• OpenAI says its new GPT 5.2 set a ‘new state-of-the-art score’ for professional knowledge work

    Sam Altman
    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman

    • OpenAI said GPT-5.2, its latest model, is its best yet at doing "professional knowledge work."
    • In a benchmark test, OpenAI said it outperformed industry professionals in tasks across 44 occupations.
    • GPT-5.2's release comes just days after OpenAI CEO Sam Altman declared a "code red" in response to Google's Gemini 3.

    OpenAI released its anticipated update to GPT-5 on Thursday, boasting that the new AI is "the most capable model series yet for professional knowledge work."

    "We designed GPT‑5.2 to unlock even more economic value for people; it's better at creating spreadsheets, building presentations, writing code, perceiving images, understanding long contexts, using tools, and handling complex, multi-step project," the company said in a statement.

    In a benchmark test called GDPval, OpenAI said its new AI model can outperform "industry professionals at well-specified knowledge work tasks spanning 44 occupations."

    "GPT‑5.2 Thinking produced outputs for GDPval tasks at >11x the speed and <1% the cost of expert professionals, suggesting that when paired with human oversight, GPT‑5.2 can help with professional work," the company said.

    OpenAI GPT 5.2 results from GDPval benchmark test
    OpenAI's GPT 5.2 results from GDPval benchmark test

    And in a note that is sure to catch the attention of bankers, OpenAI wrote that in an internal benchmark of junior investment banking analyst spreadsheet modeling tasks — "such as putting together a three-statement model for a Fortune 500 company with proper formatting and citations, or building a leveraged buyout model for a take-private" — the new model's score per task was "9.3% higher than GPT‑5.1's, rising from 59.1% to 68.4%" on average.

    The company also touted its gains in agentic coding ability.

    The release comes just over a week after OpenAI CEO Sam Altman declared a "code red" in a private message to employees, marshaling more resources to ChatGPT amid increasing competition from Google and other companies.

    Google has been considered by many in tech to be gaining, if not surpassing, OpenAI in the AI race with its recent release of Gemini 3 AI model.

    This is a developing story…

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now?

    A young woman sits with her hand to her chin staring off to the side thinking about her investments.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    Key Points

    • Nvidia stock is beating the market this year, but its gains are slowing down.
    • The company is facing competition from other chip developers.
    • Nvidia continues to roll out more powerful products to power AI.

    Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) stock is up 37% year-to-date as we approach the end of 2025. That’s about double the S&P 500‘s total return this year, which is certainly an impressive gain. However, it’s a significant slowdown from previous years — 239% in 2023 and 172% in 2024. In fact, it has gained 1,260% over the past five years, including a painful period when it lost more than half of its total value in 2022.

    Will that trend continue? And does it make sense to invest $1,000 in Nvidia stock today? 

    The key to AI

    Nvidia has had such an incredible run-up over the past few years because its graphics processing unit (GPU) chips are the most powerful chips to handle massive data loads for artificial intelligence (AI) creation. As hyperscalers build out huge AI businesses and develop data centers to generate the next wave of AI capabilities, Nvidia’s chips have been in high demand.

    The company continues to roll out new and more powerful products to drive all the new and exciting AI development, but competition is heating up, with companies like Advanced Micro Devices and even Alphabet scoring new, important deals for their chips.

    Given Nvidia’s central position in AI right now, it doesn’t look like there’s any near-term danger of losing its edge. It’s natural that as the industry explodes, other companies are going to make strides and also take some market share.

    Which means that, as much as we can anticipate future challenges, Nvidia is still going to be a good investment. Even if it doesn’t deliver the same staggering gains it has in the past, investing $1,000 in Nvidia stock makes sense today.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    The post Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now?

    Before you buy Nvidia shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p { margin-bottom: 0 !important; }

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    More reading

    Jennifer Saibil has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • How much could the Pilbara Minerals share price rise in 2026?

    Pilbara Minerals share price ASX lithium shares A stylised clean energy battery flexes its muscles, indicating a strong lift in share price for ASX energy companies

    The ASX lithium share Pilbara Minerals Ltd (ASX: PLS) has had an incredible performance in 2025 to date, rising by around 80%, as the below chart shows. You may be wondering what’s predicted for the business in the coming year.

    PLS Group, which the company recently changed its name to, has benefited from a resurgence in investor confidence about the lithium industry after a difficult period for the supply and demand balance of the key battery commodity.

    But, some analysts may now think that the Pilbara Minerals share price may have run too far. Let’s take a look at what’s expected for the business over the next 12 months.

    Price targets for the Pilbara Minerals share price

    A price target can be informative of whether analysts think a business is overvalued or undervalued.

    The price target is where analysts think the share price will be in 12 months from the time of the investment call.

    According to CMC Markets, analysts are quite mixed on PLS Group right now, with five buy ratings, five hold ratings and three sell ratings.

    But, the average price target of $3.08 across those analysts is certainly negative. That implies a possible decline of 25% over the next year, which would be a significant decline to where it was a couple of months ago. That would still represent a sizable increase from where it was in December 2024.

    What’s going on with the lithium price?

    UBS recently released a note that talked about how there has been an increase in battery energy storage systems (BESS) demand:

    Following a ~2-year bearish stance on lithium, we shifted to Neutral in August due to: ongoing supply disruptions, further anticipated disruptions to Chinese lepidolite producers (CATL) and resilient overall demand. In this note, we have materially increased our short to mid term lithium price deck following an 11% increase in lithium demand driven by BESS. We now envisage markets moving into deficit from 2026 onwards.

    With spot now trading at US$1,170/t, we have lifted our lithium forecast to US$1,800/t/US$2,850/t/US$2,625/t SC6 CFR China in 2026/27/28 (+64%/148%/94% from prev. forecast), though we leave our long term incentive based price unchanged at US$1,200/t.

    UBS also said that after coming off a low base, it has increased earnings projections in FY27 and FY28 by more than 100% for the pure lithium plays, including PLS Group, which is exciting for owners of Pilbara Minerals shares. This is a “steep turnaround from burning cash” as recently as the last quarter for some lithium miners, according to UBS.

    The broker upgraded its global battery demand by up to 11% between 2025 to 2030. On the UBS’ global battery team numbers, BESS will account for around 31% (1.2TWh) of total battery demand by 2030, compared to around 20% today.

    UBS currently has a neutral rating on Pilbara Minerals shares, with a price target of $4, implying little change in the valuation over the next 12 months.

    The post How much could the Pilbara Minerals share price rise in 2026? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Pilbara Minerals Limited right now?

    Before you buy Pilbara Minerals Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Pilbara Minerals Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Taylor Swift knows people want her to ‘go away’ and ‘give someone else a turn’ — she just doesn’t want to

    Taylor Swift appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" on December 10, 2025.
    Taylor Swift appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" on December 10, 2025.

    • Ahead of the premiere of her Eras Tour docuseries, Taylor Swift appeared on "The Late Show."
    • Swift said she values career longevity and admires artists who can "keep a good thing going."
    • Swift said she's aware that some people would prefer her to "go away," but she doesn't want to.

    Taylor Swift has been known to accept feedback from fans and critics, but there's one request she refuses to heed: "Go away."

    Ahead of the premiere of her Disney+ docuseries, "The End of an Era," Swift appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" to discuss her recent achievements and milestones.

    When Colbert asked Swift who she could turn to for advice, she listed rock star Stevie Nicks and pop producer Max Martin as confidants.

    "What I look up to the most in people is career longevity — career longevity, friendship longevity, longevity in their relationships, you know? How do you keep a good thing going?" Swift said.

    "I think there are certain corners of our society that really love that and look up to longevity," she continued. "There are also corners that are like, 'Give someone else a turn! Can't you just go away so we can talk about how good you were?' And I'm like, 'I don't want to.'"

    Swift has faced accusations of overexposure throughout her career, but particularly in the last few years. Her cross-continental, 149-show Eras Tour, which concluded in December 2024, garnered extensive media coverage and consistently went viral on social media. The New Yorker said Swift had achieved "complete domination over popular culture."

    Taylor Swift performs during the Eras Tour in France.
    Taylor Swift performs during the Eras Tour in France.

    When Swift released "The Tortured Poets Department" halfway through the tour's two-year run, fans and critics alike called the album overlong and overindulgent. When it topped the Billboard 200 for 17 weeks, fans of other artists complained that Swift was sabotaging her fellow pop stars, including Billie Eilish and Charli XCX, by preventing their albums from reaching No. 1 on the chart.

    Swift's newest album, "The Life of a Showgirl," was met with similar reproach. In his review for The Atlantic, Spencer Kornhaber wrote, "'Showgirl' is the sound of an overworked and overexposed entertainer reaching the mountaintop to find something worse than disappointment: burnout." Swift's prolificacy and sales tactics have been described as shameless and excessive.

    Still, Swift has refused to shrink away from the spotlight. The first two episodes of "The End of an Era" will be available to stream on Friday, along with an extended version of her Eras Tour concert movie, featuring a new segment with songs from "The Tortured Poets Department." The remaining four episodes of the docuseries will be released in pairs over the next two weeks.

    During her interview with Colbert, Swift also joked that she prefers to think of herself as "passionate" and "hyperactive," rather than a workaholic.

    "When I take time off, it's always just like, I can't slow down the fact that I need to get up and do a lot of things today. But I can change what those things are," she said. "I can figure out how to chill out, but I'm never gonna be a chill person."

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • A sommelier recommends 5 of the best sparkling wines under $30 that taste more expensive than they are

    Bottle of Brut Prosecco Mionetto Prosecco
    Brut Prosecco

    • Even if you don't love Champagne, you might enjoy an alternative (more affordable) sparkling wine.
    • We spoke to a sommelier who said many people actually prefer prosecco's citrusy, fresh flavor.
    • The next time you want a warm, full-bodied red sparkling wine, reach for a bottle of Lambrusco.

    It's one of the most celebratory times of the year, bringing an onslaught of toast-filled festivities.

    Though Champagne is often the de facto alcohol filling flutes, the popular sparkling French wine isn't ideal for everyone's palate — or budget, particularly when it comes to serving a big group.

    Madison Aspinwall, a California-based sommelier, told Business Insider that there are plenty of high-quality, affordable alternatives to real Champagne, which can cost well over $60 per bottle.

    In fact, some decent bottles of sparkling wine can be found for less than half that price.

    Here are a few of Aspinwall's recommendations you can feel confident about grabbing for your next celebration.

    Prosecco can be an affordable alternative to Champagne

    Bottle of La Marca Prosecco
    La Marca Prosecco.

    Made from Glera grapes in Prosecco, Italy, this sparkling white wine can be a less expensive (but still delicious) swap for Champagne.

    "Prosecco is rarely over $30 a bottle," Aspinwall said. "It's made in a totally different style from Champagne, but I find it equally delicious."

    She said that many people who try different sparkling wines for the first time actually tend to prefer prosecco over Champagne, finding the former tastes fresher, cleaner, and more citrusy.

    For a classic, easy-to-find option, Aspinwall recommends La Marca, an extra-dry prosecco that runs between $15 and $20 for a 750-milliliter bottle.

    Brut prosecco is the perfect option if you prefer acidic flavors

    Brut prosecco is a solid starter sparkling wine.

    "I think a brut prosecco is the best for someone who is just getting into sparkling wines and doesn't like the taste of Champagne," Aspinwall said.

    She added that brut is on the lower end when it comes to sweetness (specifically, it has between 0 and 12 grams of residual sugar per liter), giving it a fresher, more acidic taste than other varieties.

    Aspinwall told BI that one of her go-to choices is Pizzolato, a brut prosecco. A 750-milliliter bottle typically costs between $20 and $25.

    "It tastes amazing, and it's in the most fun bottle with funky packaging," she added.

    Fruit-forward Lambrusco is a fitting choice for the holiday season

    Bottle of Lambrusco
    Bottle of Lambrusco

    On the hunt for a sparkling wine that feels special? Turn to Lambrusco, a sparkling Italian red that comes in a range of sweetness levels.

    "I think it's perfect for the holiday season because, as a red wine, it has a bit more warmth to it than a prosecco or Champagne," Aspinwall said.

    She added that this type of wine tends to have more body, tannins, and fruit-forward flavors, such as cherry, raspberry, and strawberry.

    You can also get it in white and rosé variations.

    "It can be super complex, unique, and fun to experiment with if you're just getting into sparkling wine," she said, adding that one of her top recommendations is Broletto Lambrusco.

    A 750-milliliter bottle typically retails for between $16 and $20, depending on the retailer.

    If you love sweet wine, pour yourself some demi-sec prosecco

    For those who prefer a very sweet wine, Aspinwall recommended turning to a demi-sec variety.

    This type of prosecco has between 32 and 50 grams of residual sugars per liter, meaning it's generally sweeter than a brut prosecco.

    "It's perfect for people who are looking for something that's really approachable," she said.

    Consider trying a demi-sec variety from La Marca — a 750-milliliter bottle can cost between $15 and $20.

    Moscato d'Asti is another sweet sparkling wine that pairs well with dessert

    One of Aspinwall's favorite sparkling wines is Moscato d'Asti.

    The sparkling white Italian wine, which she described as tropical, fruity, and juicy, pairs well with certain sweet treats.

    "I absolutely love Moscato d'Asti with soft-serve ice cream because it's a really cool dessert combination," she told BI. "It has that fruity, delicious tart acidity, but it's also very sweet, so it's super easy for people who are just getting into sparkling wine to enjoy."

    Consider picking up Vietti Moscato d'Asti, which retails between $15 and $23 for a 750-milliliter bottle.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • The 20 most beloved restaurant chains in the US, according to Yelp

    in n out burgers in a tray
    in n out burgers in a tray

    • Yelp ranked the most beloved chains in the country according to customer reviews and search volume.
    • Popular chains, such as Dave's Hot Chicken, In-N-Out, and Texas Roadhouse, topped the list.
    • Lesser-known chains, such as First Watch and bb.q chicken, also ranked highly.

    A new ranking of the most popular restaurant chains in the US reveals that both iconic spots and lesser-known favorites are winning over customers.

    Yelp ranked the most beloved restaurant chains in the country based on a variety of factors, including average rating, customer reviews, repeat page views, and search volume.

    The list, which was released on Tuesday, featured well-known national chains like In-N-Out, Olive Garden, and Chili's, as well as some hot up-and-comers like Dave's Hot Chicken and bb.q Chicken.

    Here are the 20 most beloved restaurant chains in America, according to Yelp.

    20. Shake Shack
    Image shows a Shake Shack tray with two drinks, two burgers, and two baskets of crinkle cut fries.
    Shake Shack Founder Danny Brown thinks there is no obligation to tip for takeout orders.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 48%

    Number of locations (2024): 373

    19. Jet's Pizza
    Jet's Pizza
    Jet's Pizza.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 69%

    Number of locations (2024): 450

    18. Sweetgreen
    The Fish Taco warm bowl at Sweetgreen.
    There was too much arugula on the Fish Taco bowl at Sweetgreen.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%

    Number of locations (2024): 246

    17. Habit Burger & Grill
    Habit burger grill outside

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 49%

    Number of locations (2024): 377

    16. Outback Steakhouse
    outback steakhouse full meal

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%

    Number of locations (2024): 675

    15. Chili's
    UNDER EMBARGO: Chili's Big Smasher burger
    Chili's Big Smasher burger.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%

    Number of locations (2024): 1,209

    14. P.F. Chang's
    P.F. Chang's restaurant

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 50%

    Number of locations (2024): 221

    13. The Cheesecake Factory
    The Cheesecake Factory in Queens, New York.
    My boyfriend and I visited The Cheesecake Factory in Queens, New York.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 48%

    Number of locations (2024): 215

    12. Denny's
    Denny's.
    Denny's.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 64%

    Number of locations (2024): 1,334

    11. Blaze Pizza
    Assembly Line Format blaze pizza
    Blaze Pizza uses an assembly line similar to Chipotle or Subway.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 63%

    Number of locations (2024): 265

    10. LongHorn Steakhouse
    The exterior of a Longhorn steakhouse.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 57%

    Number of locations (2024): 594

    9. Carrabba's Italian Grill
    Carrabba's Italian Grill

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 59%

    Number of locations (2024): 210

    8. Olive Garden
    Sign outside an Olive Garden restaurant
    The manager of an Olive Garden in Kansas gave staff a blunt ultimatum.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 58%

    Number of locations (2024): 923

    7. Mountain Mike's Pizza
    Mountain Mike's Pizza
    Mountain Mike's Pizza.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 63%

    Number of locations (2024): 299

    6. Texas Roadhouse
    Texas Roadhouse

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 57%

    Number of locations (2024): 664

    5. BJ's Restaurants
    BJ's Restaurants
    BJ's Restaurants.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 60%

    Number of locations (2024): 218

    4. In-N-Out Burger
    An In-N-Out Burger sign.
    American regional chain of fast food restaurants In-N-Out Burger sign seen at the San Francisco site.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 66%

    Number of locations (2024): 415

    3. First Watch
    First Watch breakfast food
    First Watch serves one brunch menu, all day for 7.5 hours.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 73%

    Number of locations (2024): 572

    2. bb.q Chicken
    bb.q chicken sign inside a restaurant

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 71%

    Number of locations (2024): 208

    1. Dave's Hot Chicken
    Dave's Hot Chicken debuts a fried cauliflower sandwich.
    Dave's Hot Chicken debuted a fried cauliflower sandwich on January 8.

    Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 71%

    Number of locations (2024): 245

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Should you buy Tesla while it’s below $500?

    Man charging an electric vehicle.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    Key Points

    • Autonomous driving technology and robotics could transform Tesla into a much different company.
    • Its electric vehicle sales are slowing, and its margins are shrinking.
    • Investors have priced lofty expectations into the stock.

    Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) might be one of the more difficult stocks to own comfortably due to the amount of volatility there has been in its share price, but it has been a huge winner for some investors over the years. Its successful phases have made it into one of the world’s most valuable companies, with a market cap of close to $1.5 trillion.

    The electric vehicle (EV) maker’s stock is up by around 105% in the past five years, and it’s within reach of the all-time high it touched last December. Should investors buy Tesla while it’s below $500? 

    Imagine a completely different future

    The bullish view of Tesla is that it is transforming into a software, robotics, and artificial intelligence enterprise. This is precisely how CEO Elon Musk wants investors to think about the business. 

    Tesla has long-term optionality with its robotaxi operations, which are currently carrying paying passengers in Austin and the San Francisco Bay Area in a controlled capacity, with more cities to come. The objective here is to get that business going in a lot more markets — not only in the U.S., but internationally as well. The premise assumes that as demand and usage pick up, costs as a share of revenues would come down. The best outcome would be for Tesla to generate a colossal amount of recurring, high-margin revenue from driverless cars.

    Humanoid robots might be an even bigger opportunity — Musk estimates that business could help Tesla reach a market cap of $25 trillion. It appears that there could be a market for these devices among commercial clients that would use them in factory settings. There might also be demand from consumer households.

    In short, a decade from now, Tesla might look totally different from how the company looks today. However, when looking strictly at its current situation, it’s not easy to always be optimistic. Tesla’s revenue growth has slowed dramatically due to a combination of intensifying competition, higher interest rates, and a public backlash among some consumers over Musk’s forays into politics. Profits have been under pressure, too: Its Q3 2025 operating margin of 5.8% was down sharply from the 10.8% margin it produced in the prior-year period.

    Is Tesla stock overvalued or undervalued?

    It can be difficult for investors to effectively gauge the valuations of a company like Tesla. Based on traditional metrics, like its price-to-sales ratio of 17 or the price-to-earnings ratio of 304, the stock is ridiculously overvalued. One would only expect investors to buy shares of a company trading at such lofty premiums if it were putting up remarkable financial performances, delivering monster growth and significant profits. Yet Tesla hasn’t been operating at a high level recently.

    Viewed in this light, the shares are extremely expensive. But of course, Tesla is a story stock. The market’s actions today are defined by narratives, which can clearly have huge impacts on share prices. Tesla and Musk get so much attention for their innovativeness and forward-thinking that it makes sense that many investors are believers.

    If Tesla’s self-driving vehicles and robots prove successful in a reasonable time frame, then the stock’s current valuation might very well end up looking like a bargain in retrospect. Earnings could grow substantially, lifting the stock up.

    Whether it will achieve that favorable outcome, though, is far from clear. Tesla will need to execute in a near-flawless fashion, and not just from the technological and manufacturing perspectives. It will need cooperation from regulators and legislators. And there’s no certainty that its future products will see the type of customer adoption that the bulls predict.

    Moreover, a critic could argue that Tesla’s current valuation essentially prices in a great deal of the optimistic forecast for success. Only investors who are able and willing to take on a lot of risk in their portfolios should even consider buying this EV stock now. While there is a chance that the investment could be a profitable one over the longer term, it’s impossible to accurately assess. Risk-averse investors would be better off avoiding Tesla at these levels.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    The post Should you buy Tesla while it’s below $500? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Tesla right now?

    Before you buy Tesla shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Tesla wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p { margin-bottom: 0 !important; }

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    More reading

    Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Buy Australian: ASX stocks positioned to beat global markets next year

    A fresh-faced young woman holds an Australian flag aloft above her head as she smiles widely.

    The share market has a long history of bouncing back from tough periods. Over more than a century, ASX stocks have delivered returns of roughly 10% per annum on average, even while enduring recessions, inflation spikes, rate shocks, and global turmoil.

    But every now and then, certain companies emerge from a difficult year in far better shape than they entered it. And after a challenging 2025 for many high-quality businesses, a select group of ASX stocks is now being tipped to outperform not only the local market, but potentially global indices as well.

    If you’re looking for standout ASX opportunities for 2026, these two names could be the ones to watch.

    CSL Ltd (ASX: CSL)

    CSL has had a bruising year, with investor sentiment hurt by Seqirus restructuring noise, tariff speculation, and questions around the margin recovery of the key CSL Behring business. Yet beneath the short-term issues sits one of the most successful Australian companies of the past three decades.

    This is a business with enormous competitive advantages, entrenched global market share, and a long runway for growth across plasma therapies, vaccines, and emerging treatments. Analysts widely expect margins to normalise over the next couple of years and earnings growth to accelerate.

    Importantly, CSL is now trading at one of its cheapest valuations in years. For a company that is historically priced at a premium, today’s discount offers long-term investors a window that doesn’t appear often.

    UBS currently has a buy rating and $275.00 price target on its shares. This implies potential upside of over 50% for investors from current levels.

    TechnologyOne Ltd (ASX: TNE)

    Another Australian stock that could beat global markets in 2026 is TechnologyOne. It is a software powerhouse that has grown earnings for over 15 consecutive years. And despite delivering another robust year of recurring revenue growth in FY 2025, its share price has pulled back materially, creating an unusually attractive entry point.

    With its software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform entrenched in government, education, and large enterprise customers, this ASX stock enjoys some of the stickiest revenues on the Australian share market. In addition, its margins are among the highest in the tech sector, and its shift to subscription income continues to strengthen its long-term earnings base. Throw in its UK expansion and management’s belief that it can double in size every five years, and you have a stock that could be a fantastic buy and hold pick.

    The team at UBS is also feeling very bullish on this one. It recently put a buy rating and $38.70 price target on its shares. This suggests that upside of almost 40% is possible between now and this time next year.

    The post Buy Australian: ASX stocks positioned to beat global markets next year appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in CSL right now?

    Before you buy CSL shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and CSL wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has positions in CSL and Technology One. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended CSL and Technology One. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended CSL and Technology One. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • This AI matchmaking startup says it can find your ‘soulmate’ — but be prepared to spend $50,000. Read its pitch deck.

    Jake Kozloski founder and CEO of Keeper
    Jake Kozloski is the CEO of dating startup Keeper.

    • Keeper, an AI dating startup, believes its matchmaking tech can pair people with their soulmates.
    • The dating company raised $4 million in pre-seed funding last year.
    • Keeper shared the most recent version of its pitch deck with Business Insider.

    Keeper, an AI matchmaking startup, thinks it can help deliver your "soulmate" to you. And if it can't, it'll let you know.

    "We're saying we actually know who could be your soulmate or not," Jake Kozloski, Keeper's CEO, told Business Insider. "We're not going to waste your time and pretend that a hundred thousand of these people could be. We'll tell you no."

    Founded in 2022, the dating platform uses layers of algorithms and AI models to match people who sign up for its service. The startup is now disclosing for the first time, exclusively to Business Insider, that it raised a $4 million pre-seed investment in October 2024, led by Lightbank and Lakehouse Ventures. Goodwater Capital and Champion Hill Ventures participated in the round, among others.

    Investors "see AI as an inflection point in the dating app landscape" and an opportunity to "disrupt the incumbents," Kozloski said.

    Keeper isn't the only startup attempting to shake up the online dating market. Other AI matchmaking apps, such as Sitch and Amata, have raised millions to build next-generation dating apps. Dating app incumbents like Tinder and Bumble are also making plays with AI-powered experiences.

    Kozloski said the company's values were another piece of its pitch that attracted some investors.

    "They feel like there's a marriage crisis adjacent to the whole Elon Musk fertility crisis stuff that he talks about," said Kozloski, who described Keeper as being "friendly with the pronatalist movement."

    Wanting kids, though, isn't a requirement to use Keeper, Kozloski added.

    Since launching, Keeper has had more than 1.5 million sign-ups, and about 300,000 of those have made accounts, Kozloski said. Among that pool, there have been a "small number" of matches. Keeper didn't share exactly how many matches it's made, but according to its pitch deck, 10% of dates from its beta version resulted in marriage. With its funding, Keeper has been building out its matchmaking technology over the past year.

    Keeper is limited to heterosexual couples right now, and doesn't offer explicit options for different gender identities.

    "We basically have to build a new algorithm for homosexual relationships, which we're happy to do and we will do eventually, but for now, we want to get to product market fit with our core product first," Kozloski said. "Frankly, heterosexual relationships, especially for finding life partnership, seems to be a bigger market, a stronger market for us right now."

    Making a profile on Keeper is a sit-down process. The initial form to make an account asks for the standard details of many dating apps (like your age or height), as well as academic test scores (including SATs), your career ambitions, salary, and net worth. It even encourages taking an external personality test. After you fill out the initial onboarding questionnaire, there are 13 more steps, ranging from uploading photos to sharing your philosophy on love.

    "We don't let our users create their own profiles," Kozloski said. Keeper uses the information it gathers to curate a profile for you.

    Kozloski said Keeper uses a non-AI algorithm first to streamline potential matches, focusing on data points like age range initially.

    "We use LLMs once we have your top hundred that our other algorithms have identified," he said. "The LLMs are trained on our matchmaking insights that we've learned so far, and so they can narrow down those last hundred and do the final pass of, 'OK, who actually is worth offering among these.'"

    Some of the AI matchmaking comes into play when analyzing "general attractiveness" and users' specific attributes, like baldness or hair color, Kozloski said. The startup has also partnered with a team of researchers at Stanford, Kozloski said, who help train the LLMs (Keeper provides anonymized data to the research team).

    However, Keeper isn't fully automated, and for the time being, includes human matchmakers in the process. If there's a match, Keeper connects the two people over text message.

    The startup has a complicated payment structure with a hefty price tag — but only for men.

    Keeper has male users sign a "marriage bounty" that typically costs $50,000 (if the user gets married) and has them pay $5,000 for any dates from the service (the date fees go toward the total bounty cost, Kozloski said).

    Read the most recent version of Keeper's pitch deck.

    Note: Keeper has shared an updated version of its pitch deck, which it is now sharing with investors, that includes new details since its raise in October 2024. Some details have been redacted.

    Keeper claims its AI-powered matchmaking is the 'most accurate'
    The world's most accurate
matchmaker, powered by AI
    It touts that 1 in 10 dates lead to engagements
    1 in 10 Keeper first dates
have led to an engagement.

    "1 in 10 Keeper first dates have led to an engagement," the slide says.

    It highlights the size of the matchmaking market
    Matchmaking: Old School
yet shockingly massive

    Keeper describes the matchmaking market as "old school yet shockingly massive," per the slide.

    It then says that matchmaking could be enhanced by technology
    When technology provides perfect
matches, matchmaking will be the
best way to meet your partner.

    "With the opportunity to 10x," the slide says. "When technology provides perfect matches, matchmaking will be the best way to meet your partner."

    Then, it introduces Keeper's product
    Made possible by Keeper
The AI matchmaker that will
introduce you to your soulmate
on the first match

    "The AI matchmaker that will introduce you to your soulmate on the first match," the slides says. It also includes product imagery.

    It showcases how its beta version performed
    Our v1 worked
extremely well.

Dates convert to marriage

    "Our v1 worked extremely well," the slide says.

    It says that 10% of dates lead to marriage.

    The deck shows press and social media content about the startup
    "Most [of us] now see Keeper as the only
company really pushing forward the
vision most there have or agree with."
    Keeper showcases how many people have signed up
    We've grown to 1.5M
signups — 100% organically.

    It says it has had 1.5 million sign-ups. "This makes us the largest pool of any traditional matchmaker," the slides says. It lists competitors like Tawkify, Keeper, Ditto, Sitch, and Known Dating.

    Keeper explains its network effect
    True network-effect.
The first mover quickly becomes a monopoly.

    "Everyone signs up if we deliver soulmates on the first match," the slide says.

    "The first mover quickly becomes a monopoly," it says.

    Then, it introduces its founders
    Jake Kozloski — Founder, CEO
Repeat founder with previous exit
8 years startup product management and growth roles
10 years of dating apps as a user; now happily married to wife Aliia

    Here's what the slide says:

    Jake Kozloski: Founder, CEO

    • Repeat founder with previous exit
    • 8 years startup product management and growth roles
    • 10 years of dating apps as a user; now happily married to wife Aliia

    Toban Wiebe: Co-Founder, Head of AI

    • PhD from Penn in economic/statistical modeling of Marriage Markets
    • 8 years industry experience in ML/DS, most recently at Instacart and Uber
    • Met his wife Dee 10 years ago in grad school via OkCupid
    It also lists the researchers the startup is working with
    The top researchers in the world are on our side.

    Here are the names of the researchers:

    • Michal Kosinski: PhD, Cambridge
    • Geoffrey Miller: PhD, Stanford
    • Naman Gupta: PhD Student, Stanford
    • Ignacio Rios Uribe: PhD, Stanford
    Keeper explains why it's raising capital
    We're raising to scale profitable human-in-the-loop
matchmaking to $2M in annual revenue.

    "We're raising to scale profitable human-in-the-loop matchmaking to $2M in annual revenue," the slide says.

    The deck includes its founder's email
    Keeper
    As well as an appendix with additional data
    Appendix
    The deck includes a slide about marriage rates decreasing
    80% of young singles want to get married.
40% actually will.

    "80% of young singles want to get married," the slide says. "40% actually will." It cites data from Match Group and data scientist Allen Downey.

    It then maps out the incumbent dating app landscape
    Dating apps bad at creating
relationships, worth billions.

    Dating apps are "bad at creating relationships, worth billions," the slide says. "Imagine the value of the first product that's great at it."

    It lists matchmaking competitors, too
    Matchmakers can't scale

    "Matchmakers can't scale," the slide says.

    Keeper shows how its LLM and vision models work
    LLMs and vision models enable
scalable matchmaking for the
first time in history

    "LLMs and vision models enable scalable matchmaking for the first time in history," the slides says.

    It goes into more depth on its tech
    We've built the most accurate process in the world.

    "We've built the most accurate process in the world," the slide says.

    Here are the steps the slide lays out:

    • In-depth preference collection
    • Accurately measure all traits
    • AI evaluates every pair
    • Offer only very strong matches
    • Feedback refines future matches
    It then explains its pricing model
    We earn more, faster, by aligning
with users' incentives.

    "We earn more, faster, by aligning with users' incentives," the slide says.

    Its current model, which has humans involved in matchmaking, is free for women and costs men $5,000 per date. For male users, the marriage bounty costs $50,000, and the slide says that Keeper has contracted $14 million "so far."

    Keeper outlines that in a future model, where the tech is fully automated, dates will cost $250, and the marriage bounty contract will cost $5,000.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Kate Winslet said she doesn’t like the term ‘nepo baby’

    Kate Winslet and her son on the red carpet.
    Kate Winslet and her son on the red carpet.

    • Kate Winslet thinks the term 'nepo baby' is silly, and she tells her kids to ignore it.
    • Winslet's directorial debut, "Goodbye June," which is out in December, was written by her son.
    • She came to his defense, claiming it would have been made "with or without her."

    Kate Winslet thinks the term nepo baby is "silly."

    The Oscar winner and mom-of-three told the BBC on Wednesday that her kids, who have followed her into showbiz "aren't getting a leg up."

    "There are lots and lots of people in the world whose children go into a similar family business, whether it's being a judge or a lawyer or a doctor," she said. "Part of it actually is teaching them to ignore the white noise of silly terms like nepo baby, which you can't really do anything about."

    Winslet, 50, was speaking in an interview promoting her upcoming film "Goodbye June," which marks her editorial debut and will be released in select US and UK theaters December 12, and on Netflix December 24. Her eldest son, Joe Anders, 21, wrote the screenplay.

    She said that Anders had expressed concern that people may think the film, which he wrote on a screenwriting course, was picked up only because of his famous parents. But Winslet defended his talent."The film would've been made with or without me. The script is so, so good," she said.

    Anders' father is the acclaimed film director Sam Mendes, 60, who was married to Winslet for seven years until their split in 2010. Anders starred alongside his mom in the 2023 movie "Lee," and also appeared in the Oscar-nominated war film "1917," which was directed by his father.

    Mia Threapleton, Winslet's 25-year-old daughter, is also a rising star. She had a starring role in Wes Anderson's latest film, "The Phoenician Scheme," which was released in May. It comes after she played Winslet's daughter in the 2022 BAFTA award-winning TV drama "I Am Ruth."

    The youngest of Winslet's children, 12-year-old Bear Blaze Winslet, has yet to grace the silver screen, but has already expressed an interest. During a 2021 appearance on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Winslet shared jokingly that at age 7, Bear Blaze told her he wanted "to be an actress."

    Read the original article on Business Insider