• Elon Musk isn't done with Superchargers yet.
• Despite firing Tesla's Supercharger team last week, the CEO committed to the network on Friday.
• "Tesla will spend well over $500m expanding our Supercharger network," Musk wrote on X.

Apparently, Elon Musk really is still game for Superchargers.

On Friday, the billionaire Tesla chief took to X to clarify that he was, in fact, still very committed to building out Tesla's Supercharger business.

"Just to reiterate: Tesla will spend well over $500m expanding our Supercharger network to create thousands of NEW chargers this year," Musk wrote. "That's just on new sites and expansions, not counting operations costs, which are much higher."

You may recall that just a week ago, Musk suddenly decided to fire nearly all the 500 employees on Telsa's Supercharger team.

Tesla's Supercharger network, a collection of fast-charging plug-in stations spread over more than 50,000 sites globally, was seen by investors as a vital cornerstone in the company's ambitions to lead the EV market.

Rivals like Ford and GM have been scrambling to gain access to it. The spread of chargers was also seen as a key strategy to offset concerns potential EV buyers might have around range anxiety too.

So as news broke that Musk was axing the Supercharger team, it's safe to say Tesla investors were left more than a little puzzled. As Tesla investor Ross Gerber put it: "Any retreat from this part of the business will have a negative impact on the EV industry."

At the time, Musk tried to offset some concerns by saying Tesla still "plans to grow" the network, just "at a slower pace for new locations and more focus on 100% uptime and expansion of existing locations."

But with his comments on Friday, it looks like Musk has set out to shake off any lingering doubts about his commitment to a business that analysts have estimated could generate almost $7.5 billion in revenue and $730 million in profit a year for Tesla by 2030.

The thing is, with Tesla still without a functioning Supercharger team, the logistics of implementing Musk's plans remain a bit of a mystery.

Musk, who has driven a big shake-up at Tesla recently following the decision to cut more than 10% of the company's workforce in March, seems to be focusing on robotaxis as he looks to boost Tesla's AI and autonomous driving capabilities.

Two days before firing the Supercharger team, the billionaire wrote on X: "Tesla will spend around $10B this year in combined training and inference AI, the latter being primarily in car. Any company not spending at this level, and doing so efficiently, cannot compete."

At a time when companies are plowing billions of dollars into AI, there seems to be some logic here. But Musk also has a stated goal of selling 20 million Teslas a year by 2030.

He'll definitely want to amp up his Supercharger network too if he plans on achieving that.

• Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Manchester United co-owner, is banning remote work for the club's staff.
• The policy shift was prompted after email traffic declined at one of his companies on work-from-home Fridays.
• His hard-line RTO approach falls in line with many big companies like Apple, Dell, and Meta.

The billionaire co-owner of Manchester United, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, has told staff that he's banning work from home after key metrics were missed at one of his companies.

In an all-hands video call last week, Ratcliffe told staff that they would need to start coming into the office or "seek alternative employment," The Guardian reported.

Ratcliffe, the 103rd richest person on earth, bought a 27.7% stake in the soccer club in February, and his company, Ineos, took over the management of football operations. The billionaire is coming in strong by shaking off the company's post-COVID flexible work policy to boost productivity.

The policy shift was largely spurred by a dip in email traffic, per The Guardian.

Ratcliffe told Manchester United employees that traffic dropped 20% after one of his companies trialed work-from-home Fridays.

Staff are also under fire after Ratcliffe called out the untidiness of the club's premises last week. The billionaire told staff that the state of the club's IT department was a "disgrace," and other areas of the training ground weren't much better, The Athletic reported.

However, the strict policy change has some challenges. The company premises in Manchester and London don't actually have enough space to accommodate all staff coming into the office full time, per The Athletic.

Plenty of other businesses have taken the same hard-line approach to bringing employees back to the office. Dell delivered a similar ultimatum to its employees earlier this year: return to the office, or you won't be promoted. Other companies enforcing strict return-to-office mandates include Apple, Meta, and Google.

However, not everyone agrees that RTO mandates are the best way to boost productivity. Globant, a software company with 30,000 employees, is allowing all its employees to stay fully remote.

Some research has also called the effectiveness of RTO mandates into question. A recent study on S&P 500 firms by researchers at the Katz Graduate School of Business found that companies with strict RTO mandates weren't more profitable, and workers weren't necessarily more productive.

• Malcolm Aw said he pulled out of a Neom contract because of alleged Saudi human rights abuses. 
• The CEO of Solar Water told BI that he had planned to build solar desalination plants. 
• Human rights campaigners say tribe members are being forcibly evicted to make way for the megacity. 

A green energy founder pulled out of a $100 million Neom contract after he realized that the Saudis were bulldozing villages to make way for the megacity.

Malcolm Aw, the CEO and founder of Solar Water, told Business Insider that he initially got involved with Neom to help realize its ambitions as a pioneering green energy "eco-city."

Neom is the centerpiece of Saudi ruler Mohammed bin Salman's Vision 2030 project to diversify the Saudi economy away from fossil fuels and transform it into a luxury tourism destination and innovation hub.

However, Aw said he was so appalled at reports of human rights abuses that he canceled the Neom contract in 2022, despite having already built some of his desalination plants there.

"They just, they bulldoze their way right through villages and everything, which is just unbelievable," said Aw.

Aw spoke to BI after BBC News reported that an exiled Saudi colonel said Saudi Arabia authorized the use of lethal force to clear the way for its Neom desert megacity.

Col Rabih Alenezi said he was ordered to evict people living on the land to make way for a part of the project called The Line. The area was mostly populated by the Huwaitat tribe.

The BBC said it was not able to independently verify Alenezi's comments about lethal force.

however, satellite images analyzed by the BBC showed three villages, including schools and hospitals, were destroyed to make way for Neom.

One of the villagers, Abdul Rahim al-Huwaiti, was later reportedly killed by Saudi authorities, said the UN.

"What it tried to do is turn the whole province into Dubai or Qatar or something, but in doing so, they are clearing the people who have been there for years out of the area," said Aw.

"These people could be such a contribution to this whole development. You know the villages have all been removed."

Aw, who is a descendant of Tiger Balm founder Aw Boon Haw, told BI that he had initially been drawn to work on the Neom project because of its commitment to green energy and ecology.

Aw's company uses solar energy for desalination, while most desalination plants burn fossil fuels and have been found to pollute oceans. Neom had offered Aw's company, Solar Water, $100m for exclusive rights to use his technology.

Neom's planners say they want to be an"eco-city," with the signature project "The Line" — a vertical mirrored skyscraper cutting through the desert — running on 100% renewable energy and 95% of the land preserved for nature. They claim to be committed to "respecting existing communities and cultural heritage within our region."

But Aw believes the promises are not being fulfilled, and planners are performing a U-turn on their original vision for the city.

"What they're doing is not ethical and what they're doing is they're creating an exclusivity to house wealthy people in a wealthy touristic area. But that wasn't the original idea. The idea was to develop a green scenario," he said.

"The whole idea we came in is to make the place green, and for the people, the local people, the indigenous who have been there for ages, for yonks, to be able to share into development," said Aw. "But then they change course. Suddenly, they are totally different from what we expect to do, and in doing so, they have done a lot of damage."

Neom declined to comment on Aw's claims. The Saudi embassy in the UK did not respond to a request for comment.

Saudi Arabia has been trying to quell public criticism about its Vision 2030 plans.

Last year, BI reported that the crackdown extended to those criticizing the evictions on social media, with Fatima al-Shawarbi sentenced to 30 years in prison for speaking out.

The project has been beset by problems in recent months, with costs spiraling to an estimated $1 trillion and key projects delayed or cut back. In April, Bloomberg reported that Saudi officials were reducing the number of people expected to be living in Neom from around one million to 300,000 by 2030. The report also said the length of The Line could be cut from around 100 miles to one mile.

Aw urged planners to stand by their original ethical and ecological vision.

"You know, we have the technology to solve the [green energy] problem that people are complaining about today. Absolutely. Absolutely. But there's just not the vision or the ethical commitment," he said.

• Target plans to stock Pride merch in about half its stores this year, sources told Bloomberg.
• The full range will be available online, it reported.
• Last year, Target's Pride range faced a massive backlash from conservatives, contributing to a fall in sales.

Target plans to stock Pride merch in just half its stores after it faced an intense backlash and even calls for a boycott last year, Bloomberg reported.

The retailer is looking at data for each store to decide where to stock the products, and is likely to sell them in about half of its locations for Pride Month in June, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg. It plans to sell its full Pride range online, the people said.

A Target spokesperson told Bloomberg that the company was committed to supporting the LGBTQ+ community "during Pride Month and year-round." The company would have internal programs and a presence at Pride events across the county, the spokesperson said.

Last year Target faced a massive backlash from vocal conservatives over its Pride range, which included slogan tote bags and sweaters as well as transgender-friendly swimsuits. The retailer said some people had made "threats" impacting workers' safety and CEO Brian Cornell said its call centers had received "high volumes of angry, abusive and threatening calls."

In some stores, Pride displays were moved to quieter areas. Some workers in Florida and Texas told Business Insider that products related to transgender Pride had been removed from their stores.

Some LGBTQ+ Target workers said that the company's response to the backlash left them feeling alienated.

Target CFO Michael Fiddleke told investors last summer that the reaction to its Pride range had contributed to the retailer's first quarterly sales decline in six years.

Bud Light was also targeted by conservatives last year after partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, and some Starbucks workers said the coffee chain had banned them from displaying Pride decor, including flags. A Starbucks spokesperson told Business Insider at the time that there had been no changes to its LGBTQ+ policies.

• Warren Buffett slashed his Apple stake then found himself forced to work from his iPhone.
• The investor turned to the device after phone lines went down this week at Berkshire Hathaway HQ.
• "I'm glad we didn't sell all of our Apple," Buffett joked to The Omaha World-Herald.

Warren Buffett may be cursing the universe for its wicked sense of humor.

The famed investor revealed during Berkshire Hathaway's annual shareholder meeting on Saturday that he'd slashed his Apple stake. Two days later, he walked into his company's headquarters to find the phone lines were down, forcing him to work from his iPhone.

"I don't know how to do much with it, but I do know how to answer calls," Buffett, 93, told The Omaha World-Herald on Wednesday when the local outage had not yet been resolved.

"I'm glad we didn't sell all of our Apple," he quipped.

Buffett famously spends his days analyzing companies and conversing on the phone, so the outage was a major headache for him — especially as he left his cellphone at home on Monday.

"We had this meeting that went over very well all weekend, and now to anybody who has phoned us in the last three days, they think we have gone out of business," Buffett joked to his hometown newspaper.

He was nodding to Berkshire cashing in 13% of its Apple stake for roughly $20 billion last quarter. At the end of December, the position was worth $174 billion and made up nearly half of Berkshire's $353 billion portfolio.

Berkshire's disposals, and an 11% drop in Apple's stock price, cut the holding's value to $135 billion, or 40% of the portfolio at the end of March.

Buffett is unabashedly old school and proudly frugal. Berkshire follows suit despite commanding a near-$900 billion valuation and ranking among the nation's 10 largest public companies.

For example, Berkshire's corporate homepage is a list of hyperlinks straight out of the 1990s:

Buffett's tech skepticism made his massive bet on Apple a surprise to many people. But the investor has pointed to the iPhone's immense appeal and how indispensable it is to users. He got a taste of just how much people rely on it this week.

• A think tank hid a free bottle of wine in its website's terms and conditions.
• They aimed to see if anyone actually reads privacy policies. It took three months to be claimed.
• Tax Policy Associates founder Dan Neidle said it was a "childish protest" at the need for privacy policies.

It might just be worth reading those T&Cs after all.

In February, UK think tank Tax Policy Associates snuck a tempting offer into one of the clauses on its website's terms and conditions, to see if anybody would actually notice.

"This website uses cookies so it remembers your name if you leave a comment. You can reject them if you like," the privacy policy read. "We will send a bottle of good wine to the first person to read this."

The think tank's founder, Dan Neidle, said on X on Thursday that someone had finally claimed the bottle.

"Our ongoing experiment into whether anyone reads website T&Cs continues," he wrote, adding that the wine "just got claimed."

Neidle told the BBC that the T&Cs stunt was "my childish protest that all businesses have to have a privacy policy and no-one reads it."

The website's privacy policy has since been updated to say: "We know nobody reads this."

Amusingly, the person who claimed the bottle was only reading it because they were writing their own T&Cs and needed examples to follow, Neidle told the BBC.

The wine he sent out, per the BBC, was a 2013-2014 bottle of Château de Sales, which retails for about $44.

So-called "gotcha clauses" have been around for a while, highlighting a seemingly intractable problem in digital life.

In 2014, a security firm added what it called a "Herod clause" into a public wi-fi network's terms and conditions.

Six people signed up to "assign their first born child to us for the duration of eternity," in order to access the wi-fi, as The Guardian reported at the time.

The authors of one 2017 study found that 98% of participants signed up to similarly onerous terms.

Neidle said he was inspired by the legendary clause that Van Halen buried in their tour rider, according to the BBC.

At each stop, the group demanded a bowl of M&Ms with all the brown ones taken out — not because they were pampered, but because it would prove that the host venue was paying attention to more crucial safety and technical aspects of their show.

"It was a brilliant strategy to see if people were paying attention," Neidle told the BBC.

There are many reasons why few people read T&Cs, marketing experts Jeff Rotman and Paul Harrison wrote in The Conversation last year.

People tend to trust that large companies won't screw them over and that any problems would have already been spotted and dealt with before, they said.

They also said that evidence suggests that people are slightly more likely to read them if they're perceived as short, if they're spending a lot of money, or if they think they'll have a chance to influence the terms of the contract.

• Emirates CEO Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum criticized Boeing in a CNBC interview.
• He told the planemaker: "Get your act together."
• Boeing is balancing plane safety with keeping its customers happy over delivery times.

Boeing is facing criticism from one of its biggest customers, as the CEO of Emirates told the planemaker to "get your act together," in an interview with CNBC.

During Tuesday's interview, Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum expressed disappointment with delays to deliveries of new Boeing planes Emirates has ordered.

"We're not happy really with what's going on, we always really wanted to see this aircraft entering the fleet when it had been promised — and there is a delay, it's not only to us," he told CNBC.

"I think they have to put a lot of pressure in order to make sure that they deliver to the customer whatever they promised."

Al Maktoum told CNBC that his message for Boeing is: "Get your act together and just do it. And I think they can do it."

Boeing did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent by Business Insider.

The planemaker's reputation has faltered since a 737 Max operated by Alaska Airlines lost a door plug in midair in January. In its preliminary report, the National Transportation Safety Board said the plane — delivered just 66 days earlier — left Boeing's factory missing key bolts.

As a result, aircraft production has slowed as Boeing tries to regain customers' trust.

After announcing his resignation, Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun said the company needed to slow down production in order to focus on safety and avoid another incident like the blowout.

Al Maktoum's comments highlight the difficult balancing act Boeing must achieve in the coming months — ensuring that it prioritizes safety over pretty much everything else, while also keeping delays to a minimum.

With 250 planes on order, Emirates is Boeing's biggest customer for widebody jets. The Dubai-based carrier also does a lot of business with rival Airbus: on Monday, it announced the first destinations to be served by the A350 which enters service in September. It's also by far the biggest operator of the superjumbo A380.

While Al Maktoum expressed his disappointment with Boeing, he didn't go as far as to say that this would lead to canceling orders or switching to more Airbus jets. "I won't be able to say exactly what we are planning," he told CNBC.

That contrasts with United Airlines. In January, CEO Scott Kirby said delays to the 737 Max 10 mean the carrier is building an alternative plan without it. The chief financial officer then said the Airbus A321neo is being considered as an alternative.

• Norway is often in the 10 happiest countries in the world, but is also in the top 3 most productive.
• A Norwegian CEO based in Oslo whose worked in the US shares the major differences.
• He said Norwegians have stricter boundaries between work and home life and are never late. 

This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Sondre Kvam, co-founder and CEO of Naer, a VR platform that helps teams improve their productivity with fully immersive workshops, who lives in Oslo, Norway. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

I live and work in Norway and am a co-founder of Naer, a VR productivity platform. I work with employees based all around the world and travel to the US frequently. I often think about productivity and how to embed it in working practices.

Sweden is often lauded for its working practices, and of course, it has a larger economy, but it's Norway that's often ranked as one of the most productive countries in the world. Looking at GDP per hour, Norway often falls in the top three countries globally.

These aspects of Norway's working culture contribute to high productivity while maintaining a good work-life balance. Norway also falls in the top 10 happiest countries in the world.

People spend less time navigating workplace conflict

Much of our work life is based around the Norwegian model of cooperation and mutual respect between employers and employees, unions, employee associations, and the government.

There are laws to ensure good information flows between businesses and employees. For instance, if you have more than 30 employees, you're obligated to have an "employee representative" as part of the board.

There are unions for knowledge workers and most normal jobs like restaurant work. Discussions between unions and companies usually happen via the "Næringslivets Hovedorganisasjon" or NHO, a sort of union businesses can join. Companies don't have to join the NHO, but most do.

Norway has something called "lønnsoppgjøret" or "the salary settlement" every year, where general guidelines around pay are established for each industry in negotiations with unions and employer associations. Once a wage baseline has been set in each sector, every business has some leeway to give more to high performers.

Civil conversations between all these players are the norm, and people don't spend much time in conflicts regarding workplace issues because they're handled by these trusted bodies.

Because of that, Norwegian employees tend to be focused and spend their time well during work hours. Most people work traditional hours like 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. or 9 p.m. to 5 p.m. There's a mentality that you should strive to have a life outside work by working set hours and having boundaries.

Deep work is the default

At work, Norwegians are working, and deep work is expected of everyone. So there's no doing life admin, answering LinkedIn messages, chatting to colleagues about unrelated topics, or online shopping, like in UK or US offices. Most of the time, Norwegians are head down working or collaborating. Pretty much every Norwegian has some sort of noise-canceling headset. If you're wearing one, you want absolute peace.

Going to the US, I often hear of people putting in 80-hour working weeks. However, Americans have a different relationship to the workplace — they stay later because they have longer commutes and maybe can get dinner, use the gym, or other life admin services at their offices. 'Busywork,' life admin, and rest time all happen at work.

In Norway, anyone working at any large company logs off and continues with their home lives when the day's allocated working hours are up, which are tightly regulated during collective bargaining. That's across sectors — banking, consulting firms, and service jobs.

A lot of people turn off notifications outside work. I've set up my notification systems so that only important things come through outside work hours. I like getting up early, reading books, and trying to spend time with things relevant to my work. There's this misconception that being constantly available for your workplace makes you more productive or faster. Being constantly "on" just interrupts time to think things through or get inspiration from other places.

There's an understanding between employers and employees in Norway that you will do better work if you're not thinking about work all the time. Talking of work outside work is not taboo, but you don't want to be the guy who can't shut up about work. Norwegians are encouraged to take holidays and spend time with their families. Stress and exhaustion narrow your perspective, which in turn degrades your work.

Ahead of time, or you're late

For Norwegians, being late to anything is incredibly rude. Either you're ahead of time, or you're late. Sitting around waiting for someone to join a meeting is one of the things Norwegians hate the most. It's throwing both money and time out of the window.

As a society, we do not praise "grinding for the sake of grinding," and there's an awareness of the cost-benefit of doing so. I don't feel a pressure not to work, but there's a clear expectation that I keep an eye on my own well-being.

As the cofounder of a startup, I work a fair amount, with particular crunch points like launching products, sorting recruitment, and preparing for a fundraise. Having customers in other time zones also means I must be flexible with my work schedule and sometimes work in the evening or early morning.

As everywhere else, there is a problem of people being burned out as founders in Norway.

My girlfriend is much more strict on the boundaries of her work. She is a data scientist and backend engineer for a Norwegian startup. When she's done for the day, she completely switches messages off. She probably gets even more annoyed than I about waiting for someone on a call.

It links to the fact we have limited time at work. You get used to this dynamic where time is precious and hate it when someone's late outside work. If I were to be more than 10 minutes late for a date in Norway, that would be unacceptable. That relationship would be finished before it started — it's a total dealbreaker.

• Cold Stone Creamery is facing legal action over 'pistachio' ice cream that contains no pistachios.
• The plaintiff argued that the name misled her into believing the ice cream contained real nuts.
• Last week, a judge ruled that the case can move forward. It's unclear when it will go to trial.

The parent company of Cold Stone Creamery is facing legal action after a New York woman ordered "pistachio" ice cream only to discover that it didn't contain pistachios.

In a ruling last week, Gary R. Brown, a federal judge at the Eastern District Court of New York in Brooklyn, allowed the case against Kahala Brands to move forward.

It all started when the plaintiff visited a Cold Stone Creamery in Levittown, Long Island, in July 2022, ordering what she believed was a pistachio ice cream.

In court filings, her legal team argued that she "reasonably believed" it contained the nut due to its name, but Brown wrote that "heartbreak followed."

The ruling says that upon examining the website's ingredient list, the plaintiff learned that the ice cream was made using a "mixture of highly processed ingredients" but no actual pistachios.

According to the ruling, it was instead made with pistachio flavoring, consisting of "Water, Ethanol, Propylene Glycol, Natural & Artificial Flavor, Yellow 5, [and] Blue 1."

The plaintiff's lawyers argued that had she been aware of this, she wouldn't have bought the ice cream.

In the ruling, the plaintiff compared Cold Stone Creamy's pistachio ice cream to offerings from Häagen-Dazs and Ben and Jerry's, both of which contained real pistachios.

She also compiled a survey of more than 400 US consumers, in which about 85% of participants believed a product labeled as pistachio ice cream would indeed contain pistachios, according to the ruling.

Despite Kahala Brands' efforts to have the case dismissed, including arguing that an online ingredient list was sufficient, the judge remained unconvinced.

However, he agreed that the case should focus solely on pistachio ice cream, and not other products with potentially deceptive names, and he dismissed implied warranty and unjust enrichment claims.

Kahala Brands did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It is unclear when the case will go to trial.

The lawsuit represents a broader trend of customers holding fast-food chains accountable for misleading product names or failing to meet expectations set by advertisements.

Business Insider previously reported on the rise in false-advertising class-action lawsuits against big food chains, including McDonald's and Taco Bell.

But Oren Bitan, an expert in these types of lawsuits, told BI that these types of claims face a high bar for success.

• The nation's biggest tech companies have spent more than $25 million lobbying Congress in Q1.
• Many of the tech giants have pivoted to developing AI tools in the past year.
• They're trying to make their voices heard ahead of time as Congress debates regulating the field.

The nation's largest tech companies spent more than $28 million on lobbying services in the first quarter of 2024.

Federal lobbying firms — advocates paid to try to influence legislators on Capitol Hill — were required to disclose their first-quarter earnings from companies on April 22, showing the groups they partnered with and some of the services they were lobbying for.

Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, and other industry leaders have spent billions in the past year alone developing AI tools and large language models, with each company trying to one-up the other. That is abundantly clear in federal lobbying disclosures, which reveal the companies have spent nearly $5 million more this quarter compared to Q1 in 2023, when they spent just under $23.6 million.

These companies also spend big bucks trying to persuade legislators to join their causes as they struggle to regulate the ever-changing technology industry.

Meta

After its Metaverse project cost Meta $16 billion in 2023 alone, leading the massive company to shutter some of its offices and lay off thousands of employees, the company's big focus in 2024 has been on its new open-source large language model, Llama.

Meta's spent the most on lobbying compared to its competitors, amounting to $8.5 million. The bulk of that — $7.64 million — went to Meta's in-house team of lobbyists, with the remaining $886,250 split up between 19 firms.

Amazon

In the first three months of 2024 alone, Amazon paid 29 different lobbying firms $5.85 million to lobby on behalf of its web services product, online pharmacy, and other company interests.

Amazon reported spending $4.35 million on its in-house lobbying team, which has more than 10 members, and about $1.24 million on the other 28 firms hired by the tech giant.

Alphabet/Google

Alphabet, the parent company of Google, reported $23.7 billion in profit in their Q1 quarterly earnings, exceeding Wall Street's expectations.

CEO Sundar Pichai said in an earnings call that much of Google's profit came from its search engine, but its foray into generative AI with its Gemini model has also been lucrative.

Alphabet reported spending $3.7 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2024, $3 million of which remained with their in-house team. The remaining $700,000 was divvied up between 18 outside lobbying firms.

ByteDance/TikTok

ByteDance — the parent company of the massively popular social media app TikTok — reported spending $2.8 million lobbying in Q1 of 2024 alone, while TikTok itself also reported spending $440,000 on similar services. The two combined to spend about $3.2 million.

Congress introduced and passed a law earlier in 2024 that's set to ban TikTok from US app stores if ByteDance doesn't divest, despite TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew personally traveling to Washington, DC, to lobby against it.

Microsoft

Microsoft bet big on OpenAI in July 2019, investing $1 billion "to build secure, trustworthy and ethical AI to serve the public." Since then, Microsoft has reportedly invested $13 billion into the startup.

The investment has been a success for the company, helping it become a leader in the AI space.

Microsoft is reportedly working on its own large language model, MAI-1, to rival Google and OpenAI, though a timeline for its release is uncertain.

The company has spent $3.2 million in 2024 lobbying the halls of the Capitol, about $2.8 million of which went to its own team of lobbyists.

Apple

Apple has yet to formally announce its foray into building large language models or publicly available AI tools, but CEO Tim Cook teased in a recent earnings call that the company would make a big announcement regarding AI in "coming weeks."

The Wall Street Journal reported May 6 that the company was in the process of developing computer chips built specifically for AI software.

In the first three months of 2024, Apple spent $2.88 million on federal lobbyists, with $2.1 million going to its own lobbying team. The rest of Apple's lobbying investment was divided between eight other firms.

OpenAI

After a meteoric rise in 2023, OpenAI has spent $530,000 lobbying on Capitol Hill. The bulk of OpenAI's reported lobbying spending — $340,000 — was to its in-house team.

OpenAI also reported paying $80,000 to the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, $90,000 to global firm DLA Piper, and $20,000 to Hogan Lovells, which specializes in "corporate, finance, litigation, regulatory and IP law."

Tesla

Tesla reported spending $390,000 in Q1 in 2024. Seventy-one percent of that, or $280,000, went toward Tesla's personal lobbying team. The electric vehicle manufacturer also spent $80,000 on lobbying services from Cassidy & Associates and $30,000 from Pioneer Public Affairs.

CEO Elon Musk has notably been a staunch opponent of government subsidies in recent years despite Tesla and its subsidiaries getting $2,829,855,494 in federal and state loans since 2007.

X/Twitter

The Musk-owned X has spent $240,000 so far in 2024 on lobbying, with the vast majority —$170,000 — going to its in-house lobbying team. The remaining $70,000 was split between The Joseph Group and TwinLogic Strategies.

Musk notably invested resources in the past year in developing Grok, an AI-based chatbot he wants to use to summarize news on X that's had mixed success.

Nvidia

Nvidia, a company known for its GPU and computer chip manufacturing, has benefited enormously from the rapid growth of AI because its chips have become a "de facto industry standard" for developing AI models.

The company reported spending the least on lobbying of any major tech company on this list, $160,000, which was split evenly between The Nickles Group and Tiber Creek Group.