Ahead of the premiere of her Disney+ docuseries, "The End of an Era," Swift appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" to discuss her recent achievements and milestones.
When Colbert asked Swift who she could turn to for advice, she listed rock star Stevie Nicks and pop producer Max Martin as confidants.
"What I look up to the most in people is career longevity — career longevity, friendship longevity, longevity in their relationships, you know? How do you keep a good thing going?" Swift said.
"I think there are certain corners of our society that really love that and look up to longevity," she continued. "There are also corners that are like, 'Give someone else a turn! Can't you just go away so we can talk about how good you were?' And I'm like, 'I don't want to.'"
Swift has faced accusations of overexposure throughout her career, but particularly in the last few years. Her cross-continental, 149-show Eras Tour, which concluded in December 2024, garnered extensive media coverage and consistently went viral on social media. The New Yorker said Swift had achieved "complete domination over popular culture."
Taylor Swift performs during the Eras Tour in France.
Swift's newest album, "The Life of a Showgirl," was met with similar reproach. In his review for The Atlantic, Spencer Kornhaber wrote, "'Showgirl' is the sound of an overworked and overexposed entertainer reaching the mountaintop to find something worse than disappointment: burnout." Swift's prolificacy and sales tactics have been described as shameless and excessive.
Still, Swift has refused to shrink away from the spotlight. The first two episodes of "The End of an Era" will be available to stream on Friday, along with an extended version of her Eras Tour concert movie, featuring a new segment with songs from "The Tortured Poets Department." The remaining four episodes of the docuseries will be released in pairs over the next two weeks.
During her interview with Colbert, Swift also joked that she prefers to think of herself as "passionate" and "hyperactive," rather than a workaholic.
"When I take time off, it's always just like, I can't slow down the fact that I need to get up and do a lot of things today. But I can change what those things are," she said. "I can figure out how to chill out, but I'm never gonna be a chill person."
Even if you don't love Champagne, you might enjoy an alternative (more affordable) sparkling wine.
We spoke to a sommelier who said many people actually prefer prosecco's citrusy, fresh flavor.
The next time you want a warm, full-bodied red sparkling wine, reach for a bottle of Lambrusco.
It's one of the most celebratory times of the year, bringing an onslaught of toast-filled festivities.
Though Champagne is often the de facto alcohol filling flutes, the popular sparkling French wine isn't ideal for everyone's palate — or budget, particularly when it comes to serving a big group.
Madison Aspinwall, a California-based sommelier, told Business Insider that there are plenty of high-quality, affordable alternatives to real Champagne, which can cost well over $60 per bottle.
In fact, some decent bottles of sparkling wine can be found for less than half that price.
Here are a few of Aspinwall's recommendations you can feel confident about grabbing for your next celebration.
Prosecco can be an affordable alternative to Champagne
La Marca Prosecco.
Ellen O'Brien
Made from Glera grapes in Prosecco, Italy, this sparkling white wine can be a less expensive (but still delicious) swap for Champagne.
"Prosecco is rarely over $30 a bottle," Aspinwall said. "It's made in a totally different style from Champagne, but I find it equally delicious."
She said that many people who try different sparkling wines for the first time actually tend to prefer prosecco over Champagne, finding the former tastes fresher, cleaner, and more citrusy.
For a classic, easy-to-find option, Aspinwall recommends La Marca, an extra-dry prosecco that runs between $15 and $20 for a 750-milliliter bottle.
Brut prosecco is the perfect option if you prefer acidic flavors
Brut prosecco is a solid starter sparkling wine.
"I think a brut prosecco is the best for someone who is just getting into sparkling wines and doesn't like the taste of Champagne," Aspinwall said.
She added that brut is on the lower end when it comes to sweetness (specifically, it has between 0 and 12 grams of residual sugar per liter), giving it a fresher, more acidic taste than other varieties.
Aspinwall told BI that one of her go-to choices is Pizzolato, a brut prosecco. A 750-milliliter bottle typically costs between $20 and $25.
"It tastes amazing, and it's in the most fun bottle with funky packaging," she added.
Fruit-forward Lambrusco is a fitting choice for the holiday season
Bottle of Lambrusco
Ellen O'Brien
On the hunt for a sparkling wine that feels special? Turn to Lambrusco, a sparkling Italian red that comes in a range of sweetness levels.
"I think it's perfect for the holiday season because, as a red wine, it has a bit more warmth to it than a prosecco or Champagne," Aspinwall said.
She added that this type of wine tends to have more body, tannins, and fruit-forward flavors, such as cherry, raspberry, and strawberry.
"It can be super complex, unique, and fun to experiment with if you're just getting into sparkling wine," she said, adding that one of her top recommendations is Broletto Lambrusco.
A 750-milliliter bottle typically retails for between $16 and $20, depending on the retailer.
If you love sweet wine, pour yourself some demi-sec prosecco
For those who prefer a very sweet wine, Aspinwall recommended turning to a demi-sec variety.
This type of prosecco has between 32 and 50 grams of residual sugars per liter, meaning it's generally sweeter than a brut prosecco.
"It's perfect for people who are looking for something that's really approachable," she said.
Consider trying a demi-sec variety from La Marca — a 750-milliliter bottle can cost between $15 and $20.
Moscato d'Asti is another sweet sparkling wine that pairs well with dessert
One of Aspinwall's favorite sparkling wines is Moscato d'Asti.
The sparkling white Italian wine, which she described as tropical, fruity, and juicy, pairs well with certain sweet treats.
"I absolutely love Moscato d'Asti with soft-serve ice cream because it's a really cool dessert combination," she told BI. "It has that fruity, delicious tart acidity, but it's also very sweet, so it's super easy for people who are just getting into sparkling wine to enjoy."
Consider picking up Vietti Moscato d'Asti, which retails between $15 and $23 for a 750-milliliter bottle.
Yelp ranked the most beloved chains in the country according to customer reviews and search volume.
Popular chains, such as Dave's Hot Chicken, In-N-Out, and Texas Roadhouse, topped the list.
Lesser-known chains, such as First Watch and bb.q chicken, also ranked highly.
A new ranking of the most popular restaurant chains in the US reveals that both iconic spots and lesser-known favorites are winning over customers.
Yelp ranked the most beloved restaurant chains in the country based on a variety of factors, including average rating, customer reviews, repeat page views, and search volume.
The list, which was released on Tuesday, featured well-known national chains like In-N-Out, Olive Garden, and Chili's, as well as some hot up-and-comers like Dave's Hot Chicken and bb.q Chicken.
Here are the 20 most beloved restaurant chains in America, according to Yelp.
20. Shake Shack
Shake Shack Founder Danny Brown thinks there is no obligation to tip for takeout orders.
Richard Levine/Getty Images
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 48%
Number of locations (2024): 373
19. Jet's Pizza
Jet's Pizza.
Jet's Pizza/Yelp
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 69%
Number of locations (2024): 450
18. Sweetgreen
There was too much arugula on the Fish Taco bowl at Sweetgreen.
Nancy Luna/Business Insider
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%
Number of locations (2024): 246
17. Habit Burger & Grill
Irene Jiang/Business Insider
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 49%
Number of locations (2024): 377
16. Outback Steakhouse
Irene Jiang/Business Insider
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%
Number of locations (2024): 675
15. Chili's
Chili's Big Smasher burger.
Erin McDowell/Business Insider
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 51%
Number of locations (2024): 1,209
14. P.F. Chang's
John Greim/LightRocket/Getty Images
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 50%
Number of locations (2024): 221
13. The Cheesecake Factory
My boyfriend and I visited The Cheesecake Factory in Queens, New York.
SOPA Images/Getty Images
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 48%
Number of locations (2024): 215
12. Denny's
Denny's.
Shutterstock
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 64%
Number of locations (2024): 1,334
11. Blaze Pizza
Blaze Pizza uses an assembly line similar to Chipotle or Subway.
Blaze Pizza
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 63%
Number of locations (2024): 265
10. LongHorn Steakhouse
Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 57%
Number of locations (2024): 594
9. Carrabba's Italian Grill
Ken Wolter/Shutterstock
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 59%
Number of locations (2024): 210
8. Olive Garden
The manager of an Olive Garden in Kansas gave staff a blunt ultimatum.
Getty Images
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 58%
Number of locations (2024): 923
7. Mountain Mike's Pizza
Mountain Mike's Pizza.
Mountain Mike's Pizza/Yelp
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 63%
Number of locations (2024): 299
6. Texas Roadhouse
Paul Weaver/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 57%
Number of locations (2024): 664
5. BJ's Restaurants
BJ's Restaurants.
Michael Vi/Shutterstock
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 60%
Number of locations (2024): 218
4. In-N-Out Burger
American regional chain of fast food restaurants In-N-Out Burger sign seen at the San Francisco site.
Photo by Alex Tai/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 66%
Number of locations (2024): 415
3. First Watch
First Watch serves one brunch menu, all day for 7.5 hours.
First Watch
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 73%
Number of locations (2024): 572
2. bb.q Chicken
The Image Party/Shutterstock
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 71%
Number of locations (2024): 208
1. Dave's Hot Chicken
Dave's Hot Chicken debuted a fried cauliflower sandwich on January 8.
Nancy Luna/Business Insider
Percent of reviews that were four or five stars: 71%
This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.
Key Points
Autonomous driving technology and robotics could transform Tesla into a much different company.
Its electric vehicle sales are slowing, and its margins are shrinking.
Investors have priced lofty expectations into the stock.
Tesla(NASDAQ: TSLA) might be one of the more difficult stocks to own comfortably due to the amount of volatility there has been in its share price, but it has been a huge winner for some investors over the years. Its successful phases have made it into one of the world’s most valuable companies, with a market cap of close to $1.5 trillion.
The electric vehicle (EV) maker’s stock is up by around 105% in the past five years, and it’s within reach of the all-time high it touched last December. Should investors buy Tesla while it’s below $500?Â
Imagine a completely different future
The bullish view of Tesla is that it is transforming into a software, robotics, and artificial intelligence enterprise. This is precisely how CEO Elon Musk wants investors to think about the business.Â
Tesla has long-term optionality with its robotaxi operations, which are currently carrying paying passengers in Austin and the San Francisco Bay Area in a controlled capacity, with more cities to come. The objective here is to get that business going in a lot more markets — not only in the U.S., but internationally as well. The premise assumes that as demand and usage pick up, costs as a share of revenues would come down. The best outcome would be for Tesla to generate a colossal amount of recurring, high-margin revenue from driverless cars.
Humanoid robots might be an even bigger opportunity — Musk estimates that business could help Tesla reach a market cap of $25 trillion. It appears that there could be a market for these devices among commercial clients that would use them in factory settings. There might also be demand from consumer households.
In short, a decade from now, Tesla might look totally different from how the company looks today. However, when looking strictly at its current situation, it’s not easy to always be optimistic. Tesla’s revenue growth has slowed dramatically due to a combination of intensifying competition, higher interest rates, and a public backlash among some consumers over Musk’s forays into politics. Profits have been under pressure, too: Its Q3 2025 operating margin of 5.8% was down sharply from the 10.8% margin it produced in the prior-year period.
Is Tesla stock overvalued or undervalued?
It can be difficult for investors to effectively gauge the valuations of a company like Tesla. Based on traditional metrics, like its price-to-sales ratio of 17 or the price-to-earnings ratio of 304, the stock is ridiculously overvalued. One would only expect investors to buy shares of a company trading at such lofty premiums if it were putting up remarkable financial performances, delivering monster growth and significant profits. Yet Tesla hasn’t been operating at a high level recently.
Viewed in this light, the shares are extremely expensive. But of course, Tesla is a story stock. The market’s actions today are defined by narratives, which can clearly have huge impacts on share prices. Tesla and Musk get so much attention for their innovativeness and forward-thinking that it makes sense that many investors are believers.
If Tesla’s self-driving vehicles and robots prove successful in a reasonable time frame, then the stock’s current valuation might very well end up looking like a bargain in retrospect. Earnings could grow substantially, lifting the stock up.
Whether it will achieve that favorable outcome, though, is far from clear. Tesla will need to execute in a near-flawless fashion, and not just from the technological and manufacturing perspectives. It will need cooperation from regulators and legislators. And there’s no certainty that its future products will see the type of customer adoption that the bulls predict.
Moreover, a critic could argue that Tesla’s current valuation essentially prices in a great deal of the optimistic forecast for success. Only investors who are able and willing to take on a lot of risk in their portfolios should even consider buying this EV stock now. While there is a chance that the investment could be a profitable one over the longer term, it’s impossible to accurately assess. Risk-averse investors would be better off avoiding Tesla at these levels.
This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.
This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.
Should you invest $1,000 in Tesla right now?
Before you buy Tesla shares, consider this:
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Tesla wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service heâs run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended Tesla. The Motley Fool Australia has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
The share market has a long history of bouncing back from tough periods. Over more than a century, ASX stocks have delivered returns of roughly 10% per annum on average, even while enduring recessions, inflation spikes, rate shocks, and global turmoil.
But every now and then, certain companies emerge from a difficult year in far better shape than they entered it. And after a challenging 2025 for many high-quality businesses, a select group of ASX stocks is now being tipped to outperform not only the local market, but potentially global indices as well.
If you’re looking for standout ASX opportunities for 2026, these two names could be the ones to watch.
CSL has had a bruising year, with investor sentiment hurt by Seqirus restructuring noise, tariff speculation, and questions around the margin recovery of the key CSL Behring business. Yet beneath the short-term issues sits one of the most successful Australian companies of the past three decades.
This is a business with enormous competitive advantages, entrenched global market share, and a long runway for growth across plasma therapies, vaccines, and emerging treatments. Analysts widely expect margins to normalise over the next couple of years and earnings growth to accelerate.
Importantly, CSL is now trading at one of its cheapest valuations in years. For a company that is historically priced at a premium, today’s discount offers long-term investors a window that doesn’t appear often.
UBS currently has a buy rating and $275.00 price target on its shares. This implies potential upside of over 50% for investors from current levels.
Another Australian stock that could beat global markets in 2026 is TechnologyOne. It is a software powerhouse that has grown earnings for over 15 consecutive years. And despite delivering another robust year of recurring revenue growth in FY 2025, its share price has pulled back materially, creating an unusually attractive entry point.
With its software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform entrenched in government, education, and large enterprise customers, this ASX stock enjoys some of the stickiest revenues on the Australian share market. In addition, its margins are among the highest in the tech sector, and its shift to subscription income continues to strengthen its long-term earnings base. Throw in its UK expansion and management’s belief that it can double in size every five years, and you have a stock that could be a fantastic buy and hold pick.
The team at UBS is also feeling very bullish on this one. It recently put a buy rating and $38.70 price target on its shares. This suggests that upside of almost 40% is possible between now and this time next year.
Motley Fool investing expert Scott Phillips just revealed what he believes are the 5 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and CSL wasn’t one of them.
The online investing service he’s run for over a decade, Motley Fool Share Advisor, has provided thousands of paying members with stock picks that have doubled, tripled or even more.*
And right now, Scott thinks there are 5 stocks that may be better buys…
Motley Fool contributor James Mickleboro has positions in CSL and Technology One. The Motley Fool Australia’s parent company Motley Fool Holdings Inc. has positions in and has recommended CSL and Technology One. The Motley Fool Australia has recommended CSL and Technology One. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
Jake Kozloski is the CEO of dating startup Keeper.
Joe Jenkins
Keeper, an AI dating startup, believes its matchmaking tech can pair people with their soulmates.
The dating company raised $4 million in pre-seed funding last year.
Keeper shared the most recent version of its pitch deck with Business Insider.
Keeper, an AI matchmaking startup, thinks it can help deliver your "soulmate" to you. And if it can't, it'll let you know.
"We're saying we actually know who could be your soulmate or not," Jake Kozloski, Keeper's CEO, told Business Insider. "We're not going to waste your time and pretend that a hundred thousand of these people could be. We'll tell you no."
Founded in 2022, the dating platform uses layers of algorithms and AI models to match people who sign up for its service. The startup is now disclosing for the first time, exclusively to Business Insider, that it raised a $4 million pre-seed investment in October 2024, led by Lightbank and Lakehouse Ventures. Goodwater Capital and Champion Hill Ventures participated in the round, among others.
Investors "see AI as an inflection point in the dating app landscape" and an opportunity to "disrupt the incumbents," Kozloski said.
Keeper isn't the only startup attempting to shake up the online dating market. Other AI matchmaking apps, such as Sitch and Amata, have raised millions to build next-generation dating apps. Dating app incumbents like Tinder and Bumble are also making plays with AI-powered experiences.
Kozloski said the company's values were another piece of its pitch that attracted some investors.
"They feel like there's a marriage crisis adjacent to the whole Elon Musk fertility crisis stuff that he talks about," said Kozloski, who described Keeper as being "friendly with the pronatalist movement."
Wanting kids, though, isn't a requirement to use Keeper, Kozloski added.
Since launching, Keeper has had more than 1.5 million sign-ups, and about 300,000 of those have made accounts, Kozloski said. Among that pool, there have been a "small number" of matches. Keeper didn't share exactly how many matches it's made, but according to its pitch deck, 10% of dates from its beta version resulted in marriage. With its funding, Keeper has been building out its matchmaking technology over the past year.
Keeper is limited to heterosexual couples right now, and doesn't offer explicit options for different gender identities.
"We basically have to build a new algorithm for homosexual relationships, which we're happy to do and we will do eventually, but for now, we want to get to product market fit with our core product first," Kozloski said. "Frankly, heterosexual relationships, especially for finding life partnership, seems to be a bigger market, a stronger market for us right now."
Making a profile on Keeper is a sit-down process. The initial form to make an account asks for the standard details of many dating apps (like your age or height), as well as academic test scores (including SATs), your career ambitions, salary, and net worth. It even encourages taking an external personality test. After you fill out the initial onboarding questionnaire, there are 13 more steps, ranging from uploading photos to sharing your philosophy on love.
"We don't let our users create their own profiles," Kozloski said. Keeper uses the information it gathers to curate a profile for you.
Kozloski said Keeper uses a non-AI algorithm first to streamline potential matches, focusing on data points like age range initially.
"We use LLMs once we have your top hundred that our other algorithms have identified," he said. "The LLMs are trained on our matchmaking insights that we've learned so far, and so they can narrow down those last hundred and do the final pass of, 'OK, who actually is worth offering among these.'"
Some of the AI matchmaking comes into play when analyzing "general attractiveness" and users' specific attributes, like baldness or hair color, Kozloski said. The startup has also partnered with a team of researchers at Stanford, Kozloski said, who help train the LLMs (Keeper provides anonymized data to the research team).
However, Keeper isn't fully automated, and for the time being, includes human matchmakers in the process. If there's a match, Keeper connects the two people over text message.
The startup has a complicated payment structure with a hefty price tag — but only for men.
Keeper has male users sign a "marriage bounty" that typically costs $50,000 (if the user gets married) and has them pay $5,000 for any dates from the service (the date fees go toward the total bounty cost, Kozloski said).
Read the most recent version of Keeper's pitch deck.
Note: Keeper has shared an updated version of its pitch deck, which it is now sharing with investors, that includes new details since its raise in October 2024. Some details have been redacted.
Keeper claims its AI-powered matchmaking is the 'most accurate'
Keeper
It touts that 1 in 10 dates lead to engagements
Keeper
"1 in 10 Keeper first dates have led to an engagement," the slide says.
It highlights the size of the matchmaking market
Keeper
Keeper describes the matchmaking market as "old school yet shockingly massive," per the slide.
It then says that matchmaking could be enhanced by technology
Keeper
"With the opportunity to 10x," the slide says. "When technology provides perfect matches, matchmaking will be the best way to meet your partner."
Then, it introduces Keeper's product
Keeper
"The AI matchmaker that will introduce you to your soulmate on the first match," the slides says. It also includes product imagery.
It showcases how its beta version performed
Keeper
"Our v1 worked extremely well," the slide says.
It says that 10% of dates lead to marriage.
The deck shows press and social media content about the startup
Keeper
Keeper showcases how many people have signed up
Keeper
It says it has had 1.5 million sign-ups. "This makes us the largest pool of any traditional matchmaker," the slides says. It lists competitors like Tawkify, Keeper, Ditto, Sitch, and Known Dating.
Keeper explains its network effect
Keeper
"Everyone signs up if we deliver soulmates on the first match," the slide says.
"The first mover quickly becomes a monopoly," it says.
Then, it introduces its founders
Keeper
Here's what the slide says:
Jake Kozloski: Founder, CEO
Repeat founder with previous exit
8 years startup product management and growth roles
10 years of dating apps as a user; now happily married to wife Aliia
Toban Wiebe: Co-Founder, Head of AI
PhD from Penn in economic/statistical modeling of Marriage Markets
8 years industry experience in ML/DS, most recently at Instacart and Uber
Met his wife Dee 10 years ago in grad school via OkCupid
It also lists the researchers the startup is working with
Keeper
Here are the names of the researchers:
Michal Kosinski: PhD, Cambridge
Geoffrey Miller: PhD, Stanford
Naman Gupta: PhD Student, Stanford
Ignacio Rios Uribe: PhD, Stanford
Keeper explains why it's raising capital
Keeper
"We're raising to scale profitable human-in-the-loop matchmaking to $2M in annual revenue," the slide says.
The deck includes its founder's email
Keeper
As well as an appendix with additional data
Keeper
The deck includes a slide about marriage rates decreasing
Keeper
"80% of young singles want to get married," the slide says. "40% actually will." It cites data from Match Group and data scientist Allen Downey.
It then maps out the incumbent dating app landscape
Keeper
Dating apps are "bad at creating relationships, worth billions," the slide says. "Imagine the value of the first product that's great at it."
It lists matchmaking competitors, too
Keeper
"Matchmakers can't scale," the slide says.
Keeper shows how its LLM and vision models work
Keeper
"LLMs and vision models enable scalable matchmaking for the first time in history," the slides says.
It goes into more depth on its tech
Keeper
"We've built the most accurate process in the world," the slide says.
Here are the steps the slide lays out:
In-depth preference collection
Accurately measure all traits
AI evaluates every pair
Offer only very strong matches
Feedback refines future matches
It then explains its pricing model
Keeper
"We earn more, faster, by aligning with users' incentives," the slide says.
Its current model, which has humans involved in matchmaking, is free for women and costs men $5,000 per date. For male users, the marriage bounty costs $50,000, and the slide says that Keeper has contracted $14 million "so far."
Keeper outlines that in a future model, where the tech is fully automated, dates will cost $250, and the marriage bounty contract will cost $5,000.
Kate Winslet thinks the term 'nepo baby' is silly, and she tells her kids to ignore it.
Winslet's directorial debut, "Goodbye June," which is out in December, was written by her son.
She came to his defense, claiming it would have been made "with or without her."
Kate Winslet thinks the term nepo baby is "silly."
The Oscar winner and mom-of-three told the BBC on Wednesday that her kids, who have followed her into showbiz "aren't getting a leg up."
"There are lots and lots of people in the world whose children go into a similar family business, whether it's being a judge or a lawyer or a doctor," she said. "Part of it actually is teaching them to ignore the white noise of silly terms like nepo baby, which you can't really do anything about."
Winslet, 50, was speaking in an interview promoting her upcoming film "Goodbye June," which marks her editorial debut and will be released in select US and UK theaters December 12, and on Netflix December 24. Her eldest son, Joe Anders, 21, wrote the screenplay.
She said that Anders had expressed concern that people may think the film, which he wrote on a screenwriting course, was picked up only because of his famous parents. But Winslet defended his talent."The film would've been made with or without me. The script is so, so good," she said.
Anders' father is the acclaimed film director Sam Mendes, 60, who was married to Winslet for seven years until their split in 2010. Anders starred alongside his mom in the 2023 movie "Lee," and also appeared in the Oscar-nominated war film "1917," which was directed by his father.
Mia Threapleton, Winslet's 25-year-old daughter, is also a rising star. She had a starring role in Wes Anderson's latest film, "The Phoenician Scheme," which was released in May. It comes after she played Winslet's daughter in the 2022 BAFTA award-winning TV drama "I Am Ruth."
The youngest of Winslet's children, 12-year-old Bear Blaze Winslet, has yet to grace the silver screen, but has already expressed an interest. During a 2021 appearance on "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Winslet shared jokingly that at age 7, Bear Blaze told her he wanted "to be an actress."
Amid the return-to-office push in corporate America, young workers are romanticizing their commutes.
Commuters who participated in the TikTok trend said it helps boost their morale.
Licensed therapist Brianna Paruolo said romanticizing can be a positive way to reframe a routine.
When Danielle Pogue hits the pavement each morning for the cross-borough trek to her office in Brooklyn, she relies on two essentials to propel her forward: a perfectly curated Spotify playlist and the mental power to romanticize each step.
"I have perfected the New York City strut," Pogue told me.
Pogue, 27, graduated from college in 2020 and entered the labor force at the height of the pandemic, when working remotely was more necessary than trendy. After moving to New York the following year, she jumped at the chance to work in the office at both postgrad jobs she's held in digital marketing. Part of the reason was the commute.
"It definitely is something that I look forward to now," Pogue said of her 25-minute journey to the office. "I think of the alternative, which would be living really close to my office, maybe having it just be around the corner — and for some reason, that doesn't feel as appealing to me anymore. A lot of that has to do with the routine that I've made for myself."
That routine is a kind of portable daydream: As she navigates her way through foot traffic and train platforms, Pogue might imagine herself as a high-powered executive or a trendy young professional in a movie montage, having her main character moment.
In October, Pogue posted a video of her daily strut on TikTok set to KT Tunstall's "Suddenly I See," the song that memorably plays during the opening credits of 2006 movie "The Devil Wears Prada." Pogue captioned the post, "hot tip: romanticize your commute to work by listening to this song & acting like you're in a '90s romcom." It's amassed over 70,000 views and counting.
"Clearly, it's something that people resonate with, and also want to replicate in their own morning routine," Pogue said of why she thinks her post gained traction. After all, romanticizing an existing routine is easy, accessible, and free of charge — perfect for inspiring the online masses.
RTO with an aesthetic twist
Pogue isn't the only woman with a go-getter protagonist like Anne Hathaway's Andy Sachs on her digital mood board. Videos similar to Pogue's are littered across my For You Page on TikTok, with captions like "being employed means getting to act mysterious and romanticize my morning commute," or "romanticizing the commute I dreamed of when I was younger." They're often paired with nostalgic tunes or cinematic pop songs, including "What a Wonderful World" by Louis Armstrong, "Young and Beautiful" by Lana Del Rey, and, of course, "Everything Is Romantic" by Charli XCX.
While the call to "romanticize your life" on TikTok can sometimes lean aspirational, as much of the internet does, devotees reject the implication that romanticizing your life requires buying new things. Rather, the goal is to appreciate what's already in reach.
Brianna Paruolo, a licensed mental health therapist and founder of On Par Therapy, said that while showing off for strangers online can be a "slippery slope" if it leads to a craving for more validation, romanticizing can be a positive way to reframe mundanity.
"When we romanticize, we take notice in the small moments of beauty," Paruolo said. "When you film your morning coffee routine or walk to the subway, you are using your digital lens to train your mental lens to scan for positive experiences rather than functioning on autopilot."
For Pogue, that holds true. "It kind of just sets my day up for success," she said of why she romanticizes her commute, online and otherwise. "If you're dreading your morning commute, you're dreading getting to the office, and then everything that happens after that is more likely to feel a little bit negative."
Anne Hathaway is seen filming "The Devil Wears Prada 2" in New York City.
TheStewartofNY/GC Images
Although TikTok has been awash in videos about romanticizing everyday life since the early pandemic, videos about romanticizing your commute are part of a newer subgenre whose rise coincides with the recent return-to-office push in corporate America.
Data from Placer.ai, a leading foot-traffic analytics firm, found that office visits nationwide were up about 10% in 2024 compared with 2023. Other stats paint an even starker picture: A McKinsey survey of over 8,000 people across 15 industries found the number of employees working mostly in person, as opposed to mostly remote or hybrid, doubled in 2024 compared to the previous year.
Andrea Yamhure Sepúlveda, 25, started her corporate consulting job in January 2023. About two years later, her company began asking employees to spend 60% of their workweek in the office; lately, managers have been sending quarterly reports to recap their employees' in-person stats.
New York-based Sepúlveda, who's also a content creator in her spare time, has taken this sea change in stride. She enjoys filming the morning minutiae — her first cup of tea, the sunrise glow over the Manhattan skyline — and sharing the clips on TikTok like a public gratitude journal.
"It's like, you're going to have to do this anyway, so you might as well find the positive," she said. "If I dread the fact that I have to wake up at 5 a.m. and travel, then it's gonna suck. And then I'm going to have to do it next Monday, and the next Monday."
Screenshots from TikTok videos about romanticizing your commute.
@andrea_yamhure/jeankarlo/jade.fattouh/TikTok
Maria Lysy, a 25-year-old marketing professional in the Washington, DC, metro area, agreed that casting her commute in a positive light helps boost her morale for the workday ahead.
Lysy said her commuting routine lately has involved listening to pop singer Audrey Hobert, especially her songs "Phoebe" and "Sex and the City," and reminding herself that her younger self would be proud of where she is today. She described this process as "finding the extraordinary in the ordinary."
"It sounds so simple, but I've always dreamed of going to my 'big girl job,'" Lysy said. "I feel like it's so easy to take a negative approach on a lot of things, but it's just as easy just romanticize the littlest things you do. It totally changes your perspective."
Netflix director Carl Rinsch, right, outside court
Lloyd Mitchell, Getty, BI composite
A Manhattan federal jury found Carl Rinsch guilty on seven counts, including fraud.
Rinsh went to trial over $11 million Netflix gave him for a futuristic sci-fi show.
Rinsch, who took the stand in his own defense, looked straight ahead as the verdict was read.
A Manhattan federal jury on Thursday found Carl Rinsch guilty on charges that he scammed Netflix out of $11 million in a lavish spending spree.
After less than five hours of deliberation, the jury said it found Rinsh guilty on all seven counts, including fraud, money laundering, and illegal money transmission. He faces up to 90 years in prison, but is expected to be sentenced to far less.
Rinsch, wearing a purple-plaid tie and matching pocket square, looked straight at the judge as the jury foreman read the verdict.
The case centered on the millions of dollars Netflix paid Rinsch to film "White Horse," a sci-fi epic about a world where clone-like beings, after a schism with humankind, create their own society walled off from the rest of the world. Rinsch testified in his own defense earlier this week.
Rinsch — a Ridley Scott protege who previously directed the Keanu Reeves-starring "47 Ronin" — shot footage for "White Horse" on two continents. But by the fall of 2019, he exceeded the $44 million Netflix budgeted for the project and asked for more money.
Through the end of 2019 and early 2020, Rinsch negotiated with Netflix to figure out how to move "White Horse" forward and realize his ambitions. He envisioned a franchise like "Star Wars" and "Game of Thrones," complete with an elaborate fantasy world, that could become part of Netflix's catalogue.
In March of 2020, the streaming service agreed to give Rinsch's production company another $11 million.
Then, everything went wrong.
On the witness stand in Manhattan federal court, he said he believed the bulk of the $11 million was meant to reimburse him for keeping the production of "White Horse" afloat the previous fall, when it had gone over-budget. According to him, Netflix expected him to conduct only "soft pre-production" on a potential second season.
At closing arguments on Wednesday, Assistant US Attorney David Markewitz presented the jury with a Buzzfeed-style list of "10 Ways You Know Carl Rinsch is Guilty." In a slideshow, he walked them through what he said were Rinsch's contradictory claims — on the witness stand, in emails and text messages, and in prior statements in a civil legal dispute with Netflix — that he said demonstrated Rinsch wasn't telling the truth.
He argued it was absurd to think Rinsch's lavish purchases — like a $439,000 handmade Hastens mattress — could not have possibly been meant for the production of "White Horse." And Rinch's 2021 purchases of Rolls-Royces were insured in his own name, rather than insured by Netflix.
"In a TV show, a mattress is going to be covered by sheets and a blanket," Markewitz told the jury. "No one watching 'White Horse' from home is going to have any idea what is under those linens."
Daniel McGuinness, an attorney representing Rinsch, told the jury that Rinsch never had the "intent" required to find him guilty.
He showed them emails and texts leading up to the March 2020 agreement that he said demonstrated Rinsch's negotiating posture had always been that Netflix owed him about $11 million for reimbursement. Rinsch never said he would spend all the money on additional production for "White Horse," McGuinness said.
In reality, according to McGuinness, the situation was a "contract dispute" based on misunderstandings between Rinsch and Netflix.
"They were talking past each other, and the government has turned it into a nefarious fraud conspiracy," McGuinness said.
This is a breaking story. Please check back for updates.
From grocery-store brands to small family-owned bottles, anything goes at my house.
As a certified sommelier, when I entertain, I want to serve the perfect wines to match any meal, occasion, and person.
Whether I'm ordering takeout, making one of my trusty weeknight dishes, or preparing a fancy meal for guests, they expect something delicious in their glasses.
Here are a few of my go-to wines that never fail to please when I'm hosting.
Bubbly is not just for big celebrations or New Year’s Eve.
Brianne Cohen
With many styles to choose from, there's a sparkling wine for every occasion.
I've found that opening a bottle of bubbly for guests makes them feel special, which is what hosting is all about.
With its high acidity, sparkling wine is also perfectly food-friendly — meaning, it pairs quite well with so many bites.
Some of my favorite brands include Gloria Ferrer, a domestic sparkler from California; Alta Langa Bera Brut, an excellent Italian sparkling wine; and Champagne Telmont, when only true French Champagne will do.
My guests rarely turn down a refreshing white wine.
Brianne Cohen
With its palate-cleansing nature, a refreshing white wine pretty much always hits the spot.
If you're eating something spicy (such as Indian, Mexican, or Thai cuisine), it will also help cool your palate between each bite.
Grapes like sauvignon blanc, vermentino, and Chenin blanc are some of my favorites, and you can't go wrong with Teneral Cellars vermentino, William Hill sauvignon blanc, or Hye Meadow Winery Chenin blanc.
Italian reds are a perfect food-friendly choice.
Brianne Cohen
Nothing is cozier than a glass of Italian red wine.
The variety has come a long way from the ubiquitous Chianti served at neighborhood restaurants.
Top-quality Italian reds come from every region of the country now, and it's no surprise that Italian food is the perfect pairing.
A structured Brunello di Montalcino from Castello Banfi pairs well with grilled meats and hearty stews. Super Tuscan wines never let me down, especially if I'm serving them with a spectacular Italian feast.
I also enjoy the wines from Tenuta Argentiera in Bolgheri, and Madrevite wines from Umbria, which are made with indigenous Italian grapes.
Ending the night with something sweet is a nice treat.
Brianne Cohen
I like ending the night with a dessert wine when I entertain.
Port reigns supreme and can please a wide range of palates.
Fonseca Bin 27 Reserve Ruby port is a classic red — perfect on its own or with any chocolate-based dessert. Taylor Fladgate's 10-Year-Old tawny port is sweet with a nice balance of nuttiness for those looking for more complexity.
Vin de Paille is also a great dessert wine for those who appreciate a good white. It's made from raisins, which gives it a sweeter, more concentrated flavor.
Alta Colina Winery and Tablas Creek Vineyard in California make two of my favorite bottles.
I like to have a nonalcoholic wine on hand.
Brianne Cohen
Nonalcoholic wines are one of the fastest-growing varieties in the industry.
If my guests are abstaining — for any reason — I want to have something available for them to enjoy as well.
Fre makes great non-alcoholic white wines like pinot grigio. Noughty has a delicious nonalcoholic sparkling wine that I think tastes as good as the real thing, and Kally sells bottles made from classic wine grapes, like chardonnay and cabernet sauvignon.
This story was originally published on November 19, 2024, and most recently updated on December 11, 2025.