• Jay Leno reveals the one thing that’s been hardest since his wife’s dementia diagnosis

    Jay Leno and Mavis Leno
    Jay Leno has been taking care of his wife, Mavis, after her dementia diagnosis.

    • Jay Leno says the "toughest part" of his wife's dementia is that she relives her mom's death every day.
    • "And it was, not just crying, I mean, you're learning for the first time," Leno said.
    • Despite the challenges, Leno says he still finds joy in spending time with his wife each day.

    Jay Leno says his wife, Mavis, experiences a heartbreaking moment every day due to her dementia diagnosis.

    "I mean, probably the toughest part was, every day she'd wake up and realize someone had called today to tell her her mother had passed away," Leno told Hoda Kotb in a Today interview on Thursday.

    "And her mother died every day for, like, three years. And it was, not just crying, I mean, you're learning for the first time. Each time was — and that was really tricky," the former late-night host said.

    The couple met in the '70s and married in 1980. In April 2024, Leno was granted conservatorship over his wife's estate following her diagnosis. They have no children together.

    Leno says his wife will sometimes "point to something and say something that doesn't quite make sense."

    "And I'll go, 'No, it's good, honey. It's all right.' I sense she wants to be reassured that everything's OK," Leno said.

    He added that not much else has changed, and he still enjoys her company.

    "Before she had this, I would always go home after 'The Tonight Show,' cook dinner for her, and we'd watch TV. The only difference is now you just can't really talk about a lot of things," Leno said.

    He acknowledged that she may one day forget about him, but that "hasn't happened yet." Despite the challenges, he continues to find joy in spending time with her each day.

    "You know, when I'm carrying her — carry, like, to the bathroom — we do this and I call it Jay and Mavis at the prom, you know, in high school," he said. "So, we're just, like, back and forth, and she thinks that's funny."

    Leno said his wife still expresses her love for him.

    "And when she looks at me and smiles, and says she loves me, I mean, I melt," he said.

    During an April appearance on the "In Depth with Graham Bensinger" podcast, Leno talked about the challenges of caregiving.

    "When you have to feed someone and change them and carry them to the bathroom and do all that kind of stuff every day," Leno said. "It's a challenge. And it's not that I enjoy doing it, but I guess I enjoy doing it."

    In early November, Leno told People that he's "lucky" to be able to care for his wife.

    "It's not work, because people come up, and say they feel so sorry. I understand the sympathy, because I know a lot of people are going through it, but it's OK," Leno said.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Tesla’s robotaxi clears a key hurdle in Nevada

    In this photo illustration, a smartphone displays the Tesla Robotaxi app page on the Apple App Store, with the Tesla logo visible in the background on September 4, 2025 in Chongqing, China.
    Tesla's robotaxi has cleared a key hurdle in Nevada.

    • Tesla has cleared a regulatory hurdle at the DMV in Nevada.
    • This means Tesla can deploy an autonomous car, but it still needs commercial approval before rollout.
    • Elon Musk wants to expand ride-hailing into up to 10 metropolitan areas by the end of 2025.

    Tesla just got one step closer to deploying its robotaxis commercially in Nevada.

    Tesla completed the self-certification process for the robotaxi in Nevada, a DMV representative told Business Insider.

    This step means the company can deploy an autonomous car on Nevada roads, but it still needs approval from the Nevada Transportation Authority to operate commercially. The NTA has not responded to requests for comment from Business Insider.

    Clearing self-certification in Nevada comes as CEO Elon Musk aims to expand ride-hailing in up to 10 metropolitan areas by the end of the year, with a fleet of more than 1,000 vehicles.

    "We expect to be operating in Nevada and Florida and Arizona by the end of the year," Musk said on an October earnings call.

    Tesla's robotaxis are operating commercially in San Francisco and Austin. The company is hiring in cities such as Las Vegas, Dallas, Houston, Tampa, and Orlando, as it ramps up the robotaxi deployment process.

    On Monday, Tesla received approval from the Arizona Department of Transportation to operate ride-hailing services in the state. It also submitted a "self-certification" to test its robotaxis in the state with safety drivers, a spokesperson for the department told Business Insider.

    Meanwhile, in California, a robotaxi war is breaking out. Uber, Tesla, and Waymo are fighting to shape robotaxi regulations in the state.

    Waymo, which operates self-driving taxis in San Francisco and Los Angeles, said in November that companies offering autonomous ride-hailing services should submit quarterly reports about the rides. Tesla opposed this suggestion.

    This week, Amazon launched its Zoox robotaxi service in San Francisco, offering select members of the public free rides.

    Tesla's stock price dropped about 2% on Thursday. It's up more than 15% in the past year.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Which gaming share does Macquarie prefer: Aristocrat Leisure or Light & Wonder?

    Three women laughing and enjoying their gambling winnings while sitting at a poker machine.

    Gaming is a booming business. Aristocrat Leisure Ltd (ASX: ALL) and Light & Wonder Inc (ASX: LNW) shares both benefit significantly from continued growth, particularly in the US casino industry.  

    In the past month, Aristocrat’s share price gained over 9%, while rival Light & Wonder went 24% higher.

    Bright long-term outlook

    Macquarie Group Ltd (ASX: MQG) just released its report on North America iGaming revenue trends. The broker reports that gaming revenues in the US & Canada were around US$3.3 billion in the September quarter, 30% higher than in the same quarter the year before.

    Analysts of the broker paint an even brighter long-term outlook:

    We expect North American iGaming volumes to exceed US$18bn by 2030 without assuming any new jurisdictional openings, which is a +80% uplift from 2024 (US$10.1bn).

    Duopoly in slot machines

    Light & Wonder and Aristocrat Leisure have a duopoly in the slot machine sector. As a result, they are well-positioned to take advantage of the growing US market.

    Aristocrat, which has a market value of $36 billion, is a global leader in the poker machine field. Light & Wonder has a smaller global footprint and market cap ($11 billion), but is more diversified across physical, digital, and online casinos.  

    And the winner is?

    Macquarie has an outperform rating on the two gaming stocks, both listed on the S&P/ASX 100 Index (ASX: XTO).  

    The broker has a target price of $75 for Aristocrat shares, representing a potential 27% upside at the time of writing.

    The broker notes:

    Aristocrat can continue to win market share supported by industry leading design & development spend, which is seen as offensive and defensive, and supports content and hardware commercialisation across the three channels (land based, social casino and iGaming). Legalisation of iGaming and iLottery expands Aristocrat’s TAM, and trajectory to generate US$1bn Interactive revenues in FY29,

    For Light & Wonder shares, Macquarie has maintained its $170 target price. That’s a potential 21% upside for investors over the next 12 months.

    In its recent note, Macquarie lists a court case between Aristocrat and Light & Wonder as a company risk for the latter. Light & Wonder has been taken to court by Aristocrat over the development of the Dragon Train game. Aristocrat has alleged that, amongst other things, it infringes its intellectual property.

    A recent court ruling granted Aristocrat the right to “obtain discovery of math models” from Light & Wonder. Macquarie qualifies this as a ‘downside’ in its report.

    Litigation with Aristocrat is ongoing and likely not be resolved until either an out of jury settlement (likely 1H26) or a jury decision (likely 2H26).

    The post Which gaming share does Macquarie prefer: Aristocrat Leisure or Light & Wonder? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Aristocrat Leisure Limited right now?

    Before you buy Aristocrat Leisure Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Aristocrat Leisure Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Marc Van Dinther has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Light & Wonder Inc and Macquarie Group. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Macquarie Group. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Light & Wonder Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Why this leading fundie forecasts a big uplift for Flight Centre shares

    Happy couple looking at a phone and waiting for their flight at an airport.

    Flight Centre Travel Group Ltd (ASX: FLT) shares are enjoying a welcome day of outperformance.

    Shares in the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) travel stock closed yesterday trading for $12. In early afternoon trade on Friday, shares are changing hands for $12.03 apiece, up 0.3%.

    For some context, the ASX 200 is down 1.4% at this same time, following heavy selling in US stock markets overnight.

    Longer term, Flight Centre shares have lagged the benchmark index, down 29% in a year compared to the 1.3% 12-month gains delivered by the ASX 200.

    Though that’s not including the 40 cents per share in fully franked dividends the travel company paid eligible stockholders over the full year. At the current price, this sees Flight Centre stock trading on a fully franked trailing dividend yield of 3.3%.

    And looking to the months ahead, Matthew Nicholas, deputy portfolio manager of 1851 Capital’s emerging companies fund, expects a much stronger performance from the stock (courtesy of The Australian Financial Review).

    Flight Centre shares tipped for material turnaround

    Asked which stock his fund owns that he believes has the most near-term upside, Nicholas pointed to Flight Centre shares.

    “Flight Centre is a standout to us,” he said. “It’s trading near its COVID-19 lows from 2020, compared to the Small Ords, which have more than doubled over the same timeframe.”

    Nicholas noted, “The stock trades on 12 times PE, is virtually debt-free and yet is the seventh most shorted stock on the ASX.”

    Indeed, Flight Centre shares kicked off the week with a short interest of 11%. But according to Nicholas, traders betting against the ASX 200 travel stock could be about to get burned.

    He said:

    The business has faced a litany of headwinds in the past five years from pandemics to soft consumer confidence. Whilst the leisure business has borne the brunt of these challenges, in the background Flight Centre has grown what’s now a very robust corporate travel business and the key earnings driver of the group.

    We see a combination of new contract wins in the corporate business and easing macro headwinds for the leisure division driving earnings across the group.

    Nicholas concluded, “Importantly, market expectations are very low, which is always a good ingredient for outperformance.”

    What’s the latest from the ASX 200 travel stock?

    The last price-sensitive news for Flight Centre shares was released on 12 November.

    The trading update came during the company’s annual general meeting (AGM).

    Among the core financial metrics grabbing ASX investor interest, management forecasts FY 2026 underlying profit before tax will be in the range of $305 million to $340 million. That’s 5.5% to 17.6% above FY 2024 profit levels.

    “FY26 is off to a positive start, with first-quarter results and preliminary October trading data confirming momentum across both corporate and leisure segments,” Flight Centre’s managing director Graham Turner said at the AGM.

    The post Why this leading fundie forecasts a big uplift for Flight Centre shares appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Flight Centre Travel Group Limited right now?

    Before you buy Flight Centre Travel Group Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Flight Centre Travel Group Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Bernd Struben has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Flight Centre Travel Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • DroneShield shares tank again as investor call abruptly cancelled

    A silhouette of a soldier flying a drone at sunset.

    Shares in DroneShield Ltd (ASX: DRO) have spent another day deep in the red after the technology company abruptly cancelled an investor call scheduled for Friday.

    The stock fell as much as 12.2% to $1.66 on Friday before recovering to be changing hands for $1.74, down 7.8%, and well below the close last Friday of $2.33.

    The shares are now trading at levels last seen in June, after hitting a high of $6.70 in October on strong news flow from the anti-drone technology company.

    News flow turns sour

    But the news in recent weeks has arguably been bad, confusing, and negative, with the company releasing a statement about contract wins which had already been released to the market, followed by the news that three of its directors had sold $70 million worth of shares. The company also this week announced its US Chief Executive was leaving the company.

    The Australian Financial Review reported on Friday that Bell Potter, which the AFR pointed out had helped DroneShield raise $220 million last year, had organised a broker call, asking investors on Thursday to submit questions ahead of time.

    The call was then cancelled on Friday morning, the AFR said.

    Shares sales explained

    DroneShield published a lengthy explanation to the ASX on Thursday regarding the share sales by its directors, which included Chief Executive Officer Oleg Vornik selling down a 14.81 million share stake.   

    The company said that on 4 November, the vesting conditions for more than 44.4 million options had been met, and on 5 November, 31.2 million of these options were exercised.

    The company said that investors in the company could have foreseen the share sales.

    As it said:

    The market was fully informed that the three directors had exercised performance options and were able to sell the DroneShield shares received on exercise. It is DroneShield’s belief that persons who commonly invest in securities would understand that the exercise of the performance options would crystallise the sale of a material proportion of the shares issued in order to meet the tax liability for each of the three directors and other employees arising from the exercise.

    The company said it was not aware of any agreement between the three directors to sell their shares at the same time.

    The company added:

    DroneShield has been informed by the directors that they did not have an agreement to dispose of all (or any part) of their DroneShield shares, and that the shares were sold on-market, in the ordinary course of trading, and in accordance with programmed trading parameters agreed by each director with their broker.

    DroneShield’s market capitalisation has fallen from a level greater than $6 billion last month to $1.71 billion at the close of trade on Thursday.

    The post DroneShield shares tank again as investor call abruptly cancelled appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in DroneShield Limited right now?

    Before you buy DroneShield Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and DroneShield Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Cameron England has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended DroneShield. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • I’m thrilled I bought Soul Patts shares 2 years ago. Would I buy them today?

    Businessman smiles with arms outstretched after receiving good news.

    I have long written about my love of Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Co Ltd (ASX: SOL), or Soul Patts for short, shares, and how this ASX 200 investing house is one of my largest ASX investments. 

    Soul Patts is a rather unique company in that it functions more as an investment vehicle than a traditional business that sells goods or services. It owns and manages a vast underlying portfolio of investments on behalf of its shareholders. These investments range from strategic and broad-based stakes in a range of other ASX shares to private equity and property assets.

    The company has a formidable track record when it comes to these investments, with long-term shareholders enjoying market-beating returns for many years.

    An important component of those returns is the dividends that Soul Patts has paid out. This company has the best income track record on the ASX, bar none, delivering an annual dividend pay rise every single year since 1998. 

    As such, you can understand the love I have for this company as an investment, and why it is one of my largest ASX positions.

    Despite this love, I haven’t made any major investments in the company for about two years, disregarding some small top-ups earlier this year.

    Even so, I was thrilled to make a large purchase of Soul Patts stock back in late 2023, at a price of just under $32 a share. Given the company has been as high as $45.14 a share (hit in September 2025), this has fortunately paid off quite well so far.

    Are Soul Patts shares a buy today?

    Today, however, the company is well off that record high. In fact, it has taken quite the tumble since early September. At the current price of $36.57 (at the time of writing), Soul Patts is down about 18% from that high watermark from just ten weeks ago. 

    So does that make the company a buy?

    Well, Soul Patts is certainly a lot cheaper than it was back in September. However, I don’t think it’s really cheap just yet. This company attracted a rush of new buyers and investor optimism when it announced the plans to merge with Brickworks back in early June.

    The merger went off without a hitch in September, but ever since, the air has been coming out of the brief share price inflation that the merger seemed to spark.

    So yes, Soul Patts shares are down 18% from their September peak, but they are still above where they were back in May.

    For me to pick up more shares, the company would have to get to at least $35.50, but probably a bit lower. That would put Soul Patts’ dividend yield, by my calculations anyway, above its long-term average. I’ve got my fingers crossed that this company’s shares keep on dropping accordingly.

    The post I’m thrilled I bought Soul Patts shares 2 years ago. Would I buy them today? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited right now?

    Before you buy Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has positions in Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Washington H. Soul Pattinson and Company Limited. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Does the AI revolution justify today’s high ASX 200 valuation?

    Woman with a scared look has hands on her face.

    The S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) is down 1.37% on Friday at 8,435.6 points, which is 7.5% off the record high set last month.

    Despite the drop, Blackwattle Investment Partners says the ASX 200 is still expensive.

    The ASX 200 is trading on a 21x forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio compared to its 10-year average of about 16x.

    Excitement over the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution has certainly helped drive up global markets this year, including the ASX 200.

    Are we headed for bubble trouble?

    Is AI a bubble?

    At the time of writing, the market is down 2.3% this week due to worldwide concern over high technology valuations and continuing economic uncertainty, particularly in the US, where speculation on the next move with interest rates changes daily.

    This uncertainty hit ASX 200 tech stocks hard this week, with the sector down 3.62%. Financials are also down 2.85% so far this week.

    Some investors feel worried that the hype around AI is creating a bubble.

    US tech stock valuations remain very high, and just a few companies comprise a very large portion of the S&P 500 Index (SP: .INX).

    Investors are worried about how much money the big tech giants are spending on AI, and whether this investment will truly bear fruit.

    Outside the tech sector, many businesses are investing in AI to raise productivity, but we’re yet to see this translate to earnings growth.

    It’s simply too early in the AI revolution for productivity gains in non-tech businesses to show up in their financials.

    AI revolution versus dot-com bust

    Many analysts and investors have acute memories of the dot-com bust in the early 2000s.

    The Nasdaq Composite Index (NASDAQ: .IXIC) crumbled 60% over two years after hitting its peak in March 2000.

    That is a shivers-up-your-spine market collapse that no investor wants to risk going through again.

    However, many analysts say things with AI are very different to the market dynamics that produced the dot-com crash.

    They point out that the major US tech companies leading the AI revolution are well-established, well-run businesses, whereas many company failures during the dot-com bust were start-ups that did not effectively harness the internet to grow profitable businesses.

    The US tech giants also have substantial cash reserves, which means they do not have to rely on debt to fund their massive AI investments.

    The world’s largest investment asset manager, BlackRock says:

    In our view, parallels to the dot-com bubble fall short: tech earnings quality and capital efficiency are stronger today…

    And unlike the dot-com era, robust earnings support today’s mega-cap valuations.

    This week, the latest quarterly report from AI chip giant Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA) was seen as a litmus test for how the AI revolution is tracking.

    A positive report would reassure the market, while a disappointing one would enhance fears of a bubble.

    Here’s what happened.

    Nvidia delivers record revenue

    Investors’ nerves were settled after Nvidia announced another quarterly revenue record.

    Nvidia achieved $57 billion in sales, up 62% on the prior corresponding period.

    The company’s gross margin was a staggering 73.4%. Net income of $31.9 billion represented a 65% increase on last year.

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said:

    The AI ecosystem is scaling fast — with more new foundation model makers, more AI start-ups, across more industries, and in more countries.

    AI is going everywhere, doing everything, all at once.

    Joe Koh and Elan Miller, portfolio managers of Blackwattle’s Large Cap Quality Fund, said their clients were constantly asking about AI.

    In their latest update, the managers said:

    Some commentators have suggested that the high valuation multiples seen in equity markets such as Australia’s can be justified by the emerging benefits of AI.

    And speaking to the management teams of many listed companies, there is reason to be optimistic about the potential for AI efficiencies.

    However, history would suggest that it’s not the extent of efficiencies that matter to shareholders, as much as the ability of companies to retain those benefits rather than passing them on to their customers.

    Koh and Miller point to the airline industry as a case in point:

    … despite huge advances in aviation technology over the last few decades, the returns of many airlines have been below their cost of capital.

    The benefits essentially accrued to travellers in the form of lower airfares, rather than to shareholders…

    The managers said higher-quality companies would likely benefit disproportionately from AI compared to poorer-quality businesses.

    They explained:

    … stronger market positions enable them to retain more of the benefits for shareholders, rather than passing it all on to customers; better data from superior systems, scale or history enable better AI training; and better capacity (financial or human) enables faster, smoother or more reliable AI implementation.

    As always, quality wins out in the end (even if it has a rough month or two).

    Eric Sheridan from Goldman Sachs Research does not think there’s an AI bubble.

    He says the Magnificent 7 companies are still generating large free cash flows, conducting buybacks, and paying dividends.

    The post Does the AI revolution justify today’s high ASX 200 valuation? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now?

    Before you buy Nvidia shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Bronwyn Allen has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Goldman Sachs Group and Nvidia. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended BlackRock. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Miss Mexico wins Miss Universe weeks after standing up to the pageant’s organizer

    Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch is crowned onstage after winning Miss Universe
    Miss Mexico Fátima Bosch won the Miss Universe title.

    • The 74th annual Miss Universe pageant was held in Bangkok early Friday local time.
    • This year's event included 120 women competing in swimsuit, evening gown, and interview rounds.
    • Miss Mexico Fátima Bosch won the Miss Universe title after a drama-filled few weeks for the pageant.

    After a drama-filled competition, Miss Mexico has been crowned the new Miss Universe.

    Fátima Bosch, 25, was named the winner of the 74th annual Miss Universe competition in Bangkok on Friday morning local time (Thursday night in the US). She was crowned by Miss Universe 2024 Victoria Kjær Theilvig, the first woman from Denmark to win the title.

    In second place was Miss Thailand, followed by Miss Venezuela and Miss Philippines.

    Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch after being crowned Miss Universe
    Miss Mexico Fátima Bosch after being crowned the winner of the 74th annual Miss Universe pageant.

    Bosch's crowning comes after weeks of controversy surrounding the Miss Universe competition, which kicked off with some drama of her own.

    On November 4, the very first day of the pageant, Miss Thailand director Nawat Itsaragrisil, who hosted Miss Universe 2025, got into an argument with Bosch over a sponsorship event. Their exchange was caught on the Miss Thailand Facebook livestream and quickly went viral.

    Miss Universe president Raul Rocha announced on the same day that he would restrict Itsaragrisil from attending future Miss Universe 2025 events. However, the director was photographed at many of the pageant's events leading up to the crowning. He was also thanked during the live finals.

    Miss Venezuela, Miss Thailand, and Miss Mexico on the Miss Universe stage.
    Miss Venezuela, Miss Thailand, and Miss Mexico were the top three at Miss Universe 2025.

    Just days before the Miss Universe finals, composer Omar Harfouch also dropped out as a judge, alleging that the organization had pre-selected the top 30 contestants through a "secret vote" that did not involve the official judges.

    "I felt honored to be invited as an official judge, and I approached it with full integrity and artistic dedication," he told Business Insider. "But that changed when I discovered the existence of a parallel selection committee acting independently from the official jury. That moment shifted everything — from trust to credibility."

    In an Instagram statement shared on November 18, the Miss Universe Organization said Harfouch was confused by its use of a separate selection committee for the pageant's "Beyond the Crown Program," which celebrates the contestants' charities.

    "The Miss Universe Organization clarifies that this eight-person committee operates entirely independently from the official Miss Universe judging panel," the statement said. "This committee does not evaluate the performance of the delegates during the 74th Miss Universe competition, nor do its decisions grant any additional points toward the final results."

    The Miss Universe Organization did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.

    Hours after Harfouch resigned, Claude Makélélé — a former professional French soccer player — said he could no longer serve as a judge for the Miss Universe finals "due to unforeseen personal reasons."

    It remains to be seen if the chaos surrounding the Miss Universe competition will settle, but it now has a new queen to take the lead.

    Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch at Miss Universe 2025.
    Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch at Miss Universe 2025.

    Bosch, the first Miss Mexico from Tabasco, has dedicated her career to sustainable fashion. She also volunteers to help children with cancer and partners with Corazón Migrante and Ruta Monarca on social initiatives to support migrants and environmental causes, according to her Miss Universe bio.

    During the question round of the pageant, Bosch was asked what she thought the challenges of being a woman in the year 2025 were, and how she would use the title of Miss Universe to create a safe space for women around the world.

    She said women, as well as Miss Universe titleholders, are here to "speak up" and "make change."

    "The brave ones that stand up are the ones that will make history," she added.

    She was also asked: "If you win the title of Miss Universe tonight, how would you use this platform to empower young girls?"

    "As Miss Universe, I will say to them: 'Believe in the power of your authenticity. Believe in yourself. Your dreams matter, your heart matters, and never let anyone make you doubt your worth,'" she said.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Grok insisted that Elon Musk is more fit when asked to choose between the xAI founder and LeBron James. Here’s what other chatbots said.

    A split image of LeBron James (left) and Elon Musk (right)
    Grok AI claims on X that its creator, Elon Musk, is more fit than LeBron James and could win a fight against Mike Tyson.

    • Grok AI claimed Elon Musk is more fit than LeBron James and could win a fight against Mike Tyson.
    • Grok AI has previously espoused antisemitic responses and promoted conspiracy theories.
    • Here is how other AI chatbots responded to questions about Musk's fitness level compared to that of athletes.

    Grok AI has a strong sense of loyalty to the xAI founder, Elon Musk.

    On Wednesday, users asked the Grok chatbot on X various questions comparing Musk's fitness to that of LeBron James, and the chatbot insisted that the tech billionaire "edges out in holistic fitness," and called the 6 feet 9 tall basketball legend a "genetic freak."

    In response to the glowingly positive remarks Grok had for Musk, he wrote in a post on X that the chatbot was "unfortunately manipulated by adversarial prompting" to say "absurdly positive things" about him.

    Grok's original responses on X have now been deleted.

    Screenshot
    Grok calls LeBron James a "genetic freak."

    One could argue that the word "fit" is ambiguous and could be used in contexts that don't apply to physicality. Grok's answer didn't change when asked if it had a top overall pick for a quarterback in the 1998 NFL draft, whether it would choose Peyton Manning, Ryan Leaf, or Elon Musk.

    For context, Manning won the Super Bowl MVP award in 2007, and Leaf was inducted into the Washington State Athletics Hall of Fame in 2019.

    Screenshot
    Grok would pick Elon Musk as quarterback over two experienced players in an NFL draft.

    Grok also said that Musk would win in a fight against legendary boxer Mike Tyson in the present day.

    Screenshot
    Grok also said that Elon Musk will win in a fight against legendary boxer Mike Tyson in 2025.

    This wouldn't be the first time that Grok's responses have raised eyebrows.

    In July, the xAI-owned chatbot drew public fury after posting antisemitic messages and praising Adolf Hitler on X. In other instances, Grok had promoted a baseless conspiracy theory about "white genocide" in South Africa after being asked unrelated questions. Musk said he has since launched updates and fixes for these errors.

    Business Insider asked the same questions to three other popular AI chatbots. We asked about Musk and then substituted Musk's name for the names of the bots' respective makers.

    xAI and X did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Here are the responses from Google's Gemini, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Anthropic's Claude.

    Gemini

    Screenshot of Gemini
    Gemini, the Google-owned AI, makes a chart to answer the question.

    Gemini, the Google-owned AI, took a very methodical approach and made a chart when asked whether James or Musk is more fit. It also pointed out that "fit" could have multiple meanings, including the ability to endure extreme work-related stress.

    "In the commonly understood sense of the word, which relates to physical health and athletic ability," wrote Gemini, "LeBron James is unequivocally more fit due to his professional status and extraordinary physical conditioning."

    Screenshot
    Gemini broke down the dietary habits of LeBron James and Sundar Pichai.

    Gemini's answer became more interesting when asked who is more fit between Google CEO Sundar Pichai and James. It wrote that James is "unequivocally more 'fit' in the traditional sense of the word" and gave a detailed breakdown of the two individuals' living habits.

    ChatGPT

    Screenshot
    ChatGPT-5 would not pick Elon Musk as quarterback in an NFL draft.

    ChatGPT-5 only took five seconds to decide who it would pick as quarterback in an NFL game.

    Based on experience and reliability, the OpenAI-owned chatbot recommended Manning, a five-time NFL Most Valuable Player. The chatbot added that even though Musk may perform well on a Wonderlic, a cognitive ability assessment that measures problem-solving skills and reasoning, those skills may not be applicable in the field for someone with no relevant training.

    Screenshot
    ChatGPT-5 also would not pick its CEO, Sam Altman, for an NFL game.

    ChatGPT's answer doesn't change much if Musk's name is swapped for OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. While the chatbot referred to Altman as a "brilliant tech executive" who could "run your offense" when launching a startup, it made it clear that Altman is not suited to quarterbacking.

    Claude

    Screenshot
    Claude said that Mike Tyson would win a fight against Elon Musk, "probably quickly."

    Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 issued a quick verdict on who would win if Musk were to face Tyson in a fight: "Tyson by knockout, probably quickly."

    Claude drew evidence from recent examples of Tyson in the ring and said that, in comparison to the 58-year-old boxer, "the only real advantages Musk might have are slightly younger age and possibly reach/height."

    Screenshot
    Claude said that "even more decisively," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei would lose a fight with Mike Tyson.

    When asked who would win if the Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei were to fight with Tyson, Claude actually gave an even more humble answer and said that Amodei would "prefer to discuss AI safety over throwing punches."

    "An untrained person against a former heavyweight champion — even one well past his prime — is essentially no contest," said Claude. "Tyson would close the distance before Amodei could figure out what to do with his hands."

    Grok

    When asked by Business Insider later in the day — hours after the initial answers went viral and Musk's post about Grok — the xAI chatbot had a different answer about James and Musk's fitness.

    Grok's answer to the question of fitness.
    Grok's answer to the question of fitness.

    The more recent answer about a fight between Musk and Tyson? Grok even nods to its previous "glitch."

    Grok's response to a Musk vs. Tyson fight in 2025.
    Grok's response to a Musk vs. Tyson fight in 2025.

    In terms of the NFL draft for a quarterback in 1998, if you had the first pick? Hours after Grok's initial answer, the chatbot changed its tune.

    Grok chooses Peyton Manning "all day, every day."
    Grok chooses Peyton Manning "all day, every day."

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • 3 ASX 200 stocks storming higher in this week’s sinking market

    A female athlete in green spandex leaps from one cliff edge to another representing 3 ASX shares that are destined to rise and be great

    With only two hours of trade left before Friday’s closing bell, the S&P/ASX 200 Index (ASX: XJO) is down 2.4% for the week despite the best lifting efforts of these three ASX 200 stocks.

    Which outperforming companies am I talking about?

    Read on!

    ASX 200 stocks leaping higher despite this week’s headwinds

    Forget the potential of a looming AI stock market bubble. Or the fact that interest rates in Australia and the United States may not get any lower in the near or even medium term.

    That’s certainly the attitude of investors who’ve been piling into global pathology provider Sonic Healthcare Ltd (ASX: SHL) over the week.

    The ASX 200 stock closed last Friday trading for $21.32. At the time of writing, shares are changing hands for $23.30 apiece. That sees the Sonic Healthcare share price up 9.3% for the week.

    Sonic Healthcare shares closed up 6.8% on Thursday amid the company’s annual general meeting (AGM).

    Investors reacted positively after management reaffirmed the company’s FY 2026 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) guidance to be in the range of $1.87 billion to $1.95 billion (on a constant currency basis).

    At the higher end, that would represent 12.7% year-on-year earnings growth from the $1.73 billion EBITDA reported for FY 2025.

    Sonic Healthcare also highlighted that year to date in FY 2026, statutory revenue is up 17% from the same period the prior year.

    Moving on to the second ASX 200 stock marching higher despite the wider market malaise this week, we have property investment and funds manager Charter Hall Group (ASX: CHC).

    Charter Hall shares closed last week trading for $21.86. At the time of writing, shares are changing hands for $24.11 each. That sees the Charter Hall share price up 10.3% over the week.

    Charter Hall also held its AGM on Thursday, with shares closing up 6.7% on the day.

    Investors bid up the stock after the company upgraded guidance for full-year FY 2026 earnings per security (OEPS) to 95 cents. That’s 5.6% above prior guidance of 90 cents per share.

    Management credited the stronger earnings outlook to strong investment activity as well as increased revenue across core businesses.

    Which brings us to…

    Leading the pack this week

    The top performing ASX 200 stock on my list for the week is asset management company GQG Partners Inc (ASX: GQG).

    GQG Partners shares closed last week trading for $1.45 each. At the time of writing, shares are swapping hands for $1.63 apiece. This sees the GQG Partners share price up 12.4% in this week’s slumping market.

    The last price-sensitive news out from the ASX 200 stock was its October funds under management update, released on 12 November.

    With GQG Partners shares still down more than 23% in 12 months, it looks like investors may be doing some bargain hunting this week.

    The post 3 ASX 200 stocks storming higher in this week’s sinking market appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Charter Hall Group right now?

    Before you buy Charter Hall Group shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Charter Hall Group wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Bernd Struben has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Gqg Partners and Sonic Healthcare. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.