
Remember, the more frequently one invests, the more one will pay in brokerage fees. Someone who invests $500 every fortnight will probably pay double the brokerage fees of someone ploughing in $1,000 per month.
Free brokerage is still rare on the ASX and may not be as good as it seems. Saying that, Betashares found that someone paying $15 in brokerage every month would be $29,550 worse off after 40 years than an investor who never forks out for transaction fees.
Be mindful of your cash
Holding a certain proportion of one’s overall wealth in liquid cash is a good idea. We here at the Motley Fool argue that everyone should keep an emergency fund of cash ready for a rainy day. For any unexpected costs, in other words. The last thing anyone who doesn’t have spare cash ready to go needs is an unexpectedly large cost that requires unnecessary borrowing or untimely selling of shares.
However, keeping too much of one’s wealth in cash can be harmful to one’s long-term wealth. This opportunity cost against ASX shares has reduced significantly with the current high interest rate environment. Even so, many Australians still don’t keep their cash in accounts that pay the highest interest rates.
Betashares found that there is a monumental cost of keeping more cash around for longer. It found that someone who invests $1,000 a month into that 6%-retuning index fund would be $131,433 better off after 40 years than someone who simply saves up their cash all year and invests $12,000 in an annual lump sum.
That does assume our investor earns zero interest on that cash while it’s sitting in the bank. Even so, this is a good exercise to show off the benefits of investing in ASX shares as much as you can, as soon as you can.
Wondering where you should invest $1,000 right now?
When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool Share Advisor newsletter he has run for over ten years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
Scott just revealed what he believes could be the ‘five best ASX stocks’ for investors to buy right now. We believe these stocks are trading at attractive prices and Scott thinks they could be great buys right now…
Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
It’s probably fair to say that Australians aged around 30 years old are probably some of the country’s most uninformed groups when it comes to superannuation. With retirement still decades away, many 30-somethings don’t find super all that interesting, at least compared to other pursuits that are normal at this kind of age, such as establishing a successful career or starting a family.
But as anyone who understands the power of compounding knows, 30 is a great age to start taking your superannuation seriously. After all, those who are in their 30s today might not have too much else to rely upon if they wish to enjoy a long and comfortable retirement free of financial worries.
Those in their 30s are also some of the first Australians who would have benefitted from high compulsory superannuation payments for the entirety of their working lives.
This report reveals that over the 2021 financial year, the average super fund of someone aged 30-34 contained $51,400. The median balance, which is less skewed by outliers, was $38,681.
For men, the average balance was $56,344, while the median came in at $41,849.
For women, we got an average balance of $46,289 and a median of $35,716.
These numbers should generate at least some consternation amongst Australians in their 30s right now. As reported by the ABC this year, it is estimated that someone aged 30 today should have at least $59,000 in superannuation if they wish to be on track for a ‘comfortable’ retirement by the time they hit 67.
The Association of Super Funds Australia (ASFA) currently defines a comfortable retirement as one funded by at least $69990,000 in super if one is in a couple, or $595,000 for singles.
This also assumes those retiring own their own home, rely on a part pension and withdraw their super as a lump sum.
The ‘comfortable’ retirement they will then enjoy includes private health insurance, provisions for buying household goods, a quality car, occasional international and domestic travel, as well as good mobile and home internet connections.
Despite these assumptions, it appears that those around 30 today have some ground to make up with their super funds if they wish to enjoy a comfortable retirement.
Wondering where you should invest $1,000 right now?
When investing expert Scott Phillips has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the flagship Motley Fool Share Advisor newsletter he has run for over ten years has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
Scott just revealed what he believes could be the ‘five best ASX stocks’ for investors to buy right now. We believe these stocks are trading at attractive prices and Scott thinks they could be great buys right now…
Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
The Equinox EV is a solid addition to the electric crossover market.
I found that Super Cruise elevates the experience behind the wheel.
The Equinox EV is priced and designed to compete directly with Tesla's mass-market cars.
There's another electric Chevrolet crossover on the market as the bowtie brand leans into EVs while others are pulling back.
I got to take the new all-electric Equinox EV on a quick drive in Metro Detroit and came away impressed with the little hatchback's performance.
Two trims are available on dealer lots today, with a starting price of $43,295. That's a new, much-needed option in the sub-$50,000 price range for EVs. GM is also promising even cheaper options for the Equinox later this year, with a base model that starts at $34,995.
The Equinox EV has an EPA-estimated range of 319 miles. Its DC fast-charging capability of up to 150 kW enables 77 miles of range to be added in 10 minutes of charging, according to GM estimates.
The Equinox EV also boasts plenty of cargo space, with 57.2 cubic feet of storage with the second row folded down.
This little Tesla fighter, priced and designed to compete directly with Model 3 and Model Y, delivered a smooth ride on GM's pre-selected course that included surface road and highway driving.
The Tesla influence on the Equinox EV is undeniable
A close-up of the mechanical door handle on the Equinox EV
Nora Naughton, Business Insider
The first things I noticed as I approached the Equinox EV for my test drive were the door handles. When the vehicle is locked, the handles lay flush with the door. Unlocked, they pop out like a level to pull and open the door.
This is a direct nod to Tesla, which originated this door handle design. On a mostly sunny 75-degree day, they didn't give me any trouble, but cold weather does seem to cause trouble for these mechanical door handles.
The styling on the Equinox EV turns a milquetoast mom car into a stylish prowler
A Chevrolet Equinox EV parked in a driveway
Nora Naughton, Business Insider
The gas-powered Equinox is one of many boring crossovers in Chevrolet's portfolio. The layman might not be able to distinguish it from a Trax or a Blazer.
But the electrified version is designed to stand out, with a hood that swoops down to narrow headlights, helping give the crossover a menacing stance. More sculpting around the back wheels also gives it a wider appearance, too, making it more distinct from its gas-powered counterpart.
Sleeker design is a must-have in the electric crossover market, which also includes lookers like the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Mustang Mach-E.
Unlike the sparse Tesla models, Equinox EV has buttons, nobs, and vents that accent the space
Interior view of front cabin in a 2024 Chevrolet Equinox EV RS.
Jim Fets, General Motors
I've always found the sparse interior of the Model 3 and Model Y to feel a bit cavernous, so I was glad to see a lot of accenting and design cues built into the Equinox EV's interior.
Some trims also have more fun color combinations for the leather seating to add a bit of personality inside the car.
Still, overall I found the interior of the electric car to be somewhat underwhelming. I've sat in a lot of Chevrolet interiors over the years, this one didn't feel all that different or special.
Super Cruise elevates the experience in the Equinox EV
The view from behind the wheel of the Chevrolet Equinox EV while it drives using the hands-free Super Cruise technology.
Nora Naughton, Business Insider
While the Equinox EV's interior leaves a bit to be desired, the optional Super Cruise hands-free technology elevates the driving experience to make the Equinox EV feel more special than your average crossover.
I sat back and enjoyed the sunny ride on the highway while Super Cruise navigated traffic.
The Equinox EV is a solid addition to the electric crossover market, but Chevy has a lot to prove with Ultium
A close-up of the Chevrolet Equinox EV badge
Nora Naughton, Business Insider
Overall, I enjoyed my time behind the wheel of the Equinox EV. It delivers the zippy ride you expect from a battery-powered car, and Chevrolet's engineers have tuned the car to hug corners and feel smooth and stable out on the road.
There aren't a ton of extra frills or surprises, but the Equinox EV gave me just about everything I would want out of an electric crossover — the type of EV I'd be most likely to add to my own driveway.
But I can't help but wonder how some of the troubles with the Ultium technology in the Blazer rollout will affect its chances up against Hyundai, Kia, and Tesla. Electric car customers today are less patient than the techy early adopters who pioneered the market.
Chevrolet is hoping to take advantage of this shift in customer preferences with its trusted reputation as a legacy brand, flooding the market with EVs while others are pulling back. But the Blazer's messy launch, which included a stop-sale to repair software issues, might have an effect on how even the most loyal Chevrolet owner views the Equinox EV.
After browsing the selection of potential dates on Amazon Dating, users can click and "buy" them.
Erin Clark/The Boston Globe/Getty Images
A group of content creators, with an animation company Thinko, created Amazon Dating, a satirical dating platform where people can fake-purchase their dream date.
The website looks eerily similar to Amazon's real site and has functional features that allow users to "buy" the featured dates.
Some people said putting a price on people, especially on black people during Black History Month, is problematic. Some found Amazon Dating humorous for drawing parallels with the toxic nature of online dating.
Online dating can often make people feel more like commodities than singles looking for love, with photo-heavy profiles for others to swipe through, and suggested chat-up lines.
Every person who's "for sale" on Amazon Dating comes with a price, reviews, a bulleted description of hobbies, and even a drop down to choose how tall you want them to be.
They've also added relationship-related features that match Amazon's typical style. Instead of offering different sizes for the humans featured, the Thinko team added "love language" options for each person, so you can choose whether your digitally-designed dream date enjoys words of affirmation, acts of service, physical touch, or another love language from Gary Chapman's best-selling book.
Karen's hobbies include speaking to the manager and the police, according to Amazon Dating.
Thinko
Different people cost different amounts, which raised some concerns
When you go to the fully functional Amazon Dating homepage, you can see different people as if they were available to purchase.
The Amazon Dating homepage.
Thinko
Although Thinko noted that Amazon Dating was a joke, some viewers didn't like that they monetized humans at different prices.
Amazon Dating allows you checkout like you would on the real Amazon website
After browsing the selection of potential dates on Amazon Dating, users can click and "buy" them.
To test the function, Insider "bought" Teddy, 87, in the size "words of affirmation" and at a height of 5'5". Teddy also happened to be the "Deal of the Day."
One previous Teddy customer noted in the reviews section that Teddy was a great gift for a family member.
"I bought as a wedding gift for my great Aunt who is in her 80's and was getting remarried," the faux review read. "They had a cute reaction."
After hitting "add to cart," a review window appeared just like it does for any real Amazon order.
Once the order was placed, a fake confirmation message was generated.
Teddy was Amazon Dating's "Deal of the Day."
Thinko
What it looks like after clicking the checkout button.
Thinko
You also get a message confirming your fake order.
Thinko
The website has other functional features, including a downloable 'non-ghosting agreement'
In addition to being able to fake-purchase people, Amazon Dating has other clickable and interactive features that poke fun at dating in the digital age.
"This Non-Ghosting Agreement is entered into by and between __________________ ("Disclosing Party") and ___________________ ("Receiving Party") for the purpose of preventing the unauthorized action of "Ghosting," as defined below," the document reads.
And if users click the button for Prime Video, they're redirected to the popular video chatting website Chat Roulette.
An Amazon spokesperson said the company has "no comment" on Amazon Dating.
Editor's note, May 24, 2024: This article has been updated to reflect the chosen name of a source mentioned in the story.
The rumored MacBook (not pictured) won't have a physical keyboard.
Getty Images
Apple could be releasing an all-screen foldable MacBook in 2026.
Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said production costs could rival the $3,500 Vision Pro headset.
The rumored MacBook would come with an as-yet-announced M5 series processor.
Apple could be gearing up to release an all-screen, foldable MacBook for 2026, and it may cost quite a bit.
That's according to Ming-Chi Kuo, a much-followed analyst who has previously been a go-to for Apple product predictions, having often done so accurately.
In a Thursday blog post, citing a survey, the supply-chain analyst at TF International Securities said that the product, Apple's first foldable-screen device, could measure 20.25 inches, though "Apple is also considering using an 18.8" panel instead."
The "target mass production schedule for the panel and assembly" is Q4 2025 and H1 2026, respectively, he wrote. That compares to a previous estimate of 2027.
Still, the cost for consumers could reach Vision Pro pricing levels, Kuo wrote. The Vision Pro has a retail price tag of $3,499.
That's because the cost of making a hinge and display that "make the panel as crease-free as possible" looks hefty. It requires "high design specifications," and current preliminary estimates put the panel costs at around $600—$650 and hinge costs at $200—$250 each, he said.
However, "if production yields improve significantly by the time of mass production, these costs could decrease." Plus, "due to the more defined product positioning of the foldable MacBook, the shipments are expected to be significantly higher than those of the Vision Pro. Shipments are estimated to exceed 1 million units in 2026," Kuo estimated. That's a boon for Apple after the mixed success of the headset launched earlier this year.
The MacBook could also come with a yet-to-be-announced M5 chip. When Apple introduced the new iPad Pro on May 7, the tech giant introduced the M4, calling it an "outrageously powerful chip for AI."
