Nvidia released its fiscal first-quarter results on Wednesday and reported record quarterly revenues of $26 billion — outdoing analyst estimates for $24.65 billion. That's up over 260% from a year ago, showing that raging demand for its chips, which are used to power artificial intelligence technology, is still growing.
Nvidia shared a solid forecast for the future, too, saying second-quarter revenue will be about $28 billion, also ahead of expectations.
The news helped push Nvidia's shares up in late trading to above $1,000 for the first time. The stock has risen more than 200% in the last twelve months.
Even as customers wait for Blackwell, Nvidia's next GPU chip, to be released later this year, sales of its H100 chip are still strong, the company said. CFO Colette Kress also told investors on a call that demand for its H200 and Blackwell chips is well ahead of supply as the company works towards global availability of the latter later this year.
"We expect demand may exceed supply well into next year," Kress said.
Meantime, CEO Jensen Huang said the company would see "a lot of Blackwell revenue this year."
Nvidia also raised its quarterly dividend by 150%, from four to 10 cents per share, and announced a 10-for-1 stock split, effective next month.
Jacob Bourne, a senior analyst at Emarketer, a sister company to Business Insider, said Nvidia defied gravity again as "AI companies globally continue to depend on its chips, networking hardware, and its software ecosystem."
Some tech giants have recently announced plans to create their own chips to help power their AI offerings. Google is making its own Arm-based CPU processor, Axion, and Microsoft is also attempting to develop its own AI chips. However, most companies are still relying on Nvidia.
"Tech companies' public praise of Nvidia is a telltale sign of its dominance — they want to reduce their dependence on the chipmaker but realize they're not quite there yet," Bourne said. "We can expect that more bold innovative moves from Nvidia will help it maintain its industry position for the foreseeable future."
New Hope Corporation Ltd (ASX: NHC) shares could be in danger of crashing deep into the red.
That’s the view of analysts at Goldman Sachs, which are feeling very bearish about the ASX 200 mining giant.
What is the broker saying about this ASX 200 mining giant?
Goldman has been busy running the rule over the coal miner’s recent quarterly update.
In case you missed it, for the three months ended 30 April, New Hope delivered a 28% quarter on quarter increase in ROM coal production to 3,665,000 tonnes. This was driven by a 23% increase in Bengalla production to 2,955,000 tonnes and a 55% jump in New Acland production to 710,000 tonnes.
The ASX 200 mining giant also delivered the goods with its sales volumes. It reported a 21% quarter on quarter increase in coal sold to 2,358,000 tonnes. This was achieved with an average realised sales price of $179.78 per tonne, which was flat on the previous quarter.
Goldman was relatively satisfied with the company’s update. It commented:
NHC reported 3Q24 total saleable coal production and sales of 2.5Mt/2.4Mt, +21% QoQ (+5%/-6% vs. GSe) with the ongoing ramp-up of the Bengalla and the New Acland mines running slightly ahead of schedule. EBITDA for the April Q was A$219mn, broadly in-line with 50% of our ~A$400mn estimate for the 2H (end of July).
NHC finished the quarter with net cash of ~A$381m (incl. leases and cash held in fixed income assets), down only slightly from ~A$400m at end of Jan, and post the payment of the A$144mn interim dividend and A$80mn further investment in Malabar Resources.
However, it hasn’t been enough to change its bearish view on the ASX 200 mining giant.
Goldman remains bearish
According to the note, the broker has responded to the update by retaining its sell rating with an improved price target of $3.60 (from $3.50).
Based on the current New Hope share price of $5.08, this implies potential downside of just under 30% for investors over the next 12 months.
The broker named two reasons why it is bearish on this ASX 200 mining giant. One is its valuation, the other is its belief that the thermal coal market will soon soften. It explains:
[W]e rate NHC a Sell based on: 1. Valuation & FCF: The stock is trading at ~1.35x NAV (A$3.67/sh) and discounting a long-run thermal coal price of ~US$100/t (real) vs. our US$83/t estimate (based on our view of long run global marginal costs). NHC is also trading on a NTM EBITDA multiple of ~5x vs. global coal peers on ~4.5x (median). We note that FCF yield is -3%/10% in FY24/25 on our ~US$132/113/t thermal coal price assumptions, and -2%/17% at spot thermal (both include benefits from hedging). 2. Thermal Coal market to soften further in 2024: our global commodity team forecasts a ~40Mt surplus for 2024 due to decreasing global import demand, largely driven by a weakening in China hoarding demand (-80Mt) and high inventory levels, and growing export capacity (+50Mt) from Indonesia, Australia and Russia, and we expect marginal costs to fall to US$100/t in 2024. We forecast US$130/t for 6000kcal NEWC benchmark in 2024.
Should you invest $1,000 in New Hope Corporation Limited right now?
Before you buy New Hope Corporation Limited shares, consider this:
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and New Hope Corporation Limited wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
The ASX dividend giantWashington H. Soul Pattinson and Co. Ltd (ASX: SOL) appeals to me much more than Westpac Banking Corp (ASX: WBC) shares.
Both businesses are more than 120 years old and have provided investors with long-term dividend streams. Soul Patts has paid a dividend annually since it was listed in 1903.
Westpac is one of the largest ASX bank shares, while Soul Patts is a diversified investment conglomerate.
There are three key reasons why I’ve chosen the investment business for my portfolio over Westpac shares.
Dividend growth
Westpac currently has a higher dividend yield, with a trailing grossed-up yield of 6.6%, compared to the Soul Patts grossed-up dividend yield of 4%.
However, in the long term, Soul Patts has been much more successful at growing its dividend.
The last two dividends (91 cents per share) from Soul Patts are almost double what was paid in 2013 (46 cents per share).
Westpac’s last two dividends ($1.62 per share) are 16.5% lower than what the ASX bank share paid in 2013 ($1.94 per share).
I believe Soul Patts’ asset base gives it more scope to deliver growth over time.
Earnings diversification
Westpac largely makes its profit by lending to households and businesses in Australia and New Zealand, which doesn’t offer much earnings diversification. So, Westpac shares are very reliant on the bank’s loan book.
Soul Patts is invested in numerous industries and ASX shares, it has the flexibility to invest wherever it sees opportunities. Some of its biggest industry exposures include resources, telecommunications, building products, property, financial services, agriculture, electronics, and electrical parts. These investments generate profit and pay dividends for Soul Patts.
Some of the biggest positions in its ASX portfolio include TPG Telecom Ltd (ASX: TPG), Brickworks Limited (ASX: BKW), New Hope Corporation Ltd (ASX: NHC), Tuas Ltd (ASX: TUA) and Macquarie Group Ltd (ASX: MQG).
Over time, Soul Patts’ portfolio can continue to grow and generate further cash flow to fund bigger dividends.
Dividend stability
If I invest in a stock for passive income, I’d like to know that the dividend will likely keep flowing even in a recession. That’s likely when I would need the cash flow the most!
Ignoring the one-off year of 2020, which was heavily impacted by the pandemic, Westpac saw its 2021 annual dividend decrease by approximately a third compared to the 2019 annual dividend. The 2023 dividend was 18% lower than 2019.
Meanwhile, Soul Patts has grown its annual ordinary dividend every year since 2000 â it kept rising during the COVID-19 years.
Soul Patts’ dividend isn’t guaranteed to keep growing, but it’s invested in a portfolio of primarily defensive assets, which offers security. The investment house usually retains some of its annual cash flow each year to invest in more opportunities to help grow its dividend in future years.
Should you invest $1,000 in Washington H. Soul Pattinson And Company Limited right now?
Before you buy Washington H. Soul Pattinson And Company Limited shares, consider this:
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Washington H. Soul Pattinson And Company Limited wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has positions in Brickworks and Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Brickworks, Macquarie Group, and Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Brickworks, Macquarie Group, and Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
Sometimes it can be tempting to invest in a speculative stock promising the world.
However, unfortunately for investors, more often than not, these type of ASX shares fail to deliver on expectations and destroy wealth instead of creating it.
At the same time, investors keeping it simple and focusing on defensive ASX shares with stable and strong business models are slowly getting rich with limited effort.
But which ASX shares could deliver the goods for investors in this way? Let’s take a look at a couple that are reliable and defensive.
This biotechnology giant could be a quality option for investors. It has delivered market-beating returns over the past decade thanks to the strength of its business, its investment in research and development, and increasing demand for immunoglobulins.
And thanks to a rare period of underperformance for its shares, analysts at Morgans believe now is a great time for investors to invest in CSL. They commented:
While shares have struggled of late, we continue to view CSL as a key portfolio holding and sector pick, offering double-digit recovery in earnings growth as plasma collections increase, new products get approved and influenza vaccine uptake increases around ongoing concerns about respiratory viruses, with shares trading at 25x, a substantial discount (20%) to its long-term average.
Morgans currently has an add rating and a $315.40 price target on the company’s shares.
Over at Goldman Sachs, its analysts believe that REA Group could be a high quality ASX share to buy now.
REA Group is the leading player in Australian real estate listings through its dominant realestate.com.au website. It is thanks to this market leadership position that Goldman is so positive on its outlook. It highlights REA Group’s pricing power and opportunity in lead generation. It explains:
We believe REA Group, a leading real estate classified business with strong market positions across Australia, Asia and the United States, has one of the best risk/reward profiles in our domestic media coverage. In particular, we are positive on the pricing power of the real estate classified vertical, given that we believe budgets will rise (at the expense of commissions), and within existing budgets, REA, as a leading player in the vertical, under-monetises its lead generation. We also see the current negative sentiment around AU property as more a driver of share prices over earnings.
We believe REA is among the highest-quality names in our coverage, given it has the highest ability to continue to drive pricing, with: (1) significant disparity between lead share and revenue share; (2) the lowest cost relative to overall vertical transaction; (3) a profitable and still fragmented end market; and (4) the existence of Vendor Paid advertising, with strong valuation support with current trading multiples in-line with historical levels.
Goldman has a buy rating and $202 price target on its shares.
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and CSL wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has positions in CSL. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended CSL, Goldman Sachs Group, and REA Group. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended CSL and REA Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
Coles Group Ltd (ASX: COL) shares are a popular investment on the ASX. That’s understandable. After all, Coles is one of the most prominent businesses in the country, given that it runs the nation’s second-largest network of supermarket grocery stores.
Coles is, in my view, a relatively defensive company. It has a durable earnings base and a solid and reliable dividend track record. Despite this, the Coles share price has displayed significant volatility since it was listed on the ASX in its own right back in late 2018.
To illustrate, Coles shares have traded between $12.50 and $19 over the past five years. Today, the company is priced smack bang in the middle of this range. At the close of trading on Wednesday, it was asking $16.11 a share.
Take a look at all this for yourself here:
As we’ve covered before here at the Fool, I find Coles appealing for a number of reasons. This stock’s dividend track record, as well as its defensive nature, are two things I tend to look for in an ASX share.
But finding a quality company is only half the investment process. As the late great Charlie Munger once said, “No matter how wonderful a business is, it’s not worth an infinite price.”
So, what price would I be happy to buy Coles shares at today?
What price would make me buy Coles shares?
Well, when it comes to a dividend payer like Coles, I like to gauge an investing case by using the dividend yield. As any good investor knows, a company’s dividend yield has an inverse relationship with its share price.
Because of this relationship, in Coles’ case, we can use the dividend yield to determine what has historically been a good investment price.
Right now, Coles has a dividend yield of 4.1%, which includes full franking credits. That’s not bad, given that the company was trading at a yield of just 3.53% last June when it was at its last 52-week high of $18.70.
However, it’s not quite at a level where I’d be happy to buy. Coles’ current 52-week low is $14.82, which was hit back in October last year. At this price, Coles’ dividend yield would have been as high as 4.45%.
Now, I’m not waiting for Coles to get back to those levels. But I would become very interested if the company reached around $15 a share. At that price, investors could expect a dividend yield of around 4.4%.
Now, $15 might seem a long way from the current Coles stock price. But given this company’s volatile past, I wouldn’t be surprised to see it get back there at some point in the next year or two. And if it does, I might just have to buy some shares and hopefully secure a 4.4% dividend yield for my portfolio.
Should you invest $1,000 in Coles Group Limited right now?
Before you buy Coles Group Limited shares, consider this:
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Coles Group Limited wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Coles Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
Maya Ajmera, Grace Sun, and Christina Chan on stage at this year's Regeneron ISEF ceremony, where Sun won the top prize.
Chris Ayers/Society for Science
The Regeneron ISEF is a huge science fair that attracts top talent from all over the world.
This year, the competition awarded $9 million in prizes. It has a history of prestigious winners.
That can make for a stressful competition, but parents shouldn't add to it, CEO Maya Ajmera said.
What's been called the "granddaddy" of science fairs took place last week.
With over $9 million in prizes and heaps of prestige, the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF) attracts some of the best and brightest students from around the world, like Hawaii and California as well as Kildare, Ireland and Shanghai, China.
Past winners includeNobel Prize recipients, Rhodes Scholars, and MacArthur Foundation genius grant awardees.
With that kind of money and acclaim on the line, it's not surprising that the atmosphere surrounding thecompetition is intense.
"I think a lot of kids who are here actually — I don't think I'm reading it wrong — are truly excited to be here," said Maya Ajmera, the president and CEO of the Society for Science, which coordinates ISEF. "But they also feel the pressure of wanting to win and the pressure of going to college," she told Business Insider last week.
Thebiggest mistake that parents with ambitious, curious kids can make is adding to that pressure, she said.
Grace Sun holds an OECT device that helped her win the ISEF science fair.
Chris Ayers/Society for Science
While it can be useful to have a parent invested in helping their kid meet deadlines and make a nice-looking poster, some adults take it too far. Ajmera advises parents to "stand back and let your kid do it."
"Get out of their way," she said, "and don't pressure them too much."
If competing at ISEF is any indication of success, then Ajmera's advice certainly seems to work.Parents of ISEF competitors who spoke with Business Insider shared her philosophy.
"We never pressure them," Maria Estrada, whose two children have both competed and won awards at ISEF, told Business Insider. Estrada said she's never expected her children to have 5.0 GPAs, and that she's even asked her daughter to slow down and be a kid.
"I accepted my kids for who they are," she added. "I think it's important for parents to know their kids' abilities."
Another parent,Alexa Groff, has a daughter, Taylor, who competes in science fairs and is a competitive dancer. She said that a friend recently told her she'd expected Groff to be an intense "dance mom" who showed up early to everything.
In reality, the friend told her she was "super-duper chill."
"I think it's important for Taylor to explore her passions without my hand in it," Groff said. When her daughter wanted to quit volleyball, for example, she said she let it happen and supported the decision."I want her to figure things out on her own, but know that I'm there for whatever she needs me for," Groff said.
Combining passion and hard work to solve problems
As part of theISEF competition, nearly 2,000 students from 49 states and 70 countries gathered in Los Angeles to showcase their research to judges. ISEF pulls the finalists from 400 smaller science fairs from around the world, taking the winners from a pool of 175,000 competitors.
While not typically at the same level as peer-reviewed scientific research, ISEF students' topics can be as sophisticated as microbial genetics, bone tumors, and microplastic filtration.
Far from overly involving themselves, parents are often surprised at what their children accomplish with their projects. "They're kind of amazed, actually," Ajmera said.
Students are often inspired to pursue these difficult subjects because of real-world issues and not by their parents' insistence to compete, Ajmera said.
"A lot of kids have their own personal stories to share of something that's affected their families or their communities, and they want to go in and solve it," Ajmera said of the Gen Z competitors.
For example, 18-year-old Maddux Alexander Springer received this year's $10,000 Peggy Scripps Award for Science Communication for his studies on a tumor-causing disease in green sea turtles near his home in Hawaii.
Krish Pai, Grace Sun, and Michelle Wei took top prizes home at this year's ISEF.
Chris Ayers/Society for Science
That kind of interest and enthusiasm can carry a student far, which is important since most winning projects are often complex and time-consuming.
For example, 16-year-old Grace Sunwon this year's top prize, the $75,000 George D. Yancopoulos Innovator Award, for her project on organic electronic devices. Sun told Business Insider she had to miss hours of school to work in a university lab for her project.
For some kids, though, it's all worth it because the time and effort are investments in what they hope will be their future careers.
"A lot of these kids are going to either land in academia doing research, or they're going to be entrepreneurs and start new companies on the new cutting-edge technologies," Ajmera said.
Former presidential candidate and current BuzzFeed investor Vivek Ramaswamy talks to the media in front of Donald Trump's criminal trial in New York.
David Dee Delgado/Getty Images
Vivek Ramaswamy ran a failed campaign for the Republican presidential nomination.
Now he owns 7.7% of BuzzFeed, the struggling digital media publisher.
What's going on? We don't know. So we're guessing here.
Why is Vivek Ramaswamy buying up shares of BuzzFeed?
Let's start by stating the obvious: It is very funny to type the sentence "Why is Vivek Ramaswamy buying up shares of BuzzFeed?"
Ramaswamy, as you may recall, was a fringe candidate in the most recent Republican presidential primary, where his platform consisted of praising Donald Trump and promising to "Take America First further than Trump." He dropped out of the race in January, after spending a reported $30 million of his own money on the campaign and coming in fourth in the Iowa caucuses.
And BuzzFeed is BuzzFeed — the cheeky digital publisher that sprouted up alongside Facebook and, at one point, seemed poised to become the future of media. At its peak, it sported a valuation of nearly $2 billion and had a knack for commanding the attention of millennials, advertisers, and old media giants like The New York Times, which worried that BuzzFeed would displace it.
By the time BuzzFeed went public in 2021, however, almost all of the air had left the digital publishing bubble. Since then BuzzFeed has gone through multiple layoff rounds, unwound a big M&A deal that was the supposed reason for its IPO in the first place, and its stock sank so low it risked getting kicked off the Nasdaq.
Ramaswamy has yet to talk to BuzzFeed's board or management, says a person familiar with the company. And neither BuzzFeed nor Ramaswamy has responded to requests for comment, so we're just going to have to guess here. A few theories from the peanut gallery:
It's the money! This is the most obvious answer because it's why any activist shareholder invests in a company. They may say they have better strategy, or that management is incompetent, or whatever. What they really want is for shares in the company to be worth more than what they paid for them, and it doesn't really matter how they get there.
It's the clicks! Ramaswamy likes attention — he spent $30 million of his own money getting himself onto the national stage last year. So why not spend a few million more and buy his very own media platform? BuzzFeed no longer commands the same kind of media spotlight it used to, but it's still pretty big and includes not just BuzzFeed.com, but also The Huffington Post as well as First We Feast — better known as the company that makes the "Hot Ones" viral chicken wing/celebrity interview show. ("Viral chicken wing/celebrity interview show" is also fun to type.)
It's a troll! $4 million is a lot for a practical joke, but Ramaswamy (apparently) has cash to burn. Maybe he's getting a kick out of the idea that a Trump-loving Republican can cause chaos at a media company famous for publishing the infamous Trump "dossier".
Attorney Nicole Shanahan has joked that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. chose her to be his running mate based on her staggering wealth,
Brandon Bell/Getty Images
Nicole Shanahan reportedly received over $1 billion from her divorce from Google founder Sergey Brin.
Brin, one of the wealthiest persons in the world, is worth over $139.5 billion.
Shanahan has used her wealth to buck up RFK Jr.'s long-shot presidential campaign.
Attorney Nicole Shanahan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s running mate, has a staggering wealth that would make her one of the wealthiest vice presidents in history if their long shot campaign were successful this November.
According to The New York Times, Shanahan's largess is largely due to her divorce settlement with Google founderSergey Brin. Shanahan received more than $1 billion from the divorce, three people with knowledge of her finances told The Times. Brin, one of the wealthiest people in the world, is worth an estimated $139.5 billion, according to Forbes.
Forbes previously estimated in March that Shanahan received roughly $390 million in Alphabet shares from Brin based on the then-estimated value of shares that were likely transferred to her. Their divorce records are not public. Forbes tried to piece together what Shanahan may have received from her husband of three years based on Brin's public disclosures about his stake in Alphabet.
The Wall Street Journal reported last year on rumors that Shanahan had an affair with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a claim both have denied. The Times, citing three sources, reported that the affair happened after both of them took ketamine at a Miami party in late 2021 and that she told Brin about it.
Brin and Shanahan reportedly separated weeks later, and Brin filed for divorce in early 2022.
Shanahan has used her wealth to help Kennedy's campaign, donating $10 million to a pro-Kennedy super PAC. Her $2 million donation helped the group, American Values 2024, secure a Super Bowl ad that compared Kennedy to his father, RFK, and his presidential uncle, JFK. Other Kennedys did not appreciate his allies blatantly using the family's image to boost his campaign.
Kennedy, according to The Times, initially eyed Jets Quarterback Aaron Rodgers and former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura before settling on Shanahan as his running mate. Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has also claimed to have had conversations with Kennedy about being his vice president but has said to shift her focus to trying to join former President Donald Trump's ticket.
Rodgers told reporters on Tuesday that he wasn't quite ready to retire from the NFL to enter politics.
"I love Bobby," Rodgers said. "We had a couple of really nice conversations. But there were really two options: It was retire and be his VP or keep playing."
Kennedy's largest focus at the moment is trying to make next month's debate between President Joe Biden and Trump. The unprecedented early debate does offer him a narrow path to get on the stage, but it's unclear if he can meet both the polling and ballot access thresholds in time. A third-party presidential candidate hasn't debated alongside the two major nominees since Texas businessman Ross Perot in 1992.
A separate family says that their teen daughter discovered a cellphone taped to the inside of a toilet seat on an American Airlines flight.
Lewis & Llewellyn LLP
American Airlines is facing backlash for blaming a 9-year-old girl in a hidden camera lawsuit.
The airline's defense claimed the girl should have seen the phone filming her in the bathroom, court document show.
Lawyers amended the court record after criticism; American Airlines says it does not blame the child.
American Airlines is facing backlash after saying that a 9-year-old girl should have seen the cellphone filming her in the bathroom in its initial lawsuit defense.
Paul Llewellyn, an attorney for the girl's family, told Business Insider that the airline placing blame on the 9-year-old was "shocking." Llewellyn is representing several families who claim Estes Carter Thompson filmed their children on American Airlines flights in separate civil lawsuits against the airline.
Lawyers for the airline amended the court record to remove the claims of fault placed on the girl.
Thompson, a former flight attendant for the airline, is also facing federal charges of attempted sexual exploitation of children and possession of images of child sexual abuse.
Federal authorities charged Thompson after police say he taped his phone to a toilet seat during a flight from Charlotte, North Carolina, to Boston to film a 14-year-old girl in September 2023. Thompson pleaded not guilty on Monday.
Llewellyn is representing that girl's family in a civil lawsuit against the airline. The lawsuit alleged Thompson used "psychological tricks" to make her think the filming wasn't strange. He is also representing the family of a 9-year-old girl, who says Thompson filmed her in the bathroom during a flight from Texas to Los Angeles in January 2023.
The family of the 9-year-old became aware of the incident after FBI agents informed them that images of their child were found on Thompson's iCloud account, according to the lawsuit.
In a response to the family's complaint, lawyers for America Airlines denied negligence on the part of the airline, claiming that the girl "knew or should have known" that the bathroom was "compromised" because it "contained a visible and illuminated recording device."
The 9-year-old girl's mother said in a statement that the family was both "shocked and angered" by the defense.
"How in good conscience could they even make such a suggestion?" the family said. "American Airlines has no shame."
American Airlines told Business Insider in a statement that it does "not believe this child is at fault, and we take the allegations involving a former team member very seriously."
"Our outside legal counsel retained with our insurance company made an error in this filing," American said in the statement. "The included defense is not representative of our airline and we have directed it be amended this morning."
Llewellyn said that the airline's defense is "not credible" and that "the bell can't be unrung."
"They should never have taken such a position in the first," Llewellyn said.
Nicole Shanahan took ketamine with Elon Musk and had a sexual encounter in 2021, NYT reported, citing multiple sources.
Shanahan, a lawyer and RFK Jr.'s running mate, was married to Brin from 2018 to 2023.
Shanahan and Musk both previously denied having an affair.
Nicole Shanahan took ketamine with Elon Musk at a private party in 2021 and later told her husband at the time, Google cofounder Sergey Brin, that she had sex with the Tesla CEO, The New York Times reported, citing multiple sources.
The New York Times published an article on Wednesday about Shanahan, a lawyer campaigning as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s running mate for the 2024 presidential election.
The article discussed details of her relationship with Brin, whom she married in 2018 before the pair finalized their divorce in May 2023, and sheds new light on a past allegation that she had an affair with Musk in 2021, which both Shanahan and Musk have denied.
During Shanahan's marriage to Brin, the Times reported that Shanahan partied with Silicon Valley's upper echelon and engaged in recreational drug use that included ketamine and cocaine, citing eight sources as well as documents the publication viewed. Ketamine is a "dissociative anesthetic" that can have some hallucinogenic effects, according to The Drug Enforcement Administration. Ketamine can be legally prescribed under federal law and recent research indicates it could be used to treat depression, but it's also a popular party drug.
Nicole Shanahan and Sergey Brin, who were previously married.
Ian Tuttle/Getty Images
Stressors like the COVID-19 pandemic and their daughter's autism diagnosis began weighing on the former couple's marriage, prompting Shanahan to start going out and attending events without Brin, according to the report.
"At a party in early 2021 in Miami, Ms. Shanahan was so intoxicated by drugs and alcohol that she required an IV infusion," the outlet reported.
Three sources told the Times that Shanahan and Musk had an affair in December 2021 during a private party in Miami. They both took ketamine and "disappeared together for several hours," the Times reported, citing four people who had been briefed on the matter and related documents.
"Ms. Shanahan later told Mr. Brin that she had had sex with Mr. Musk, three of the people said. She also relayed the details to friends, family and advisers," the Times reported.
Elon Musk.
Anna Webber/Variety/Getty Images
Brin filed for divorce from Shanahan one month later in January 2022, citing "irreconcilable differences."
Representatives for Shanahan, Musk, and Brin did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment ahead of publication.
The Wall Street Journal first reported in July 2022 that an "alleged affair" between Shanahan and Musk had created a rift between the Tesla CEO and Brin, whom many considered to have a close and amicable friendship.
"This is total bs. Sergey and I are friends and were at a party together last night!" Musk wrote. "I've only seen Nicole twice in three years, both times with many other people around. Nothing romantic."
He added in another post: "Haven't even had sex in ages (sigh)."
Musk also posted a photo of himself with Brin, which he said had been taken at the party the previous day (his biographer Walter Isaacson later said that Brin had "tried to avoid" the selfie).
"We are confident in our sourcing, and we stand by our reporting," The Wall Street Journal said in a statement at the time.
Shanahan also denied any affair, telling People that the speculation was "utterly debilitating."
"To be known because of a sexual act is one of the most humiliating things . . . it was utterly debilitating," she told the outlet. "I remember feeling like everything I had ever worked for was under siege by a press cycle that had no idea what was going on in my life and who I was."
In response to questions from a The New York Times reporter, Shanahan said she was "shocked the NYT is letting you run something like this."