• Jennifer Rozelle has been working in estate law for over a decade. 
• She's witnessed some heartbreaking fights between families over inheritance. 
• One pair of siblings even argued until they lost their inheritance to legal fees. 

This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Jennifer Rozelle, 36, an attorney at the firm Indiana Estate & Elder Law, about seeing families receive inheritances in her line of work. The following has been edited for length and clarity.

I'm an attorney who practices exclusively in estate planning, elder law, and estate administration fields. I help people with planning for incapacity, death, and long-term care. I also work with family members of the deceased, helping them navigate the legal processes that occur after a person dies.

When a person dies, I represent the trustee or executor of their estate. My responsibility is to ensure that they follow the estate plan that the person who died created or, if the person didn't have an estate plan, that they follow intestacy laws, which will dictate who inherits what from the person who's passed.

I've been in this line of work since 2012 when I joined an Indiana-based law firm. Around five years ago, my husband, also an attorney, and I purchased the firm.

When I've dealt with inheritance at my job, I've noticed that putting money on the table changes people. I've seen it benefit a lot of people — they receive money or property they didn't have before — but I'd be remiss if I didn't recognize how many families end up fighting over it.

Families fight over property that is valuable — and not so valuable

My husband often says that dealing with estate planning documents is the easiest part of our jobs — It's the relationships and personalities involved that make it difficult.

In my experience, it's not even the amount of money that makes families fight. I've seen people bicker over personal property in mom or dad's house that isn't worth anything but has high sentimental value, like a family sword or jewelry. You can't always split this type of property between relatives.

I was once tasked with getting a valuation of a mother's wedding ring as two children were fighting over it. It turned out that the wedding ring was comprised of cubic zirconia, not real diamonds. Once that was discovered, neither wanted the ring.

Legal fees can end up consuming estates, so when estates have a significant amount of assets, there's a lot more time and room for families to argue.

Many years ago, I was involved in a case where two sisters were fighting, and their legal fees were consuming their estate balance. We were trying to get them to settle their dispute before they ran out of money, but one of the siblings looked us dead in the eye and said, "I would rather see you guys get that money than my sister." I will never forget the look on her face. In the end, the beneficiaries walked away with nothing. Litigation continued and consumed the entire estate balance.

Sometimes, you can tell from a mile away that a family doesn't get along and will argue, but some fights really do surprise you.

I once had a client who died with two properties, which went to his two children. Both children were in the room during previous meetings with the client and were very agreeable and amicable.

After their father died, the siblings began to argue over the properties; one wanted to sell both, and the other wanted to keep them. The one who wanted to sell was frustrated because their sibling, who wished to keep the properties, wasn't paying any of the bills.

I would never have thought in a million years that these two clients would have fought, but they both dug their heels in and went to court, where they were forced to sell the properties and split the money. They could have saved themselves a lot of time and money if they were more collaborative.

Grief impacts the way people handle inheritance issues

It breaks my heart to see families fighting over inheritance. We spend countless hours creating a plan so that nothing bad will happen, but when humans, relationships, and personalities enter into the equation, unpleasant surprises can occur.

I once had a client who was estranged from one of her children. She anticipated that her estranged child would kick up a fuss about inheritance down the line. She had written a letter before she died explaining why she disinherited the estranged child and gave it to me to keep until she died.

After she died, the estranged child was the first person to call my office. I gave the letter to her, and she caused an absolute scene in my office. There was a lot of screaming and expletives, but at the end of the day, I'm glad it happened in my office and not in front of her sibling.

Grief is very much at play in a lot of inheritance disputes. People can be in a very emotional and fragile state. Because I'm naturally a glass-half-full kind of person, speaking about death with people all day doesn't really impact me negatively. I'm used to the fact that people might react in a way that I don't agree with. I'd be doing them a disservice if I didn't extend them a little grace while they are navigating tough times, but it does become challenging when people are disrespectful.

I've also seen that inheritance has the power to do good

I think a lot of people assume that inheritances can impact families for the worse. People want to hear the juicy, dramatic stories, but I've mostly found that bickering families will calm down eventually and resolve things.

I've also had the pleasure of seeing how inheritance can have a positive impact. I've seen beneficiaries who didn't expect to inherit anything from someone receive a surprise check, or money being given to charitable organizations.

One client I had didn't have anyone close to her to leave money to, as her spouse and child had both died before her. She ended up leaving around $7 million to five charitable organizations. I got to be the person calling some of these organizations and telling them they'd be receiving money from this person's estate.

Seeing this kind of good come out of inheritances just fills my cup. I think it's important not to forget how inheritance can also change lives for the better.

• The AI frenzy is similar to the crypto craze a few years ago, top economist Paul Romer said.
• The Nobel Prize winner called it "typical bubble hype" and predicted AI progress would slow sharply.
• A narrowing, AI-obsessed stock market could signal an economic slump ahead, another expert said.

The breathless buzz around artificial intelligence is similar to the rabid excitement that surrounded digital assets such as dogecoin and NFTs in recent years, a top economist warned.

"There was this solid consensus only a couple years ago that cryptocurrencies were going to change everything, and then suddenly that consensus just goes away," Paul Romer told Bloomberg TV this week.

"Nobody even asks, 'Gee, why were we so confident and then it blew up?'" he added.

The Nobel Prize winner, former World Bank chief economist, and Boston College professor drew a parallel between the grand claims and rank speculation of that period and the ongoing AI craze.

"Right now there's way too much confidence about the future trajectory of AI," Romer said. "When people project this forward I think they're at risk of making a very serious mistake." 

He acknowledged that AI has advanced significantly in the past few years. However, the economist argued there was not enough data available for the tech to keep progressing at the same pace.

"Things are going to slow down a lot," Romer said. "It's just a lot of hype, the typical bubble hype where people are trying to cash in on the latest trend."

He predicted that in two years there would be broad agreement that AI was a bubble and people had overestimated its short-term potential.

Winners and losers

Romer is calling out the kind of AI hype that has boosted Nvidia stock more than sixfold since the start of last year, valuing the graphics chip maker as high as $2.8 trillion — just shy of Apple's market cap.

More staid companies like Nike and McDonald's, and even non-AI tech companies have performed far worse. They're "getting squashed," said Gary Kaltbaum, the president of Kaltbaum Capital Management, told Fox Business this week.

Transportation stocks are also in "bad shape," he said, cautioning that a narrowing market has often preceded past economic slumps.

"I think the economy's now in somewhat of a downtrend," Kaltbaum said. "Not a big recession or anything like that, but heading the wrong way."

Economically sensitive stocks have underperformed recession-resistant ones this year, signaling investors anticipate trouble, he continued.

"The market's speaking up here," Kaltbaum said. "I can promise you, if we head into recession, the market will be down 10% before you even know it."

Taken together, Romer and Kaltbaum see AI-linked stocks as hogging the market's gains — rightfully or not — and view the frenzy as a sign of problems ahead.

• Indeed's analysis of entry-level roles found inspector was the hottest job.
• The job-search site analyzed jobs using growth in the share of postings, pay, and experience.
• The top jobs weren't just ones that typically need a bachelor's or four-year degree.

If you're looking for your first job, you might want to consider joining the ranks of licensed practical nurses, inspectors, and business analysts.

Those three jobs were among the 15 hottest entry-level positions per a post from the job-search site Indeed.

"Graduation season is upon us and with it, the imminent influx of high school and college-level Gen Z graduates into the labor market," the Indeed post stated.

The US unemployment rate for 20- to 24-year-olds was 6.7% in April, above where it stood a year prior but not as high as in this past February and March, Bureau of Labor Statistics data suggests. A report from Handshake about the class of 2024 stated, "About 7 in 10 2024 graduates are confident they will find a job or other post-graduate opportunity that will allow them to apply the skills they learned in college and build toward the career they want."

Indeed's ranking of entry-level jobs included those that had an average salary of at least $45,000, noted zero to three years of experience in the job descriptions, and was also based on growth in the share of job postings.

"The jobs on this list were identified based on positive year-over-year growth in share of postings (September 2022- March 2023 compared to September 2023- March 2024) and ranked in order of highest paying," the report stated.

Inspector ranked No. 1 on the list, which Indeed told Business Insider largely includes property and construction inspectors. The Indeed post noted that an inspector job "does not require a four-year college degree, showing that skills-first experience may be just as valuable as education." Cable technician ranked No. 11, and installation technician ranked No. 10, which tend to require only a high school diploma based on the Indeed post. Some people don't see getting a four-year degree as worth it, as seen in recent results from a Pew Research Center survey of US adults.

Below are the top 15 hottest entry-level jobs from the Indeed list.

15. Licensed practical nurse

Percent change in job share: 17.24%

Average annual salary: $54,987

14. Entry-level field technician

Percent change in job share: 45.45%

Average annual salary: $55,000

13. Correctional officer

Percent change in job share: 21.43%

Average annual salary: $55,500

12. Sterile processing technician

Percent change in job share: 38.46%

Average annual salary: $57,031

11. Cable technician

Percent change in job share: 80.00%

Average annual salary: $58,912

10. Entry-level installation technician

Percent change in job share: 213.64%

Average annual salary: $60,000

9. Entry-level insurance agent

Percent change in job share: 41.03%

Average annual salary: $60,253

8. Entry-level sales representative

Percent change in job share: 27.17%

Average annual salary: $62,361

7. Entry-level civil engineer

Percent change in job share: 26.09%

Average annual salary: $65,352

6. Business analyst

Percent change in job share: 23.81%

Average annual salary: $66,394

5. Police officer

Percent change in job share: 15.38%

Average annual salary: $69,703

4. Mental health technician

Percent change in job share: 45.8%

Average annual salary: $75,322

3. Registered nurse — medical/surgical

Percent change in job share: 24.00%

Average annual salary: $77,281

2. Quality engineer

Percent change in job share: 84.62%

Average annual salary: $79,925

1. Entry-level inspector

Percent change in job share: 50.00%

Average annual salary: $80,253

America's young men aren't working. Well, a smaller share of them are working, anyway. As of April, about 86% of prime-age men — meaning those between 25 and 54 — were employed, a significant drop from the 1950s and 1960s, when that number was often closer to 95%. And 52% of men 16 to 24 were working, compared with well above 60% decades ago.

There are plenty of explanations for what might be going on — perhaps it has to do with recessions or disabilities or wages not being high enough to draw them in. There is an equally robust number of proposed solutions to this conundrum: upskilling and reskilling, convincing men to go into fields historically viewed as being for women, getting employers to be more realistic about requiring college degrees.

Let's toss another possible explanation into the mix: the unemployment-insurance system. The way firings are handled might actually affect whether guys get hired in the first place.

First, some basics. When a worker is laid off or fired, they're generally eligible for unemployment insurance, a program designed to help people stay afloat financially while they look for their next gig. After applying and being approved, which can be a pain, unemployed workers collect a check each week. The checks don't replace all their wages; the amount is generally less than half of what they were making before. It's something to tide them over so they can pay their bills, keep food on the table, etc., and that's good for the economy because it's a drag on everything when people suddenly can't do those things.

It's a straightforward enough idea, but the way we pay for UI is pretty wonky. Every business pays a tax into the pool of money that goes to paying unemployment insurance; the tax bill is footed by the employer, not the employee, unlike Social Security, which gets paid for by both. (Employers pay a certain percentage into UI on every paycheck, and those with more employees wind up kicking more in. It's sort of like the employer's part of Social Security.) But instead of it being a flat tax (the business kicks in X percentage each month) the rate can go up through a system called "experience rating." The experience in question is how much the employer has laid off workers in the past: More layoffs mean a higher tax rate. The thinking is that the more workers the company has let go, the more it's pushed people to draw on the UI system, so therefore it should pay more in unemployment taxes.

If you are going to get taxed for any employees that get laid off, you're going to be a lot more hesitant about hiring.

The idea behind this is understandable (though most countries don't do UI this way). If you want to discourage businesses from firing people willy-nilly, you penalize those that do. But in practice it's had some unintended consequences. A new paper from Matt Darling, a senior employment-policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, a center-right think tank, argues that the experience-rating system has made some employers reluctant to hire workers they're worried won't work out — and that young men, in particular, are the ones being harmed.

"If you are going to get taxed for any employees that get laid off, you're going to be a lot more hesitant about hiring," Darling told me. "It isn't the sole driver, but I think it's an important one."

The experience-rating system wasn't nationwide until the federal government in the mid-1980s mandated that states adopt the program. Darling looked at what happened when it was forced on the state of Washington, which held out on implementing the program until 1985. He compared it with Oregon, which already had an experience rating in place. The states' unemployment rates for young, entry-level workers moved in sync before Washington's experience rating was in place. When it was implemented, workers in Washington started to see higher unemployment. Darling found that after the experience rating was introduced in Washington, the unemployment rate for workers 15 to 25 — basically entry-level workers — increased by 2.5 percentage points. The effect was driven almost entirely by young men: Unemployment went up by 2.7 percentage points for young men but by only 0.1 percentage points for young women.

"It does sort of tie into a lot of things that people have been thinking about," Darling said. "Why is the male employment rate declining in general?"

The prospect of higher unemployment taxes can prompt employers to steer clear of people they perceive as riskier workers or opt to hire contractors. In more-nefarious situations, they might try to discourage workers from applying for unemployment or make their employees so miserable that they quit and therefore aren't eligible for UI benefits. So why would young men bear the brunt of this?

Men tend to outnumber women in economically vulnerable industries, such as manufacturing and construction. In recessions, those sectors are often hardest hit, meaning their jobs are among the first to go. (The pandemic recession was the exception.) Businesses in those sectors may also be extra sensitive to their experience ratings; they don't want to add even more to their taxes.

Employers might also see young men as riskier to bring on board. Fairly or unfairly, there's a stereotype that young men are more volatile, more immature, and less responsible than their female counterparts. Darling notes that men drop out of college at higher rates than women and argues that the same behavioral differences that drive that trend could also mean businesses see them as a higher layoff risk.

There are some ideas out there about policy solutions to fix the experience rating and UI. Darling's preference is to ax the experience rating and just pick a simple tax rate.

Implementing any of these solutions would be complicated, as there's rarely much political will to act on unemployment insurance. People realize how screwed up the system is when times are bad (see: the Great Recession, the pandemic), but once things get back to normal, everyone sort of forgets. Whatever appetite for action there might have been in Congress dies out — there's no real constituency of people who consider themselves the "unemployed worker." Lawmakers on Capitol Hill and in state legislatures do not love talking about taxes unless they're cutting them.

As for why so many young men aren't working, it's a doozy. There's no quick fix for recessions or incarceration rates or pay or any of the many other factors driving the shift. But maybe a step in the right direction here is to at least talk about it. And, hey, if you're a business owner, maybe take a risk on that young guy who walks through your door instead of worrying about what it might cost you if you decide to fire him.

Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, writing about business and the economy.

Sleep is the great unifier. Everyone needs it to repair cells, store memories, and balance emotions. It also helps us solve complex problems — ever need to just "sleep on it"?

Hustle culture tells us sleep is for the lazy. CEOs such as Apple's Tim Cook and Robinhood's Vlad Tenev tout their limited sleep schedules. Gordon Ramsay attributes his success to long workdays and little sleep. One woman told Business Insider she had saved tens of thousands of dollars by juggling two full-time jobs and sleeping for just three hours each night.

But while different people tend to feel more alert at different times of day, the science is clear: Everyone needs at least seven to nine hours of sleep each night in order to function properly. Teenagers need a full eight to 10 hours. And there is emerging evidence that women, who historically have been largely excluded from sleep studies, need more rest than men. When we don't get enough sleep, it can influence everything from how much money we make to our likelihood of developing dementia, heart disease, and diabetes.

Yet more than 85 million Americans are running on fumes. They don't get enough sleep, and the problem has grown worse over time.

The internet is littered with advice on how to get enough sleep: Keep your phone in a different room. Don't drink alcohol before bed. Turn the thermostat down. There's even specialized advice for couples: Maybe separate bedrooms will help. Those with extra cash can take things a step further. Drake bought a $395,000 horsehair mattress that supposedly improves circulation. Michael Phelps slept in a hyperbaric chamber that simulated being at 8,000 feet. And expensive products such as Oura's smart ring and Whoop's smart band promise to use data to improve your sleep.

These tactics imply that proper "sleep hygiene" (and expensive products) can fix chronic sleep deprivation. In fact, researchers used to believe that people in cities — where sleep impediments like noise pollution, bright lights, cramped conditions, and poor airflow are common — got the worst sleep. But an analysis of 2020 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by my team at American Inequality, a data-driven newsletter, has found that the most underslept people live in low-income, rural areas, primarily in the South. Residents of West Virginia, Kentucky, and Alabama regularly get the least amount of sleep — and it's not because they don't have horsehair mattresses.

Researchers have found that stress is one of the strongest indicators of poor sleep. Economic stress, in particular: Americans in poverty report getting the least amount of sleep. In a 2022 survey, 87% of Americans polled said they lost sleep worrying about their finances. And in a 2020 study, 13% of newly unemployed people said they got four hours of sleep or less a night, half of what the average employed person gets. In counties where about half the population doesn't get enough sleep, many of which are in Alabama, unemployment rates are twice as high as the US average, and median household incomes hover around $35,000.

Mingo County, tucked in the southwestern corner of West Virginia, is the most sleep-deprived county in the most sleep-deprived state. One-quarter of Mingo residents live in poverty — double the national average. On top of that, the county struggles with poor health, another major contributor to poor sleep. Nearly half of Mingo residents are obese (10 percentage points higher than the national average) and one in three smoke cigarettes (triple the national average). Mingo is also home to the highest rates of hypertension and heart disease in the state.

On the other end of the spectrum is Boulder County, Colorado, which you might call the sleep capital of America; 80% of residents reported being well rested. Here, the unemployment rate is one of the lowest in the state, and the median household income falls at $92,000. It's also one of the healthiest counties in country.

In major cities such as Manhattan and San Francisco, where the median incomes are $90,000 and $126,000 respectively, seven in 10 people reported getting sufficient sleep. Money may not buy happiness, but it does seem to buy better sleep.

Mental and physical health, which tend to be worse in lower-income areas, also contribute to sleep inequality. In our analysis, we overlaid the CDC's sleep data with a CDC survey on mental health and found a 79% correlation between mental-health problems and poor sleep. A 2022 study by Columbia researchers found a similar relationship. According to Johns Hopkins, three-quarters of people with depression say they struggle to fall asleep or stay asleep. Other research has found that half of people with chronic pain and as many as half of people with cancer don't get enough sleep.

These factors build on each other. Economic stress, depression, and physical pain make it harder to sleep, and the lack of sleep makes all these situations more difficult to manage. Americans with sleep disorders earn an average of $2,500 less each year than their well-rested peers and are more likely to have to leave their jobs. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University found that poor sleep increased the likelihood of developing the very diseases that keep people awake at night in the first place: cancer, dementia, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. It also accelerates the spread of certain cancers. Once these negative feedback loops begin, it can make it harder for people to dig out of cycles of inequality.

To fix their sleep problems, people often resort to outlandish sleep hacks like using a red light bulb in their bedroom or taking a cold shower before bed. One of the more common approaches, the "military sleep method," which relies on breathwork and relaxation techniques, isn't backed up by much research.

Some advice, including building a regular sleep schedule, breathing filtered air, and getting daily exercise, will probably help you sleep better. But these individual hacks tend to distract from what's actually plaguing the most sleep-deprived Americans. If you lose your job or suffer from chronic pain, trying not to think for 10 seconds isn't going to do much.

Big, structural changes such as better access to affordable healthcare, expanding income-support programs like the child tax credit, and implementing mental-health programs in schools would go a long way to ending the sleep-deprivation doom loop. But in the meantime, there are a few smaller fixes, such as moving school start times to 8:30 a.m. In the most sleep-deprived states, schools tend to start earlier, beginning at 7:40 a.m. on average in Mississippi and 7:49 a.m. in Alabama. Students slog through school in a fog of sleep deprivation, which affects their ability to learn. Pushing back start times can improve grades by 4.5%, or the equivalent of three months of student learning.

According to the CDC, 70% of high schoolers are not getting enough sleep. One study found that delaying school start times to 8:30 a.m. or later for high schools and elementary schools would add $83 billion to the US economy within a decade because of students' improved performance in school. California and Florida are already on board, recently passing bills mandating that all public high schools start no earlier than 8:30 a.m.

Another way forward is through labor regulations. In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education implemented rules limiting work hours for all medical residents to ensure they got enough sleep. Since then, care for patients and doctors' well-being have improved. But more rules are needed — 40% of healthcare workers still weren't getting enough sleep when the CDC last looked at the issue, in 2017. Industries such as transportation also have rules to protect sleep, limiting truck drivers to 11 hours on the road at a time. But there are many professions where people are left to their own devices. In the food-services industry, people juggle inconsistent shifts and low pay that often requires taking on multiple jobs, and 40% of workers don't get enough sleep. Among gig workers, who lack traditional employment protections, inconsistent pay has been found to contribute to worse sleep.

When people start to fall behind on sleep, their social, economic, and physical lives soon begin to suffer. The cycles of inequality deepen, and no amount of red-light therapy can reverse the trend.

Jeremy Ney is the author of American Inequality, a data publication project that spotlights US inequality topics. He was previously a macro policy strategist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

• Kristina Knighten and Paul Cordier bought a fixer-upper listed for $27,000 by a lake in Italy.
• The couple are teachers and stumbled upon Lago Iseo, the town, during a European road trip in 2018.
• They ditched plans to move to the US after falling in love with the area — and have no regrets.

Kristina Knighten was never interested in a conventional life. Luckily, neither was her husband, Paul Cordier.

The couple, who are both English-as-a-second-language (ESL) teachers, met while working in Vietnam in 2014. Bustling Ho Chi Minh City was a far cry from the suburbs of Chicago, where Knighten, 38, grew up.

But the move made sense for Knighten.

"I need to see new things, and my wanderlust needs to be satiated," she told Business Insider.

After a few years in Asia, Knighten and Cordier, who is 46, got teaching jobs in the UAE with annual salaries just shy of $70,000.

"Making $1,500 a month was not going to cut it for the rest of our lives," she said.

They decided to save for a down payment on a house in Chicago, where the typical home sells for about $350,000, according to Realtor.com.

It would have been tough, even with their new salaries, as many young Americans struggle to buy homes amid a challenging housing market with low supply, high prices, and relatively high mortgage rates — but it wouldn't have been impossible.

Nevertheless, a fateful European road trip in 2018 led Knighten and Cordier to abandon their plans. Take a look.

Knighten and Cordier fell in love with a lakeside town in northern Italy.

As teachers, Knighten and Cordier get summers off. In 2018, they spent it driving a rundown car that cost £250, or around $315, on a road trip through Europe.

Eventually, the couple ended up in Italy.

After a brief stay in San Remo, a coastal city they found too touristy, they found a travel blog with a photo of Monte Isola, an island in the middle of a lake close to the Alps.

The couple drove to the lake and stayed for a few days, getting to know the area and meeting locals.

Knighten and Cordier booked a small bed-and-breakfast on Monte Isola, a roughly five-square-mile island dotted with small villages in the middle of Lago Iseo, a glacier lake surrounded by lush green mountains.

They were awestruck — and shocked an island this beautiful wasn't better known.

"We've traveled all over the world together, through South America, the Middle East, and Asia," Knighten said. "And this place blows our minds."

At a small bar on the island, Cordier, whom Knighten describes as "gregarious," approached a few locals to ask what there was to do.

"They were like, 'We're actually going to a party tonight on a boat. Do you want to come?'" Knighten said.

The couple went and ended up making lasting friendships.

Within days, Knighten and Cordier were scouting properties on the island and even considered buying a pig shed.

Knighten said she and Cordier had nearly saved $40,000 to put toward a down payment on a house in Chicago, even though that sum could only buy them a property "not in a great neighborhood."

But stunned by the lake's beauty, Knighten and Cordier were curious about the cost of buying a home there. Quickly, they realized they could afford a fixer-upper in Lago Iseo with the cash they already had in their bank accounts.

On that first trip, Knighten and Cordier toured two properties for sale.

One was an old pig shed listed for €34,000, or around $36,000. They seriously considered converting it into a tiny home but decided against it because it was too remote and would have cost too much money to fix up.

Undeterred, they came back in 2019 and found a house for sale for €25,000, or $27,000.

Knighten and Cordier returned to Monte Isola on a house-hunting mission in the summer of 2019.

They eventually found a house listed for €25,000, around $27,000.

"It didn't have any photos of the interior. It was one of those with one photo of the outside of the house," she said. "You're like, 'Is this a bait property?'"

Thankfully, it wasn't, but they were told other buyers had beaten them to the punch.

But when those buyers fell through, the couple went to see it.

The house was beautiful but had an "eerie" feel because the previous owner had suddenly died.

The previous owner, who died a few years before Knighten and Cordier came to Lago Iseo, primarily used the home for vacations.

Walking in for the first time, Knighten said it seemed that the owner's death was unexpected.

"There were nightgowns hung in the wardrobe, a toothbrush in the bathroom, salt and oil and stuff in the kitchen," she said. "You almost felt like you were trespassing."

Even though it was a little "eerie," Knighten and Cordier fell in love with the house, which had a kitchen and a multipurpose room on the ground floor and two bedrooms and a bathroom on the second floor.

Unlike the pig shed, it was closer to the lake and public transportation.

It needed a lot of work, but the couple ended up putting up a €500, or $540, deposit the day they saw it.

Knighten and Cordier signed an agreement to buy the house in July 2019 and put down a €500, or $540, good-faith deposit.

At the time, they were thinking of using it as a summer house, as Knighten said they didn't think they could afford to move to Italy full-time given her $730-a-month student loan payment and how much less they thought teachers made in Italy.

The plan was to continue living in the UAE and visit Italy in the summers, when Cordier, who worked in construction before going into teaching, could gradually renovate the house.

But, yet again, the plan changed.

When the couple got married in 2022, their families got a chance to see the magic of the lake.

Knighten said she and Cordier got engaged before their first trip to Italy in 2018 but had never given much thought to when or where they'd actually tie the knot. That changed when they saw Lago Iseo.

"That's the first time we kind of got excited about 'Oh yeah, let's get married, let's have a wedding,'" she said.

After a delay due to COVID-19, they finally hosted their wedding in Italy in 2022 with loved ones and friends they'd made on their first visit to the lake in 2018 in attendance.

No one was surprised that they had bought the lakeside house.

"We both have always wanted an unconventional life and made choices to live an unconventional life. So it didn't surprise anyone in our family," she said. "When they came to the wedding, everyone was like, 'This place is magic.'"

Around the same time, the couple began thinking their fantasy of living in Italy could become reality.

Before their wedding in 2022, Knighten and Cordier had the idea of starting an online subscription-based exam preparation business for the UAE's equivalent of the SATs.

The growth of their business eventually gave them the confidence to quit their teaching jobs in the UAE and move to Italy full-time during the summer of 2023.

Although their test-prep business, which they finally launched in the fall of 2023, has yet to turn a profit, Knighten said the teaching jobs they ended up finding in Italy paid better than they'd anticipated.

"We're really happy," she said.

The renovation kicked off in full swing in March — and it's still ongoing.

The house required a lot of TLC, which isn't cheap. Knighten said she and her husband estimate the project will cost roughly $100,000.

But the budget is expensive because they're making significant changes, Knighten added. For example, they're adding ensuite bathrooms to both bedrooms and structural upgrades like a new roof and skylights.

While they're renovating their house, they're living in a rental apartment nearby.

They've hired professionals to help with major changes, but Cordier also lends a hand whenever he's available. Knighten said it's still taken longer than they expected to move in.

They'd hoped to be living in the house by June, but it's looking closer to December as most people in Italy don't work full-time in August, she added.

During renovations, Knighten and Cordier discovered their house is a lot older than they thought.

Knighten said a real-estate agent told them the house was probably built in the 18th century.

But during the renovation process, the couple found a stone window hidden behind plaster that their architect said indicated the property was potentially medieval.

The discovery was all the more exciting because Knighten and Cordier love old artifacts.

"We're both really into history, and particularly history you can touch and feel," she said.

They also kept a lot of furniture the previous owner left behind to add character and save money.

When the couple was sold the home, the real-estate agent offered to get rid of all of the previous owner's furniture for them, which didn't sit right with Knighten or Cordier.

"There were loads of really cool vintage pieces," she said. "We went through everything in the house, and we've kept a lot."

Doing so has helped them cut down on costs and get creative with the renovation process.

For example, the couple can't afford new kitchen cabinets, so they've decided to use old wooden dressers that were already in the house for kitchen storage instead.

Knighten and Cordier might have been happy in the US, but she has no doubts Italy was the right choice.

Knighten has no regrets about choosing their slice of Italian paradise over a chance to move back to the US.

"The quality of life here is beyond. It's incredible," she said. Benefits they're enjoying include better grocery produce, how walkable everything is, and, of course, free healthcare, which the couple can enroll in because they are residents.

It's a game changer for Knighten, who recalled experiencing an ovarian cyst rupture when she was living in the US without health insurance. Despite having two jobs at the time, she hesitated to go to the hospital because of how much it would cost.

"Looking back at it, I'm like, how is America considered the developed world?" Knighten said.

Given the great deal they have as teachers in Italy and how poorly many teachers are paid in the US, Knighten and Cordier have no plans to move stateside.

But Knighten wouldn't rule anything out.

"Five years ago, I didn't expect to be doing this, and 10 years ago, I did not expect to be in the UAE or Vietnam," she said. "I'd 100% live in Chicago again. But I just don't see that happening for me, especially in my profession."

• Andrea Mac, a business owner who made $550,000 last year,  refuses to pay her daughter's tuition.
• Mac questions the value of investing such a significant amount of money into a college education.
• She and her husband want to instill independence, responsibility, and success in their children.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Andrea Mac, a growth strategist at Prequal from the Greater Chicago area. It's been edited for length and clarity.

For the last seven years I've built a business that made just under $550,000 in 2023. I'm projecting that I'll make seven figures in 2024.

Despite this income, my husband and I have not agreed to — nor do we plan to — pay for the college tuition of our oldest daughter, a sophomore at the University of Iowa.

Stating that feels vulnerable and unpopular because, within our network, this is an uncommon or less commonly talked-about choice. But we didn't make this decision lightly, and we considered many factors.

Seven key considerations went into our decision.

1. Fostering autonomy and independence in our children.

When everything — including school choice, scholarships, performance, and even access to grades — is dictated or overseen by parents, students can become passive participants in their education. By not paying for college, we want our children to own their academic journey fully. This means they'll need to make crucial decisions, seek scholarships, and manage their finances, which will help them truly understand the value of their education.

To be fair, we've decided that we, as parents, don't get to choose which college our children attend. If they spent our money on tuition, we'd need a say in that decision. Instead, we've told our college-age daughter: you can choose to attend a college that costs $5,000 or $100,000 a year, but we're not writing a blank check.

2. Making sure they understand the privilege of attending college

My husband and I feel that pursuing a college degree is not a rite of passage but a choice and commitment to higher education.

As a young adult transitioning from high school, it's the perfect opportunity to evaluate the opportunity cost critically, investment of both time and money, and projected return on investment from such a commitment.

If they choose college, this sense of ownership can drive them to perform better and take their studies more seriously. Knowing they've worked hard to contribute to their education can instill pride and accomplishment.

3. Keeping our financial future secure

We've worked very hard to achieve economic mobility and to live in a neighborhood that offers the best educational opportunities we can afford. I've worked, and continue to work, diligently to provide for our family of six.

Committing about $800,000 — an average of $200,000 per child for a four-year university degree — could jeopardize our future financial security. We prioritize living within our means, and paying for college for four children would stretch our finances beyond what we're willing to risk.

For example, investing $200,000 over four years into scaling my consultancy firm could produce more revenue and provide more significant long-term benefits for our family. Likewise, with an average annual return for stock market investments at about 10%, that same $200,000 could yield almost an additional $100,000 in return over that same four-year time period.

4. Living within our means

Financial prudence is a core value for us. We're not willing to take on debt to pay for college. We believe in financial stability and the importance of living within our means.

This decision aligns with our commitment to avoid debt and maintain a healthy financial position, which benefits our entire family.

5. Considering the Return on Investment

Education is an investment, and we consider the potential return like any investment. With rising tuition costs, my husband and I think it's essential to evaluate whether the outcomes in terms of ROI justify the financial outlay for college.

We question the value of investing such a significant amount of money into a college education, especially when there are alternative paths to success that don't involve incurring massive debt.

6. Maintaining equality between siblings

We have four children aged 5 to 19, and we care about equality among siblings. Committing to paying for one child's college education means we must do the same for all of them to maintain fairness.

This long-term financial commitment could span many years, potentially affecting our ability to support our younger children in other meaningful ways. We want to ensure our financial decisions don't create inequality among our children.

7. Avoid fostering a sense of entitlement in our children

By making them responsible for their college expenses, we hope to instill a strong work ethic and a sense of responsibility in our kids. We also hope our choice will help them understand the value of hard work and the importance of making prudent financial decisions.

We're encouraging our children to take responsibility for their education and financial choices

Our children must evaluate cost-effective options, seek scholarships, and consider alternative education paths like community college, vocational training, or starting their careers earlier. This approach teaches them to be pragmatic and resourceful, skills that will serve them well throughout their lives.

Evaluating whether to pay for our kids' college tuition was a challenging decision, but it's rooted in our desire to foster autonomy, responsibility, and financial prudence.

Ultimately, by empowering our children to take charge of their education and finances, we feel we're helping to set them up for a lifetime of independence, responsibility, and success. 

If you are teaching your children a unique financial lesson and would like to share your story, email Manseen Logan at mlogan@businessinsider.com.

• Stevie Howell is an artist who has lived in LA for about five years.
• She enjoys the city's creative scene and the many produce that can be grown in the area.
• Howell says the isolation, dullness, traffic, and lack of green spaces and community is bad in LA.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Stevie Howell, an artist and business owner who lives in Los Angeles. It's been edited for length and clarity.

I moved to Los Angeles about five years ago from San Francisco, and I previously lived in New York City and Chicago.

I expected my move would be easy since I'd still be living in California — but I've been surprised that I haven't seen a lot of things in LA that I've seen in a smaller city like San Francisco. 

LA has many positives beyond the great weather that lets you do outdoor activities year-round. The city also attracts creativity — it's home to great design, art, and comedy. This area also has amazing produce — you can grow almost anything here, so it's lemon trees and passion fruit vines galore.

But these are the five of the worst things that I've experienced while living in Los Angeles.

1. LA has horrible urban planning 

LA's urban planning could be so much better. Decades ago, the planners made huge mistakes that destroyed this city. They removed most of the canals that made Venice, Venice; took away the streetcars; built freeways that cut through all the low-income areas; made too many huge streets that aren't walkable and buildings that aren't human-scaled; and put strip malls everywhere instead of charming storefronts to walk by and window shop.

In general, it seems as though LA doesn't value urban beauty. Beauty happens inside here, behind walls, and in private homes. 

I've noticed that there aren't enough green spaces. LA lacks great parks compared to other cities like San Francisco and New York City. If only Frederic Olmstead had made a couple of trips to Southern California.

Driving around LA I can see how the neighborhoods change. Some areas receive more attention and infrastructure while others don't. 

2. The city feels dull 

For a bustling city, life in LA can have a surprising lack of vibrancy. It doesn't feel urban the way cities like NYC or SF do — I don't feel an urban buzz or excitement.

People-watching is a rarity here unless I count DIY photoshoots set up in front of pink walls. While I love overhearing the occasional only-in-LA style conversation or hearing my neighbors practice lines in their backyard, the conversations generally involve too much talk about traffic. 

The traffic makes it so hard to get places that I end up doing a lot less than I'd do in other big cities. For me, this means less going to museums, galleries, shows, talks, or even just a dinner on the other side of town. Often the same museum shows exhibited in LA will travel to other cities, and there have been times when I've missed the entire duration in LA but see it on a quick trip to NYC or Chicago. 

3. I feel isolated 

LA felt socially distant even before COVID and before "socially distant" was a thing. It feels like a sprawling mass of suburban enclaves next to each other. People are kind of in their own worlds, doing their own thing.

It's common for me to go months without seeing my closest friends here. This is another thing that mostly has to do with traffic and how sprawling the city is — people seem to stay in their neighborhoods and homes.

4. Driving sucks here 

We all know traffic is a huge problem in LA — after all, LA is home to 11 of the top 25 worst traffic corridors in the US. Good luck ever seeing your best friend who lives 12 miles away. Going from the east to the west side or vice versa can be excruciating, even with an arsenal of great podcasts loaded up.

Walking isn't really an option in most cases because of huge streets and extreme distances, and every time I try, I almost get hit by a driver who just doesn't expect there to be someone walking — even in a crosswalk.

And on the rare day it rains, everyone forgets how to drive. A drizzle adds about double the commute time.

5. I don't feel any sense of community 

I don't feel a strong sense of community in LA. It lacks cohesion that brings the whole city together, and I think this is why people have to work to find a sense of community.

Because it's such a driving culture, I don't interact with people as much as I do in other cities I've lived in. I don't ride the subway and get to sit next to someone who lives a completely different life than I do.

Because of this lack of interaction with a wider demographic range, it's hard to feel connected to the city as a whole. 

If you moved to a new city or state and want to share your experience, email Manseen Logan at mlogan@businessinsider.com.

• Google Lens uses image recognition to identify landmarks, plants, animals, and more.
• Google Lens also facilitates reverse image searches and can translate text.
• Google Lens is available as a standalone app for Android users and incorporated as a feature in other Google-owned apps.

Google Lens is a tool that uses Google's image recognition technology to help you navigate the real world. 

It can help you recognize a brand logo, pinpoint a location, figure out who someone is, identify a product, and so much more. It's useful, fun, and almost unnervingly effective to implement.

Here's what you'll need to do to start using this helpful tool to identify images around you:

What images can Google Lens identify?

You can use Google Lens to identify images on your camera and gain more information about landmarks, plants, animals, products, and other objects. It can also be used to scan and auto-translate text. You can use Google Lens to scan images already in your photo library or, with an Android phone, you can activate Google Lens directly as you snap a new image.

Google Lens is also incorporated into Google Images: Snap a photo with it to perform a reverse image search.

Google Lens has numerous useful applications. You can use it to look up plants or insects you encounter to see if they're dangerous; you can use it to translate foreign street signs; and you can even use it to check out that funky rash you've developed (though Google points out that its technology should not be considered a medical diagnosis). 

Google Lens is also deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem, making it convenient to use it through other apps like Google Photos, Google Assistant, and Google's search engine.

Google Lens also has its disadvantages, however. Critics have complained that the technology is not yet sophisticated enough to be useful. It sometimes struggles with accuracy and fails to recognize products or brands.

How to use Google Lens

Google Lens should be enabled by default on Android phones. If not, the standalone Google Lens app is available for download for Android phones in the Google Play store. While iPhone users can't download the standalone app, Google Lens is still incorporated into other iOS-compatible apps like Google Translate or Chrome.

Here's how to use the Google Lens app to identify images on an Android phone:

1. Open the Google Lens app and swipe down.

2. Select "Open Camera" and grant the app approval to use the camera.

3. Take a photo of whatever you want Google Lens to identify by tapping the search button in the bottom-center section of the screen.

Once you snap the photo and Google Lens identifies the image, you'll get a list of relevant information about it.

You can select from a number of different options depending on the content your photo; use the document icon to scan text, the character icons to translate text, the shopping cart icon for shopping information, or the fork and knife icon for restaurant info, to name several useful examples.

How to use Google Lens through Google Photos

You can also access Google Lens via the Google Photos app.

First, snap a photo of whatever you want to identify (or you can have an image already in your camera roll that you want to inspect with Google Lens). Next, open the Google Photos app, select the relevant photo, and then tap the Google Lens icon.

From there, you will be able to access many of the tools and features mentioned above on in relation to Android phones. You will be able to identify locations (including screenshots from Google Street View), people (both friends and family in your own photos, and famous people like Google CEO Sundar Pichai), products, logos and more, all to the best of Google Lens' ability.

Just remember, while you can use Google Lens via Google Photos on your iPhone or iPad, some of your options will be limited; for instance, you won't be able to identify products via their barcodes. Overall, the user experience will be mostly the same for Android and iOS users, though.