• Top brokers name 3 ASX shares to buy next week

    A businessman looking at his digital tablet or strategy planning in hotel conference lobby. He is happy at achieving financial goals.

    It was another busy week for Australia’s top brokers. This has led to the release of a number of broker notes.

    Three broker buy ratings that you might want to know more about are summarised below. Here’s why brokers think these ASX shares are in the buy zone:

    Electro Optic Systems Holdings Ltd (ASX: EOS)

    According to a note out of Bell Potter, its analysts retained their buy rating on this defence company’s shares with a reduced price target of $8.10. This followed the completion of the acquisition of the MARSS Group’s drone interceptor business for $10 million last week. Bell Potter notes that interceptor drones are an emerging hard-kill counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) technology that is expected to grow in demand in the coming years. Although it will be 12 to 24 months until EOS has developed a commercial product, Bell Potter thinks it will be worth the wait. It is estimating that interceptor revenue will come in at $6 million in 2027 then consistently grow in the double digits in the years that follow. In addition, it once again highlights that EOS is positioned as a market leader in C-UAS solutions and is leveraged to increasing budget allocations to C-UAS technologies. The EOS share price ended the week at $4.55.

    Lovisa Holdings Ltd (ASX: LOV)

    A note out of Morgans revealed that its analysts upgraded this fashion jewellery retailer’s shares to a buy rating with a trimmed price target of $40.00. This followed the release of a trading update from Lovisa for the first 20 weeks of FY 2026. Morgans notes that the company’s sales and store growth have slowed over the past three months. However, given that Lovisa is still growing sales at 20%+, which is impressive given the challenging retail trading conditions, it remains very positive. Especially with the recent pullback in its share price, which Morgans thinks has created an opportunity to buy a high quality retailer with a global store rollout strategy. It also highlights that its shares are trading back around their average 10-year forward earnings multiple despite offering ~20% earnings per share compound annual growth over the next 3 years. The Lovisa share price was fetching $32.13 at Friday’s close.

    WiseTech Global Ltd (ASX: WTC)

    Another note out of Bell Potter revealed that its analysts retained their buy rating on this logistics solutions software provider’s shares with a trimmed price target of $100.00. The broker was pleased to see management reiterate its FY 2026 guidance at its annual general meeting this month. It believes this was the first hurdle cleared by management and is now looking forward to its investor day event next week. Bell Potter is expecting an update on its new commercial model and the launch of its Container Transport Optimisation (CTO) offering. The WiseTech Global share price ended the week at $73.02.

    The post Top brokers name 3 ASX shares to buy next week appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Electro Optic Systems Holdings Limited right now?

    Before you buy Electro Optic Systems Holdings Limited shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Electro Optic Systems Holdings Limited wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has positions in Lovisa and WiseTech Global. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Electro Optic Systems, Lovisa, and WiseTech Global. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended WiseTech Global. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Lovisa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • How much of my portfolio should Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS) be?

    Hand with Australian dollar notes symbolising ex-dividend date.

    There are few ways to get as cheap exposure to the ASX share market as the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (ASX: VAS). What’s not to love about a low management fee and plenty of diversification?

    Impressively, the VAS ETF has an annual cost of 0.07% per year, which is very close to zero. Investors can hold this fund and be charged very little, while plenty of fund managers may charge 1% or more of the net assets of the fund. That’s pleasing for net returns.

    Another strength of the investment is the number of holdings it has. The fund tracks the S&P/ASX 300 Index (ASX: XKO), which is an index of 300 of the biggest businesses on the ASX. That certainly helps diversification.

    How much of an investor’s portfolio should the VAS ETF comprise?

    There isn’t a ‘right’ answer of course – it depends on what an investor is looking for.

    For an investor wanting a passive investment that can provide a solid dividend yield, this ASX ETF certainly ticks the box and could play a key role. At the end of October 2025, it had a dividend yield of 3.1% (with franking credits being a bonus on top of that).

    But I think we’d be missing out on other appealing investments if the VAS ETF were to be 100% of our portfolio.

    Some of the most respected and diversified investment options in Australia have a minority weighting in ASX shares.

    For example, the Vanguard Diversified High Growth Index ETF (ASX: VDHG) is invested in a variety of assets, including ASX shares, international shares, emerging market shares, and bonds. The VDHG ETF has a target allocation of 36% to Australian shares.

    Meanwhile, AustralianSuper’s ‘high growth’ investment option has a current allocation of 32.2% to Australian shares.

    So, for Australian-based, diversified juggernauts, they have around a third of their portfolios invested in Australian shares. I think that’s a very reasonable allocation for Australians who are considering the VAS ETF.

    However, we should keep in mind that the ASX accounts for only around 2% of the global share market; we shouldn’t ignore the excellent opportunities overseas.  

    My own portfolio

    Currently, none of my portfolio is invested in the VAS ETF for two key reasons.

    Firstly, the fund is heavily weighted to the largest ASX blue-chip shares – around 45% of the portfolio is invested in the biggest ten positions. That makes the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF seem a bit less appealing on the diversification side of things than at first glance.

    I also believe that there are plenty of investments on the ASX that can grow faster than the VAS ETF, which is why I allocate money to the best opportunities I can see every chance I get.

    The post How much of my portfolio should Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS) be? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF right now?

    Before you buy Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor Tristan Harrison has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • I became a widow in my 20s. It taught me to say ‘yes’ more and live every day like it might be my last.

    Powerful rear view shot of a mature woman looking out of her bedroom window
    The author, not pictured, lost her husband in her 20s.

    • My first husband died unexpectedly when we were both in our 20s.
    • Becoming a widower taught me that romantic love is not the only kind of love out there.
    • Getting married again doesn't mean that I will erase my widowhood.

    As I filled out the intake paperwork at my annual physical, I quickly clicked through all the standard demographic information, halting as I reached the marital status question. I hovered over the dropdown menu before clicking "widowed." I realized that next year I would be clicking "married."

    Though I will consider myself both "married" and "widowed" after my coming wedding, the binaries that govern paperwork will not honor this joint identity, erasing a title that I have come to embrace in the past four years since my husband's death.

    I was a widow in my 20s

    Eli died in an accident when he was 25. We were newlyweds, embarking on a life together and humming with excitement for all the future held. Overnight, that future we had spent years discussing and planning evaporated.

    Man hiking in Bulgaria
    The author's first husband died unexpectedly when he was 25.

    Many other young people I know who have lost partners have grappled with the title "widow" or "widower," words that rarely conjure images of people in their 20s with potentially decades of life ahead. But, as I attended dozens of grief groups, sitting among others who had lost loved ones, I realized that partner loss is unusual in having a title I could claim.

    There is no equivalent for someone mourning a sibling, a child, or a friend, no single word to signal the magnitude of that perpetual pain. Grateful for the terminology available to me, I quickly adopted "widow," weaving it into my identity.

    Widowhood has redefined how I live in countless ways, but three lessons have lit my path forward.

    I say 'yes' more now

    First, I have fought (and continue to fight) to let go of the pervasive culture of delayed gratification. I am haunted by the number of times I said "no" to Eli in favor of pursuing a future moment of joy rather than relishing the present.

    I said no to spontaneous weekend trips because I deemed it more responsible to save for a bigger vacation later. I said no to small pleasures, such as theater tickets and late-night snacks at the bodega, because I was budgeting for future milestones and increasing my contributions to retirement accounts. I said no to quiet moments together at the end of long workdays because I was preoccupied with climbing a career ladder.

    Woman hiking Machu Pichu
    The author and her husband always dreamed of hiking the Inca Trail and visiting Machu Picchu. She hiked it by herself, carrying his passport with her.

    Now, rather than living for a future that might or might not come, I try to say yes — to joy, to love, and sometimes to a touch of chaos, even when it feels impractical or risky. Celebrating the present is often a messy endeavor, but it is undoubtedly a way of living.

    There's more than romantic love

    Second, I was raised in a sea of cultural narratives that centered romantic love as the ultimate love. And it was for me. But when it slipped through my fingers, I realized that what I missed most about our partnership was the love that had been nurtured and developed in our friendship.

    After Eli's death, the love that sustained me came from expanding the boundaries of connection — in the friends who could sense how I was doing by the tone of my voice, in the family that welcomed me for weeks on their futons when I couldn't bear to be home alone, and in random strangers who understood my loss through their own experiences. Love is an unlimited resource that doesn't subscribe to any hierarchy. There is so much to go around.

    I live like any day could be my last

    Third, I now live each day knowing it could be my last, or worse, the last for someone I love. Rebuilding my life after loss has meant learning to find peace in uncertainty and to hold both hope and fear simultaneously. Some days, the unknown feels paralyzing, and other days it sharpens my attention and makes the ordinary sparkle. As I look toward a future of getting remarried, the joy is tinged with my awareness of tragedy. Yet that discomfort makes love, in all forms, feel even more urgent.

    I'll be honest, for me, neither time nor new relationships have healed my loss. The grief hasn't softened into something easier to bear. The sadness has shifted as my life has changed, but I don't miss Eli any less than the day he died. If anything, I miss him more, devastated by all that he has missed these last four years.

    I now walk through my life seeing all its fragile edges, the delicate seams that could instantly unravel and swallow me whole. But walking the tightrope, hand in hand with dozens of others, including my exceptional fiancé, has made the balancing act not only bearable but also beautiful.

    Becoming "married" again is not an act of erasure, as I sometimes fear; instead, it's an homage to my widowhood. I now realize that choosing love, living in the present, and acknowledging the magnitude of uncertainty is the truest way to find Eli's wandering spirit in every corner of my life.

    I am beyond grateful to be getting married again. And I am beyond grateful to be a widow for the rest of my life.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Why today’s cheap ASX shares could double my money during the next bull market

    Excited couple celebrating success while looking at smartphone.

    The market may be close to record levels, but plenty of high-quality ASX shares are still sitting well below their recent highs.

    Short-term uncertainty, from interest rates to weak consumer confidence to sector-specific issues, has created rare pockets of value, even as the broader market edges into bullish territory.

    History shows that buying quality ASX shares at depressed prices can be one of the most effective ways to capitalise on a bull market.

    And with several elite ASX names currently trading at significant discounts, this could be the moment long-term investors look back on as a major turning point.

    Buying undervalued ASX shares

    Purchasing strong ASX shares when their share prices are temporarily depressed can dramatically improve long-term returns. When sentiment sours, prices often fall far more than fundamentals justify, and this disconnect can set the stage for powerful rebounds once confidence returns.

    Many ASX leaders are in that position right now.

    For example, CSL Ltd (ASX: CSL) is trading miles below historical valuation multiples due to temporary margin and regulatory concerns. REA Group Ltd (ASX: REA) has been dragged down by market volatility despite maintaining unrivalled pricing power. Treasury Wine Estates Ltd (ASX: TWE) has tumbled as premium wine demand softens due to consumer spending weakness, even though its brand strength and Asian strategy remain intact.

    Meanwhile, market darlings like WiseTech Global Ltd (ASX: WTC) and Xero Ltd (ASX: XRO) have suffered heavy selloffs after investors rotated out of growth.

    These companies may look out of favour now, but structurally, their long-term outlooks remain extremely compelling.

    Not all cheap shares are equal

    A falling share price doesn’t automatically make a stock a bargain. Some ASX shares trade at low valuations because their earnings outlook is deteriorating or their competitive positions are weakening.

    That’s why focusing on businesses with strong balance sheets, sustainable competitive advantages, and clear long-term growth drivers is crucial.

    CSL controls a global network of plasma centres that would take competitors decades to replicate. REA dominates Australia’s online real estate sector with enormous brand power. WiseTech owns mission-critical software deeply embedded in global supply chains. Xero continues to expand into a vast global market of small businesses. Treasury Wine holds some of the most recognised premium labels in the wine industry.

    These are exactly the kinds of companies that can recover and thrive in a long bull market.

    Doubling an investment faster

    Even matching the long-term market returns of around 10% per year could double an investment in seven years. But buying high-quality businesses while they are undervalued can accelerate that timeline significantly.

    When the bull market fully takes hold, sentiment often swings sharply. Companies that were punished during downturns frequently become some of the strongest performers on the way back up, especially when their fundamentals remain intact.

    Given the scale of recent declines, CSL, REA, Treasury Wine, WiseTech and Xero could be among the ASX names that rebound the hardest once conditions stabilise. As a result, owning them at today’s prices may offer the kind of upside that long-term investors dream of.

    The post Why today’s cheap ASX shares could double my money during the next bull market appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in CSL right now?

    Before you buy CSL shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and CSL wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has positions in CSL, REA Group, Treasury Wine Estates, WiseTech Global, and Xero. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended CSL, Treasury Wine Estates, WiseTech Global, and Xero. The Motley Fool Australia has positions in and has recommended Treasury Wine Estates, WiseTech Global, and Xero. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended CSL. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Billionaire Peter Thiel just sold Nvidia and Tesla for these other two “Magnificent Seven” stocks

    A woman sits at her computer with her chin resting on her hand as she contemplates her next potential investment.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    Key Points

    • Nvidia and Tesla had impressive gains during Q3.
    • Thiel purchased Microsoft and Apple shares during Q3.

    Peter Thiel is a legendary personality in the tech space. He’s a cofounder of PayPal and Palantir, and was one of Facebook’s (now Meta Platforms) first outside investors. That’s an impressive resume, and makes following his investment moves a wise idea.

    During Q3, Thiel’s fund made two surprising moves: It sold a ton of Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) stock and completely exited its Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) position. In its place, he purchased Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT). 

    Those are some interesting moves, but are they the right ones? Let’s find out. 

    Peter Thiel is sitting on a large pile of cash after Q3

    There are many reasons why someone might sell a stock. The most obvious is that they’ve lost faith in a position or feel that a stock has gotten overvalued, and it’s time to move on. Another possibility for someone like Peter Thiel is that he may have found something else more lucrative to invest in. Lastly, Thiel could be making a substantial purchase and just wants the money to fund that.

    However, there’s only one reason why Thiel is purchasing stocks like Microsoft and Apple: He thinks they will go up.

    To determine if he rolled the money from Tesla and Nvidia into Microsoft and Apple, let’s look at the sales and buys and see if it was a direct transfer or if he’s sitting on a big pile of cash. Determining exactly when Thiel sold the stocks isn’t possible, so we need to make a few assumptions.

    During Q3 2025, Tesla’s stock traded at a low of $294, an average of $347, and a high of $445. Nvidia’s stock traded at a low of $153, an average of $174, and a high of $187. That’s a wide range of prices Thiel could have sold at, so we’ll use the average to determine the total dollar figure of the sales.

    Thiel sold nearly 208,000 shares of Tesla during Q3, which works out to about $72 million worth of Tesla stock. He sold 538,000 shares of Nvidia in Q3, which is $94 million worth of Nvidia stock.

    Switching gears to Microsoft and Apple, he owned zero shares of each during Q2, so it’s easy to figure out the average value of these investments. With Thiel owning 49,000 shares of Microsoft and 79,000 shares of Apple, these two positions would have cost him about $25 billion for the Microsoft purchase and $18 billion for the Apple purchase.

    That is nowhere near the amount of money he cleared from the Tesla and Nvidia sales, so it’s fairly obvious that Thiel is sitting on a big pile of cash after his Q3 transactions. He may use that to invest in an exciting artificial intelligence (AI) or even a quantum computing start-up, or he could be getting worried about the valuation of the market.

    Either way, the move from Nvidia and Tesla conveys that he’s de-risking his portfolio. Microsoft and Apple are much safer stocks than Tesla or Nvidia, so this move is clearly a defensive one. However, I don’t think one of the moves was correct.

    The move to sell Nvidia and buy Apple is questionable

    While I have no problem selling Tesla to buy Microsoft, the biggest question for me is: Why would he sell Nvidia to buy Apple? Apple is growing at an incredibly slow pace, with revenue rising at less than 10% for multiple years. Contrast that with Nvidia, which has delivered explosive growth for several years and isn’t slated to slow anytime soon due to massive data center buildouts.

    NVDA Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts

    Despite this massive growth mismatch, Apple and Nvidia trade for nearly the same valuation when next year’s forward earnings are considered.

    NVDA PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts

    To me, Nvidia looks like the much better stock to buy and hold, but Peter Thiel also has a longer and far more legendary track record than I do. This mismatch of ideas is what makes the market, and investors need to do their own research and thinking to determine if a move like selling Nvidia and buying Apple is right for them. 

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    The post Billionaire Peter Thiel just sold Nvidia and Tesla for these other two “Magnificent Seven” stocks appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now?

    Before you buy Apple shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Apple wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p { margin-bottom: 0 !important; }

    This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

    More reading

    Keithen Drury has positions in Meta Platforms, Nvidia, PayPal, and Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Palantir Technologies, PayPal, and Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has recommended the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft, long January 2027 $42.50 calls on PayPal, short December 2025 $75 calls on PayPal, and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • Buffett’s retirement imminent: Should you sell Berkshire Hathaway stock?

    Warren Buffett

    Like many investors around the world, I own Berkshire Hathaway Inc (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) shares in my investing portfolio. And, like I suspect all of those shareholders, I am not looking forward to the imminent retirement of Berkshire’s CEO, and patron saint, Warren Buffett.

    Earlier this year, Buffett surprised investors (to the extent that a 95-year-old can) with the announcement of his retirement at the end of 2025. Buffett is set to step down as CEO of Berkshire on 1 January 2026, to be replaced by long-time lieutenant Greg Abel.

    It’s a momentous changing of the guard at Berkshire, which cannot be understated. Buffett has been CEO at the sprawling conglomerate since the early 1960s. Over that time, he rebuilt Berkshire Hathaway, with the help of the late Charlie Munger, from a failing textiles company to the US$1.1 trillion company it is today. That success was enabled by a compounded rate of return that is estimated to be about 20% per annum over those many decades – an unrivalled achievement in financial history.

    Almost every person who has bought Berkshire Hathaway stock in living memory has probably done so to try and hitch their financial wagons to that of Buffett. That includes this writer. After all, the track record has been there for all to see.

    But this spectacular era of American capitalism is sadly drawing towards its inevitable conclusion. Sure, Buffett has promised to remain as chairman of Berkshire. But no one can deny that this is the dawning of a new era for Berkshire.

    So, as we approach the final month of Buffett’s decades-long stint as Berkshire’s CEO, is it a good time to sell out of the company that he built?

    With Buffett retiring, is it time to sell Berkshire stock?

    Well, I don’t think so. I personally don’t plan to offload my shares anytime soon, anyway.

    There are two reasons why I will continue to hold Berkshire in my portfolio.

    The first is its nature. Although Buffett is stepping down from the top of Berkshire, his investments will remain. Warren Buffett has built his success on picking the very best businesses for Berkshire’s portfolio, and holding them indefinitely. They famously include Coca-Cola Co (NYSE: KO), American Express Co (NYSE: AXP), Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL), and more recently, Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL). But those are just some of the public ones. In addition, Berkshire owns a bevy of private companies outright. These include Duracell, Dairy Queen, See’s Candies, BNSF Railway, and Geico.

    Buffett picked these companies for a reason, and on the assumption that they will continue to pour ever-rising profits into Berkshire’s coffers. This is Buffett’s legacy that I think will continue to deliver long after he steps off the stage.

    Secondly, it’s my view that Buffett has set the company up well for success. The succession plan has been in the works for years and has the legendary investor’s full approval (and influence). Although I’d wager every shareholder would be keen to see Buffett remain at the helm until Judgement Day, this is the next-best option in my view.

    Here’s some of what Buffett has said on the succession himself:

    I would leave the capital allocation to Greg and he understands businesses extremely well. If you understand businesses, you’ll understand common stocks… I think the prospects of Berkshire will be better under Greg’s management than mine.

    Abel has also stated that:

    It’s really the investment philosophy and how Warren and the team have allocated capital for the past 60 years. Really, it will not change. And it’s the approach we’ll take as we go forward.

    Although I am sad to see Buffett step away from the company he built from almost nothing, I am confident that its future is rosy. As such, I won’t be selling my shares anytime soon.

    The post Buffett’s retirement imminent: Should you sell Berkshire Hathaway stock? appeared first on The Motley Fool Australia.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Berkshire Hathaway Inc. right now?

    Before you buy Berkshire Hathaway Inc. shares, consider this:

    Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. wasn’t one of them.

    The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*

    And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…

    * Returns as of 18 November 2025

    .custom-cta-button p {
    margin-bottom: 0 !important;
    }

    More reading

    American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Motley Fool contributor Sebastian Bowen has positions in Alphabet, American Express, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Coca-Cola. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Alphabet, Apple, and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended Alphabet, Apple, and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.

  • I live in France. This little-known seaside town is as charming as other famous French Riviera spots and less pretentious.

    Author Rachel Hosie in Sanary-sur-Mer
    I've fallen in love with the charm and beauty of Sanary-sur-Mer, a small coastal town in France.

    • Sanary-sur-Mer, a small port town, is one of my favorite places on the French Riviera to visit.
    • I love watching yachts bob in the harbor, and enjoying the beauty of the pastel buildings and shops.
    • It feels authentically French but doesn't seem particularly well known or too crowded.

    Though millions of people visit the French Riviera each year, many travelers set their sights on famous spots like Nice, Cannes, Antibes, and Saint-Tropez.

    But since moving to the Côte d'Azur a few months ago, I've discovered a few lesser-known but, in my opinion, much better spots to visit in the area.

    One of my absolute favorites is a small coastal town called Sanary-sur-Mer. I've been a few times now and have been utterly charmed by it each time.

    Sanary-sur-Mer is a lesser-known gem along France's south coast.
    Boats in harbor at Sanary-sur-Mer
    Some of the smaller boats could be rented.

    Situated between Marseille and Toulon, Sanary-sur-Mer is a port town along the Mediterranean Sea with a population under 20,000.

    Many locals I've spoken to where I live half an hour away have agreed that Sanary is considered the nicest place in the area.

    Though it's popular with the French, it's seemingly not on many international tourists' radars. It can get a bit overshadowed by popular nearby spots like Cannes and Saint-Tropez.

    When my husband and I have visited Sanary-sur-Mer, I didn't hear any language other than French spoken around me, which is rare to find in the south of France during the summer (and a far cry from a September Sunday in Antibes, where I could barely move among British, Irish, and American tourists).

    It's surrounded by beautiful blue waters.
    Boats in waterfront area in Sanary-sur-Mer

    The town is based around a wide, clean-looking harbor full of bobbing yachts and other boats.

    There may not be as many superyachts as you'd find further up the coast, but there are still plenty of huge ones to admire and imagine floating around in.

    Some of the smaller boats are even available for visitors to rent.

    Whenever we visit, the area feels quiet and peaceful.
    View of lighthouse at end of dock in Sanary-sur-Mer

    On one trip, we walked along the port and up to a charming lighthouse and were surprised by how quiet it was despite being a summer Saturday afternoon.

    There were only a few other people and some children splashing in the nearby fountains. It was refreshing compared to the more touristy spots that are always heaving with crowds.

    There are also lovely pedestrian areas.
    Esplanade in Sanary-sur-Mer
    The esplanade in Sanary-sur-Mer felt so clean.

    Lined with cafés and restaurants, the waterfront is so clean I thought I was on a film set when we first visited.

    My husband and I especially enjoy getting ice cream in one of the cafés on the wide esplanade — a wonderful place to sit and watch the world go by.

    I'm also pleased to say that we've found many public toilets in the area that are actually free to use and in decent condition.

    We love taking in the beautiful buildings and boutiques.
    People walking along streets in Sanary-sur-Mer
    The pedestrianized streets were lovely to walk along.

    Narrow cobbled streets full of chic boutiques snake up from the harbor, dotted with tropical palm trees and pastel-colored buildings with blue and green shutters that offer traditional Provençal charm.

    Sanary-sur-Mer is also packed full of little stores selling chic clothes and interesting homewares — I've treated myself to a plant pot in Maman & fiston and some linen trousers in Serendipity.

    There aren't big designer shops like you'd find in Cannes or Nice, but Sanary feels all the more authentic for it. The town is less fussy and certainly not pretentious at all.

    I've already made a mental note to come back here before Christmastime.

    The area is rich with history, too.
    Retro-style light pink and blue cinema in Sanary-sur-Mer

    The "regular" buildings in Sanary-sur-Mer, like most of Provence, are beautiful, but one building that stood out to me was the cinema, Cinéma A.b.c.

    Dating back decades, the building's retro facade features striking and beautiful pastel colors. Although it has been updated to better function as a theater, its exterior has changed very little.

    The town also has walking tours for visitors who want to learn more about the local history. For example, this coastal town was a refuge for German and Austrian authors and artists who fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s.

    Little beaches offer perfect swimming opportunities.
    View of stairs leading into sea at Sanary-sur-Mer
    I loved the stairs that led into the sea.

    You don't have to go far out of Sanary to find large beaches, such as Plage de Portissol, a big white-sand one that curves around the coast.

    I especially enjoy the areas with staircases right by the harbor. I don't love getting sandy, so being able to go straight down some stairs from the rocks and into the clear blue water is my idea of heaven.

    All in all, I already can't wait for my next trip to Sanary-sur-Mer to experience more of it. I'd definitely recommend visiting if you want to authentically experience the south coast of France.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • I’ve traveled to more than 70 countries. Each one helped prepare me for motherhood in a unique way.

    The author with her daughter by Lake Powell, AZ, in 2017.
    The author and her daughter on the shore of Lake Powell in 2017.

    • I spent many years traveling the globe and have been to more than 70 countries.
    • Experiences with wildlife and diverse cultures inspired have inspired my approach to parenting.
    • Motherhood, like adventure travel, requires courage, adaptability, and a sense of wonder.

    I've given baths to elephants in Nepal, played tug-o-war over pancakes with a monkey in Guatemala, and spent sleepless nights on roach-infested buses through Brazil.

    I've been humbled, amazed, and tested on my travels, at times wishing I could just go home and other times feeling more alive and overjoyed than ever before — kind of like a day in the life of a mom. After all, if you are a mother, perhaps you, too, have bathed an unwieldy, toddler-sized elephant, tussled with tiny monkeys over pancakes, and had your share of brutal sleepless nights.

    In my mind, moms and other dedicated caregivers are true adventure travelers, even if they barely leave their neighborhood. I should know. Over the last 27 years, I've traveled through more than 70 countries across five continents, and motherhood is the wildest, most wondrous adventure I've ever known.

    The author with her husband while traveling in Nepal in 2003.
    The author and her husband while traveling in Nepal in 2003.

    I gained inspiration from gorillas

    Before I had my daughter, I worked seasonal jobs in ski towns and national parks to save up for months-long backpacking trips all over the world. This itinerant life led me to a career as a writer and editor for national travel magazines.

    Wild mountain gorilla mama and twins in Rwanda in 2012. Mom's name is Kabatwa and twins are Isangano (meeting place) and Isango (appointment).
    The author said that working at TK gorilla mama and twins in Rwanda in 2012. Mom's name is Kabatwa and twins are Isangano (meeting place) and Isango (appointment).

    Then, the once-in-a-lifetime chance to see a wild mountain gorilla mama and her twins in Rwanda's Volcanoes National Park inspired me to want a different, deeply primal adventure — something that I couldn't get to on a plane, bus, or train. Instead, I longed for the meaningful, internal exploration of life as a parent.

    Good thing my husband, Mike, was also up for the trip.

    There are overlaps between adventure travel and life with a baby

    The first days after my daughter came home from the hospital, the experience of early motherhood felt familiar, but only because I'd been that bleary-eyed, overwhelmed, and at the same time absolutely enthralled before — in India. Riding an old-fashioned yellow taxi through Kolkata on our first day there had exposed me within minutes to more desperate poverty than I'd ever seen, but also more beauty, humanity, and the mind-blowing knowledge that this other, intense way of living went on every day, all the time, despite my ignorance of it. So goes life with a newborn.

    The author at Chichén Itzá in Mexico in 1999.
    The author at Chichén Itzá in Mexico in 1999.

    As I navigated those first months of motherhood, I felt the same sense of adventure, fear, wonder, and excitement I had while traveling alone to the Mayan ruins in Mexico, whitewater rafting amid crocodiles in Zimbabwe, and climbing the cable ladder up Half Dome in Yosemite. It took the same kind of courage and tenacity to get through it as well.

    But the fierce love I felt for my baby journeyed beyond any place in my heart I'd ever known.

    My new travel partner helps me see life with fresh eyes

    By the time my daughter was a toddler, I'd come to see her as my pint-sized travel partner, transforming everyday events into fresh adventures.

    Hunts for ladybugs and snails were our safaris. Chats with the diverse crew of nannies and parents at a local park became intercultural exchanges. Trips to the zoo were rainforest hikes, filled with macaws and monkeys. Wherever we went, she helped me explore the world anew through her eyes.

    Along the way, when things fell apart or I felt like a failure, I remembered how many times I felt the same way on my global journeys.

    There is no way to get an "A" grade in motherhood, just as there is no way to ace traveling through a complex, unfamiliar place. You will get lost and make mistakes. You will also depend on the generosity of strangers and the friendship of fellow travelers or other parents traveling through their own wild, amazing, unmapped terrain. You can only do your best, guided by your own internal compass.

    Now that my daughter is 12, it's clear to me she already possesses a traveler's mindset of courage, curiosity, flexibility, and kindness. Wherever life takes her, she'll be ready for the adventure.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • I was laid off shortly after having a baby. Now I have no choice but to be a stay-at-home mom.

    Woman in homeoffice
    The author was laid off shortly after returing to work from parental leave.

    • I took 12 weeks of parental leave, and months after returning to work, my position was eliminated.
    • It's been almost a year, and I'm still looking for my next full-time role.
    • I can't afford childcare until I have a steady job, so I work from home as a freelancer.

    It's no secret that when you become a parent, a massive shift in identity occurs.

    My whole world had changed, and no matter how much I had prepared for it, I could never truly understand until it happened. Suddenly, you can't take a shower without announcing it.

    When that identity shift for me came with a layoff, I had to reorder my entire life twice within a span of a few months.

    I was laid off months after coming back to work

    I gave birth, and 12 weeks later, I came back to work. A couple of months after my return, I was told my position would no longer be funded at the end of the year. I had three months' notice to find work during the holiday season and an election, but wasn't able to secure a new gig.

    I celebrated the new year knowing that I had no idea what would come next. Still, I remained hopeful. It's been almost a year, and I'm still searching for full-time employment.

    For many people, jobs are just a means to pay the rent, which is a valid and healthy perspective on employment. But my parents are both people whose careers held a lot of personal meaning for them and made up part of their sense of identity, so I don't think it's a coincidence that I sought out work that gave me a sense of purpose as well.

    I always saw myself as a working parent

    When I envisioned myself as a parent, even before I had decided it was right for me, I saw myself as a working parent. There was never a part of that dream that allowed for a version of me that didn't have the financial stability and identity that my work gave me. My mom always emphasized, as well as modeled, financial stability and independence for me, and so did other women in my life who parented their kids as single moms.

    Work allowed me a clear way to see my contribution to the home. I made a higher income than my spouse. Finances were still tight, as they are for so many families, but I knew that even on a day when I didn't do as much laundry as I planned, I still earned a paycheck to help us pay the rent and afford diapers.

    Woman posing for photo
    The author freelances while taking care of her child.

    Now I have to recalibrate my identity outside and as part of my relationship to my child. I can't afford childcare again until I have full-time employment, and although I earn freelance payments, they're not enough to cover the vast majority of our needs.

    There's value in my unpaid work, too

    I choose to understand and value the unpaid work I do as a parent who is home with my toddler most days, even if society largely doesn't, both financially and socially.

    I can't define myself by my smaller paychecks. When I show my child how to say certain words or encourage imaginative play, I'm doing something important for my family. My household labor is essentially 24/7 and allows my spouse to do their paid labor.

    My days are packed with work as a stay-at-home parent, which I didn't fully understand about stay-at-home parents' days before I experienced them. The mental load of fulfilling and adapting to your child's ever-changing needs, while managing housework, freelancing, and searching for full-time employment, is enormous.

    My spouse is a very involved and loving dad, but the practical reality is that I'm the person our kid sees most, and certain responsibilities have fallen to me as a result. We care about resisting strict gender roles in our family, but circumstances have made it so that we have to work extra hard not to fall too deeply into them.

    I have flexibility, but sometimes feel isolated

    Then there is the fact of social isolation. I have to work even harder to find social interactions with adults outside my home. Occasionally, I reach out to parent groups, attend a library story time, or prioritize asking my mother-in-law to watch my toddler so I can get some time away to see friends or try to make new ones. It isn't always enough, but it helps me keep a sense of self, and it gives my child other people, and sometimes kids, to develop strong bonds with, which is good for them.

    Of course, my life isn't all strain and struggle. I have more flexibility to take my toddler to the dentist and play fun games with them between naps. All of those things are magical experiences, and I know that whatever comes next, I'll look back on this time and cherish the memories I shared with them while they were so young. However, I still want my child to know me as someone who loves them dearly but is also independent, with hobbies and a career, so that they understand that such a life is possible for them.

    As a family, we will continue to find ways to see beauty and community in life, despite hardship, and value each other's labor, whether paid or unpaid, and be empathetic toward one another. I also value the work of stay-at-home parents more than ever, and I wish I had understood the load they carry much sooner in life. These lessons will be valuable for me even when financial circumstances — hopefully — change.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • 11 Netflix shows that went on for too long — sorry

    Gaten Matarazzo, Finn Wolfhard, Caleb McLaughlin, and Noah Schnapp as Dustin, Mike, Lucas, and Will in season five of "Stranger Things."
    Dustin, Mike, Lucas, and Will in season five of "Stranger Things."

    • Netflix is known for canceling shows before their time, but some shows overstay their welcome.
    • "House of Cards" started out critically acclaimed, but it quickly fell from grace.
    • It took nearly 10 years to produce five seasons of "Stranger Things."

    Last year alone, Netflix canceled over 20 of its original titles, many of them before their time.

    Still, it doesn't mean Netflix isn't capable of holding on to some of its originals for way too long.

    Did "Fuller House" need to last for more than one season? No. Neither did "13 Reasons Why" nor "Insatiable."

    Keep scrolling to see which 11 Netflix Originals lasted longer than they should have.

    While Claire Underwood deserved her chance at the top, "House of Cards" should have ended much earlier.
    house of cards claire

    "House of Cards," based on a British TV show of the same name, rightfully earned its critical and fan acclaim for the first two or three seasons.

    However, between seasons five and six, Kevin Spacey, who played the diabolical Frank Underwood, was written out of "House of Cards" following multiple allegations of sexual misconduct from various people, including staffers on the set of the show.

    In 2022, he was ordered to pay the show's production company $31 million for his alleged behavior — the company argued his exit had cost them a large sum in lost profits. This was reduced to $1 million in 2024.

    In a UK trial in 2023, Spacey was found not guilty of 12 sexual assault charges against him in relation to accusations brought by four other men.

    But even before the accusations and before Underwood was rightfully killed off, the show was wearing thin. There is only so much backstabbing, murder, and political machinations one can take.

    Though Claire (and Robin Wright) deserved to have her moment in the Oval Office, the season five finale in 2017 was more than enough to show she was officially taking the power back into her own hands.

    "Orange Is the New Black" was, and is, an important show in terms of representation, but after the death of Poussey, it lost its heart.
    Orange is the new black

    "OITNB" began as one of Netflix's first forays into prestige TV back in 2013, and it had a buzzy premise: It was based on a real memoir of Piper Kerman, who spent a year in a women's prison.

    "OITNB" was the first scripted show to really delve into the prison industrial complex inside a female prison, and made strides towards more trans representation on TV and more same-sex relationships on TV. It also helped educate viewers about what life was like inside a prison.

    However, when Black people are disproportionately killed by the police in real life, it seemed almost cruel to viewers to show the murder of Poussey, a Black woman, by a white prison guard during a riot in season four. It also unfortunately played into the "Bury Your Gays" trope, since Poussey identified as a lesbian.

    The first few seasons of "OITNB" should be required viewing, but seven seasons and 91 episodes were just too much.

    And, while some got a "happy" ending, many other characters along the way suffered more injustices and tragedy, like Tiffany, Maritza, and Red.

    With original comedies getting canceled after one or two seasons, there's no reason "Fuller House" should have lasted five seasons.
    fuller house 508

    We'll admit, seeing the entire extended Tanner clan (give or take an Olsen twin) was really fun — for a season in 2016.

    The awkwardness of Aunt Becky's mysterious disappearance aside, it's hard to justify keeping "Fuller House" on the air for five seasons when groundbreaking new content like "One Day at a Time," "I Am Not Okay with This," and "The Get Down" only got a season or two.

    The story of "13 Reasons Why," which was an adaptation of a novel, was over after the first season in 2017.
    Hannah Bakery 13 Reasons Why Netflix season one Katherine Langford

    You might also call this "Big Little Lies" syndrome — that is, when what should have been a limited series based on a novel needlessly drags on the story.

    The Jay Asher novel was the complete story of high school student Clay dealing with the trauma of his high school crush, Hannah Baker, dying by suicide.

    However, the show, in addition to being graphic and problematic in its depiction of suicide and other sensitive subjects, dragged on the story for another three seasons, putting characters through an unbelievable amount of pain and suffering. Hannah didn't stick around past season two, even though the show was ostensibly about her and Clay.

    "The Ranch" lasted for 80 mediocre episodes from 2016 to 2020.
    the ranch netflix

    There was nothing actually wrong with "The Ranch" — at least not after Danny Masterson was written off — but it was just … boring.

    The sitcom about a family living on a cattle ranch in Colorado seemed like it would have been more at home on CBS than Netflix, a platform that prides itself on pushing the limits of television.

    As already stated, it's hard to explain why this show gets four seasons and 80 episodes, when other, more original shows get half that.

    Although "Making a Murderer" was a smash success, the second season was wholly unnecessary.
    making a murderer

    The first season of this true crime series (though at the time, we didn't know there'd be a season two) was a phenomenon when it was released in 2015.

    It was shot over 10 years, and focused on the case against Steven Avery, who first served 18 years in prison due to a wrongful conviction, but was then tried and convicted of a different crime (this time a murder) a few years after he was released. He's currently serving a life sentence.

    If the first season took 10 years to make, and there had been no significant updates on Avery's case, how could a second season three years later be worth 10-plus hours investing in?

    Spoiler: It wasn't, as explained by Vanity Fair.

    While "Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life" only got one season, many fans of the original wished it hadn't happened at all.
    gilmore girls year in the life
    "Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life" is Netflix's most binge-raced original show.

    "Gilmore Girls" lasted for seven seasons on network TV, though only six were under the stewardship of co-creators Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino. The last season is generally panned by fans, and the Palladinos maintain they've never seen it.

    After the show's end in 2007, Sherman-Palladino said she's always known how the series would end, down to the last four words.

    So, when Netflix announced they'd be reviving the show in 2016, fans were elated.

    But when the four episodes dropped, fans were left disappointed and bewildered due to Rory's apparent turn into an entitled brat who constantly forgot about her boyfriend and believed she deserved every journalism job out there.

    They also weren't happy about the lack of development and communication between Luke and Lorelai almost a decade into their relationship — and don't even get us started on those infamous last four words.

    Now, there are plenty of fans who wish "Gilmore Girls" had stayed in 2007.

    "Insatiable" shouldn't have made it to air, let alone to two seasons.
    insatiable

    When the trailer for "Insatiable" dropped in 2018, it became abundantly clear that Netflix had miscalculated.

    While the show thought it had achieved a black comedy "Heather"-esque tone, it was more mean than biting, more cringe-worthy than funny, and generally fat-phobic. It was surprising when it got renewed, but even just two seasons was more than enough from this crew.

    The lackluster second season proved "Sex/Life" should've been one and done.
    sex/life netflix

    Was "Sex/Life" a good show? No, but when it premiered in 2021, it got people talking about what it's like to balance motherhood with your own personal dreams and a healthy sex life.

    It's unfortunate, then, that it was promoted as what Business Insider's Tamar Barbash called "a show about a horny, unsatisfied wife."

    It wasn't surprising that it got renewed for a second season, but when season two dropped almost two years later to almost zero fanfare, it became clear that this could've been an interesting limited series that had an open-ended finale. 

    Its April 2023 cancellation was almost a given.

    "Emily in Paris" has been on so long that she's not even in Paris anymore.
    emily in paris
    "Emily in Paris" is available to stream on Netflix.

    "Emily in Paris" dropped on Netflix in October 2020. We were all still stuck inside due to the pandemic, and it was fun to have something to all hate-watch together.

    But here we are in 2025, and the cast is gearing up for the release of season five of this preposterous show about Emily (Lily Collins), a marketing savant, apparently, moving to Paris and systematically destroying the lives of those around her.

    Now, Paris isn't enough for her, because she moved to Rome at the end of season four. Please, hasn't Italy been through enough?

    We can only hope that season five will see Emily end her reign of terror and return to Chicago.

    We're never going to be mad about more "Stranger Things," but we are mad it's taken a decade to wrap up.
    eleven stranger things
    "Stranger Things."

    This is more of a calendar problem than a content problem. When this show started, the kids were real pre-teens. But just four seasons — and a whopping nine years — later, these kids are adults. As in, "Millie Bobby Brown is a wife and mother" adults.

    What we mean is: Why did it take nine years to tell a five-season story?

    Read the original article on Business Insider