• Ahead of the premiere of her Eras Tour docuseries, Taylor Swift appeared on "The Late Show."
• Swift said she values career longevity and admires artists who can "keep a good thing going."
• Swift said she's aware that some people would prefer her to "go away," but she doesn't want to.

Taylor Swift has been known to accept feedback from fans and critics, but there's one request she refuses to heed: "Go away."

Ahead of the premiere of her Disney+ docuseries, "The End of an Era," Swift appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" to discuss her recent achievements and milestones.

When Colbert asked Swift who she could turn to for advice, she listed rock star Stevie Nicks and pop producer Max Martin as confidants.

"What I look up to the most in people is career longevity — career longevity, friendship longevity, longevity in their relationships, you know? How do you keep a good thing going?" Swift said.

"I think there are certain corners of our society that really love that and look up to longevity," she continued. "There are also corners that are like, 'Give someone else a turn! Can't you just go away so we can talk about how good you were?' And I'm like, 'I don't want to.'"

Swift has faced accusations of overexposure throughout her career, but particularly in the last few years. Her cross-continental, 149-show Eras Tour, which concluded in December 2024, garnered extensive media coverage and consistently went viral on social media. The New Yorker said Swift had achieved "complete domination over popular culture."

When Swift released "The Tortured Poets Department" halfway through the tour's two-year run, fans and critics alike called the album overlong and overindulgent. When it topped the Billboard 200 for 17 weeks, fans of other artists complained that Swift was sabotaging her fellow pop stars, including Billie Eilish and Charli XCX, by preventing their albums from reaching No. 1 on the chart.

Swift's newest album, "The Life of a Showgirl," was met with similar reproach. In his review for The Atlantic, Spencer Kornhaber wrote, "'Showgirl' is the sound of an overworked and overexposed entertainer reaching the mountaintop to find something worse than disappointment: burnout." Swift's prolificacy and sales tactics have been described as shameless and excessive.

Still, Swift has refused to shrink away from the spotlight. The first two episodes of "The End of an Era" will be available to stream on Friday, along with an extended version of her Eras Tour concert movie, featuring a new segment with songs from "The Tortured Poets Department." The remaining four episodes of the docuseries will be released in pairs over the next two weeks.

During her interview with Colbert, Swift also joked that she prefers to think of herself as "passionate" and "hyperactive," rather than a workaholic.

"When I take time off, it's always just like, I can't slow down the fact that I need to get up and do a lot of things today. But I can change what those things are," she said. "I can figure out how to chill out, but I'm never gonna be a chill person."

• Even if you don't love Champagne, you might enjoy an alternative (more affordable) sparkling wine.
• We spoke to a sommelier who said many people actually prefer prosecco's citrusy, fresh flavor.
• The next time you want a warm, full-bodied red sparkling wine, reach for a bottle of Lambrusco.

It's one of the most celebratory times of the year, bringing an onslaught of toast-filled festivities.

Though Champagne is often the de facto alcohol filling flutes, the popular sparkling French wine isn't ideal for everyone's palate — or budget, particularly when it comes to serving a big group.

Madison Aspinwall, a California-based sommelier, told Business Insider that there are plenty of high-quality, affordable alternatives to real Champagne, which can cost well over $60 per bottle.

In fact, some decent bottles of sparkling wine can be found for less than half that price.

Here are a few of Aspinwall's recommendations you can feel confident about grabbing for your next celebration.

Prosecco can be an affordable alternative to Champagne

Made from Glera grapes in Prosecco, Italy, this sparkling white wine can be a less expensive (but still delicious) swap for Champagne.

"Prosecco is rarely over $30 a bottle," Aspinwall said. "It's made in a totally different style from Champagne, but I find it equally delicious."

She said that many people who try different sparkling wines for the first time actually tend to prefer prosecco over Champagne, finding the former tastes fresher, cleaner, and more citrusy.

For a classic, easy-to-find option, Aspinwall recommends La Marca, an extra-dry prosecco that runs between $15 and $20 for a 750-milliliter bottle.

Brut prosecco is the perfect option if you prefer acidic flavors

Brut prosecco is a solid starter sparkling wine.

"I think a brut prosecco is the best for someone who is just getting into sparkling wines and doesn't like the taste of Champagne," Aspinwall said.

She added that brut is on the lower end when it comes to sweetness (specifically, it has between 0 and 12 grams of residual sugar per liter), giving it a fresher, more acidic taste than other varieties.

Aspinwall told BI that one of her go-to choices is Pizzolato, a brut prosecco. A 750-milliliter bottle typically costs between $20 and $25.

"It tastes amazing, and it's in the most fun bottle with funky packaging," she added.

Fruit-forward Lambrusco is a fitting choice for the holiday season

On the hunt for a sparkling wine that feels special? Turn to Lambrusco, a sparkling Italian red that comes in a range of sweetness levels.

"I think it's perfect for the holiday season because, as a red wine, it has a bit more warmth to it than a prosecco or Champagne," Aspinwall said.

She added that this type of wine tends to have more body, tannins, and fruit-forward flavors, such as cherry, raspberry, and strawberry.

You can also get it in white and rosé variations.

"It can be super complex, unique, and fun to experiment with if you're just getting into sparkling wine," she said, adding that one of her top recommendations is Broletto Lambrusco.

A 750-milliliter bottle typically retails for between $16 and $20, depending on the retailer.

If you love sweet wine, pour yourself some demi-sec prosecco

For those who prefer a very sweet wine, Aspinwall recommended turning to a demi-sec variety.

This type of prosecco has between 32 and 50 grams of residual sugars per liter, meaning it's generally sweeter than a brut prosecco.

"It's perfect for people who are looking for something that's really approachable," she said.

Consider trying a demi-sec variety from La Marca — a 750-milliliter bottle can cost between $15 and $20.

Moscato d'Asti is another sweet sparkling wine that pairs well with dessert

One of Aspinwall's favorite sparkling wines is Moscato d'Asti.

The sparkling white Italian wine, which she described as tropical, fruity, and juicy, pairs well with certain sweet treats.

"I absolutely love Moscato d'Asti with soft-serve ice cream because it's a really cool dessert combination," she told BI. "It has that fruity, delicious tart acidity, but it's also very sweet, so it's super easy for people who are just getting into sparkling wine to enjoy."

Consider picking up Vietti Moscato d'Asti, which retails between $15 and $23 for a 750-milliliter bottle.

• Yelp ranked the most beloved chains in the country according to customer reviews and search volume.
• Popular chains, such as Dave's Hot Chicken, In-N-Out, and Texas Roadhouse, topped the list.
• Lesser-known chains, such as First Watch and bb.q chicken, also ranked highly.

A new ranking of the most popular restaurant chains in the US reveals that both iconic spots and lesser-known favorites are winning over customers.

Yelp ranked the most beloved restaurant chains in the country based on a variety of factors, including average rating, customer reviews, repeat page views, and search volume.

The list, which was released on Tuesday, featured well-known national chains like In-N-Out, Olive Garden, and Chili's, as well as some hot up-and-comers like Dave's Hot Chicken and bb.q Chicken.

Here are the 20 most beloved restaurant chains in America, according to Yelp.

20. Shake Shack

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 48%

Number of locations (2024): 373

19. Jet's Pizza

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 69%

Number of locations (2024): 450

18. Sweetgreen

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%

Number of locations (2024): 246

17. Habit Burger & Grill

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 49%

Number of locations (2024): 377

16. Outback Steakhouse

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%

Number of locations (2024): 675

15. Chili's

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%

Number of locations (2024): 1,209

14. P.F. Chang's

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 50%

Number of locations (2024): 221

13. The Cheesecake Factory

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 48%

Number of locations (2024): 215

12. Denny's

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 64%

Number of locations (2024): 1,334

11. Blaze Pizza

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 63%

Number of locations (2024): 265

10. LongHorn Steakhouse

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 57%

Number of locations (2024): 594

9. Carrabba's Italian Grill

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 59%

Number of locations (2024): 210

8. Olive Garden

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 58%

Number of locations (2024): 923

7. Mountain Mike's Pizza

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 63%

Number of locations (2024): 299

6. Texas Roadhouse

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 57%

Number of locations (2024): 664

5. BJ's Restaurants

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 60%

Number of locations (2024): 218

4. In-N-Out Burger

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 66%

Number of locations (2024): 415

3. First Watch

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 73%

Number of locations (2024): 572

2. bb.q Chicken

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 71%

Number of locations (2024): 208

1. Dave's Hot Chicken

Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 71%

Number of locations (2024): 245

• Keeper, an AI dating startup, believes its matchmaking tech can pair people with their soulmates.
• The dating company raised $4 million in pre-seed funding last year.
• Keeper shared the most recent version of its pitch deck with Business Insider.

Keeper, an AI matchmaking startup, thinks it can help deliver your "soulmate" to you. And if it can't, it'll let you know.

"We're saying we actually know who could be your soulmate or not," Jake Kozloski, Keeper's CEO, told Business Insider. "We're not going to waste your time and pretend that a hundred thousand of these people could be. We'll tell you no."

Founded in 2022, the dating platform uses layers of algorithms and AI models to match people who sign up for its service. The startup is now disclosing for the first time, exclusively to Business Insider, that it raised a $4 million pre-seed investment in October 2024, led by Lightbank and Lakehouse Ventures. Goodwater Capital and Champion Hill Ventures participated in the round, among others.

Investors "see AI as an inflection point in the dating app landscape" and an opportunity to "disrupt the incumbents," Kozloski said.

Keeper isn't the only startup attempting to shake up the online dating market. Other AI matchmaking apps, such as Sitch and Amata, have raised millions to build next-generation dating apps. Dating app incumbents like Tinder and Bumble are also making plays with AI-powered experiences.

Kozloski said the company's values were another piece of its pitch that attracted some investors.

"They feel like there's a marriage crisis adjacent to the whole Elon Musk fertility crisis stuff that he talks about," said Kozloski, who described Keeper as being "friendly with the pronatalist movement."

Wanting kids, though, isn't a requirement to use Keeper, Kozloski added.

Since launching, Keeper has had more than 1.5 million sign-ups, and about 300,000 of those have made accounts, Kozloski said. Among that pool, there have been a "small number" of matches. Keeper didn't share exactly how many matches it's made, but according to its pitch deck, 10% of dates from its beta version resulted in marriage. With its funding, Keeper has been building out its matchmaking technology over the past year.

Keeper is limited to heterosexual couples right now, and doesn't offer explicit options for different gender identities.

"We basically have to build a new algorithm for homosexual relationships, which we're happy to do and we will do eventually, but for now, we want to get to product market fit with our core product first," Kozloski said. "Frankly, heterosexual relationships, especially for finding life partnership, seems to be a bigger market, a stronger market for us right now."

Making a profile on Keeper is a sit-down process. The initial form to make an account asks for the standard details of many dating apps (like your age or height), as well as academic test scores (including SATs), your career ambitions, salary, and net worth. It even encourages taking an external personality test. After you fill out the initial onboarding questionnaire, there are 13 more steps, ranging from uploading photos to sharing your philosophy on love.

"We don't let our users create their own profiles," Kozloski said. Keeper uses the information it gathers to curate a profile for you.

Kozloski said Keeper uses a non-AI algorithm first to streamline potential matches, focusing on data points like age range initially.

"We use LLMs once we have your top hundred that our other algorithms have identified," he said. "The LLMs are trained on our matchmaking insights that we've learned so far, and so they can narrow down those last hundred and do the final pass of, 'OK, who actually is worth offering among these.'"

Some of the AI matchmaking comes into play when analyzing "general attractiveness" and users' specific attributes, like baldness or hair color, Kozloski said. The startup has also partnered with a team of researchers at Stanford, Kozloski said, who help train the LLMs (Keeper provides anonymized data to the research team).

However, Keeper isn't fully automated, and for the time being, includes human matchmakers in the process. If there's a match, Keeper connects the two people over text message.

The startup has a complicated payment structure with a hefty price tag — but only for men.

Keeper has male users sign a "marriage bounty" that typically costs $50,000 (if the user gets married) and has them pay $5,000 for any dates from the service (the date fees go toward the total bounty cost, Kozloski said).

Read the most recent version of Keeper's pitch deck.

Note: Keeper has shared an updated version of its pitch deck, which it is now sharing with investors, that includes new details since its raise in October 2024. Some details have been redacted.

Keeper claims its AI-powered matchmaking is the 'most accurate'

It touts that 1 in 10 dates lead to engagements

"1 in 10 Keeper first dates have led to an engagement," the slide says.

It highlights the size of the matchmaking market

Keeper describes the matchmaking market as "old school yet shockingly massive," per the slide.

It then says that matchmaking could be enhanced by technology

"With the opportunity to 10x," the slide says. "When technology provides perfect matches, matchmaking will be the best way to meet your partner."

Then, it introduces Keeper's product

"The AI matchmaker that will introduce you to your soulmate on the first match," the slides says. It also includes product imagery.

It showcases how its beta version performed

"Our v1 worked extremely well," the slide says.

It says that 10% of dates lead to marriage.

The deck shows press and social media content about the startup

Keeper showcases how many people have signed up

It says it has had 1.5 million sign-ups. "This makes us the largest pool of any traditional matchmaker," the slides says. It lists competitors like Tawkify, Keeper, Ditto, Sitch, and Known Dating.

Keeper explains its network effect

"Everyone signs up if we deliver soulmates on the first match," the slide says.

"The first mover quickly becomes a monopoly," it says.

Then, it introduces its founders

Here's what the slide says:

Jake Kozloski: Founder, CEO

• Repeat founder with previous exit
• 8 years startup product management and growth roles
• 10 years of dating apps as a user; now happily married to wife Aliia

Toban Wiebe: Co-Founder, Head of AI

• PhD from Penn in economic/statistical modeling of Marriage Markets
• 8 years industry experience in ML/DS, most recently at Instacart and Uber
• Met his wife Dee 10 years ago in grad school via OkCupid

It also lists the researchers the startup is working with

Here are the names of the researchers:

• Michal Kosinski: PhD, Cambridge
• Geoffrey Miller: PhD, Stanford
• Naman Gupta: PhD Student, Stanford
• Ignacio Rios Uribe: PhD, Stanford

Keeper explains why it's raising capital

"We're raising to scale profitable human-in-the-loop matchmaking to $2M in annual revenue," the slide says.

The deck includes its founder's email

As well as an appendix with additional data

The deck includes a slide about marriage rates decreasing

"80% of young singles want to get married," the slide says. "40% actually will." It cites data from Match Group and data scientist Allen Downey.

It then maps out the incumbent dating app landscape

Dating apps are "bad at creating relationships, worth billions," the slide says. "Imagine the value of the first product that's great at it."

It lists matchmaking competitors, too

"Matchmakers can't scale," the slide says.

Keeper shows how its LLM and vision models work

"LLMs and vision models enable scalable matchmaking for the first time in history," the slides says.

It goes into more depth on its tech

"We've built the most accurate process in the world," the slide says.

Here are the steps the slide lays out:

• In-depth preference collection
• Accurately measure all traits
• AI evaluates every pair
• Offer only very strong matches
• Feedback refines future matches

It then explains its pricing model

"We earn more, faster, by aligning with users' incentives," the slide says.

Its current model, which has humans involved in matchmaking, is free for women and costs men $5,000 per date. For male users, the marriage bounty costs $50,000, and the slide says that Keeper has contracted $14 million "so far."

Keeper outlines that in a future model, where the tech is fully automated, dates will cost $250, and the marriage bounty contract will cost $5,000.

• Kate Winslet thinks the term 'nepo baby' is silly, and she tells her kids to ignore it.
• Winslet's directorial debut, "Goodbye June," which is out in December, was written by her son.
• She came to his defense, claiming it would have been made "with or without her."

Kate Winslet thinks the term nepo baby is "silly."

The Oscar winner and mom-of-three told the BBC on Wednesday that her kids, who have followed her into showbiz "aren't getting a leg up."

"There are lots and lots of people in the world whose children go into a similar family business, whether it's being a judge or a lawyer or a doctor," she said. "Part of it actually is teaching them to ignore the white noise of silly terms like nepo baby, which you can't really do anything about."

Winslet, 50, was speaking in an interview promoting her upcoming film "Goodbye June," which marks her editorial debut and will be released in select US and UK theaters December 12, and on Netflix December 24. Her eldest son, Joe Anders, 21, wrote the screenplay.

She said that Anders had expressed concern that people may think the film, which he wrote on a screenwriting course, was picked up only because of his famous parents. But Winslet defended his talent."The film would've been made with or without me. The script is so, so good," she said.

Anders' father is the acclaimed film director Sam Mendes, 60, who was married to Winslet for seven years until their split in 2010. Anders starred alongside his mom in the 2023 movie "Lee," and also appeared in the Oscar-nominated war film "1917," which was directed by his father.

Mia Threapleton, Winslet's 25-year-old daughter, is also a rising star. She had a starring role in Wes Anderson's latest film, "The Phoenician Scheme," which was released in May. It comes after she played Winslet's daughter in the 2022 BAFTA award-winning TV drama "I Am Ruth."

The youngest of Winslet's children, 12-year-old Bear Blaze Winslet, has yet to grace the silver screen, but has already expressed an interest. During a 2021 appearance on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Winslet shared jokingly that at age 7, Bear Blaze told her he wanted "to be an actress."

• Amid the return-to-office push in corporate America, young workers are romanticizing their commutes.
• Commuters who participated in the TikTok trend said it helps boost their morale.
• Licensed therapist Brianna Paruolo said romanticizing can be a positive way to reframe a routine.

When Danielle Pogue hits the pavement each morning for the cross-borough trek to her office in Brooklyn, she relies on two essentials to propel her forward: a perfectly curated Spotify playlist and the mental power to romanticize each step.

"I have perfected the New York City strut," Pogue told me.

Pogue, 27, graduated from college in 2020 and entered the labor force at the height of the pandemic, when working remotely was more necessary than trendy. After moving to New York the following year, she jumped at the chance to work in the office at both postgrad jobs she's held in digital marketing. Part of the reason was the commute.

"It definitely is something that I look forward to now," Pogue said of her 25-minute journey to the office. "I think of the alternative, which would be living really close to my office, maybe having it just be around the corner — and for some reason, that doesn't feel as appealing to me anymore. A lot of that has to do with the routine that I've made for myself."

That routine is a kind of portable daydream: As she navigates her way through foot traffic and train platforms, Pogue might imagine herself as a high-powered executive or a trendy young professional in a movie montage, having her main character moment.

In October, Pogue posted a video of her daily strut on TikTok set to KT Tunstall's "Suddenly I See," the song that memorably plays during the opening credits of 2006 movie "The Devil Wears Prada." Pogue captioned the post, "hot tip: romanticize your commute to work by listening to this song & acting like you're in a '90s romcom." It's amassed over 70,000 views and counting.

"Clearly, it's something that people resonate with, and also want to replicate in their own morning routine," Pogue said of why she thinks her post gained traction. After all, romanticizing an existing routine is easy, accessible, and free of charge — perfect for inspiring the online masses.

RTO with an aesthetic twist

Pogue isn't the only woman with a go-getter protagonist like Anne Hathaway's Andy Sachs on her digital mood board. Videos similar to Pogue's are littered across my For You Page on TikTok, with captions like "being employed means getting to act mysterious and romanticize my morning commute," or "romanticizing the commute I dreamed of when I was younger." They're often paired with nostalgic tunes or cinematic pop songs, including "What a Wonderful World" by Louis Armstrong, "Young and Beautiful" by Lana Del Rey, and, of course, "Everything Is Romantic" by Charli XCX.

While the call to "romanticize your life" on TikTok can sometimes lean aspirational, as much of the internet does, devotees reject the implication that romanticizing your life requires buying new things. Rather, the goal is to appreciate what's already in reach.

Brianna Paruolo, a licensed mental health therapist and founder of On Par Therapy, said that while showing off for strangers online can be a "slippery slope" if it leads to a craving for more validation, romanticizing can be a positive way to reframe mundanity.

"When we romanticize, we take notice in the small moments of beauty," Paruolo said. "When you film your morning coffee routine or walk to the subway, you are using your digital lens to train your mental lens to scan for positive experiences rather than functioning on autopilot."

For Pogue, that holds true. "It kind of just sets my day up for success," she said of why she romanticizes her commute, online and otherwise. "If you're dreading your morning commute, you're dreading getting to the office, and then everything that happens after that is more likely to feel a little bit negative."

Although TikTok has been awash in videos about romanticizing everyday life since the early pandemic, videos about romanticizing your commute are part of a newer subgenre whose rise coincides with the recent return-to-office push in corporate America.

Data from Placer.ai, a leading foot-traffic analytics firm, found that office visits nationwide were up about 10% in 2024 compared with 2023. Other stats paint an even starker picture: A McKinsey survey of over 8,000 people across 15 industries found the number of employees working mostly in person, as opposed to mostly remote or hybrid, doubled in 2024 compared to the previous year.

Early indicators suggest these figures continued to grow in 2025. As Business Insider previously reported, July set a post-pandemic record high for office attendance, up 10.7% from July 2024. In September, the so-called "hybrid creep" continued to ramp up, with more and more companies enacting strict RTO policies, including Intel, NBCUniversal, and Starbucks. Earlier this month, Instagram's chief, Adam Mosseri, announced that most US staff would be expected to return to the office five days a week starting in February.

'You might as well find the positive'

Andrea Yamhure Sepúlveda, 25, started her corporate consulting job in January 2023. About two years later, her company began asking employees to spend 60% of their workweek in the office; lately, managers have been sending quarterly reports to recap their employees' in-person stats.

New York-based Sepúlveda, who's also a content creator in her spare time, has taken this sea change in stride. She enjoys filming the morning minutiae — her first cup of tea, the sunrise glow over the Manhattan skyline — and sharing the clips on TikTok like a public gratitude journal.

"It's like, you're going to have to do this anyway, so you might as well find the positive," she said. "If I dread the fact that I have to wake up at 5 a.m. and travel, then it's gonna suck. And then I'm going to have to do it next Monday, and the next Monday."

Maria Lysy, a 25-year-old marketing professional in the Washington, DC, metro area, agreed that casting her commute in a positive light helps boost her morale for the workday ahead.

Lysy said her commuting routine lately has involved listening to pop singer Audrey Hobert, especially her songs "Phoebe" and "Sex and the City," and reminding herself that her younger self would be proud of where she is today. She described this process as "finding the extraordinary in the ordinary."

"It sounds so simple, but I've always dreamed of going to my 'big girl job,'" Lysy said. "I feel like it's so easy to take a negative approach on a lot of things, but it's just as easy just romanticize the littlest things you do. It totally changes your perspective."

• A Manhattan federal jury found Carl Rinsch guilty on seven counts, including fraud.
• Rinsh went to trial over $11 million Netflix gave him for a futuristic sci-fi show.
• Rinsch, who took the stand in his own defense, looked straight ahead as the verdict was read.

A Manhattan federal jury on Thursday found Carl Rinsch guilty on charges that he scammed Netflix out of $11 million in a lavish spending spree.

After less than five hours of deliberation, the jury said it found Rinsh guilty on all seven counts, including fraud, money laundering, and illegal money transmission. He faces up to 90 years in prison, but is expected to be sentenced to far less.

Rinsch, wearing a purple-plaid tie and matching pocket square, looked straight at the judge as the jury foreman read the verdict.

The case centered on the millions of dollars Netflix paid Rinsch to film "White Horse," a sci-fi epic about a world where clone-like beings, after a schism with humankind, create their own society walled off from the rest of the world. Rinsch testified in his own defense earlier this week.

Rinsch — a Ridley Scott protege who previously directed the Keanu Reeves-starring "47 Ronin" — shot footage for "White Horse" on two continents. But by the fall of 2019, he exceeded the $44 million Netflix budgeted for the project and asked for more money.

Through the end of 2019 and early 2020, Rinsch negotiated with Netflix to figure out how to move "White Horse" forward and realize his ambitions. He envisioned a franchise like "Star Wars" and "Game of Thrones," complete with an elaborate fantasy world, that could become part of Netflix's catalogue.

In March of 2020, the streaming service agreed to give Rinsch's production company another $11 million.

Then, everything went wrong.

On the witness stand in Manhattan federal court, he said he believed the bulk of the $11 million was meant to reimburse him for keeping the production of "White Horse" afloat the previous fall, when it had gone over-budget. According to him, Netflix expected him to conduct only "soft pre-production" on a potential second season.

Netflix balked. Former executives testified in the trial that the $11 million was meant to go toward finishing a first season that Rinsch never delivered. According to prosecutors, the entire negotiation for the $11 million was a sham, and Rinsch meant to defraud the company all along.

At closing arguments on Wednesday, Assistant US Attorney David Markewitz presented the jury with a Buzzfeed-style list of "10 Ways You Know Carl Rinsch is Guilty." In a slideshow, he walked them through what he said were Rinsch's contradictory claims — on the witness stand, in emails and text messages, and in prior statements in a civil legal dispute with Netflix — that he said demonstrated Rinsch wasn't telling the truth.

He argued it was absurd to think Rinsch's lavish purchases — like a $439,000 handmade Hastens mattress — could not have possibly been meant for the production of "White Horse." And Rinch's 2021 purchases of Rolls-Royces were insured in his own name, rather than insured by Netflix.

"In a TV show, a mattress is going to be covered by sheets and a blanket," Markewitz told the jury. "No one watching 'White Horse' from home is going to have any idea what is under those linens."

Daniel McGuinness, an attorney representing Rinsch, told the jury that Rinsch never had the "intent" required to find him guilty.

He showed them emails and texts leading up to the March 2020 agreement that he said demonstrated Rinsch's negotiating posture had always been that Netflix owed him about $11 million for reimbursement. Rinsch never said he would spend all the money on additional production for "White Horse," McGuinness said.

In reality, according to McGuinness, the situation was a "contract dispute" based on misunderstandings between Rinsch and Netflix.

"They were talking past each other, and the government has turned it into a nefarious fraud conspiracy," McGuinness said.

This is a breaking story. Please check back for updates.